Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Your Money or Your Life: Strong Medicine for America's Health Care System 1st Edition
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enter David M. Cutler, a Harvard economist who served on President Clinton's health care task force and later advised presidential candidate Bill Bradley. One of the nation's leading experts on the subject, Cutler argues in Your Money or Your Life that health care has in fact improved exponentially over the last fifty years, and that the successes of our system suggest ways in which we might improve care, make the system easier to deal with, and extend coverage to all Americans. Cutler applies an economic analysis to show that our spending on medicine is well worth it--and that we could do even better by spending more. Further, millions of people with easily manageable diseases, from hypertension to depression to diabetes, receive either too much or too little care because of inefficiencies in the way we reimburse care, resulting in poor health and in some cases premature death.
The key to improving the system, Cutler argues, is to change the way we organize health care. Everyone must be insured for the medical system to perform well, and payments should be based on the quality of services provided not just on the amount of cutting and poking performed.
Lively and compelling, Your Money or Your Life offers a realistic yet rigorous economic approach to reforming health care--one that promises to break through the stalemate of failed reform.
- ISBN-100195160428
- ISBN-13978-0195160420
- Edition1st
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateFebruary 5, 2004
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.3 x 1 x 6.3 inches
- Print length158 pages
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Highest ratedin this set of products
The Price We Pay: What Broke American Health Care--and How to Fix ItPaperback
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From The New England Journal of Medicine
Copyright © 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. The New England Journal of Medicine is a registered trademark of the MMS.
From Booklist
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
"This slender but important book...makes some exceedingly valuable points. Its passionate argument that modern medicine works is persuasive. It argues equally convincingly that there is both an economic and a moral case for medical spending. Perhaps most notable, it points out the many perverse incentives in our current system of financing medical care, and it argues that we should correct the system by providing financial incentives for the medical treatments and the approaches we truly want. The book, in sum, represents a significant contribution to health-policy literature and ideally, would be used to inform present and future discussions of health care in America."--St. Louis Post-Dispatch
"Concise and persuasive...avoids most of the ideological shoals of the health care debate.... Cutler shows how the current system could be redesigned so that everyone is insured, the quality of care improves and the overall costs remain roughly the same."--Washington Post
"Cutler has paved the way for a unique new understanding of health care in America: policy makers and providers should focus on increasing the value of dollars spent rather than rehashing the tired distinction between cutting costs and paying more. For everyone interested in improving health care in the United States, this is original and inspiring--actually, indispensable." --Bill Bradley
"A thoughtful analysis of the problems afflicting our health care system. His creative proposals will interest every citizen concerned about improving American health care." --Edward M. Kennedy
"This highly-readable volume explores all of the major issues that confront us as we attempt to improve America's health care system. David Cutler provides a clear and concise guide to how one should think about the costs and benefits of health care, the value of medical advances, and options for reforming the health care system. This is the book to buy if you want to understand how we can improve health care in America." --Robert D. Reischauer, President, The Urban Institute
"Cutler presents a refreshingly optimistic path for the future of America's health care system--promoting policies focused on increasing the value of medical services and improving health outcomes. He finds over and over that while health care expenditures are significant, we get a great deal more in return. His work is a major contribution to what I believe will become an increasingly interesting and important debate--is more medical spending necessarily bad?" --Art Collins, Chairman and CEO, Medtronic, Inc.
"Cutler's upbeat book delivers a welcome message to a public wearied by reports of medical errors, the rising number of uninsured, and the relentless growth in medical expenditures. Anyone with a serious interest in the U.S. health care system--and its future--should read this engaging and provocative book by one of the most insightful health policy experts in the nation." --Alan Garber, Center for Health Policy, Stanford University
"When economics and medicine mix there is bound to be confusion unless someone like Harvard economics professor Cutler, who seems to effortlessly make a complex issue comprehensible, is doing the mixing.... An elegant investigation."--Booklist
"It's also important for readers to understand the cost effectiveness behind developments in treating such conditions as cardiovascular disease, infant mortality and mental illness; chapters devoted to these are the best material in Cutler's book. His case studies are well researched and offer a tremendous amount of information about medical history and its economic significance."--Los Angeles Times
About the Author
David M. Cutler is a professor of economics at Harvard University. He is a member of the Institute of Medicine and regular advisor to governments and corporations.
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; 1st edition (February 5, 2004)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 158 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0195160428
- ISBN-13 : 978-0195160420
- Lexile measure : 1180L
- Item Weight : 15.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 9.3 x 1 x 6.3 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #469,589 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #196 in Health Policy (Books)
- #405 in Social Services & Welfare (Books)
- #446 in Health Care Delivery (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Authoritative, clearly written, and quite interesting; I recommend to anyone -- professionals, academics, laypersons -- interested in these issues.
Specifics:
1) The first 5 chapters convincingly argue that the enormous increases in health care spending are first attributable to new technology and treatments, and well justified, benefits substantially exceed the costs. The arguments are based in substantial part on Cutler's own academic research. By themselves, these chapters are sufficient to justify the book. Cutler does a good job of explaining both the technical economic concepts and the medical issues, and I suspect anyone interested in the topic will find the chapters fascinating, eye-opening.
He reaches a very important conclusion: we ought to spend MORE, not less.
