- Series: On Writing Well
- Paperback: 336 pages
- Publisher: Harper Perennial; 30 Anv Rep edition (April 5, 2016)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0060891548
- ISBN-13: 978-0060891541
- Product Dimensions: 5.3 x 0.8 x 8 inches
- Shipping Weight: 6.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
- Average Customer Review: 4.7 out of 5 stars See all reviews (722 customer reviews)
- Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #1,026 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction 30 Anv Rep Edition
Use the Amazon App to scan ISBNs and compare prices.
The Amazon Book Review
Author interviews, book reviews, editors picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who bought this item also bought
About the Author
William Zinsser is a writer, editor and teacher. He began his career on the New York Herald Tribune and has since written regularly for leading magazines. During the 1970s he was master of Branford College at Yale. His 17 books, ranging from baseball to music to American travel, include the influential Writing to Learn and Writing About Your Life. He teaches at the New School in New York.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
Top Customer Reviews
I agree that Zinsser does these things, but I disagree that it is a problem. In fact, if I have one criticism of the book it is exactly the opposite: that the lessons are even more generalizable and broadly applicable than Zinsser gives them credit for. For instance, if you skip the travel writing chapter, or if you read it thinking that it only applies to travel writing, then you will miss two golden and persuasive arguments that ought to apply to *any* writer:
1) The things that come to the writer easiest -- cliché, excessive detail, syrupy and vague language -- are the things that keep the reader bored/detached/passive.
2) Your main task as a writer is to distill the essence of whatever you're writing about--to find its central idea, to describe its distinctive qualities using precise images. In other words, your main task is to work excruciatingly hard.
The goal of any writer (yes, any) ought to be to transform the reader from a passive observer into an ally. It's excruciatingly hard to do, but once you realize that that's the goal, and once you realize that the parts that come easiest are what's getting in the way of that goal, then you can start writing well.
Zinsser knows these things, and he articulates them beautifully. It is one of the most persuasive books I have read, on any subject. But I hate that the lessons are hidden within topic-specific chapters. Please read with that in mind.
From this book I learned the value of brevity. I learned the value of simplicity. And more than anything else, I learned to trust myself and the concept that, in the end, people don't love a book because they are in love with the subject, they love a book (and stick with it regardless of topic) because they like the author. I also learned, very importantly, that your teachers were all wrong when they told you not to write in the first person: Mr. Zinsser convinced me that writing in the first person is the best--often the only--way to write.
If you don't trust yourself and don't trust your ideas, why on Earth are you writing anything?
I also learned from this book that humor and surprise are necessary elements of most nonfiction writing.
Be yourself, talk directly to the reader, be funny, be human, be a tiny bit clever--and you may even surprise yourself with what a good writer you are. Trust yourself, and trust simplicity.
I'd say that this book is very helpful for scientific writing, and it certainly did help me. Writing research papers, after all, is just another form of nonfiction writing, but it might be the form that needs clarity the most. I've seen too many examples of research papers getting rejected because of poor writing, or published papers/books getting negative reviews because no one can figure out what's going on, but reading this book made me start to realize what went wrong for those papers/books and how they could be rescued. A lot of the principles talked about in this book are just upright common sense, but the author did a great job explaining why those often matter much more than an average writer would expect. IMHO, many of the principles basically boil down to "think and care for the reader" when writing, but that's exactly the challenge, especially in scientific/research writing where the reader usually has no idea at all what's going to be introduced since it's "novel". With his rich experience, the author was able to make really convincing arguments for the principles he advocated, and his strong enthusiasm made this book a truly enjoyable read.
One thing I'll add is to read it more than once, if you're like me, you'll miss many of the nuggets the first time around. I've been through it three times now and continue to find more gems of wisdom.