Summary: This book does nothing more than provide an excellent history of the debate regarding the origins of math (i.e., “invention”, “discovery”, or some combination thereof). To be frank, I was hoping for more “math” (and perhaps theology), and less philosophy. The title of the book is thus misleading – it is not about math, or God, but is rather a historical summary of a metaphysical debate.
Detailed discussion: This book comprises an intriguing metaphysical debate of math, but noting more. (For the record, metaphysics is (from the internet) “the branch of philosophy that deals with the first principles of things, including abstract concepts such as being, knowing, substance, cause, identity, time, and space.”) That definition pretty much sums up this book – i.e., the book is essentially a summary of the philosophical debate regarding the origins of math. So, notwithstanding the title, there is minimal theological debate in this book – the closest it comes to that end is some quotations (at pgs. 76-77) from Galileo to the effect that math is the language of the universe, and of God. Otherwise, it is basically a summary of the metaphysical debate over the last 2500 years, with no resolution of the debate (to date). Perhaps the author should have prefaced his book with his closing paragraph, which is a quote from Bertrand Russell to the effect that, while the issue may never be resolved by debate, the benefit of the debate is in “enlarge[ing] our conception of what is possible; enrich[ing] our intellectual imagination and diminish[ing] the dogmatic assurance which closes the mind against speculation; but above all because, through the greatness of the universe which philosophy contemplates, the mind is also rendered great, and becomes capable of that union with the universe which constitutes its highest good.” This quote can be interpreted in different ways (e.g., the mind of man is great due to its own existence, or the mind of man is great due to a higher existence). However, the bottom line is the proposal that the real benefit of the “math” debate is in expanding human thought.
From my own personal experience, this book did nothing to expand my mind, other than providing me with information regarding a debate of which I was not previously aware. At best I am left with some information that I can use in future cocktail party conversations (assuming the right audience). If you are interested in abstract (and so-called "mind-expanding") debates, then this book is for you. If not, then don't waste your time with this book. There is very little "math" in it, and even less theology.
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Flip to back Flip to front
Follow the Authors
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
|
MP3 CD, Audiobook, MP3 Audio, Unabridged
"Please retry" | $13.11 | $13.99 |
 |
Frequently bought together
- +
- +
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Choose items to buy together.
Similar books based on genre
Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1
Products related to this item
Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1
Customer reviews
Top reviews from other countries
G Mohan.
Views of many great Mathematics alive and dead
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 11, 2018
Koyaanisqatsi
Unterhaltsame Mathematikgeschichte ...
Reviewed in Germany on June 7, 2010
