Baobab - Shop now
$14.99 with 48 percent savings
List Price: $29.00
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
FREE delivery Saturday, June 14 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or Prime members get FREE delivery Wednesday, June 11. Order within 18 hrs 14 mins.
Arrives 4 days before Father's Day
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$14.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$14.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon
Amazon
Ships from
Amazon
Returns
30-day refund/replacement
30-day refund/replacement
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Read full return policy
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

George C. Edwards
Follow
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Why the Electoral College Is Bad for America Hardcover – July 11, 2004

by George C. Edwards III (Author)
4.6 out of 5 stars 8 ratings
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$14.99","priceAmount":14.99,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"14","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"99","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"abOqBCmEbpz6%2FApazeBlakdwznZNn8oltYzPIWvLxf3Kog%2FKq%2BwxwLfLknN0GH6uzNeKf9oDBMEHQOkmjLf5UytZDYd1FyuTXFpKqHimSCqJdjzeGM9RV2DJHqTgon34gG0M6PtewCUygQIhgQRyRIa2KFGQEalncpO6EV1Xi40WxvOFml3vGaMH0XO6btgo","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

Americans currently choose their president through the electoral college, an extraordinarily complex mechanism that may elect a candidate who does not receive the most votes. In this provocative book, George Edwards III argues that—contrary to what supporters of the electoral college claim—there is no real justification for a system that might violate majority rule.

Drawing on systematic data, Edwards finds that the electoral college does not protect the interests of small states or racial minorities, does not provide presidents with effective coalitions for governing, and does little to protect the American polity from the alleged harms of direct election of the president. In fact, the electoral college distorts the presidential campaign so that candidates ignore most small states and some large ones and pay little attention to minorities, and it encourages third parties to run presidential candidates and discourages party competition in many states.

Edwards demonstrates effectively that direct election of the president without a runoff maximizes political equality and eliminates the distortions in the political system caused by the electoral college.
Read more
Previous slide of product details
  1. Print length
    224 pages
  2. Language
    English
  3. Publisher
    Yale University Press
  4. Publication date
    July 11, 2004
  5. Dimensions
    6.5 x 0.75 x 9.25 inches
  6. ISBN-10
    0300100604
  7. ISBN-13
    978-0300100600
Next slide of product details

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

In this slim, analytical book, Texas A&M political science professor Edwards (At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress, etc.) offers a robust critique of the intricate device underpinning presidential elections. Naturally, the 2000 election looms large here. The electoral college, not the Supreme Court, awarded the presidency to George W. Bush, contends Edwards, giving the final say to little-known presidential electors. He sees this as a troubling violation of political equality. The remedy? Direct elections, which are favored by none other than "Father of the Constitution" James Madison and a notably bipartisan roster of politicos, from Richard Nixon and Robert Dole to Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford. Edwards rebuts a phalanx of pro-electoral college arguments, including claims that the device protects the interests of smaller states and minorities. According to his research, once presidential candidates hit the campaign trail, they pay little attention to regional issues or minorities. Instead, they obsess over winning large swing states and virtually ignore smaller states and states with predictable outcomes. In this manner, some voters become more equal than others based on where they cast their ballots. Electoral college supporters may rush to the ramparts to contest this cogent attack, but as Edwards points out, any move to amend the constitution and set up a new arrangement would likely be stalled by divisive political mudslinging (with those who supported Bush in 2000 touting the virtues of the electoral college and those who supported Al Gore endorsing direct elections). But even if the current system remains in place for a while, this is still a worthy, well-argued contribution to the debate.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

From The New Yorker

Someday, there will likely be yet another serious effort to get rid of the electoral college, America's weird mechanism for picking its President, in order to replace it with the method used to choose every other elected official in the federal government: a direct election. (The strongest such effort, following the 1968 squeaker, was foiled by a Senate filibuster.) This crisp handbook, by a political scientist keen to bring such a day closer, outlines the origins of the electoral college—which the framers thought would be a kind of nominating convention, with the final choice being made by the House of Representatives—and demonstrates the many ways it violates democratic norms. Edwards uses empirical evidence to demolish such common arguments in the college's favor as its reputed benefits for small states and for minorities.
Copyright © 2005 The New Yorker

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Yale University Press
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ July 11, 2004
  • Edition ‏ : ‎ Text is Free of Markings
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 224 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0300100604
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0300100600
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.5 x 0.75 x 9.25 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.6 out of 5 stars 8 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
George C. Edwards

George C. Edwards

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
8 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers
Write a customer review

Top reviews from the United States

  • Richard Lasater
    5.0 out of 5 stars As if no one knew.
    Reviewed in the United States on November 25, 2023
    Verified Purchase
    Confirms what needs very little confirmation.
    Helpful
     Report
  • Jubal
    5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
    Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2017
    Verified Purchase
    A convincing argument for ending the archaic, anachronistic, divisive, Electoral College.
    Helpful
     Report
  • Robert Richie
    4.0 out of 5 stars Excellent analysis, wrong prescription
    Reviewed in the United States on October 20, 2004
    Verified Purchase
    Edwards provides a lucid, devastating critique of the Electoral College and its negative impact on American politics and government. After reading this book it will be hard for people to keep a straight face when defenders of this 18th century institution make such outmoded arguments as "candidates will spend time only in population centers" (as if they don't focus all their energies right now on just a handful of states and as if candidates in all races for governor don't try to win votes wherever they are in a state).

