Buy new:
-22% $17.84$17.84
FREE delivery April 15 - 16
Ships from: Gulf Coast Books LLC Sold by: Gulf Coast Books LLC
Save with Used - Good
$1.99$1.99
$3.98 delivery April 17 - 18
Ships from: glenthebookseller Sold by: glenthebookseller
Sorry, there was a problem.
There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.Sorry, there was a problem.
List unavailable.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Strapped: Why America's 20- and 30-Somethings Can't Get Ahead Hardcover – January 17, 2006
Purchase options and add-ons
Strapped offers a groundbreaking look at the new obstacle course facing young adults—the under-35 crowd—as they try to build careers, buy homes, and start families. As Tamara Draut explains, getting ahead is getting harder. A college degree is the new high school diploma—but it now costs a fortune to get that degree, and students graduate with crippling debts. Good jobs are scarcer thanks to stagnant wages and disappearing benefits. And, the cost of everything—starter homes, health coverage, child care—keeps going up and up. Budding families, even those with two incomes, struggle to pay the bills, while Visa and Mastercard have become the new safety net. Young adults are starting out behind the financial eight ball—borrowing their way into adulthood and wondering whatever happened to the American Dream.
Is this the way things have to be? Not at all, argues Tamara Draut, a leading young commentator and a fresh voice for change. She shows how the obstacle course bedeviling young adults didn’t just happen—it was allowed to happen by a generation of leaders more interested in serving wealthy interests than in investing in the nation’s future. Strapped brims with ideas for a new kind of America where every young person can go to college, buy a home, and start a family.
Strapped will help jump-start a national conversation about where the country is failing—and how we can make it right again.
- Print length288 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherDoubleday
- Publication dateJanuary 17, 2006
- Dimensions5.64 x 0.94 x 8.62 inches
- ISBN-100385515057
- ISBN-13978-0385515054
Frequently bought together

Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
Praise for Strapped
“Strapped tells a story that is compelling, frightening, and ultimately liberating. By giving a clear analysis of what has gone wrong, Draut points the way to how to make it better. This is a must-read for anyone who is young—or anyone who cares about anyone who is young.”
—Elizabeth Warren, Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law, Harvard University, co-author of The Two-Income Trap
“Tamara Draut’s meticulously researched book explains why the transition to adulthood has become almost impossibly difficult for the children of low- and middle-income families. Her highly readable account of bad policy choices and changing market forces will persuade you that this problem demands our immediate attention.”
—Robert Frank, Henrietta Johnson Louis Professor of Management, Cornell University, author of Luxury Fever
“It’s no time to be 21, and we have Tamara Draut to thank for describing to us, in precise detail, the forces arrayed against young people—and what can be done to alleviate the situation.”
– Thomas Frank, author of What’s the Matter With Kansas?
About the Author
Tamara Draut is Director of the Economic Opportunity Program at Demos, a national think tank headquartered in New York City. Her research and writing have appeared in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and Newsweek. A frequent commentator, Draut has appeared on CNN Headline News, CNN’s Lou Dobbs Tonight, CNBC’s Closing Bell, and ABC’s World News Tonight. She lives in New York City with her husband.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Higher and Higher Education
Renee, a white 26-year-old, grew up in St. Paul, Minnesota. Her parents wanted nothing more than to send her to a four-year college when she graduated from high school, but unfortunately, it was priced out of reach. Instead, Renee began taking business classes at a nearby community college that specialized in business training and got a full-time job. She worked during the day and took classes at night.
Some time later, Renee accepted a new job at a nearby printing company. A nice increase in pay was the upside; working the midnight shift was the considerable downside. Suddenly, balancing school and work became a lot more difficult. Renee would work until 8 A.M., sleep in the afternoon, and go to school at night. Eventually, racked with exhaustion, financially stressed out, and supporting an unemployed boyfriend, Renee dropped out of school. Money played a big role in her decision. She had already taken out student loans and burned through a small inheritance from her grandfather. Already $4,500 in the hole with student loans, Renee didn't want to sink any further into debt.
