Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $14.63 shipping
83% positive over last 12 months
Order it now.
+ $9.21 shipping
+ $9.21 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Follow the Author
OK
Breach of Trust: How Americans Failed Their Soldiers and Their Country (American Empire Project) Hardcover – September 10, 2013
|
Andrew J. Bacevich
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$0.00
|
Free with your Audible trial | |
|
Preloaded Digital Audio Player, Unabridged
"Please retry"
|
$69.99 | — |
-
Print length256 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherMetropolitan Books
-
Publication dateSeptember 10, 2013
-
Dimensions6.07 x 0.96 x 8.47 inches
-
ISBN-100805082964
-
ISBN-13978-0805082968
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
From Booklist
From Bookforum
Review
“Scorching… heartbreaking… Bacevich dismantles the warrior myth we civilians and politicians so enjoy worshiping from afar, and replaces that idol with flesh and blood, vulnerable humans, who deserve better than the profligate, wasteful way in which we treat them.” ―Rachel Maddow, the New York Times Book Review
“Bacevich offers a brilliant critique of an American military system sharply at variance with our democratic republican ideals. Most disturbing is his compelling argument that the fault lies with We the People. A thought-provoking ride.” ―Karl W. Eikenberry, Lieutenant General, U. S. Army (Retired) and former U. S. Ambassador to Afghanistan
“With American warmongers and militarists demanding the bombing of North Korea and intervention in the Syrian civil war, Andrew Bacevich's powerfully written Breach of Trust comes at a critical time. For Bacevich, the problem is perpetual war, a condition fostered by our citizens' detachment from the conflicts America fights. President Obama, Congress, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff should read this book, but the American people must read it because they, to Bacevich, represent the solution.” ―Colonel Gian P. Gentile, Associate Professor of History, West Point
“Breach of Trust is grimly eloquent, with prose as effortless as its truths are hard. In this superb history, Andrew Bacevich reveals the civil-military dysfunction that made this a nation of endless conflicts, waged by a professional warrior class, for a public that has traded civic virtue for mindless flag-waving. This is an original, provocative, and invaluable book for anyone who hasn't given up on America.” ―Nick Turse, author of Kill Anything That Moves: The Real American War in Vietnam
“Like the soldier that he was, Andrew Bacevich is courageous. As the scholar that he is, he is learned. As a citizen, he is impassioned. All this has combined to produce a unique voice of great value in American political life. In Breach of Trust he anatomizes what he knows best, the acute danger our current military institutions and policies pose to American democracy. Anyone who cherishes that democracy should read and heed this book.” ―Jonathan Schell, author of The Unconquerable World and The Real War
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Metropolitan Books; 1st edition (September 10, 2013)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0805082964
- ISBN-13 : 978-0805082968
- Item Weight : 12.3 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.07 x 0.96 x 8.47 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#836,652 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #6,084 in U.S. Political Science
- #9,165 in American Military History
- #42,077 in United States History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The vast majority of major powers in the world abolished conscription in the wake of the United States' decision to do so in 1973 and why not? From the standpoint of any government, abolishing conscription is the best way to keep those pesky ordinary people out of the business of war. Peacetime conscription may have been a response to the unique emergency of the Cold War but Bacevich argues that it also made the army representative of the people and gave the latter skin in the game, creating a uniquely desirable (if short lived) state of affairs.
The United States military today is just like that of Rome or Britain at the height of those countries' empires and is accordingly mired in similar unending missions. The only real way for the people to control where and to do what the army is sent, is for the people (and not just people with no better options) to make up the army. Bacevich's argument, though spare (only 196 pages) convinced me completely. Five stars.
A criticism of Bacevich I have read in the past is that all his books are essentially the same: The misuse of the country's military to solve matters of international diplomacy. However, a close look at his work shows how he systematically analyzes each facet of how the government, and in turn the country's citizens, look to using the armed forces as an end in itself to maintain America's role as the one indispensable nation on the planet.
A must read for those interested in what a lack of genuine concern, and in turn, the responsibilities of citizenship, for the men and women in uniform will affect the country's future.
Mike Gosling
As much emphasis as other readers have placed on Bacevich's call to return to conscription, I don't see it as that central. Is it really much of a retardant of machinations of the powerful elites who make those decisions? I think not; where was the resistance during the first 20 years of US involvement in Indochina (1945-1965), for example? And, often as not, the resistance within the military that emerged very near the end of US involvement there came from enlistees rather than draftees. And the draft in the post-WWII period never really hoovered in many who were outside the demographic that continues to enlist under the VOLAR, so who serves and who doesn't--absent a radical change in the workings of the still-intact Selective Service System--would not in all likelihood change with a return to statutory conscription.
Top reviews from other countries
As always the arguments are precise and backed up with thorough references. But it's not just thoroughness of thought and robust moral framework that impresses. It's his ability to locate his argument within a clear historical context and in doing so, to illuminate the present. As is so often the case, he manages to put into words and flesh out ideas that I've only dimly percieved.
For once though, I did think there were some limitations. Obviously Vietnam happened without an all-volunteer force, so going back to a citizen-soldier ethic isn't likely to achieve very much without major political changes elsewhere.





