Buy new:
-45% $9.95$9.95
$4.99 delivery January 15 - 22
Ships from: Gama1521 Sold by: Gama1521
Save with Used - Good
$8.07$8.07
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Duh Sto
Learn more
1.76 mi | Ashburn 20147
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires Paperback – Illustrated, November 29, 2011
Purchase options and add-ons
A New Yorker and Fortune Best Book of the Year
"A must-read for all Americans who want to remain the ones deciding what they can read, watch, and listen to.” —Arianna Huffington
Analyzing the strategic maneuvers of today’s great information powers—Apple, Google, and an eerily resurgent AT&T—Tim Wu uncovers a time-honored pattern in which invention begets industry and industry begets empire.
It is easy to forget that every development in the history of the American information industry—from the telephone to radio to film—once existed in an open and chaotic marketplace inhabited by entrepreneurs and utopians, just as the Internet does today. Each of these, however, grew to be dominated by a monopolist or cartel.
In this pathbreaking book, Tim Wu asks: will the Internet follow the same fate? Could the Web—the entire flow of American information—come to be ruled by a corporate leviathan in possession of "the master switch"? Here, Tim Wu shows how a battle royale for the Internet’s future is brewing, and this is one war we dare not tune out.
- Print length384 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherVintage
- Publication dateNovember 29, 2011
- Dimensions5.11 x 0.76 x 7.98 inches
- ISBN-100307390993
- ISBN-13978-0307390998
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book provides a thorough and fascinating history of the last 100 years. They describe it as an engaging read with well-written descriptions of the historical pageant. The book is described as interesting and thought-provoking, making it suitable for students.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book provides a thorough recitation of the history of the last 100 years. They find it fascinating in both its detail and overall case. The author writes well about describing the historical pageant, relationships, interplay of players, and the cycle of innovation. The book does a good job explaining the causes driving innovation versus the causes driving large media empires. It has concepts, organization, and story. Overall, customers describe it as an outstanding book about the history of media empires written with genuine interest and enthusiasm on the subject.
"...But Wu does a great job at putting history into perspective, illustrating that we shouldn't take Net Neutrality for granted, and seeing that the..." Read more
"...100+ year journey through multiple information industries was quite educational and entertaining, though a clear bias against corporate self-..." Read more
"...The rich history of how television, movies, radio, the personal computer, and the telephone were invented, their modest beginnings, the early open-..." Read more
"...you Tim Wu brings this whole discussion to life, with a very well written narrative of how the evolution of telephony, radio, film and TV has..." Read more
Customers find the book engaging and well-written. They find it thought-provoking and enjoyable to read. The book is memorable with its information about history.
"...his points contain details I haven't heard of before, it's an enjoyable read, and well analyzed...." Read more
"...through multiple information industries was quite educational and entertaining, though a clear bias against corporate self-regulation or government..." Read more
"This book is a thoroughly compelling, thought provoking read...." Read more
"...One final point: The Master Switch is written in a clear yet highly literate style that holds close to a compelling narrative arc...." Read more
Customers find the book engaging and readable. They find the perspective fascinating and unique, with enough story to keep it interesting. The book is described as entertaining and even electrifying.
"...It's not only informative but massively entertaining, even electrifying...." Read more
"...relationships, interplay of players, and he includes fascinating tidbits to spark interest...." Read more
"...is a brilliant work of praise and condemnation which is fascinating from beginning to end." Read more
"...It was easy to read, interesting, enlightening and thorough...." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 7, 2011I'm pretty critical on reviewing books and this is a rare five star. Most of us are wondering how the Internet will evolve and how it will change the future of our society in terms of where the power of information and entertainment will reside, and Wu does a great job at giving us a brief "history lesson" of several key industries - telegraph, telephone, AM and FM radio, broadcast TV, cable TV, Hollywood, and the Internet. For each, he takes us through examples of how each is subject to the same "Cycle" of disruptive innovation by entrepreneurs who first bring the promise of diversity and decentralization of power, but this is ultimately followed by the centralization of power as corporate interests consolidate power, and diversity reduces and control by few individuals affects our everyday lives and culture. It's well balanced as Wu always compares the advantages of centralized power (e.g.efficiency, quality, time to market) with it's disadvantages (e.g. stifling innovation, controlling our culture). He illustrates the role of the government at usually siding with the interests of corporate consolidation, but sometimes playing an important role at doing the opposite (e.g. breaking up the old Hollywood's control of theaters, breaking up AT&T, bring Cable TV along). He also illustrates the importance of certain powerful individuals at consolidating power, as well as other individuals at breaking up consolidated power, both sides believing in their causes more so than being in it for the money. The stories he uses to illustrate his points contain details I haven't heard of before, it's an enjoyable read, and well analyzed. I cannot attest to the accuracy of his information and analysis, but it's very credible and well balanced.
