
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-7% $18.59$18.59
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$12.41$12.41
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: ZBK Books
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare: 1599 Paperback – June 13, 2006
Purchase options and add-ons
Winner of the Baillie Gifford Prize’s 25th Anniversary Winner of Winners award
What accounts for Shakespeare’s transformation from talented poet and playwright to one of the greatest writers who ever lived? In this gripping account, James Shapiro sets out to answer this question, "succeed[ing] where others have fallen short." (Boston Globe)
1599 was an epochal year for Shakespeare and England. During that year, Shakespeare wrote four of his most famous plays: Henry the Fifth, Julius Caesar, As You Like It, and, most remarkably, Hamlet; Elizabethans sent off an army to crush an Irish rebellion, weathered an Armada threat from Spain, gambled on a fledgling East India Company, and waited to see who would succeed their aging and childless queen.
James Shapiro illuminates both Shakespeare’s staggering achievement and what Elizabethans experienced in the course of 1599, bringing together the news and the intrigue of the times with a wonderful evocation of how Shakespeare worked as an actor, businessman, and playwright. The result is an exceptionally immediate and gripping account of an inspiring moment in history.
- Print length432 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateJune 13, 2006
- Dimensions0.97 x 5.31 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100060088745
- ISBN-13978-0060088743
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Very distinguished...captivating...Shapiro succeeds where others have fallen short.” — William E. Cain, Boston Globe
“Only an extraordinary scholar could illuminate Shakespeare’s singular genius by demonstrating how much his work owes to Elizabethan cultureandsociety.” — Alexandra Alter, Chicago Tribune
“James Shapiro throws an unusually searching light across Shakespeare’s creative genius and makes him come truly alive.” — The Economist
“Superb―the product of marathon scholarship, inspired insight, narrative flair, astute surmise and searching intelligence.” — Peter Kemp, Sunday Times (London)
“an unforgettable illumination of a crucial moment in the life of our greatest writer.” — Robert McCrum, The Observer
“[This] is one of the few genuinely original biographies of Shakespeare.” — Jonathan Bate, Sunday Telegraph
“a brilliantly readable and revealing narrative.” — Nicholas Hytner, The Guardian
“For Irish readers...by far the best account yet written of the relationship between this island and Shakespeare’s work.” — Fintan O'Toole, Irish Times
“If Will in the World is essentially an extremely good historical novel, [YLOWS] is history itself” — Jeremy Treglown, Financial Times
“Excellent book....superbly illuminating....Shapiro deserves whoops of applause.” — Sam Leith, The Spectator
“Shapiro gives us a Shakespeare who chronicles his age, in a biographical form that speaks clearly to our own.” — Francis Wilson, Saturday Telegraph
“Quite brilliant….It gives a whole large picture of his life, times, and achievement. Wonderful.” — Andrew Motion, Poet Laureate (England)
“As a yarn, this is up there with The Da Vinci Code but in 1599 it’s all true!” — Sir Ian McKellen
“Mr. Shapiro has given us by his encyclopedic scholarship and lucid narrative a hitherto unknown Shakespeare.” — Jacques Barzun, author of From Dawn to Decadence
“[P]assionately written study, the product of deep scholarship and acute critical thought... fascinating.” — Stanley Wells, Editor of The Oxford Shakespeare
“a stunning exhibition of scholarly intelligence by an academic deeply committed to arriving at the truth.” — Christopher Rush, Sunday Herald, Halifax
“deliciously vivid....Shapiro weaves a tantalising narrative.” — David Lister, The Independent
“Shapiro’s scrupulous scholarship has given us a Shakespeare both for his time and our own.” — David Scott Kastan, General Editor, The Arden Shakespeare
“An intriguing addition to Shakespeare studies...open-minded readers will be stimulated and enriched by Shapiro’s contextual approach.” — Kirkus Reviews (starred review)
“This book is a masterpiece, simply a masterpiece.” — Booklist (starred review)
From the Inside Flap
1599 was an epochal year for Shakespeare and England
Shakespeare wrote four of his most famous plays: Henry the Fifth, Julius Caesar, As You Like It, and, most remarkably, Hamlet; Elizabethans sent off an army to crush an Irish rebellion, weathered an Armada threat from Spain, gambled on a fledgling East India Company, and waited to see who would succeed their aging and childless queen.
