Neu:
29,31$29,31$
Lieferung Mittwoch, 15. Januar
Versand durch: Amazon Verkauft von: RoseBookz
Mit „Gebraucht – Gut“ sparen
9,17$9,17$
Lieferung Montag, 13. Januar
Versand durch: Amazon Verkauft von: Books For You Today
Lade die kostenlose Kindle-App herunter und lese deine Kindle-Bücher sofort auf deinem Smartphone, Tablet oder Computer – kein Kindle-Gerät erforderlich.
Mit Kindle für Web kannst du sofort in deinem Browser lesen.
Scanne den folgenden Code mit deiner Mobiltelefonkamera und lade die Kindle-App herunter.
Bild nicht verfügbar
Farbe:
-
-
-
- Herunterladen, um dieses Videos wiederzugeben Flash Player
-
-
VIDEO -
Dem Autor folgen
OK
What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets Gebundene Ausgabe – 24. April 2012
Blättere durch das Buch und springe mit PageFlip immer wieder dorthin zurück, wo du aufgehört hast.
Vergrößere Bilder mit hoher Qualität, um sie genauer zu betrachten.
Profitiere von weiteren Funktionen, die nur in digitaler Form möglich sind: Nimm deine Bibliothek überallhin mit, lies mit der Kindle App auf all deinen Geräten, passe die Schriftart an, erstelle gemeinsam nutzbare Notizen und Markierungen, und vieles mehr.
Entdecke dank der Wikipedia-Integration zusätzliche Details zu den Ereignissen, Personen und Orten in deinem Buch.
Kaufoptionen und Plus-Produkte
Should we pay children to read books or to get good grades? Should we allow corporations to pay for the right to pollute the atmosphere? Is it ethical to pay people to test risky new drugs or to donate their organs? What about hiring mercenaries to fight our wars? Auctioning admission to elite universities? Selling citizenship to immigrants willing to pay?
In What Money Can't Buy, Michael J. Sandel takes on one of the biggest ethical questions of our time: Is there something wrong with a world in which everything is for sale? If so, how can we prevent market values from reaching into spheres of life where they don't belong? What are the moral limits of markets?
In recent decades, market values have crowded out nonmarket norms in almost every aspect of life―medicine, education, government, law, art, sports, even family life and personal relations. Without quite realizing it, Sandel argues, we have drifted from having a market economy to being a market society. Is this where we want to be?
In his New York Times bestseller Justice, Sandel showed himself to be a master at illuminating, with clarity and verve, the hard moral questions we confront in our everyday lives. Now, in What Money Can't Buy, he provokes an essential discussion that we, in our market-driven age, need to have: What is the proper role of markets in a democratic society―and how can we protect the moral and civic goods that markets don't honor and that money can't buy?
- Seitenzahl der Print-Ausgabe256 Seiten
- SpracheEnglisch
- HerausgeberFarrar, Straus and Giroux
- Erscheinungstermin24. April 2012
- Abmessungen15.95 x 2.73 x 23.77 cm
- ISBN-100374203032
- ISBN-13978-0374203030
Wird oft zusammen gekauft

Kundenrezensionen
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern5 Sterne59%28%9%2%2%59%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern4 Sterne59%28%9%2%2%28%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern3 Sterne59%28%9%2%2%9%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern2 Sterne59%28%9%2%2%2%
- 5 Sterne4 Sterne3 Sterne2 Sterne1 Stern1 Stern59%28%9%2%2%2%
Kundenbewertungen, einschließlich Produkt-Sternebewertungen, helfen Kunden, mehr über das Produkt zu erfahren und zu entscheiden, ob es das richtige Produkt für sie ist.
Um die Gesamtbewertung der Sterne und die prozentuale Aufschlüsselung nach Sternen zu berechnen, verwenden wir keinen einfachen Durchschnitt. Stattdessen berücksichtigt unser System beispielsweise, wie aktuell eine Bewertung ist und ob der Prüfer den Artikel bei Amazon gekauft hat. Es wurden auch Bewertungen analysiert, um die Vertrauenswürdigkeit zu überprüfen.
Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Kundenbewertungen bei Amazon funktionieren.Spitzenrezensionen aus USA
Derzeit tritt ein Problem beim Filtern der Rezensionen auf. Bitte versuche es später erneut.
-
Bewertet in den USA am25. Mai 2012Here is nice little book by Michael Sandel, who I first heard about on the Colbert Report. His main question is what he ends the book with, "Do we want a society where everything is up for sale? Or are there certain moral and civic goods that markets do not honor and money cannot buy?" He is speaking about our society and what type of one do we want to live in. It is a book which begs the question of how do markets reflect our morality and in what ways do they shape it. I really enjoyed the way Sandel writes this book with many case studies and arguments on both sides. While you can definitely see they way in which he thinks toward each situation, it seems he presents it more with the notion that these issues are something we need to realize and think critically about before they in turn shape who we become. Mainly using his two fold rubric of fairness and corruption, he assesses different situations to determine their moral judgement and how that relates to a market judgement. I think this raises some great questions to utilitarianism and different ways we make decisions. He is tying morality into everything we do, especially in the free market world, where not even here are you free from moral decisions. Rather we need to have these moral and civic discussions. Markets should not take a "nonjudgmental stance toward values." This is my overall impression and short summary, below I will give a chapter by chapter breakdown if you are interested.
Jumping the Queue
Here Sandel brings up the line cutting issue of whether there are certain things we should all have to wait for, or can money buy a fast track. This includes jumping lines at airports, solo carpool drivers, ticket scalping, concierge doctors, and the new line standing business. Are there certain things that all should wait their turn for, or does the childhood rule "don't cut in line" not apply to us so grown up? He also speaks to some of the other ways we allocate things as merit, need, and others.
Incentives
Incentives are the name of the game of economics. I am not really a student of economics though I do know my way around moral and ethical issues, and this was perhaps my favorite chapter. He raises some tough questions and starts the chapter off with one of the toughest, asking whether drug addicted women should be offered incentives to become sterile. I still don't really know where I stand but here was brought up some great discussion. Being in education I agree with his assessment of corruption coming with paying students for reading or getting good grades, but I also see parallels in this and certain academic scholarships for students who have done well in high school and continue to do well in college. So incentives still play a part for secondary and above education, but perhaps in a little different vein than the direct cash incentives of his case studies. I think his statement here best sums up the chapter, "In general, cash incentives seem to work better at getting people to show up for a specific event-a doctor's appointment or an injection-than at changing long-term habits and behaviors".
How Markets Crowd Out Morals
Actually this was my favorite chapter. What can money buy? Friends, Nobel Prizes, Academy Awards... These are a few examples of things Sandel says we all agree money can't buy. Though any more I would say the way you use your money could buy you many "Friends". Perhaps not in the true sense of the word, but definitely in some ways in which we use the word. "Economists hate gift giving" I was interested about this topic and discussed it with my wife on which she would rather have. I remember how when I was a child getting money was lame, but now at times I would much rather have money than a gift, perhaps I have become corrupted toward the social free market system. I was very surprised by how market incentives tainted civic/national duty. It was a wonderful example of market corruption, but my favorite part is his discussion of the crowding out of non market norms, and the commercialization effect. The rubs comes to intrinsic motivations and external ones, and "when people are engaged n an activity they consider intrinsically worthwhile, offering them money may weaken their motivation" which goes against the fundamental economic theory. At one of the most interesting parts of the book he describes Arrow's two tenants of the market, both of which are very interesting but the second is the one most intriguing. "Ethical behavior is a commodity that needs to be economized" or that "Markets, which rely on self-interest, spare us from using up the limited supply of virtue". Sandel and I both agree that this is a complete falsehood. He goes into some wonderful discussions on love and altruism, but I see that this economizing of virtues distorts the very meaning of the words and "corrupts" them as Sandel might say.