It's clear that Wu believes in limiting power, but who wouldn't unless you were a rising captain of industry. As I read it, I couldn't help but wonder if the Internet is different, and eagerly waited for the big Aha, the big revelation at the end. And that is where I had more mixed feelings. In the conclusion, firstly Wu did a great job at cutting through the noise and pointing out that there is always a battle between centralized power and decentralized power and this battle is not just about the obvious economic factors, but individuals who believe in the merits of their respective position on this issue. He pointed out that on one side we have centralized power via AT&T, Apple, Disney, NBC for example, and on the other side we have decentralized power via Google, Amazon, Wikipedia. His argument is that the centralized powers want to control Internet access and it was clear that his centralized issue was ensuring Net Neutrality which he described as the "common carrier issue of the Internet". At first I was disappointed that this was his main point as I don't believe that we should seriously be worried about Net Neutrality. As one of millions of people who are trying to heard on the Internet, I was hoping I was going to get more insights into the marketing power of large companies on the Internet - i.e. how do you get through the noise. Even though we small players can distribute our content on the Internet, it's still the larger players who can afford to give away a lot for free, create well produced content, and use a combination of Internet advertising/presence and traditional media channels to brand themselves. So I believe you can make an argument that in the long run, the Internet will actually make things worse for the small players because it allows an even smaller number of large players to dominate by reaping large profits with small profit margins across an enormous volume of customers. You of course could make the opposite argument that the Internet promotes diversity as the key to success is dominating a micromarket, something the larger players are not well equipped to do. So there was very little insight into that, and this was my key disappointment.
However, it was a good reminder that we can't take Net Neutrality for granted. Wu made many strong points for Net Neutrality (i.e. separation of distribution and content) at a legal level. These arguments were good and well summarized, but nothing new. However, once I saw the main point of the book being don't take this for granted, I saw important insights that he made on this topic. He pointed out that the ability for large players (both corporations and individuals) to consolidate power and control us is greater than ever with the Internet. He was focused mostly on Net Neutrality and indicated that the combination Apple and Google could fall prey ultimately to the power of the networks (e.g. AT&T). He illustrated that there are a variety of government actions that can be done across several parts of the government to ensure Net Neutrality: e.g. FCC, anti-trust/legal, etc. (i.e. you can't rely on any one government entity). But he pointed out that ultimately, what really determines what a big player will do on this issue (or any issue) is regulating their own behavior to ensure they don't alienate their customers and get bad press - imagine the backlash if a Comcast was caught censoring a website. This might fly in China, but not in the US. So in a very Jeffersonian sense, the awareness of the population of these issues, and their intolerance of it is the best defense. So, ultimately, we have to protect our right to ditch Comcast (for example) for some other Internet carrier, and fortunately we have many options - the local phone company, wireless, etc. So Wu's argument that this is an important issue is very well taken, but I'm not sure if it's the key concern.
If we look at the Apple/AT&T combination as Wu highlights, is the concern one of Net Neutrality? The concern is more about Apple's ability to censor what applications run on their iPhone/iPad. But even they got a lot of bad press about preventing certain Google and Skype apps from running on their phone. So I don't buy Wu's arguments about the real concern being these issues. He missed to me a critical issue of of marketing, branding, copyright protection, and getting your share of the noise. And he did correctly point out that anyone interesting in copyright protection is going to prefer an Apple approach vs. a Google approach as you can get some protection, certainly from the point of view of Software/applications, but no longer for music/videos, etc.
It's anybody's guess as to where this is going. But Wu does a great job at putting history into perspective, illustrating that we shouldn't take Net Neutrality for granted, and seeing that the cycle of those pushing for consolidation/centralization will always be at odds with those pushing for decentralization - i.e. a great framework for pondering and discussion. I believe that some level of consolidation is needed even if you're one to push for advocacy of issues like saving the environment, allowing smaller producers of entertainment to be heard, grass roots politics, etc, because without some level of consolidation, there will just be noise out there. And that's the biggest enemy, because only the big players might be able to cut through the noise, and over history, creating noise is an important tactic that those seeking power use.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 29, 2014I would highly recommend this book for anyone who has an interest in history, technology, or net neutrality. Since I fall into all three categories, for me, this book read like a gripping, page-turning novel. This 100+ year journey through multiple information industries was quite educational and entertaining, though a clear bias against corporate self-regulation or government sponsored monopolies can be found on nearly every page. Still, I felt the author's position was compellingly built. To take on over a century of history in less than 400 pages is very ambitious, but I was impressed by the level of detail the book went into for the various subjects covered. I do not claim to be an expert on the material, so I cannot comment on the level of misinformation, but the plentiful sources and footnotes adds to the book's credibility. I did find myself on rare occasion saying, "Hmm... I don't think that's quite right."