James Shapiro illuminates both Shakespeare's staggering achievement and what Elizabethans experienced in the course of 1599, bringing together the news and the intrigue of the times with a wonderful evocation of how Shakespeare worked as an actor, businessman, and playwright. The result is an exceptionally immediate and gripping account of an inspiring moment in history.
--William E. Cain, Boston GlobeFrom the Back Cover
1599 was an epochal year for Shakespeare and England
Shakespeare wrote four of his most famous plays: Henry the Fifth, Julius Caesar, As You Like It, and, most remarkably, Hamlet; Elizabethans sent off an army to crush an Irish rebellion, weathered an Armada threat from Spain, gambled on a fledgling East India Company, and waited to see who would succeed their aging and childless queen.
James Shapiro illuminates both Shakespeare’s staggering achievement and what Elizabethans experienced in the course of 1599, bringing together the news and the intrigue of the times with a wonderful evocation of how Shakespeare worked as an actor, businessman, and playwright. The result is an exceptionally immediate and gripping account of an inspiring moment in history.
About the Author
James Shapiro, aprofessor at Columbia University in New York, is the author of Rival Playwrights, Shakespeare and the Jews, and Oberammergau.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare
1599By James ShapiroHarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
Copyright © 2006 James ShapiroAll right reserved.
ISBN: 0060088745
Chapter One
A Battle of Wills
Late in the afternoon of Tuesday, December 26, 1598, two days before their fateful rendezvous at the Theatre, the Chamberlain's Men made their way through London's dark and chilly streets to Whitehall Palace to perform for the queen. Elizabeth had returned to Whitehall in mid-November in time for her Accession Day celebrations. Whitehall, her only London residence, was also her favorite palace, and she spent a quarter of her reign there, especially around Christmas. Elizabeth's entrance followed traditional protocol: a mile out of town she was received by Lord Mayor Stephen Soame and his brethren, who were dressed in "velvet coats and chains of gold." Elizabeth had come from Richmond Palace, where she had stayed but a month, having been at her palace at Nonsuch before that. Sanitation issues, the difficulties of feeding so many courtiers with limited local supplies, and perhaps restlessness, too, made the Elizabethan court resemble a large-scale touring company that annually wound its way through the royal palaces of Whitehall, Greenwich, Richmond, St. James, Hampton Court, Windsor, Oatlands, and Nonsuch. But in contrast with the single cart that transported an itinerant playing troupe with its props and costumes, a train of several hundred wagons would set off for the next royal residence, transporting all that was needed for the queen and seven hundred or so of her retainers to manage administrative and ceremonial affairs at a new locale.
A century later Whitehall would burn to the ground, leaving "nothing but walls and ruins." Archaeological reconstruction would be pointless, for Whitehall was more than just a jumble of Gothic buildings already out of fashion by Shakespeare's day. It was the epicenter of English power, beginning with the queen and radiating out through her privy councillors and lesser courtiers. A cross between ancient Rome's Senate and Coliseum, Whitehall was where ambassadors were entertained, bears baited, domestic and foreign policy determined, lucrative monopolies dispensed, Accession Day tilts run, and Shrovetide sermons preached. Above all, it was a rumor mill, where each royal gesture was endlessly dissected. When the Chamberlain's Men performed at court, they added one more layer of spectacle.
Whitehall figured strongly enough in Shakespeare's imagination to make a cameo appearance in his late play Henry the Eighth. When a minor courtier describes how after her coronation at Westminster Anne Bullen returned to "York Place," he is sharply corrected: "You must no more call it York Place; that's past, / For since the Cardinal fell, that title's lost." Henry VIII coveted the fine building, evicted Cardinal Wolsey, and rechristened it: " 'Tis now the King's, and called Whitehall." The courtier who so carelessly spoke of "York Place" apologetically explains that "I know it, / But 'tis so lately altered that the old name / Is fresh about me" (4.1.95-99). Whitehall's identity was subject to royal whim, its history easily rewritten. That this exchange follows a hushed discussion of "falling stars" at court makes its political edge that much sharper.