It is now four years later and Renee is still making loan payments. She anticipates it will take at least eight or nine more years to clear the debt. Today, Renee works as a legal secretary, earning $28,000 a year, which must support both her and her son. In the hopes of boosting her earnings potential, Renee has re-enrolled in school, taking correspondence classes with the aim of becoming a paralegal. When I asked Renee if she wished she could have done anything differently up to this point in her life, she didn't hesitate with her answer: "Number one, I would have finished college. I would have actually gone to a four-year college and had a real degree."
Renee is not alone. This is the story of downscaled dreams.
Soaring tuition costs combined with cuts to financial aid have forced students into massive debt and priced many smart kids out of four-year colleges altogether. Every year, 410,000 college-qualified students--just like Renee--from households with incomes less than $50,000 enroll in community college instead of going to a four-year college.(1) Another 168,000 college-qualified students don't enroll in college at all. These students took the SATs, had good grades, and were college-ready. They just didn't have the money. And they weren't willing to play the debt-for-diploma game.
Thirty or forty years ago, skipping college was much less important. While a college degree has always been considered a stepping stone to higher status and greater prosperity, it certainly wasn't expected of everyone. Jobs for high school graduates were plentiful, and many blue-collar workers made good money. Back in the 1970s, an accountant with a B.A. and a steel worker might live on the same block, drive the same cars, eat at the same restaurants, and send their kids to the same public schools. But as the pay difference between high school grads and college grads has widened, so too have the life outcomes. In 1977 there was only a 6 percentage-point difference in home-ownership rates between those with college educations and those without. Today, there is a 20 percentage-point difference. Today the college-haves and the college have-nots live in different worlds.
College: From Nicety to Necessity
Nowadays, entering the real world with only a high school diploma is like going into battle armed with only a squirt gun. Over the last thirty years, earnings for workers with high school diplomas have taken a beating. By 1994, males 25 to 34 without college degrees were earning roughly the same amount as their similarly educated grandfathers earned in 1949.(2) High school students saw the writing on the wall and more began enrolling in college. In 1975, just over half of all high school graduates continued their education after high school. Today, nearly three quarters of high school graduates enroll in some type of college after high school.(3) But those numbers are deceptive. Although young adults may be swarming into college, most are failing to complete their studies. Less than a third of young adults aged 25 to 29 had a bachelor's degree or higher in 2003--a percentage that hasn't kept pace with enrollments.(4) The kind of family someone comes from and the amount of money they can pony up exert a heavy influence on whether a student ends up at a two-year or four-year college and whether or not they will complete their degree. Which means that today's bachelor's degree holders are still a rather select group.
During the same time that a B.A. has become the new entry pass to the middle class, tuitions have soared and our federal financial aid system has fossilized. Of the $70 billion a year the federal government spends on student aid, the vast majority is loan-based aid, and in any case it is nowhere near generous enough to help many students pay for college. As a result, nearly two thirds of students graduate with student loan debt, and low-income students are most likely to be borrowing.(5) As this Red Sea of debt has risen, policymakers have dithered. Every four years or so, Congress votes on whether to make changes to the maximum amount a student can borrow or receive in grants to pay for college. During the 1980s and 1990s, grants to low-income students were bumped up a tad and student loans were made available to families regardless of their income. And yet, the amount of money a student can borrow is still the same as it was in 1992. The maximum Pell Grant award, the nation's premier program for helping poor kids pay for college, covers about one third of the costs of a four-year college today. It covered nearly three quarters in the 1970s.(6) But only 22 percent of Pell Grant recipients get the maximum award.(7)--the average award in 2003 was $2,421, which covered only a quarter of the costs of a four-year public college.8 How is it possible that as college has become more important, access to college has become more out of reach?
Perhaps our members of Congress, the majority of whom are Baby Boomers or older, don't remember just how good their generation had it when it came to being able to afford college. For any Baby Boomers reading this book, I'm about to offer you a trip down memory lane. And for young adults, I'm about to show just how badly we've been short-changed.