The only thing I was disappointed by was the relatively brief exploration of modern issues, including net neutrality. I cannot call this a criticism as the book is not marketed as a primer for net neutrality, but I was hoping for a little more content relating to the recent history of the Internet and the important issues to be solved for the future. Even though I tend to side with the author's position, I would agree that a more equal treatment of the other sides of this debate would have strengthened the argument. That said, I thoroughly enjoyed the time I spent reading through "The Master Switch" and would enthusiastically encourage everyone to give it a look.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 4, 2011Tim Wu's book has streaked like a comet across my sky at the speed of light and left indelible skid marks on my brain! This is the most awesome read of the last ten years! It's not only informative but massively entertaining, even electrifying.
Wu's predecessor, in my view, was the late Neil Postman (also from Columbia U.) who analyzed the history of communications as well with his book "Amusing Ourselves to Death" as well as other volumes.
Unlike Postman, however, Wu does not scorn communications technology but rather dissects the inner machinations of the politics and power struggles that bring it to market. The rich history of how television, movies, radio, the personal computer, and the telephone were invented, their modest beginnings, the early open-market convulsions that brought them to prominence, and their full, monopolistic flowering, are the substance of The Master Switch. Wu is very interested in the phase where invention meets commerce. And then what he calls "The Cycle" begins, and communications move from open to closed and then back again. He calls it "the rise and fall of information empires."
The history of the film studios, AT&T, and finally the epic conflict between Google and Apple all make for some of the most fascinating reading I have experienced in years. Every chapter and nearly every page is filled with marvelous insights on information industries and the political struggles that have taken place around new technologies. Even the struggles of the lowly answering machine and/or tape recorder make for a story worthy of Dostoeyevsky, as AT&T suppressed the technology of magnetic tape recording for years because they thought answering machines represented a threat to their telephone service. It took 50 yearsf for answering machines to be available to the public, thanks to the tunnelvision of AT&T.
Some of the areas and people Wu didn't cover in detail include Bill Gates...perhaps because Bill Gates was only an "accidental" monopolist. Windows has always been a more or less open operating system -- it's hardware and software platforms were available for many companies and individuals to exploit and adapt to their needs. Wu spoke of the duopoly of NBC and CBS, but said little of how this power influenced the content of the news. (another favorite subject of Postman, to be sure.) Media and communications technologies ARE different from other industries, but because they rule our perceptions of the world around us. In this, I think Wu slightly missed the mark.
Other adjectives to describe Tim "Whoa's" book are "broad and deep". He compared the rise of broadcasting in America vs England, as radio development in GB was a more governmental affair, but in America, of course, one driven by commerce. He looks at how FM radio was supressed for decades by the dominant broadcasting powers. He examines the split between Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, the former tending towards closed, controlled systems and Woz favoring an open platform in computers.
And always, Wu looks at the relationship between industrial titans and the government that regulates and/or conspires with them.
I loved Wu's description of how each of the major studios was formed in it's infancy. In a chapter called "The Time is Not Ripe for Features", he explores how the founding fathers of the West Coast movie industry flouted Edison's East Coast, patent-driven monopoly and made the movies what they are today.
Wu examines how the economic and political structure of electronic communications has affected art and media, and vice versa.
The last chapter, The Separations Principle, is certainly the most pedantic and the hardest to read, but Wu reasons his arguments with cogent detail and brings the book to a strong conclusion.
Wu's book is simply the last word on the the history of electronic communications, the men behind the control of it, and the politics and power struggles underlying it. In that these devices and industries are KEY in forming our perceptions of the world, I can hardly think of a more important book. This is my bible. I'll be reading it 10 times and more. Thanks, Tim Wu.
Top reviews from other countries
DanielleReviewed in Canada on January 5, 20175.0 out of 5 stars GREAT book, really informative
This is actually the first book i've READ cover to cover that was a class mandatory textbook and was actually interesting. It tells history as if its fiction, making everything interesting while informing you with facts and making you think about media, technology and the digital age.
