Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
You Can't Be President: The Outrageous Barriers to Democracy in America Paperback – September 9, 2008
| John R. MacArthur (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
It seems like an historic election: A woman almost won the nomination to run for President of the United states—losing to an African-American, who will run against the oldest candidate ever! It’s the realization of one of the core beliefs of our democracy: Anyone can be president.
Or is it? What if a close analysis showed that the candidates were, for the most part, getting their financing from the same corporations and lobbyists … that they all went to the same schools … that their votes were remarkably similarly on most issues …?
In a rollicking piece of journalism based on years of reporting, John R. MacArthur, the publisher of Harper’s Magazine, talks to truly independent candidates—including the first ever post-election interview of Joe Lieberman nemesis Ned Lamont—about what they were up against. He gives the most detailed breakdown yet of campaign financing sources. He analyzes the parameters of the two party system, what the Constitution has to say about that, and how the media treats independent politicians. And he also discusses how all this influences issues of local democracy.
It’s an edgy, fascinating look at the system that’s a must-read to understand whether the most historic election in American history is really going to be about change … or not.
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherMelville House
- Publication dateSeptember 9, 2008
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.76 x 7.6 inches
- ISBN-101933633603
- ISBN-13978-1933633602
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Melville House (September 9, 2008)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1933633603
- ISBN-13 : 978-1933633602
- Item Weight : 8.9 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.76 x 7.6 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,688,842 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #5,461 in Elections
- #7,162 in Democracy (Books)
- #78,218 in Specific Topics in Politics & Government
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

JOHN R. MACARTHUR is the president and publisher of Harper's Magazine. An award-winning journalist, he has previously written for The New York Times, United Press International, The Chicago Sun-Times, and The Wall Street Journal. He is also the author of the acclaimed books You Can't Be President: The Outrageous Barriers to Democracy in America, The Selling of Free Trade: NAFTA, Washington, and the Subversion of American Democracy, and Second Front: Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War. He lives in New York City.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
MacArthur's title is a riposte to a Junior Scholastic magazine article that in typical pollyanish fashion celebrated US democracy. By 'you', who can't be president, he means someone who wants to overcome the barriers to social change in the US. He then lays out many of the forces that narrow the path down which American democracy moves--lobbyists, the two party duopoly, the media/elite alliance, the numbing domination of the American marketplace by a few chains. He also has a vivid chapter about the limits of Barack Obama's early political career, marked by an aversion to courageous stances in favor of relentless careerism. By contrast, his idea of how democracy and citizenship should work is epitomized by the story of Conni Harding, who fought against the siting of a Target store in her town. It is an interesting story, but I think it reveals the limits of MacArthur's politics. Should social change really just be about blocking the destruction of small towns, rather than the reordering of national priorities? Is it possible that MacArthur is one more in a long line of writers mistaking NIMBY (not in my backyard) for the ultimate expression of democracy? Is democracy really about individuals standing up to the powerful, or about mobilizing coalitions of the weak to transform the balance of forces in the political sphere? Can we talk about the failures of American democracy and what is needed to transform it without soberly discussing the beneficiaries of the lobbyists, the chain stores, the party duopoly, etc, which go well beyond some tiny elite?
It's easy to see how John MacArthur, an award-winning journalist, author of "The Selling of "Free Trade": NAFTA, Washington, and the Subversion of American Democracy," could win the ire of the Bush clan and the Clintons. His copy is straight-forward, easy to read, in a style anyone can follow, loaded with supportive information that blends seamlessly with his theme: government by the people is a myth. The approach is not so much an attack when he has done so well to support it as an indictment of the American political system. Hopefully, we will see some changes in the future under Obama.
In this book Mr. MacArthur describes how party bosses, like Richard Daley of Chicago and the Clintons rule with an iron fist. How without so much as a nod from the federal government, Daley destroyed Meigs field in what the Chicago Sun-Times described as a land grab. No doubt some of Daley's rich realtors, donors to his reign as mayor, got richer. MacArthur describes it best:
"Just before midnight on March 30, 2003, with no warning to the Federal Aviation Administration, Daley ordered bulldozers under police escort to rip into sections of the nearly 4,000-foot runway and thus render it unusable for takeoffs and landings."
The author has much to say about the 2004 presidential campaign and Hillary's ambition to be president no matter what it cost the nation. MacArthur describes it on page 66:
"In [Hillary's] view, Howard Dean's very nomination posed a major threat to her power over the Democratic Party. Unlike Kerry (Who she hardly supported) and the other candidates, Dean was not dependent on the traditional Democratic money pool controlled by Bill and Hillary."
Quoting another Democratic insider, "Hillary's future depended on George W Bush remaining in the White House."
So, rather than allowing the election of an inspirational leader, Billery installed Terry McAuliffe, a friend and ally, to run the Democratic Party. Obviously, he was sacrificed (for the greater good, in Hillary's opinion). The Clintons left their party with a second choice candidate: John Kerry --- one that the Clintons did not support.Ironically, McAuliffe paid the price later by being replaced by Howard Dean.
The Clintons, de facto bosses of the Democratic party, not only failed to support Kerry they went after Dean in ways that no loyal American could conceive: they supported a 527 group calling itself "Americans for Jobs, Health Care, and Progressive Values." This group went after Dean during the Iowa caucuses with savage TV ads known as the "Go Back to Vermont" campaign. Perhaps this division within the Democrats created an opportunity for the Republicans so they attacked Dean. On page 75, the author gives us his assessment:
"... Bush and the Republicans feared Dean's antiwar and anti-deficit message --- feared that he would make a stronger opponent than the ambivalent and tortured John Kerry, who voted for the Iraq War resolution."
In the end, both parties eliminated from the race a candidate who might have changed things for the better.
I have a few more pages to read in this book before adding my final comments. So far, John McArthur has made his point. We (the American people) must change this system. Hopefully, the first step is voting into office a president who appears little tainted by the corruption of the system. We must be more vigilant. We must strive to be better consumers, to ask why a party is doing something, not just go back to our lives and hope that by electing a good man we made a difference. Government of the People is not quite correct --- it is a "Republic" not a democracy. We elect people who represent us. Let's all be activists. Join an activist group --- like Public Citizen. Be a part of the force that pushes government to do the will of the people. Let your voice be heard! Don't let lobbyist and the rich control our America.
If this review was helpful, please add your vote.