Markets in Life and Death
This chapter discusses some of the moral issues within insurance and the difference between it and death bets. Much of this I didn't know about. I think it shows my own fallenness that as I am reading some of this and thinking how horrible it is, I am also thinking, "I wonder if I can make any money here".
Naming Rights
His last chapter mainly discussed advertising and where it should and should not be. While the arguments towards it were slightly on the fairness angle, most dealt with the corruption factor and degradation of the items, places, cars, or school that implemented the advertising. Woven within this chapter is also a theme he has sparsely throughout the book and that is the growing distance between the wealthy and the poor. One thing I think he notices and talks about which I very much admired is that the issue is not so much that certain people now have more money than others do, whether or not that is truer now of today than the past, but rather that the wealthy seems to live in a different world than the rest of us do. At the end of the chapter he calls it skyboxification. Where "the more things that money can buy, the fewer the occasions when people from different walks of life encounter one another". Perhaps we wouldn't really care to much if others had more money than us if they didn't or couldn't use it to separate themselves into their own world. Shouldn't we all be in this thing called life together anyway? I think this is a great aspect and personally I think it is one where the church can speak volumes. In the church community it shouldn't matter if you have money or not, we are all on the same level before God and all need each other in this "common life".
-
Bewertet in den USA am27. April 2012What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets by Michael J. Sandel
" What Money Can't Buy" is the thought-provoking book that asks the ethical question, "Are there some things that money can buy but shouldn't?" With a plethora of fascinating examples, best-selling author and famed Harvard professor Michael J. Sandel once again dazzles the mind with philosophical mind teasers. In this enlightening edition, Sandel challenges the reader with economic ethics, are economic markets replacing our moral judgments? Sandel insists that these are questions that society needs to answer and decide what values should govern our social and civic life. What sets Sandel apart is precisely his ability to ask thought-provoking questions and provide lucid perspectives. This 245-page book is composed of the following five chapters: 1. Jumping the Queue, 2. Incentives, 3. How Markets Crowd Out Morals, 4. Markets in Life and Death, and 5. Naming Rights.
Positives:
1. Elegant, conversational tone that makes this book a treat to read.
2. As thought-provoking a book as you will find.
3. So many fascinating economic topics covered in a brief book.
4. Philosophy made fun. Sandel writes with panache.
5. So easy to understand yet so profound.
6. Very even-handed approach. Does a great job of addressing issues from different perspectives.
7. Sandel challenges you to think. His trademark engaging style draws you in and just when you thought you had it all figured out he forces you to rethink your position. Excellent!
8. A great job of defining the role of our markets.
9. A master at providing countless examples of modern moral dilemmas.
10. The creative minds of the free markets...interesting business models. Line standing business applied to several businesses as a curious example.
11. Some examples will test your moral fiber. I'm not going to spoil it.
12. Thought-provoking questions abound, "Under what conditions do market reflect freedom of choice, and under what conditions do they exert a kind of coercion?"
13. An interesting look at education and pay for grades programs.
14. Health bribes...do they work?
15. Perverse situations...what would you do?
16. The morality of environmental preservation, climate change, endangered species.
17. Great quotes, "Morality represents the way we would like to work, and economics represents how it actually does work."
18. What money can and cannot buy and why. Great stuff.
19. A fascinating look at the "value" of life. Enlightening.
20. The naming rights chapter goes over the business and ethics of paying for ads in practically every aspect of our lives.
21. Being the big baseball fan that I am I was happy to see a couple of sections on baseball.
22. The two running objections of laissez-faire argument: coercion and unfairness. Plenty of examples.
23. Insight into public marketing.
24. The positives and negatives of commercialism.
25. Comprehensive notes section.
Negatives:
1. So good it was too brief...I wanted more.
2. Perhaps not as great as Sandel's previous book: "Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?" but it is still an excellent book.