The Glory Days of Financial Aid
America prides itself on being a nation of unlimited opportunity. Go to school. Go to work. Go to Florida and retire when you're fifty-five. That's the theory, anyway. While European countries rely heavily on taxes to fund social policies that minimize inequality, America has historically looked to education as the great equalizer. I don't know where we're looking now. As more people want to climb the ladder of educational opportunity, we're simultaneously sawing off the rungs.
The vast system of public universities that exists today was the result of purposeful action by the federal government. In 1862, Congress passed the Morrill Act, named for its sponsor, Congressman Justin Morrill of Vermont, which provided federal land to the states to establish public colleges. The goal of these first land-grant colleges--such as those in Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, and Minnesota--was to educate the entire population and produce research to support emerging industries. In 1890, a second Morrill Act provided land to establish the country's first black colleges.
The nation continued to promote higher education throughout the twentieth century, expanding access to college as a way to redress inequality, foster democratic ideals, and spur economic development. The pledge to kick open the doors to college began in earnest with the "GI Bill of Rights." Officially known as the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944, the goal behind the GI Bill was to help millions of returning veterans "readjust" to civilian life and provide them with the education, skills, and money to successfully reintegrate into society and the economy. The GI Bill provided grants to help veterans pay for tuition, books, and health insurance. It also provided a monthly stipend to help college students pay for living expenses. Back in 1948, veterans received a grant of $500 a year--enough at the time to pay for all but $25 of tuition at Harvard.(9) On top of that, they received a monthly stipend of $50--that's $400 in today's dollars. As a point of comparison, in 2003 the average federal grant to students was $2,421, which falls $24,000 short of tuition and fees at Harvard.(10)
The GI Bill was key to building the massive middle class that exists today.(11) The hundreds of thousands of accountants, teachers, scientists, and engineers educated under the GI Bill helped fuel the long economic expansion of the postwar era and as a result changed the social and economic landscape of America. About 8 million veterans took advantage of the GI Bill, and 2.3 million of these attended colleges and universities. By 1960, half of the members of Congress had gone to college on the GI Bill. With the additional benefits of no-down-payment policies and low-interest mortgages, the GI Bill fostered the great exodus to the suburbs and the establishment of a wide middle class that came to symbolize our country's prosperity and the achievement of the American dream. Not a bad payback for a mere $91 billion investment (in today's dollars).
The kids who grew up in this new middle-class security are today's Baby Boomers. Like their fathers (it was mostly men who profited from the GI Bill), Baby Boomers benefited from generous financial aid policies and dirt-cheap tuition at colleges all across the country. But this time around, Baby Boomer women joined the college stampede.
A new law was passed to reaffirm the radical American idea that anyone should be able to go to college--and be able to pay for it. The Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA) established the college grants and student loans on w...
Product details
- Publisher : Doubleday; 0 edition (January 17, 2006)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 288 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0385515057
- ISBN-13 : 978-0385515054
- Item Weight : 15.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.64 x 0.94 x 8.62 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #4,091,803 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #4,492 in Parenting Teenagers (Books)
- #6,536 in Economic Conditions (Books)
- #83,986 in Sociology (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Looking for specific info?
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 7, 2009This book will not be well received by folks whom social scientists refer to as methodological individualists, people who hold that all explanations of social behavior and aggregate outcomes need be traced to the level of the individual person. Recall Margaret Thatcher's comment that "society doesn't exist," meaning that institutions such as social classes are merely convenient, though sometimes misleading, fictions. In other words, if it happens to you it's on you -- good decisions, bad decisions, good genes, bad genes ... everything that is real and has explanatory power can be traced to the individual level.
Fortunately there is a much more plausible and useful way of making sense of the difficulties that Tamara Draut discusses in Strapped. The period from 1946 until 1972 is sometimes referred to as the Era of the Capital-Labor Social Contract. This post-WWII period occasioned rapid creation of jobs of all kinds. A job, moreover, was much more likely to pay enough so that, should they have wanted to, a man and woman could have gotten married, bought a home, and raised a family on one income. The traditional American family prevailed: the husband worked and the wife took care of the children. This was possible not because people were especially frugal, but because compensation for work was adequate to the task.