2) Subsequent chapters survey sources of waste and problems of distribution. I found these helpful in outlining some important problems, and well worth reading, but incomplete (see below). In part these explore the incentives created by different systems of paying for health care; this helps explain why some sorts of technologies and procedures are favored over others in any particular case.
3) The concluding chapter contains his solution to the problems, a system of universal insurance (mostly private) coverage, subsidized and supervised by the federal gov't; worth reading, but inadequate. Cutler focuses on a subset of problems & proposes a solution, with little consideration for other problems or possible solutions.
For example, he ignores 'public choice' issues: how would his proposal work in a world of self-interested government official, bureaucrats, insurers, medical professionals, patients, etc.? The system he proposes might work on paper, but is quite susceptible to "gaming." USDA crop insurance is a real world example, and its poor performance should make us hesitant to expand this approach to health care.
Similarly, Cutler argues that gov't and insurers should develop a payment system that rewards providers for measurable health improvements. Cutler greatly underestimates the difficulty. Soviet planners wrestled this problem for 75 years and were unable to solve it, how to specify a set of desired production outcomes from above and then have them realized as one envisions. It's a very difficult problem, I think unsolvable. Cutler underestimates it, and devotes essentially no attention to possible solutions which would make the individual consumer directly responsible for payment, and evaluation, of health care services.
4) Cutler provides a lengthy set of citations from the scholarly literature, excellent for further study. He also features, on his website, a technical appendix. It's clear he's trying to spread light, not heat, in the health care debate. Good on him!
5) Despite any weaknesses, Cutler does a fine job of framing the issues. The book is accessible and a good read. OK, OK, 4.9 stars.
C.N. Steele Ph.D.
We have a system of health care where 20, 000 people die every year because they are uninsured. Really, what can be more precious than the life of a human being? Similarly, what is more important painting by Rembrandt or a cat in a burning building? Possibly, some would choose Rembrandts' painting instead of the cat, but that would be an individual choice. Our societal chains have to be re-linked. As humans we are capable of measuring up at the societal level; our health care system needs improvement!
In his work, the author discusses history of the health care in the United States and presents the reader with real life situations and examples. The author attempts to weigh financial costs against human life value. The reader is presented with the dilemma: on one hand there is a system with intensive technologies, high costs, that is possibly beneficial to those who can afford it; on the other hand, we can have a system that works better, and is beneficial to everyone and in which prevention plays an important role.
In authors view, it was a mistake by Bush administrations to make tax cuts benefiting very wealthy. If those tax cuts were applied to the population as a whole, we could have secured health coverage for everyone for several years without raising taxes.
Healthcare services are underused or overused ("moral hazard"). The problem is not limited to the uninsured only. The author emphasizes that we need to eliminate overuse and underuse of care. Elimination of overuse saves money, and elimination of underuse saves costs.
Truly, it costs much more to amputate foot of a diabetic patient than to prevent it through prevention strategies. Insurance companies do not pay for prevention, but almost all pay for amputation. In a case with uninsured population the situation is even worse. People go without prevention, and end up with amputated limbs, and bills mounted to six digits in thousands of dollars.
In the authors' view, fundamentally, the problem is not of affordability, but of value. The health care reform needs to address the issue of value more than affordability. Having insurance does not guarantee good care. A common response to poor quality is to make it easier for people to sue insurers and providers. Would it improve the quality of care? The author states that this is not the solution to the issue. The threat of litigation creates a silo mentality when insurers are against physicians, and physicians are against each other.
The author states that increased insurance coverage does require government action; and the only solution is to devote more resources to government medical care programs over time. The author thinks that the role of government shall be expanded in order to meet the burden of medical care.
There are other alternatives for universal health coverage such as for example single payer system, but in the authors view, these alternatives are to a degree inferior. The common belief is that competition of private insurance system is superior to government provision. The author states that firms compete with each other seeking quality improvement and cost decrease. At the same time, it is debatable whether private insurance entities have quality improvement as one of the priorities. Competition does not guarantee quality of health care, but definitely, all insurance entities are seeking the ways that would allow minimization of costs. Also, private insurance involves higher administrative costs. The author thinks that payments can be adjusted basing on health risk of employees in order to reduce adverse selection.
In my view, this is an unfair form of differentiation/discrimination basing on one's health status. It does not solve the issue of social injustice in the health care system. This type of reform will not generate better outcomes as the author states. Still, sick and poor will be lagging behind. Health care is a basic need. It is a basic right of every human being in the society. This is not the proper way of re-linking societal chains in the health care system. Medicare for all is needed for true health care reform!
The recent passage of the healthcare law did not eliminate the problem. Millions of people still will have to buy commercial health insurance policies, which will cover roughly seventy percent of their medical expenses. People will still have to pay deductibles and co-pays. Millions of people will remain uninsured. Their access to care still will be limited and care delayed. While this is happening, health insurance companies will be making a profit from millions of people who will have to buy health insurance. The insurance companies will become even more influential financially and politically after they receive money from taxpayers. They will have more power to block future reforms.
In order to eliminate the problem, we need one-payer system. We need Medicare for all. We need the system in which the government collects healthcare fees and pays out the costs. Under healthcare for all model, all citizens would be able to receive the healthcare they need. Healthcare shall be based on one's needs, and not an ability to pay!