3. Folks on opposite side of the political spectrum may have something to complain about and that may be a good thing.
4. Surprised there wasn't many shenanigans from Wall Street. That would have taken several books though.
5. Not a ground breaking book just better asked questions.
In summary, I enjoyed this book, it will give you topics to discuss for years to come. What sets Sandel apart is his innate ability to ask interesting questions and provide well thought out answers. Few authors have that innate ability to draw you in and make you ponder your arguments. The book has few shortcomings including the fact that is indeed a short book and a lot may in fact be logical to many. A 4.5 star book out of five. That being said, if you are looking for a philosophical book that is a treat to read, "What Money Can't Buy" is worth every penny. I highly recommend it!
Further suggestions: The excellent, "Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do?" by Michael J. Sandel, "Age of Greed: The Triumph of Finance and the Decline of America, 1970 to the Present" by Jeff Madrick, "Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters" by Richard Rumelt, and "The End of Growth: Adapting to Our New Economic Reality" by Richard Heinberg.
Spitzenrezensionen aus anderen Ländern
-
Adilson Rodrigues PiresBewertet in Brasilien am 4. Oktober 20215,0 von 5 Sternen Até que ponto a ética e a moral podem limitar os lucros?
Ainda não cheguei à metade do livro, mas estou gostando pelas situações que o autor coloca sobre as várias maneiras de dinheiro atrair dinheiro, com ou sem preocupação com a ética. Nós hoje vivemos no mundo da concorrência e a visão dada no livro é muito boa.
-
CPBewertet in Kanada am 5. Dezember 20205,0 von 5 Sternen Values and moral principles vs market efficiency
The author, Michael Sandel, has taught and written about values and moral principles throughout his Harvard career. This book covers some subjects (e.g life insurance, health care) where market efficiency may conflict with societal values in some circumstances, which the author explores. One example: The author asks if paying kids for reading books may not induce the wrong attitude towards reading (linking book reading to a market transaction, as opposed to a way to knowledge). The book is more an exploration of various questions involving market mechanisms and societal values, rather than a formal theory of the potential flaws of a market approach.
-
Ajay SojitraBewertet in Indien am 3. Juli 20205,0 von 5 Sternen Masterpiece exploring conflict between Markets and Morals
Must read to understand the existing confilcts betweeen morality and markets. And also how in past the market, in almost all the cases, has been able to modify the morals to its own will.
The Author sites all the possible examples to make home the point that eventhough most economists consider good unaffected by the markets, but in reality the market corrupt the goods and the values to make its way in hetherto unpaved areas.
And a debate is necessary to what extent we are willing to give way to market to modify the morals.
As always Micheal Sandale will not disappoint you. Best book which exploree this conflict.
Just go for it. You will know that Micheal Sandale is famous for all the right reasons.
Truely "A Rockstar" in Western Philosophy.
-
Simon RotelliBewertet in Italien am 18. September 20195,0 von 5 Sternen L'ho regalato a mia figlia grande, quindi 5 stelle per me!
Lettura davvero molto interessante, che aiuta a non banalizzare la questione dell'opportunità di creare alcuni mercati e ricorda semplicemente quali sono le conseguenze.
In particolare ho apprezzato la leggerezza con la quale Sandel affronta la questione: non fa il filosofo moralizzatore, offre una serie concreta di esempi e ricorda solo di soffermarsi un attimo sulle considerazioni etiche, senza paura di non allinearsi ai 'liberisti a tutti i costi' o ai 'markettari'.
In questi giorni, una delle mie tre splendide figlie, la grande, ha iniziato a studiare economia all'università. Nelle prime due lezioni hanno affrontato il concetto di 'beni' e 'bisogni', concetti che ha trovato abbastanza banali... "sono cose che tanto non chiederenno all'esame".
Le ho comprato questo libro, in edizione cartacea, per farle capire quanto invece serva non banalizzare questi due concetti! Speriamo lo legga!
-
EduardoBewertet in Mexiko am 5. Mai 20175,0 von 5 Sternen Análisis filosófico en lenguaje sencillo
El autor tiene la facilidad de tomar temas profundos y explicarlos de una forma clara y amena. Recomendable para quien le guste el enfoque de profundidad en este tema.