With the end of the Era of the Capital-Labor Social Contract, however, more and more jobs were internationalized, out-sourced, subject to down-sizing, and eliminated through technological development. Demand for labor was diminished, compensation for work was dramatically reduced, and, of economic necessity, families with two bread-winners became the norm.
People who chose to live alone had an increasingly difficult time. Things once regarded as taken-for-granted necessities, such as a house or a car, were unaffordable without credit. Greed and an unrealistic sense of entitlement had little or nothing to do with it. People simply did not make enough money to maintain the rudiments of a middle class life style.
This sort of development cannot be traced back to the individual. Instead one must recognize the reality of institutions such as classes, labor markets, and shared internationalization among the organizations that constitute big capital. Given the opportunity, employers of all kinds will drive down wages. It's the rational thing to do. After all, their purpose is to make profit. When their only antagonist is a disorganized, non-internationalized working class, they will experience enormous success.
It is interesting to speculate that the current credit crunch in the U.S. is due largely to the fact that people who wanted to live decently had no choice but to borrow. Compensation for work was simply inadequate. None of this presupposes recklessly living beyond one's means.
Instead, the Era of the Capital-Labor Social Contract set a standard for a decent life. With the passing of that Era, capital gained the upper hand, and did what it rationally should do: increase profits. If this is done at the expense of labor, so be it.
For first-rate discussions of this issue as it applies to Americans in their 30's, 40's, 50's and older, see Schwartz (1997) The Illusions of Opportunity, and Newman (1993) Declining Fortunes.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 1, 2006I think the author is right on target about the high cost of education and housing, but she doesn't mention the extraordinary tax shelters that earlier generations exploited in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, and the subsequent shift of tax burdens from the earlier generations who exploited those tax loopholes to the Gen Xers in the 1990s and 2000s. All this while earlier generations packed the government with social programs that would benefit them down the road at the expense of higher national debt obligations that Gen Xers would have to pay later on.
- Reviewed in the United States on December 2, 2014I am glad this book was on my list of required books for Labor and Economics class. I learned a lot from it and it made me critically thinking about how the economy has impact young adults. Great read. Thank you Tamara Draut!
- Reviewed in the United States on June 10, 2024I really was into this book. I saw that this author wasn’t an unbiased source, but I could overlook much of it…until the book took a turn and started bashing one political party without equally bashing the other showed that this book, though filled with many good and interesting facts, really is just a soapbox for a political debate on why one party is better than the other.
Sigh.
This is a shame that this book turned from an informative and entertaining book to a political campaign.
I did not sign up for this and did not pay for both the physical and kindle book to be told why one political party is to blame for all the woes in the world.
Such a pity.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 27, 2016Its a good read.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 9, 2014THANKS!
- Reviewed in the United States on August 26, 2006I wish I'd read the inside flap before buying this book--the author blows her own premise with this one sentence: "Budding families, even those with two incomes struggle to pay bills, while Visa and MasterCard have become the new safety nets." Emphasis on THE NEW SAFETY NETS!
THIS is why 20-and 30-somethings are strapped from the get-go. Everyone must learn the meaning of EXCESS and when they encounter it.
If you and/or your children are even SOMEWHAT financially savvy, don't waste your money on this book. If you are a Conservative, don't bring this book into your home--it advocates getting more for yourself through entitlement expansion activism. In other words, it's a book written by a Boomer Locust to Locust children, instructing them to continue spending and begging Uncle Sam for more freebies to compensate, instead of going out and working hard for things like college, retirement, medical, etc. It's entitlement mentality that's the main cause of Boomer and Boom Child indebtedness.
Draut, Ehrenreich, and Hirschman are all cast from the same mold--"Woe is me, I am a victim. Save me, Uncle Sam!" I highly suggest you avoid all of these authors.

