It does if you use Sony lenses. It is not built into the camera body, but into the lenses. We took the 100-400 to Africa and had no problems with blurred images at the far end.
First of all, don't go with the 80D if you want a canon... get the 7DM2! 24.2 vs 20.2 MP ... you don't see the difference... however you get servo focusing during video that's the fastest I've seen in a camera for that price... more so than the a6300! I have both of them... Now, if you want 4K the choice is obvious..…
see more
First of all, don't go with the 80D if you want a canon... get the 7DM2! 24.2 vs 20.2 MP ... you don't see the difference... however you get servo focusing during video that's the fastest I've seen in a camera for that price... more so than the a6300! I have both of them... Now, if you want 4K the choice is obvious... if you want 120FPS FullHD the choice is obvious. If you want s-log2 and s-log3 profile options to get more dynamic range into your 8 bit grade ;) get the A6300.. 30p 4K is about 2.3K crop factor... but not not as much jello roll ... however 24p S35 mode is 1 to 1 pixel readout at 1.5x crop factor... it's cool cause you can turn your 200mm zoom into a 460mm on the fly with 30P mode. I would get the a6300 for video because it gives you so much more options that are up to date. Next choice would be a 7DM2... ultimate though is shooting RAW with Magic Lantern on a Mark III... you get some great resolution options, 48FPS option, 14 bit raw up to 3.5k now! But the canon's are not as compact as the Sony that's for sure. I would still get the Sony overall for the price and features it overs... it has no rival to date! Rolling Shutter isn't that bad if you know how to shoot and adopt (this is in 24p S35 mode) 30p mode is much less... normal 4k. You have so many options. I has a large sensor unlike the GH4 which is a bit noisy if you ask me. Good luck!
see less
First of all, don't go with the 80D if you want a canon... get the 7DM2! 24.2 vs 20.2 MP ... you don't see the difference... however you get servo focusing during video that's the fastest I've seen in a camera for that price... more so than the a6300! I have both of them... Now, if you want 4K the choice is obvious... if you want 120FPS FullHD the choice is obvious. If you want s-log2 and s-log3 profile options to get more dynamic range into your 8 bit grade ;) get the A6300.. 30p 4K is about 2.3K crop factor... but not not as much jello roll ... however 24p S35 mode is 1 to 1 pixel readout at 1.5x crop factor... it's cool cause you can turn your 200mm zoom into a 460mm on the fly with 30P mode. I would get the a6300 for video because it gives you so much more options that are up to date. Next choice would be a 7DM2... ultimate though is shooting RAW with Magic Lantern on a Mark III... you get some great resolution options, 48FPS option, 14 bit raw up to 3.5k now! But the canon's are not as compact as the Sony that's for sure. I would still get the Sony overall for the price and features it overs... it has no rival to date! Rolling Shutter isn't that bad if you know how to shoot and adopt (this is in 24p S35 mode) 30p mode is much less... normal 4k. You have so many options. I has a large sensor unlike the GH4 which is a bit noisy if you ask me. Good luck!
Built in mics are never good. I got the Rode Videomic for my a6300, and for the little I have used the mic, it does a good job. Just be warned that the Videomic is huge when compared to the a6300. I got a dead cat to put on to the mic, but cannot use it because the "fuzzy" from it is in the frame of wider angles (th…
see more
Built in mics are never good. I got the Rode Videomic for my a6300, and for the little I have used the mic, it does a good job. Just be warned that the Videomic is huge when compared to the a6300. I got a dead cat to put on to the mic, but cannot use it because the "fuzzy" from it is in the frame of wider angles (this is using the 18-105 G lens). I am going to have get a hotshoe mount that places the mic higher so I can use the dead cat.
see less
Built in mics are never good. I got the Rode Videomic for my a6300, and for the little I have used the mic, it does a good job. Just be warned that the Videomic is huge when compared to the a6300. I got a dead cat to put on to the mic, but cannot use it because the "fuzzy" from it is in the frame of wider angles (this is using the 18-105 G lens). I am going to have get a hotshoe mount that places the mic higher so I can use the dead cat.
I really cannot say. I have read that Sony added a few tweaks, but is is basically the same camera. I can only suggest that you read the many, many reviews of the Sony a6300 and a6400 online.