-
AndreuReviewed in Spain on March 20, 20155.0 out of 5 stars Una joya valiosísima
Tim Wu interpreta la historia de las telecomunicaciones y los mesios en EE.UU. Eso ya se ha hecho antes, dirán muchos, y es cierto, pero él lo hce desde la perspectiva contemporánea, de alguien que vive en un mundo digitalizado y en una sociedad en red, en plena convergencia de telecomunicaciones y contenidos. Tim Wu pone de manifiesto sus preocupaciones habituales: la neutralidad de la red, el peligro de los monopolios, que se recomponen por su cuenta tras haber sido disueltos por los reguladores. Y por supuesto, también encontramos un análisis de lo que supone la irrupción de los nuevos mediso en la conformación de los públicos y de sus gustos.
Ned WileyReviewed in Germany on October 23, 20145.0 out of 5 stars fascinating reading for every citizen of the Information Age, essential reading for everyone working in it.
Superb tour de force of the swings of the pendulum in the ICT sector, and its implications for all of our daily lives. Read it and understand both what you have lived through, and where we are going.
Alan LentonReviewed in the United Kingdom on September 21, 20145.0 out of 5 stars Superb History of 20th Century Information Networks
Subtitled 'The Rise and Fall of Information Empires' Tim Wu's book is a tour de force history of the four great information technologies of the 20th Century - the telephone, radio/television, movies, and the internet. The book is both a history and an analysis of these industries. The lessons we can draw from the stories he tells have serious implications for the current struggle over what is now known as 'net neutrality.
The individual stories of the technologies themselves are interesting enough in their own right, but what is striking is the common themes of the histories of the telephone, radio and movies. In each case as the new disruptive technologies came into existence and there was a period of free for all, anarchy if you like, in which innovators thrived, anyone could join in, and the cost of entry was minimal.
Then came a period of consolidation, often assisted by government desire to regulate and consolidate. Politicians are notoriously wary of their constituents doing this for themselves, while the bureaucrats who run the regulatory bodies always push for consolidation. After all it's a lot easier to talk to, and come to agreement with, a few large bodies that have a similar culture, than hundreds of small organization filled with fractious non-conformists!
And of course, once you have a monopoly or semi-monopoly situation, it becomes easier to suppress new, disruptive, innovations - the suppression of FM radio in the early 30s by RCA being a classic case. In other cases the leadership of the monopoly involved simply could not conceive of any way of working other than the one currently in use. Thus the officials at AT&T thought the concept of packet switched networks (the basis of the internet) was "preposterous". In fact, so wedded were the AT&T officials to the circuit based network (the AT&T slogan was One company, One system, Universal Service), that they even turned down a US Air Force offer to pay for an experimental packet switched network!
But this isn't just a technical history. It's also a social history of the struggle to keep those technologies in the hands of ordinary people, and that is as important as the technical issues, because that is exactly what is happening now in both the internet and the software forums. In the internet the struggle is being waged under the rubric of 'net neutrality, while the software struggle is being waged through patent reform.
Both are important. At the moment anyone can post material onto the net - you don't require anyone's permission to do so, or to check what you've written before it's posted. Anyone can write software - all you need is a general purpose computer, usually a desktop PC, and a compiler or a browser, depending on your language of choice. Do I really have to tell you that the politicians and big business would prefer it otherwise?
We are on a cusp when it comes to questions of how the new and currently cheap enabling technologies of computing and the internet will be used in the future, and Tim Wu's readable and fascinating book is an important chronology and analysis of what happened on previous occasions. We need to understand that and learn its lessons, because those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Highly recommended.
-
Amazon CustomerReviewed in Italy on January 22, 20145.0 out of 5 stars Un grande libro pieno di spunti inattesi
Prima ho acquistato l'audiolibro poi ho voluto leggerlo per seguire con più attenzione la narrazione sugli eventi dell'ultimo secolo sulle invenzioni e sul business della telefonia, del cinema, della radio, della televisione, della tv via cavo tutti raccontati in maniera approfondita e con ottima padronanza sia della parte tecnologica che di quella del business. Da questo libro ricavi una visione unitaria del tema dell'inter-relazionamento delle scoperte tecnologiche con lo sfruttamento delle stesse nel business in un contesto storico cche è ricco di spunti e di informazioni assolutamente non scontate.
Altamente raccomandato.



