Shop top categories that ship internationally
$38.99
FREE International Returns
No Import Fees Deposit & $13.02 Shipping to Austria Details

Shipping & Fee Details

Price $38.99
AmazonGlobal Shipping $13.02
Estimated Import Fees Deposit $0.00
Total $52.01

Delivery Monday, January 13. Order within 14 hrs 30 mins
Or fastest delivery Friday, January 3
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
$$38.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$38.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Ships from
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Returns
Returnable until Jan 31, 2025
Returnable until Jan 31, 2025
For the 2024 holiday season, eligible items purchased between November 1 and December 31, 2024 can be returned until January 31, 2025.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention 1st Edition

4.8 4.8 out of 5 stars 12 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$38.99","priceAmount":38.99,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"38","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"99","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"%2Bbz5yXCIc9N7rtoYkNs84mYh9Sf5qvUQBlwCjxCOpQp0LB6oF%2FX%2F1bEHWtiLmtayoGJCXzuK5JMUlfDDIZ4vwh3PztpEpAUTSN%2FTKLh9wdOa2GjNGLmjYWHcgE%2FBN4Lzd2iS8La%2BL2iXkX%2F6ALuqIA%3D%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

With the end of the Cold War has come an upsurge in humanitarian interventions-military campaigns aimed at ending mass atrocities. These wars of rescue, waged in the name of ostensibly universal norms of human rights and legal principles, rest on the premise that a genuine "international community" has begun to emerge and has reached consensus on a procedure for eradicating mass killings. Rajan Menon argues that, in fact, humanitarian intervention remains deeply divisive as a concept and as a policy, and is flawed besides. The advocates of humanitarian intervention have produced a mountain of writings to support their claim that human rights precepts now exert an unprecedented influence on states' foreign policies and that we can therefore anticipate a comprehensive solution to mass atrocities.

In
The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention, Menon shows that this belief, while noble, is naïve. States continue to act principally based on what they regard at any given time as their national interests. Delivering strangers from oppression ranks low on their list of priorities. Indeed, even democratic states routinely embrace governments that trample the human rights values on which the humanitarian intervention enterprise rests.

States' ethical commitment to waging war to end atrocities remains episodic and erratic-more rhetorical than real. And when these missions are undertaken, the strategies and means used invariably produce perverse, even dangerous results. This, in no small measure, stems from the hubris of leaders-and the acolytes of humanitarian intervention-who have come to believe that they possesses the wisdom and wherewithal to bestow freedom and stability upon societies about which they know little.

Frequently bought together

This item: The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention
$38.99
Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$26.63
Only 10 left in stock (more on the way).
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$24.95
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Total price: $00
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
spCSRF_Treatment
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Choose items to buy together.

Customer reviews

4.8 out of 5 stars
12 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2019
    I would recommend this product to anyone wanting to know the truth about international relations in terms of humanitarian intervention. The realist approach brings a refreshing, sensible look at the concept.
  • Reviewed in the United States on March 19, 2016
    Rajan Menon’s new book, “The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention,” launches a timely and compelling argument against a dominant line of thought lying behind so much of modern American foreign policy—“humanitarian intervention” or “liberal interventionism.”  We are, of course, well familiar with Republican and neocon readiness to go to war, but the reality is that many Democrat Party leaders have been no less seduced into a series of optional foreign military interventions, with increasingly disastrous consequences. Hillary Clinton is today one of the leading exponents of the idea, but so are many of the advisors around President Obama.

    Menon’s book constitutes essential reading for anyone troubled by the ugly character of so much of the international scene these days, and yet dismayed by its exploitation by policy-makers who cloak invasion, power projections and military operations in the garb of humanitarian effort. Here is a cogent critique of the recent decades of US foreign policy misadventures in which our military has become the primary instrument of US policy—and justified in the name of humanitarian goals. We rarely get to hear these arguments so clearly presented. 

    In rejecting the premise of “liberal interventionism” Menon is not exercising some hard-minded, bloodless vision of policy—quite the opposite. He is deeply concerned for the wellbeing of peoples and societies abroad—who are often among the primary victims of such liberal interventionism. He argues not as an isolationist but rather as an observer who has watched so many seemingly well-minded interventions turn into horror stories for the citizens involved.

    The title of the book, “The Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention,” suggests that at the very least such policies are self-deceiving, in other cases perhaps deliberately meant to obfuscate. Menon here poses the question whether, for whatever motivation, great powers can ever sufficiently master the complexity of foreign societies to truly engineer a better life in the countries we target for remodeling. And whether we can afford to undertake an enterprise that requires deep hands-on involvement and might take decades to achieve— at the least. 

    Any reader of the book is eventually forced to confront a deeper question: when is war in fact “worth it”? Few would respond “never,” but many might respond “rarely.” Yet Menon is not arguing against war as such, so much as forcing us to acknowledge the faulty “liberal” foundation of our relentless quest for enemies to destroy—in the name of making the world a better place. An important and fresh insight into the policy confusions of our time.
    11 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2016
    With a historian’s scrupulousness, Menon draws on lessons of humanitarian interventions -- from the Ottoman Empire to East Pakistan, Cambodia, Rwanda, Kosovo, Bosnia, Darfur, and Syria -- to call into question “cosmopolitan sentiment” and “ethical commitment” often used to justify such interventions.

    Menon shrewdly exposes the hypocrisy of humanitarian interventions by showing that states only intervene to save people in other countries with their practical goals in mind; and if such intervention would compromise national (read: economic) interest, they would, at best, issue a public condemnation of mass murder. To that end, Menon cautions against selective use of humanitarian interventions, lest they create opposite effect: mistrust and cynicism of “rescued” people, and worse yet, increased violence by the perpetrators.

    To further prove his point, Mennon provides numerous examples when advanced democracies turned a blind eye to the atrocities committed in other countries, and continued to do business with – and openly support – dictators, who under different circumstances (read: in weaker countries) would have been good targets for deposition and invocation of R2P.

    Make no mistake – this book is NOT against humanitarian interventions as a way for the concerned international community to stop mass-killings and protect human rights. Instead, Menon urges the interventionists and cosmopolitans to carefully consider the price innocents pay from unintended (and ill-intended) consequences of such humanitarian pursuits, and put their money where their mouths are – if they are indeed concerned with the preservation of human lives in other countries, deeper commitment and allocation of all necessary resources should follow.

    This book is highly relevant for policy-makers, NGOs, government officials, academics, political activists, students, and other responsible citizens.

    You won’t find any conspiracy theories, rumors, or hidden agendas here – it is a sensible analysis of historical facts, presented in the clear, concise, and engaging manner.
    6 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2017
    Rajan Menon is a famous realist and democrat that is passionate about world affairs and morality. In the Conceit of Humanitarian Intervention he talks about how countries only intervene in other countries when their political status is at stake and not for the sake of the people's lives who are being taken. To support his statement he gives numerous accounts of times the United States has not helped other countries like Holodomor (Terror Famine) and ethnic cleansing, or in Rwanda. This book will appeal to anyone liberal that opposes his view on humanitarian intervention and any spirited democrat that passionately speaks about world affairs through the scope of the United States.
    One person found this helpful
    Report