For a writer like Shakespeare, whose plays exhibit a greater fascination with courts than those of any other Elizabethan playwright, visits to Whitehall were inspiring. The palace was a far cry from anything he had ever experienced in his native Stratford-upon-Avon, which extant wills and town records portray as a drab backwater, devoid of high culture. There was little touring theater, few books, hardly any musical instruments, no paintings to speak of, the aesthetic monotony broken only by painted cloths that adorned interiors (like the eight that had hung in Shakespeare's mother's home in Wilmcote). It had not always been this way. Vivid medieval paintings of the Passion and the Last Judgment had once decorated the walls of Stratford's church, but they had been whitewashed by Protestant reformers shortly before Shakespeare was born.
Whitehall had everything Stratford lacked. It housed the greatest collection of international art in the realm, its "spacious rooms" hung "with Persian looms," its treasures "fetched from the richest cities of proud Spain" and beyond. For an Englishman who (like his queen) had never left England's shores, it offered a rare opportunity to see work produced by foreign artisans. A short detour up a staircase into the privy gallery overlooking the tiltyard led Shakespeare into a breathtaking gallery. Its ceiling was covered in gold, and its walls were lined with extraordinary paintings, including a portrait of Moses said to be "a striking likeness." Near it hung a "most beautifully painted picture on glass showing thirty-six incidents of Christ's Passion." But the most eye-catching painting in the passageway was the portrait of young Edward VI. Those approaching it for the first time found that "the head, face and nose appear so long and misformed that they do not seem to represent a human being." Installed on the right side of the painting was an iron bar with a plate attached to it. Visitors were encouraged to extend the bar and view the portrait hrough a small hole or "O" cut in the plate: to their surprise, "the ugly face changed into a well-formed one."
A few years earlier this famous picture had inspired Shakespeare's lines about point of view in Richard the Second: "Like perspectives, which rightly gazed upon / Show nothing but confusion, eyed awry / Distinguish form" (2.2.18-20). It may also have inspired a similar reflection in Henry the Fifth about seeing "perspectively" (5.2.321). What the Chorus in this play calls the "Wooden O," the theater itself, operates much like this Whitehall portrait: its lens is capable of giving shape and meaning to the world, but only if playgoers make the necessary imaginative effort.
Leaving this picture gallery, Shakespeare would next have entered the long privy gallery range that led past the Privy Council chamber, where Elizabeth's will was translated into government policy. The Christmas holiday had not disrupted the councillors' labors; seven of them had met there that day, ordering, among other things, that warm clothing be secured for miserably equipped English troops facing a bitter Irish winter. The councillors adjourned in time for that evening's entertainment and resumed their deliberations the following morning.
Continues...
Excerpted from A Year in the Life of William Shakespeareby James Shapiro Copyright © 2006 by James Shapiro. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- Publisher : Harper Perennial; Reprint edition (June 13, 2006)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 432 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0060088745
- ISBN-13 : 978-0060088743
- Item Weight : 12.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 0.97 x 5.31 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #259,272 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #88 in Shakespeare Literary Criticism
- #312 in Historical British Biographies
- #1,221 in Author Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

James Shapiro is Larry Miller Professor of English and Comparative Literature at Columbia University. He has written several award-winning books, including Shakespeare in a Divided America, The Year of Lear: Shakespeare in 1606, and 1599: A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare. His essays and reviews have appeared in the New York Times, the Guardian, and the New York Review of Books, among other places. He has been awarded fellowships from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Guggenheim Foundation, and The New York Public Library Cullman Center for Scholars and Writers. In 2011, he was inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He currently serves as a Shakespeare Scholar in Residence at the Public Theater in New York City.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book provides insightful analysis of Shakespeare's plays and career. They describe it as informative, well-researched, and readable for the layman. Many readers find it enjoyable and a must-read. However, opinions differ on the level of detail provided, with some finding it excellent and engaging, while others consider it complex and obtuse.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book provides insightful analysis of four plays by putting them into historical context. They enjoy the detailed history, including the Earl of Essex conflict with Queen Elizabeth. The book keeps their interest, even if they're not a Shakespeare fan. Readers praise the author as a great storyteller with a keen sense of detail. They appreciate the idea of examining a crucial year in Elizabethan England and Shakespeare's life, 1599.
