First, the book: it is standard paperback perfectbound. Nothing special, but not exceptionally bad. I believe the hardcover is also perfectbound (they should call it "lousybound") instead of sewn; and why would I buy a hardcover, if the binding is not sewn? It won't lay open flat, which makes it even harder to read than a paperback! For $8.00, cheaper than some others, this translation is by far the best on the market.
Hays is faithful to the Greek (sometimes overliteral, rarely overfree), more so than other translations. Hays manages to transmit more of the style and mood of Aurelius' actual writing than any other translation by an order of magnitude: this can be a blessing or a curse.
However much I demand that my Bibles be literally/formally translated to carry over as much as possible even of the order and form of the God-breathed words (I can't read Hebrew or Aramaic), it's not something I desire in literature, for which, being uninspired (except artistically), the actual words and idioms used generally have no great value, the value instead being in the sense of the text. (I think Hofstadter's Godel Escher Bach is an exception to this, and can't imagine that it can be translated, as so much of the meaning of the book depends on form and peculiarities of the English language.)
St Jerome had much the same opinion, stating, I believe in an epistle to St Augustine while defending his (debatable) choice of translating his Vulgate from the Jews' modern Hebrew (which had already entered in on the process of eliminating prophecies of Christ, leaving us with gems such as, "like a lion my hands and feet", which, with different pointing, reads, "they have pierced my hands and feet" - the first one doesn't even make sense!) instead of their ancient Septuagint Greek: "When translating the sacred scriptures, I attempt to give Greek and Hebrew a clothing of Latin, retaining even the word order so far as it is possible [that is, formal translation: in the process giving rise to "Ecclesiastical Latin", as the Vulgate is no more Ciceronian or Virgilian Latin than Spanish is] but when translating the works of men, I endeavor to translate the sense of what is being said, not only the words [that is, dynamic translation]".
De Selincourt's translations of Livy are some of the best examples of the latter. Livy is far from inspired: I care little about the form of the words he used, but the sense. De Selicourt's translation has me laughing aloud, much as I imagine the original readers would have, at the constant ineptitude and malice of the tribunes, always pushing for "agrarian reform" as a rallying-cry. Ancient historians did not set out to write just a history, but also a work of great literature: mere modern history was accounted unworthy of the pen, and was for the annals of the priests, to be recorded in lists of names, locations, and dates. Names, locations, and dates do not alone a history make: the ancients understood this. That's why ancient history, from Livy to Plutarch*** to Suetonius to Xenophon to Tacitus to Polybius, is uniformly excellent, and why modern history is uniformly bad in comparison. The best of modern history, the transitional and seminal Decline and Fall of Gibbon, is the closest one comes, but it is colored and ruined by a deep hatred of all things clerical, Catholic, and Christian, which absolutely permeates the work, and a subtext of love for the barbaric Mohammedans, whom he viewed as "rational" in comparison. At least he got his bias towards the degenerate Byzantine empire and its ossified Orthodox religion right.
***Speaking of Plutarch, one has two choices: the modern and decent translations of Penguin in horrible editions, issued in half a dozen books with many lives overlapping (i.e. Alexander is in two books, Caesar in three) in a series that is still incomplete, with the lives presented out of order and Plutarch's comparisons either omitted entirely or presented after one of the lives mentioned, whereas the life being compared to is not even in the same volume, let alone back to back: or Modern Library's old translation from the 1600s (updated in the 1800s to remove the most archaic verbiage and most of the archaic pronouns) that reads poorly (even worse than Dickens, and I hate Dickens), as a stereotyped "classic", but is presented in two volumes in correct order with the comparisons, much as Plutarch intended. One needs both editions, so one can read the Penguin translations in the order given in Modern Library, and then read Modern Library's printing of Plutarch's comparisons of lives. (If one had to choose one or the other, the trade-off for readability in the Penguin is too great, compared to the poor presentation: one should choose the Modern Library.)
