Top critical review
15 people found this helpful
3.0 out of 5 starsLackluster, Plodding End to a Great First Book
ByAustinTiffanyon October 3, 2016
Short review: A bloated feeling conclusion that seems to plod forward without much intrigue and ends too conveniently for everyone involved. That said, events are still sharply emotional and tense, and you'll likely read through to the end ... just don't expect a story as sharp as "Brilliants".
Longer version: The first installment in this trilogy, "Brilliants" was, well, brilliant (sorry, I had to). But seriously, it was fantastic and easily 5 stars, and among the best stories I've ever read. It had everything that made a modern novel perfect: quick pacing, original idea, a great "what if?" premise, action, intrigue, mystery, unexpected plot twists, and a cinematic feel of grand adventure and succinct but intelligent story telling. "Written in Fire" is not this at all. In fact, "Written in Fire" feels like a testament to my opinion that "Brilliants" should have been a one-and-done stand alone novel.
At times, this installment feels like it's overly procedural; I didn't keep count, but there was at least 3 or 4 scenes where people stand around talking about the situation, and arrive at a conclusion suddenly that is typically right (if not timely). The novel also feels too convenient, oftentimes in favor of the bad-guys; just about all of their plans succeed, and Plan A doesn't, then Plan B does (yes, I know that this is also a testament to the Chess Grandmaster level intelligence of John Smith, but still). Events also seem too myopic; by now, with America practically on the verge of a civil war, you'd think we'd get an idea of what the rest of the country thinks about this. Indeed, despite every other character talking about things in the scope of the world, they apparently don't mean literally, because the only time we ever hear about anything outside of the States is in the form of one of those chapter interludes, this one a quote from a North Korean broadcast. But even ignoring that, nearly this entire story takes place in 1 of 2 locations: the New Canaan Holdfast or sometimes in Washington DC, to get a more "authoritarian" take on events. Collectively, this leads to my final irritation: events in this story just seem too chaotic (when they aren't too convenient). The novel opens up with Cooper seeing a kid hanging from a street lamp (the result of a public lynching), and yet there are no cops, and no one attempting to do anything about it. In general, it seems that most things that happen in this story happen with no local-level consequences, and everyone has lost their mind. For those paying attention in this trilogy, the story was clearly written as a sort of bizarro-world spin on a post-9/11 world, but this time with Brilliants versus Normals, and the DAR is Homeland Security (this is made very obvious by a chapter interlude advertisement for a book talking about what the world would have been like without Brilliants, in the first installment). My point here is that, even in the real world, where everyone wanted to round up Muslims for awhile and we went to war on false pretenses, we still didn't resort to literal concentration camps and putting tracking devices on Middle Eastern looking people. Yes, I understand "Written in Fire" is a work of fiction, and the stakes are much higher, and the attacks keep coming, but this ostensibly still takes place in a world the same as ours up until the 1980s and beyond. Therefore, I feel like Sakey stretched the bounds of what some readers may be willing to accept.
Non-spoiler short-take of conclusion: the ending to this story is far too convenient and neat and quick. 3 days later, everyone is acting like nothing happened. The whole thing feels unrealistic and staged, and Sakey ends up forgetting to mention the result of a pretty important (and gruesome) plot point not that much earlier in the novel.
In general, I feel like the world of Brilliants got away from Sakey and lead to a gradual decline in quality. This book still maintains the quick pace and sharp emotional pangs that the previous novels have done well, and to be sure, there will be times you'll find yourself reading faster to find out how a tense situation plays out. But ultimately I found myself not particularly impressed or swept away by this final story. And what good elements exist here are somewhat buried under too many unrealistic or strangely convenient plot devices.