"...The author shows how Shakespeare understood people by having proximity with the players in the Court of Elizabeth...." Read more
"...other playwrights of the time, and folds all this into a marvelous web of a united history so that the reader gets a full picture of this era...." Read more
"...Nevertheless, there is a lot of good stuff here. I enjoyed the detailed history, including the Earl of Essex conflict with Queen Elizabeth as much..." Read more
"...life (apparently not much is known), he does an outstanding job describing Elizabethan England and helped me deeper appreciate the playwright's..." Read more
Customers find the book informative and well-researched. It provides unexpected insights into Shakespeare's works and blends history with plots and characters. The author does a superb job of blending the period's history with the plots and characters. Overall, it offers an overview of the period and is excellent for political background.
"...The author does a superb job in blending the history of the moment with the plots, the characters, and words...." Read more
"...The title may sound a little dry, but the author has a depth of knowledge on the subject, a way of drawing fascinating connections, and a beautiful..." Read more
"...I was totally inspired by his train of thought, which prompted me to purchase this volume; it covers a year near the end of Elizabeth's reign,..." Read more
"...The development of the plays, the interpretation of the language in historical context, and the meanings of words and phrases to the audience of..." Read more
Customers find the book readable and accessible. They say it's a good read for aspiring writers. The dialogue is made more understandable when you know what's going on. It's fascinating to put flesh on the great playwright and view him in context of his time. The connections and beautiful style of prose keep them turning the pages.
"...Shakespeare understands people by interacting with them, by living with them, and his representations of Romans, Angevins, and Danes through the..." Read more
"...subject, a way of drawing fascinating connections, and a beautiful style to his prose that keep me turning the pages, and returning to this book..." Read more
"...the allusions of Shakespeare relevant to those times and more understandable to ours...." Read more
"...This is an especially good read for aspiring writers, as it dispels the myth that writing came easy to Shakespeare, and shows how much WORK went..." Read more
Customers find the book well-written and engaging. They describe it as an excellent introduction to Shakespeare and theatre of the time. Readers also mention it's a great all-around book about the author.
"...of the present as described by the author make this a most original work...." Read more
"...Just as surely, this must be one of the better ones for the general reader (as opposed to the Ph.D. in English literature)...." Read more
"Great book, so far. Textbook-ish, but that's OK...." Read more
"...It's a good read, very informative, and fully footnoted and documented...." Read more
Customers enjoy reading the book about Will Shakespeare. They find it a fun review of a specific time period and a must-read. The book takes them on an awesome journey that is enriching and amazing.
"...Nevertheless, there is a lot of good stuff here...." Read more
"...It is an entertaining and extremely informative book about a year in the life of the finest writer in the English language...." Read more
"...===Summary=== I loved the parts of the book that dealt with the commercial, political and personal histories of the times, but was not..." Read more
"...The book takes you on an awesome journey which I found enriching and amazing." Read more
Customers have different views on the book's detail. Some find it excellent, with great descriptions of the Globe Theater and Shakespeare acting out a working actor's part. Others feel the narrative is complex and obtuse, leading to lost trailing.