That brings me to the best of the "truly modern" historians, Steven Runciman; his work is terrible compared to the ancients, and stellar compared to the rest of the moderns, who are more suited to writing technical specifications or books of law than anything else. Lest anyone think the moderns are more truthful or less biased, Runciman's obsessive fawning over that same decrepit Orthodox religion and overweening sympathy for the degenerate Byzantines (and even a hint of sympathy for those enemies of all civilization, the paynim foe, the Mohammedan, who had encroached on the lands of Christendom for four centuries and were slaughtering and enslaving pilgrims to the Holy Land to attempt to prop up their failing empire by trying to acquire new sources of dhimmis wherever they could be found) should dispel that notion - only sourcing has been improved. But even with bibliographies, one can choose and weight a work towards those extremely biased sources, such as Anna Komnena's report of the Crusade (which Runciman relies heavily upon). Warren Carroll is likely the best historian of our generation, with Jaroslav Pelikan close behind; but Jaroslav Pelikan, unlike Carroll and Toynbee, did not do "surveys of history", but focused on a very specific topic. Much as all of the professions, except for the noble philosophers and theologians (and even those, to a degree) have become so cripplingly overspecialized as to be facetious to non-specialists.
Some philosophy (notably Aristotle) requires the translation to be stiff if one is to follow Aristotle's thought, and not the translator's interpretation of his philosophy (much like the Bible), which can never be trusted today. It reminds me of the old Bollingen Plato which I had to use when studying philosophy, before the much better Hackett editions and the new single-volume one were released, where all of the introductions gushed, "Plato was so smart - almost as smart as we (Hume, Locke, Kant, Hegel, Heidegger) are!" (blasphemy - Aristotle had more philosophical sense when he grunted to take a shite than Hume did in thirty years of writing ponderous tomes of trash).
For other translations, "The Emperor's Handbook" is lousy, IMO. It's too loose. I cut my teeth on Staniforth's translation, which is archaic, overly flowery, and too loose at the same time. I think the Hammond translation is the second best (after Hays) out there.
I also prefer Hays immensely because he leaves "logos" untranslated (instead of translating it as a range of words, improperly injecting interpretation in to the text, as no one option, such as "reason", works in all places in the Meditations), and, reading the book as a Catholic, I am often amazed at the insights towards Christ (the Logos) that are revealed in the jarring disconnect between the English translation and the transliteration of "logos" - I often think that Emperor Marcus Aurelius was writing about Christ; whether by accident of language, coincidence of Hellenistic philosophy, divine inspiration, or because the Christian ethos had already so permeated the Empire by the time of the writing of the Meditations, I know not. Nevertheless, Hays' translation can be used in places nearly as a Christian devotional instead of reading like Enlightenment garbage crossed with paleo-paganism and new ageism, as the Staniforth translation reads (always capitalizing "Reason", "the Whole [as in, 'return to "the Whole" at death']"). When reading Greek philosophy, "logos" is such a common word it loses its power and distinction as essentially the Incarnate Word, appearing constantly in contexts where Christ never would because of the nature of truth, being seen as in a mirror darkly - not so in the Meditations, this translation has shown, wherever "logos" is, one can insert "the Logos" and get an even greater sense of Aurelius' text - I am tempted to say a sensius plenor.
Enjoy fast, FREE delivery, exclusive deals and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club? Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Flip to back Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
- Read with Our Free App
-
Audiobook
$0.00 - 44 Used from $5.48 30 New from $7.95
Four cousins navigate love, loss, and the meaning of family over the course of one memorable year in this heartfelt family drama. | Learn more
Frequently bought together
$7.99
Get it as soon as Tuesday, Jun 6
In Stock.
Total price:
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Choose items to buy together.
What do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Popular Highlights in this book
Choose not to be harmed—and you won’t feel harmed. Don’t feel harmed—and you haven’t been.Highlighted by 10,417 Kindle readers- The present is all that they can give up, since that is all you have, and what you do not have, you cannot lose.Highlighted by 10,281 Kindle readers
- The things you think about determine the quality of your mind. Your soul takes on the color of your thoughts.Highlighted by 9,000 Kindle readers
From the Publisher
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| MEDITATIONS JOURNAL | MEDITATIONS EBOOK | |
| Makes the perfect gift for anyone interested in Stoicism! Drawing from the iconic Stoic text Meditations by Marcus Aurelius, this journal will allow readers to deepen their understanding of this philosophy and reflect on how to better their lives. | Discover the eBook edition! Nearly two thousand years after it was written, Meditations remains profoundly relevant for anyone seeking to lead a meaningful life. |
Videos
Page 1 of 1Start OverPage 1 of 1
Videos for this product
1:46
Click to play video
Customer Review: Mind Loom Book Review by Omar M Khateeb
Omar M Khateeb
Videos for this product
1:47
Click to play video
What If I Told You TODAY is the LAST day of your LIFE?
