- Mass Market Paperback: 389 pages
- Publisher: Pocket Books; 1st edition (August 1, 1977)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 067181091X
- ISBN-13: 978-0671810917
- Product Dimensions: 6.8 x 4.2 x 0.8 inches
- Shipping Weight: 7.2 ounces
- Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (202 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #646,786 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Getting the download link through email is temporarily not available. Please check back later.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
Worlds in Collision Mass Market Paperback – August 1, 1977
Up to 50% off select Non-Fiction books
Featured titles are up to 50% off for a limited time. See all titles
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought
Top Customer Reviews
Reading this book gives the open minded reader the opportunity to view the history of the Earth in a completely new way, and some of our favorite mysteries of the past may be decoded in conjunction with Velikovsky's "theories". The scientific discoveries of the 49 years since the book was first published have been very kind to Dr. Velikovsky, but not so kind to scientific dogma of the same period).
Velikovsky dares to read ancient works literally, and to look for proof of their accuracy, even when they appear flawed. If a document states that the sun rose in the west, Velikovsky is willing to search for proof that it did, instead of presuming the text is flawed. Velikovsky's ideas help to unravel mysteries which cannot be decoded until we are willing to challenge the scientific dogma which presumes that ancient documents are incorrect whenever they disagree with our perceptions of what they ought to say.
Will Stonehenge be forever a mystery, because theories that it was built as an astrological computer are dashed by the fact that present planetary orbits do not fit its alignment?Read more ›
"Worlds In Collision" was published first of Velikovsky's books -- essays, and a couple of booklets preceded it -- yet it was the last product of a line of research which began with his study of Freud's "Moses and Monotheism". Had the publication been delayed, it is possible that "Ages In Chaos" would have been better received, and the catastrophic background referred to without being revealed until years had passed. It is perhaps the greatest scholarly "what if" of the 20th century.
Accordingly, I would recommend reading "Ages In Chaos" and the related volumes, as well as "Earth In Upheaval" and "Stargazers and Gravediggers" before reading "Worlds In Collision". Avoid synopses, and don't believe most of what you've read about the book or the author. The reason for the reading of the revised chronology first is to understand the framework better. Velikovsky himself made the mistake of accepting the supposed massive eruption of Thera as the source of the Atlantis legend, as well as its place in the conventional chronology (Edwin M. Schorr pointed this out in a letter to KRONOS years ago).
If you enjoyed Sitchin, Bauval, and certain other writers, you will not only enjoy "Worlds In Collision", you'll probably rid yourself of those others' works.
See also Velikovsky's other works (new and used), Ryan and Pitman's "Noah's Flood", Mary Settegast's "Plato Prehistorian", and Robert Schoch's "Voices of the Rocks".
Most Recent Customer Reviews
great research, I have to research more, these events explain why there were all these underground cities all over the world, if people that studied the stars knew that repeating... Read morePublished 1 month ago by jeffrey gedney
Atruly great book. Read it many years ago and just bought a copy for a GranddaughterPublished 1 month ago by Jim Beattie.
I have read this book five or six times, plus the next two books in Velikovsky's trilogy. It's no wonder the scientific establishment (including Carl Sagan) ridiculed and attacked... Read morePublished 1 month ago by Weez
Some information about God and goddess are inexact. Also about astronomy today we found new informations updates but the actor only describe informations about the past from old... Read morePublished 2 months ago by Amazon Customer
I really loved this book. The author is very talented. i never believed that historians had it right, maybe this author has some clues...?Published 2 months ago by edward m grier
I read this in 1965 aged 11. My brother, a Sci-Fi nut recommended it. This book blew my mind. It totally contradicts the Aristotelian paradigm of existence on this tiny globe in... Read morePublished 3 months ago by Amazon Customer