"...The amount of detail is excellent, and Mr. Shapiro has a knack for making you feel like you're living through those events yourself...." Read more
"...Shapiro's analysis of Hamlet is long, subtle and complex, and I lost the trail of thought (just like when I read Hamlet)...." Read more
"...and original year--Shapiro is able to study the four plays in great detail and offer original insights into all of them, showing how they are focal..." Read more
"...language, archaic references and overly complex and obtuse narrative. There, I said it. (and yes, I am an Engineer...how'd you guess?)...." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2009This book is one of those rare works in which you read it word by word and each phrase creates another thought in your mind. There is focus on a few of the plays worked upon in this year, The ones of most interest were Henry V, Julius Caesar, and Hamlet. The author does a superb job in blending the history of the moment with the plots, the characters, and words.
For anyone who has matured with Shakespeare, I played Richard III in grammar school, under the aegis of Redmond O'Hanlon, a $64,000 Question winner, Shakesperian expert, and New York City police officer, not that I contributed anything of great import to my part. Reading the details of Henry V and the problems of Elizabeth with Essex and others, and Julius Caesar and the Queen, and Hamlet and the transition from a Medieval period to the Rennaisance, one gets to understand what is happening as Shakespeare is writing.
The author writes on page 286 "There are many ways to be original." Yes indeed, Shakespeare did take from existing works, but his intensity of character and his reflections of the present as described by the author make this a most original work.
On page 81 the author talks of the sounds of Shakespeare, the voices, their accents, and use of words and phrases. Sounds of this type were the transition from the spoken word to written word, and as Chaucer was to be spoken, as was Homer, Shakespeare was to be spoken and read. The speech of the Shakesperian plays was a most powerful speech. That of Henry V at Agincourt were to be the most powerful, the words used by Churchill to move England in its defense during the darkest days of World War II. The trilogy of these three plays in 1599 were plays of speech as well as of words, of actions and of courage, of leadership and of mastery of the new English. This year was that year of transition for Shakespeare and for the English language.
The discussion on page 134 regarding the "something extraordinary was beginning" as he speaks of Julius Caesar was indeed a well placed phrase. The something extraordinary was happening in 1599. It was a change in English culture, government, and the role of England in the world. It also became the foundation of our shared values and culture.
The author shows how Shakespeare understood people by having proximity with the players in the Court of Elizabeth. The characters in the plays are real people, taken from the people in the Court and the the society in general. Shakespeare understands people by interacting with them, by living with them, and his representations of Romans, Angevins, and Danes through the eyes and psyches of his contemporaries lets us see real people. There is a continuity of humanity and at the same time is is its progression.
This book must be tasted a bit at a time, it is one of those rare books that one goes back to page after page, each time understanding more and more of the Bard. The book is an all-you-can-eat buffet which allows you to go back and taste each well prepared dish. It is not the recap of many many biographies of the Bard. It is the original writing of a brilliant expert who understands and loves the Bard both in the context of his time and ours. Congratulations on writing a book with great substance.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2019This book is literary criticism with a historical lens, but can be read as a window into the literary and political landscape of late 16th century England.
I bought it because my uncle, who reads almost exclusively non-fiction about American history, picked it up at the insistence of a friend and absolutely loved it. He's hated Shakespeare his whole life (bad memories from high school), but this book has gotten him into reading the plays and now he's really enjoying them.
For myself, I have a BA in English and a BA in drama, and a cannot tell you how much Shakespeare I read in college (but it was a lot). This book has given me a really fresh perspective, not just on the author, but on his writing as well as it fits into the experiences of a person living in Elizabethan England. Some lines which have seemed unimportant to me in the past now ring with new meaning and vibrancy.
Some teachers talk about how the amazing thing about Shakespeare is that his works exist outside of time, but Shapiro roundly proves that this is not true. In fact, reading Shakespeare through this historical lens can give a modern reader a much deeper understanding of what life was like in Shakespeare's time, if only you take the time to learn a little about about the history of that epoch.