Ray's Reviews
Videos for this product
0:41
Click to play video
Meditations: A New Translation
Amazon Videos
Videos for this product
3:24
Click to play video
This book changed my Life - Meditations Review
Marcus Stone
About the author
Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Amazing book - Arrival was less than impressive
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2023
Obviously Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations is not up for debate. I am taking off a star for the way it arrived. There were some bent pages throughout.And there was a gross film of fingerprints on the front and back cover, or maybe someone touched it with sticky hands before sending it off. I had to clean it with a damp microfiber cloth. Otherwise, wonderful.
Reviewed in the United States on May 16, 2023
Images in this review
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on February 22, 2012
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on May 27, 2023
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on May 16, 2023
And there was a gross film of fingerprints on the front and back cover, or maybe someone touched it with sticky hands before sending it off. I had to clean it with a damp microfiber cloth. Otherwise, wonderful.
Amazing book - Arrival was less than impressive
Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on May 16, 2023
Obviously Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations is not up for debate. I am taking off a star for the way it arrived. There were some bent pages throughout.Reviewed in the United States 🇺🇸 on May 16, 2023
And there was a gross film of fingerprints on the front and back cover, or maybe someone touched it with sticky hands before sending it off. I had to clean it with a damp microfiber cloth. Otherwise, wonderful.
Images in this review
Top reviews from other countries
Arupratan
About Various Translations of "Meditations"
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on June 5, 2019
Arupratan
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on June 5, 2019
This collection of sublime thoughts compiled as a book (originally titled as "Eis Heauton", meaning: "To Himself"; original language was Greek) has never gone out of print since circa AD 161. The writer, Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, was a Roman emperor and the most renowned stoic philosopher of antiquity. My review though is not about the book itself but about the various available translations of the book.
There are three noted translations which are most readily available in market:
1. A. S. L. Farquharson's Everyman's Library hardcover edition.
2. Martin Hammond's Penguin Classics edition.
3. Gregory Hays' Modern Library edition.
The first one is the most revered edition published in 1944. Though the physical appearance of this edition is the most eye-catching with an elegantly produced hardcover binding and handsome printing, the translation seems dated and old-fashioned. If you want to exhibit your book collection in front of people, you may buy this edition. Though for reading pleasure and better understanding of the philosophy, I'll not recommend it.
The second edition by Penguin (2006) is better than the Farquharson's as far as readability is concerned, but avoid this one too. This translation is more inclined to the exactness of the original text than the readability or understandability of the writing. As it seems, this is the bestselling edition of "Meditations" as far as the Amazon's Indian website is concerned. Thanks to the Penguin Classics tag attached to it, perhaps. No matter what, this is NOT the best edition in comparison.
The last edition which is by Hays (2002), in my opinion (and as per the general consensus as well), is the best edition available. This is the most comprehensible translation of "Meditations" for the modern readers. The language is fluid and contemporary. If you want to study the thoughts of Aurelius more profoundly then get this Gregory Hays edition, paperback published by Modern Library (snapshots attached).
Images in this review
Amazon Customer
Beware multiple versions
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on July 19, 2020vivek mishra
One of the best eye-opening book I ever read but not for those who are unfamiliar of stoicism.
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on October 4, 2020
vivek mishra
Reviewed in India 🇮🇳 on October 4, 2020
1)You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
2)Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.
3)If you are distressed by anything external, the pain is not due to the thing itself, but to your estimate of it; and this you have the power to revoke at any moment.
4)When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...
5)Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present.
Thank you for reading my review, I hope it gave you overview of the book and if you know any more great books then please suggest more books on stoic philosophy.
Images in this review
Florian Dublin
Profound. Challenging. Life Changing.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 on November 9, 2021
