- Amazon Business: Make the most of your Amazon Business account with exclusive tools and savings. Login now
- Amazon Business : For business-only pricing, quantity discounts and FREE Shipping. Register a free business account
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
Wrong: Why experts* keep failing us--and how to know when not to trust them *Scientists, finance wizards, doctors, relationship gurus, celebrity CEOs, ... consultants, health officials and more Hardcover – January 1, 2010
by
David H. Freedman
(Author)
|
David H. Freedman
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
Are you an author?
Learn about Author Central
|
See all formats and editions
Hide other formats and editions
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Audio CD, CD, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$19.99 | — |
Enhance your purchase
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherLittle, Brown and Company
-
Publication dateJanuary 1, 2010
-
Dimensions6.5 x 1 x 9.5 inches
-
ISBN-100316087912
-
ISBN-13978-0316087919
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop TalkingPaperbackIn Stock.
The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail--but Some Don'tPaperbackIn Stock.
A Perfect Mess: The Hidden Benefits of Disorder--How Crammed Closets, Cluttered Offices, and On-the-Fly Planning Make the World a Better PlaceErc AbrahamsonPaperbackIn Stock.
Statistical Models: Theory and PracticeDavid A. FreedmanPaperbackIn Stock.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Predictably Irrational, Revised and Expanded Edition: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our DecisionsPaperbackIn Stock.
Reading and Understanding ResearchPaperbackIn stock.
Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the FutureHardcoverIn Stock.
Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our LivesNicholas A. Christakis MD PhDHardcoverOnly 1 left in stock - order soon.
What They Didn't Teach You in Graduate School: 299 Helpful Hints for Success in Your Academic CareerPaperbackIn Stock.
Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years, Updated and Expanded EditionPaperbackOnly 1 left in stock (more on the way).
Special offers and product promotions
Start reading Wrong on your Kindle in under a minute.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- ASIN : B005DI6QAM
- Publisher : Little, Brown and Company; First Edition (January 1, 2010)
- Language : English
- ISBN-10 : 0316087912
- ISBN-13 : 978-0316087919
- Item Weight : 1.1 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1 x 9.5 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#3,453,564 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.1 out of 5 stars
4.1 out of 5
69 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on October 30, 2013
Verified Purchase
This book goes beyond being just enjoyable and informative to read through; it actually causes a change in thinking and perception that is long lasting. The research is very well documented and cited, the thesis is significant and important, while the authors writing style is consistently smooth and thought provoking. I would recommend this book to anyone interested in the topic of the trustworthiness of expert research and advice. You will finish this book likely a skeptic of all experts unless you apply the short section of direction given on determining what advice is likely better to trust going forward. You will find the vast majority of this book focuses on all that is wrong with experts, hence the title. If you are looking strictly for ways to filter out the good advice in your world, you may be disappointed, as the book only briefly touches on such tactics, albeit quite well. In a nutshell, the book acts more to "identify" an important problem than it does to "fix" the problem, which for myself, was more than enough to enlighten.
9 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2020
Verified Purchase
God. His transcendent word is never wrong and His universal moral laws are never wrong. Freedman's book only highlights the importance of having a biblical epistemology. In the beginning was Logos and the Logos was with God and the Logos was/is God. Human foundations for knowledge are inadequate. Freedman ignores the question of WHY scientists should bother with ethics. Certainly, ethics are foundational to science. Ironically, that is a question science cannot answer.
Reviewed in the United States on February 16, 2011
Verified Purchase
This is a great book encouraging readers to practice due deligence when reading "expert" opinions. Freedman is at his best when analyzing the problems with many scientific studies (including peer-reviewed ones), media reporting, business, lifestyle and financial "gurus".
I had some major problems with chapter 4 "The Idiocy of Crowds" -- a title which was apparently meant in part to ridicule James Surowiecki's fine book "The Wisdom of Crowds" (and perhaps appeal to the elitism of some readers). Criticizing another's work is fine, but Freedman employs straw man tactics in criticizing the wisdom of crowds, confusing it with the wisdom of small groups, teams and mobs, which is never what Surowiecki intended. Almost everyone, including Surowiecki, knows that there are problems with group think, cocky ignoramuses taking over team brainstorming sessions, and mob actions. I would think that Surowieki would almost certainly agree with Freedman's point that "Group successes, according to research, tend to depend on certain conditions: that a group is highly diverse, for example, and that there is little or no interaction between its members on the subject at hand. Unfortunately, these conditions rarely apply to expert crowds."