Shapiro's writing style is also deeply engrossing, and very accessible. The title may sound a little dry, but the author has a depth of knowledge on the subject, a way of drawing fascinating connections, and a beautiful style to his prose that keep me turning the pages, and returning to this book again and again. 10/10, will probably read more than once.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 14, 2016I first discovered James Shapiro by accident when stumbling across a documentary called "Shakespeare, The King's Man". This show demonstrated how contemporary events found expression in his writing, especially in the early years of King James' reign. I was totally inspired by his train of thought, which prompted me to purchase this volume; it covers a year near the end of Elizabeth's reign, driven by totally different influences. As a result, my understanding of Shakespeare has undergone a massive shift.
In this book, we get much more than just a year in Shakespeare's life. We get a better understanding of how his style changed as he matured; we see how he abandons traditional Elizabethan theatre which relied strongly on the clown (or what we think of as comedian), who often improvised and even joked with the audience at the end of scenes. However, "No less gnawing a problem for Shakespeare was the clown's afterpiece, the jig. It may be hard for us to conceive of the conclusion of Romeo and Juliet—with the image of the dead lovers fresh in our minds—immediately followed by a bawdy song and dance, but Elizabethan audiences demanded it." The company's star, Will Kemp was wildly popular with audiences, but his ego combined with Shakespeare's determination to make it a "playwright's and not an actor's theater" precipitated a rupture that sent London's favorite star packing. Shakespeare weaned his audience away from the expected jigs by replacing the worn-out tradition with something altogether new: a more "naturalistic drama" and characters filled with depth that would challenge his audience to think.
I love the specifics in this book, and it will require more than one reading to absorb everything. What I did take away showed me just how much I still have to learn about Shakespeare. For instance, I knew he used Holinshed as a source for Macbeth and other histories; what I didn't know was that he lifted every play from something else (although his sonnets were all original). "There are many ways of being original. Inventing a plot from scratch is only one of them and never held much appeal for Shakespeare." Whether it was old favorites or complete histories, Shakespeare had no problem taking an existing story and revising it with his especial brand of genius. Even Hamlet was lifted "from a now lost revenge tragedy of the 1580s, also called Hamlet, which by the end of that decade was already feeling shopworn." Apparently everybody did it.
Shakespeare wrote four plays in 1599: Twelfth Night, As You Like It, Julius Caesar, and Hamlet (which wasn't finished until the following year). We learn how the angst of the time was reflected in his work. For instance, in a year rife with assassination attempts against the queen, Shakespeare had Brutus agonizing about his own role in Julius Caesar. The play manages to tread a thin line between making a statement and getting himself into trouble: "Even as Shakespeare offers compelling arguments for tyrannicide in the opening acts of the play, he shows in the closing ones the savage bloodletting and political breakdown that...were sure to follow." Often and again Shapiro showed us how Shakespeare cleverly deflects potential pitfalls, even though his contemporaries often weren't so lucky: "Of all the major playwrights of the 1590s, he alone had managed to avoid a major confrontation with those in power."
Shapiro spends an inordinate amount of time talking about Essex's ill-fated Irish campaign and the pall it spread over the country. I thought he gave a little to much emphasis to these events, as though he forgot he was writing about Shakespeare in his enthusiasm to tell the Essex story. Nonetheless, I was shocked at the number of men who were conscripted into service: "Government figures at the time indicate that 2,800 were forced to serve in 1594 and 1,806 in 1595...The number drafted in the first six months of 1599 alone was 7,300...Local authorities didn't hesitate during Elizabeth's reign to raid fairs, ale houses, inns, and other popular meeting places. The authorities could count on a good haul at the playhouses, too." In 1602, "All the playhouses were beset in one day and very many pressed from thence, so that in all there are pressed 4000." As Shapiro suggests, this would especially have resonated with the audience in "The Second Part of Henry the Fourth" when this issue was dealt with.
I've only scratched the surface here, and as you will see, Shapiro covers a lot of ground...too much, I dare say, for one volume. At times he can hard to follow and he is not an easy read. But the wealth of information is invaluable, and I'm glad I found the book.