    My one disappointment is his recommendation that we enshire the principle of "plurality rule" when directly electing the president. That would mean we could have presidents elected with less than 30% of the vote and would maintain the "spoiler" dynamic for any independent and third party candidate trying to offer new ideas to voters. Far better would be to establish a 50%-plus-one majority requirement as proposed by Congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. and groups like FairVote-The Center for Voting and Democracy -- or at the very least leave it to Congress to decide by statute.

    But Edwards' book should help re-start a national conversation about changing the Electoral College -- which as recently in 1969 came close to being abolished after the House voted by a 4-to-1 margin to go to direct election.
    22 people found this helpful
    Helpful
     Report
  • ljmck
    5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
    Reviewed in the United States on March 22, 2017
    Verified Purchase
    Thank you
    Helpful
     Report
  • William J. Kelleher, Ph.D.
    3.0 out of 5 stars Abolish Electoral College? Then what?
    Reviewed in the United States on September 12, 2008
    How would we of the 21st Century elect our Pres and VP without the electoral college? Edwards has no answer for that, but all the details are clearly laid out in The New Election Game.

    New Election Game: A Replacement for the Two-Party System of Electing Presidents
    One person found this helpful
    Helpful
     Report
  • Jordan
    4.0 out of 5 stars Best Critique of the Electoral College Available
    Reviewed in the United States on November 14, 2007
    This book is the spiritual successor to the "Electoral College Primer" series that was discontinued in 2002 due to the death of its primary authors. For opponents of the Electoral College it's a good thing the mantle has been passed, because this book represents a far more damning case for the abolishment of the Electoral College than those books did.

    A large portion of the material is lifted verbatim from those books, but in addition to exhibiting the voting power distortions created by the Electoral College, this book also tackles the practical arguments put forth in defense of the Electoral College head on. Edwards effectively dismantles the idea that it is a bastion of federalism, and also the specious "vote fraud deterrent" argument often trotted out. Perhaps the single most impressive argument in the book is a quote cited from James Madison that "The President is to represent the people, not the States". Edwards supports his refutations to EC-defender favorite slogans such as "national coalitions" not with counter-taglines but instead with cold hard numbers that prove that the Electoral College doesn't actually engender the development of any of those things.

    Where Edwards falls flat on his face, however, is in his contention that the Electoral College encourages third parties to run. This is easily refuted in both theory and practice. Extremely specific circumstances would have to come about for a third party candidate to have even a prayer of winning even one Electoral vote, much less accrue enough to throw the election into the House of Representatives. and even if such a circumstance should arise, the third party candidate would have absolutely zero chance of winning such a contingency election. Even allowing for the possibility that a candidate would wish to run exclusively to assume the "spoiler" role, such a candidate would be unlikely to attract a significant portion of the electorate.

    Perhaps the most significant criticism of this book I can offer is that however impressive the case against the Electoral College it presents, and it is impressive, it never actually delivers what its title promises. Edwards, while demolishing most of the arguments of defense for the Electoral College, never attempts to demonstrate Why the Electoral College is Bad for America. I mean that in the most literal sense. Whatever one thinks of the institution, it has produced a series of chief executives that have transformed our country into the most powerful in the history of the modern world. There's at least something to be said about that, is there not?

    Like its predecessor, the Electoral College Primer series, the most cloying thing about the book is its tendency to overstate "crises" resulting from the Electoral College, of which none of the elections were really crises, but only were close to being. Of course we are all free to speculate AFTER the election how many shifted votes would have resulted in deadlock, but time and time again, deadlock never occurs. Edwards really stretches his case when discussing one particular election(I forget which one, exactly) when he argues that if X amount of votes had shifted in Ohio, Candidate A would have won the Election by only 2 Electoral votes, and further speculates that Candidate B could have then attempted to get only Electors to change their votes. In what can only be described as intellectual dishonesty, Edwards ignores that George W. Bush won the election of 2000 by only a single Electoral vote, and this "nightmare scenario" did not play out.
    3 people found this helpful
    Helpful
     Report
  • Readalots
    4.0 out of 5 stars Electoral College Isn't Commonsense Federalism
    Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2006
    Texas A&M University political science professor George Edwards, III, brings an interesting and thought provoking study with "Why the Electoral College is Bad for America" (2004 paperback). His 198 pages provide significant research (with 21 pages of endnotes and a plethora of helpful graphs, accommodating statistical tables, and informative charts). His resource data alone is worth the cost of the book!

    Starting from the premise- the Electoral College has a wide range of advantages and disadvantages for American policy- Edwards precedes to focus on the problems with the 18th century presidential election system. He notes, "the electoral college poses a real potential for deadlock" (page 61). And, of course, the political party in power always appreciates the electoral system while the party out of presidential power wants to altogether eliminate the program.

    Encouragement of a third party system (page 140) or direct election by the national populace- or as Bob Dole calls it "commonsense federalism"- (page 121) could provide a better election system. Will the U.S. ever abandon the Electoral College?- probably not.

    Although Edwards' seven chapters are informative, his writing style is a bit tedious (his chapters average 30 pages in length!). The book is not necessarily quickly read.

    If there is disappointment in this book it is that Edwards allows his Democrat politics to entangle his political theory. He also, disappointingly, too often references contemporary news media (almost a third of his sources from chapter 6 alone are news papers and political periodicals!).

    Edwards is a good read. His book explains the role and sometimes abuse of the Electoral College. It is recommendable to all political science readers, students of American history, research collectors, and those interested in the Electoral College.
    10 people found this helpful
    Helpful
     Report