That same chapter also touches on author Nassim Nicholas Taleb's reputation as a market expert (in reading him, I never assumed that he saw himself as one). In arguing against Taleb's expert reputation, Freedman sites the "Hitchcock effect" which is interesting, because I just finished reading Taleb's "Fooled by Randomness" and he discribes the exact same scenario without giving it a name in a chapter titled "The Mysterious Letter".
The last problem I have with this book is that Freedman (or maybe his editor) shows some subtle biases of his own. When he ventures into politics, he cites only one example of the failure of expertise -- that being the failure of the Bush Administration to listen to the experts and anticipate difficulties during the Iraq war. Freedman sites what he considers to be a great documentary "No End in Sight" which was created by Charles Ferguson with collaboration by Nir Rosen (Remember him? He is the "journalist" who is today being critized for belittling and ridiculing CBS reporter Lara Logan who enduring a brutal sexual assault and beating while covering Egypt) I mean if you're going to cite only one example, why use this one? Why not use several examples from the current Administration too? No administration seems to be more in the thrall of so-called experts than this Administration. Remember how Obama said again and again that Energy Secretary Steven Chu had a Nobel Prize as if that meant he would automatically know how to stop the BP oil spill? Even Chris Matthews got sick of him saying it. Obama also ignored his experts and pursued a drilling moratorium in the Gulf which has, among other things, destroyed many jobs. Obama also talks about "Best Practices" being used to assess how and when people get treatment under Obamacare. Who decides what these "best practices" are? These are extremely important questions that will effect everyone who hasn't gotten an Obamacare waiver/exemption.
If I'm being so critical, why am I giving this book 4 stars? Because overall, it is a really good book and an extemely important one that everyone should read. It really helps you sort through the deluge of "expert opinions". Will you never be fooled? Of course not, but at least you'll know that you might be taken in every once in a while.
I had some major problems with chapter 4 "The Idiocy of Crowds" -- a title which was apparently meant in part to ridicule James Surowiecki's fine book "The Wisdom of Crowds" (and perhaps appeal to the elitism of some readers). Criticizing another's work is fine, but Freedman employs straw man tactics in criticizing the wisdom of crowds, confusing it with the wisdom of small groups, teams and mobs, which is never what Surowiecki intended. Almost everyone, including Surowiecki, knows that there are problems with group think, cocky ignoramuses taking over team brainstorming sessions, and mob actions. I would think that Surowieki would almost certainly agree with Freedman's point that "Group successes, according to research, tend to depend on certain conditions: that a group is highly diverse, for example, and that there is little or no interaction between its members on the subject at hand. Unfortunately, these conditions rarely apply to expert crowds."
That same chapter also touches on author Nassim Nicholas Taleb's reputation as a market expert (in reading him, I never assumed that he saw himself as one). In arguing against Taleb's expert reputation, Freedman sites the "Hitchcock effect" which is interesting, because I just finished reading Taleb's "Fooled by Randomness" and he discribes the exact same scenario without giving it a name in a chapter titled "The Mysterious Letter".
The last problem I have with this book is that Freedman (or maybe his editor) shows some subtle biases of his own. When he ventures into politics, he cites only one example of the failure of expertise -- that being the failure of the Bush Administration to listen to the experts and anticipate difficulties during the Iraq war. Freedman sites what he considers to be a great documentary "No End in Sight" which was created by Charles Ferguson with collaboration by Nir Rosen (Remember him? He is the "journalist" who is today being critized for belittling and ridiculing CBS reporter Lara Logan who enduring a brutal sexual assault and beating while covering Egypt) I mean if you're going to cite only one example, why use this one? Why not use several examples from the current Administration too? No administration seems to be more in the thrall of so-called experts than this Administration. Remember how Obama said again and again that Energy Secretary Steven Chu had a Nobel Prize as if that meant he would automatically know how to stop the BP oil spill? Even Chris Matthews got sick of him saying it. Obama also ignored his experts and pursued a drilling moratorium in the Gulf which has, among other things, destroyed many jobs. Obama also talks about "Best Practices" being used to assess how and when people get treatment under Obamacare. Who decides what these "best practices" are? These are extremely important questions that will effect everyone who hasn't gotten an Obamacare waiver/exemption.