Top reviews from other countries
William C. MahaneyReviewed in Canada on March 28, 20215.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant link of history and literature
Shapiro-‘A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare-1599’
James Shapiro has done an over the top brilliant job linking four of Shakespeare’s plays of 1599—Henry V, Julius Caesar, As You Like it, and Hamlet, to the impending send-off of an English army to put down Tyrone and Irish rebellion, in the midst of fears of a Spanish invasion, and tottering profits of the East India Company. All this with rising fear over who would replace an ageing Elizabeth, herself something akin to a monarch of supreme artistic talent, not averse to penning insightful letters and government documents keeping pretenders to the throne at distance. The Elizabethan theater had replaced some of the lost fabric of Catholic life, the liturgical underpinnings of communal life prior to the Reformation, and the Queen followed a leery course of not arousing one side or the other—Catholic or Protestant—which Shakespeare played up to in one play after another, always inscrutable, not advocating for one side or the other. Assassination plots were in the air, the word itself introduced to the English language in Macbeth, made the Court nervous, the populace apprehensive, and the censor (master of the revels) always wary. Shakespeare and his fellow playwrights filled the vacuum between Catholics and Reformists (even Puritans who despised them), more or less as Shapiro explains, providing a means of quasi cultural stability. But Shakespeare, in 1599, was beset with construction of the Globe playhouse, lawsuits over the materials and ownership of the new theater, terrible weather in spring curtailing construction, book banning and burnings on order from the Crown; and, when time afforded, the finishing touches to Henry V, and new insights into writing Julius Caesar. Amidst all this, John Hayward’s history of Henry IV seems to have shaken Shakespeare, along with a new translation of Tacitus and his modulation of on-and-off-again republican philosophy, which could lead to censorship problems if he were to build such thinking into Julius Caesar, due to be up first at the Globe in late summer. Never mind ‘Shakespeare in Love’, think ‘Shakespeare with words’ flowing at breakneck speed, as according to Shapiro the new playhouse was under construction with rival play companies maneuvering to put out alternate productions elsewhere. Political constraints, international threats (think another Spanish armada), growing militarism at home, angst over the Earl of Essex vs Irish rebels, ageing Queen becoming more cantankerous with time, coupled with the popularity of Hayward’s treatise which aroused strong feelings against the monarchy. Airy thoughts put to paper produced headless writers. Shapiro goes into Shakespeare’s new uncharted territory as to just how far he might assuage the populace with vibrant new thoughts regarding their position relative to rich courtiers and other patrons of the court. How to handle Brutus and Caesar? Was Brutus brutal in the extreme or a hero to rid the country of a tyrant? He struggled to put words in the mouths of actors, and to discover ways to present thoughts without speech, and to present ideas implicit in Tacitus, Hayward, and others. That he kept the Chamberlain’s Men on edge with page after page of new and revised text, his Julius Caesar would escape the wrath of the Queen and end up by itself in print as other texts were banned and burned. It was the most tumultuous of times and Shapiro has produced an extraordinary work bringing Shakespeare to life in one of the most important years of his life. Bravo is all one can say about this work.
W.C. Mahaney, author of: ‘Ice on the Equator – Quaternary Geology of Mount Kenya, East Africa’, ‘Atlas of Sand Grain Surface Textures and Applications’, and 'Hannibal's Odyssey: The Environmental Background to the Alpine Invasion of Italia".
Came up to my expectationsReviewed in Germany on May 1, 20235.0 out of 5 stars Focus on a productive year in Shakespeare's life.
The book gives fresh insights into Shakespeare's work during one important year in his life.
Mr. S. J. DermodyReviewed in the United Kingdom on January 28, 20205.0 out of 5 stars A book full of details and dates voices that is so interesting
This book should be on the list for schools Its a time casebook full of interesting details and people
SteamReviewed in France on January 12, 20195.0 out of 5 stars loved it
only criticism is that the readers should be aware that people often listen in their car so the sound being loud and not loud is very disturbing
Gene WalzReviewed in Canada on August 25, 20235.0 out of 5 stars Great Study of Shakespeare's Big Year
I learned more about "The Bard" in this well-researched study than I did in all the Shakespeare courses I took.