If I'm being so critical, why am I giving this book 4 stars? Because overall, it is a really good book and an extemely important one that everyone should read. It really helps you sort through the deluge of "expert opinions". Will you never be fooled? Of course not, but at least you'll know that you might be taken in every once in a while.
10 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on December 16, 2010
Verified Purchase
This book is a great summary of all that's wrong with information. With the increasing glut of information, it is difficult to cull through to find something that resembles defendable facts.
There is no "answer" to the question of what information is "right", since Freedman points out that much, if not all of what we read is fictional in some sense.
Recently Ben Bernanke was asked how confident that the bond buyback was going to be successful and he said he was 100% confident. This statement alone is indicative of wrong information. How can he, as an economist be 100% certain of anything? This is an example of information that should be discounted by about 100%.
This book provides techniques you can use as filters when examining information from various sources and I think that's great. There is no "right" answer but there are potentially many "wrong" answers that can be exposed by applying some of the techniques he describes in the book.
If only there was some software that would apply these filters to Google searches and warn you of the potential for bias, fraud, and incompetence. Perhaps a "truthiness" detector?
There is no "answer" to the question of what information is "right", since Freedman points out that much, if not all of what we read is fictional in some sense.
Recently Ben Bernanke was asked how confident that the bond buyback was going to be successful and he said he was 100% confident. This statement alone is indicative of wrong information. How can he, as an economist be 100% certain of anything? This is an example of information that should be discounted by about 100%.
This book provides techniques you can use as filters when examining information from various sources and I think that's great. There is no "right" answer but there are potentially many "wrong" answers that can be exposed by applying some of the techniques he describes in the book.
If only there was some software that would apply these filters to Google searches and warn you of the potential for bias, fraud, and incompetence. Perhaps a "truthiness" detector?
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
Keith M
5.0 out of 5 stars
Excellent book
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 24, 2016Verified Purchase
Thoroughly researched, highly readable and convincing.
grgo
2.0 out of 5 stars
Not relevant anymore.
Reviewed in France on February 5, 2017Verified Purchase
I honestly tried to finish the book, but it gets boring pretty quickly, it keeps giving examples of all the miscarried investigations the author could find, which would be nice as a database. As a book though, the point gets accross pretty quickly and the scattered ideas couldn't fill 50 pages.
It may have been an interesting topic by 2010, right after the crisis, when everyone was getting into explaining how we weren't able to predict important crashes. But to read it in 2017 seems insufficient, you will get nothing out of the chapters on internet and to keep reading how diet studies are flawed over and over again just made me quit reading the book.
If the idea that a research study can be flawed is new to you and you need to convince yourself that people lie in many ways, you may remotely enjoy the book. 5 years ago.
It may have been an interesting topic by 2010, right after the crisis, when everyone was getting into explaining how we weren't able to predict important crashes. But to read it in 2017 seems insufficient, you will get nothing out of the chapters on internet and to keep reading how diet studies are flawed over and over again just made me quit reading the book.
If the idea that a research study can be flawed is new to you and you need to convince yourself that people lie in many ways, you may remotely enjoy the book. 5 years ago.
One person found this helpful
Report abuse
Dr. J
5.0 out of 5 stars
Everyone should read this book.
Reviewed in Canada on February 25, 2018Verified Purchase
Thought provoking book. I have recommended it to my family and friends.
Brian Bond
5.0 out of 5 stars
Entertaining and interesting book.
Reviewed in Canada on September 25, 2014Verified Purchase
Entertaining and interesting book.
M
3.0 out of 5 stars
Three Stars
Reviewed in Canada on August 22, 2014Verified Purchase
okay

