Follow the Author
OK
The Race for What's Left: The Global Scramble for the World's Last Resources Paperback – December 24, 2012
|
Michael T. Klare
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
Print length320 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherPicador
-
Publication dateDecember 24, 2012
-
Dimensions5.65 x 0.89 x 8.27 inches
-
ISBN-101250023971
-
ISBN-13978-1250023971
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
Review
“A first-rate, well-researched wake-up call.” ―The Christian Science Monitor
“Outstanding…Exhaustively researched, beautifully written, and convincingly argued.” ―The Huffington Post
“Stunning.” ―Rolling Stone
“Reading this book, it's hard not to think about postapocalyptic fiction….Think Margaret Atwood, Cormac McCarthy, and, most recent, Suzanne Collins's Hunger Games. Yet novelists often skip over the messy parts along the road to dystopia. It's scary to think that Klare, far from crying wolf, might be providing the sordid details in real time.” ―Science News
“If you think oil is the only major thing we're running short of, think again.…Crisp, authoritative…A guidebook to wars to come.” ―Adam Hochschild, author of King Leopold's Ghost
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Picador; First edition (December 24, 2012)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1250023971
- ISBN-13 : 978-1250023971
- Item Weight : 10.3 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.65 x 0.89 x 8.27 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,078,254 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,247 in Environmental Policy
- #1,448 in Natural Resources (Books)
- #2,871 in Environmental Economics (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
1. The demand for natural resources will continue to grow
2. The supply of these resources will continue to shrink
3. The search for new sources of hydrocarbons, common and uncommon minerals, water and arable land will intensify over time and likely will generate resources wars.
In a nutshell, we are now passing from an "easy-resource world" to a "hard-resource world." This claim encapsulates a few disturbing facts: Existing oil wells no longer produce at the rate they once had and once productive mines have become stingy. These key resources have peaked or will peak soon, and this fact will drive commerce in the future. More importantly, fallow and potentially productive farm land has become scarce in various locales due to overuse, desertification, urbanization and other destructive forms of consumption. We can expect food shortages to intensify as time passes. Furthermore, increasing demand will augment this `natural' scarcity. Brazil, Russia, India and China are industrializing (or reindustrializing in Russia's case). Other countries have also taken off. Many are trying to develop their productive capacity and their natural resources. The industries in many of these countries are now competitive in the global market and will consume a growing share of the planet's raw goods. They will produce finished or near-to-finished goods, some of which will be shipped abroad and some of which will supply their local `haves' with the commodities of a `modern' consumer culture. Consumer demand, the system of production it drives and the quest for profits will thus continuously diminish the quantity of available raw materials. These goods are finite in number and, in some cases, lack an adequate substitute. Impelled by local and global demand as well as by the scarcity of the materials needed to compete, countries and firms will intensify their search for new sources of these increasingly scarce resources. Finding and using these goods will be neither easy nor cheap. We can expect competition for these resources to be intense.
This, therefore, is the race for what's left: We have consumed so much of the planet's resources that we can only renew our supply of these materials by finding new sources, mostly in inhospitable locales. We can also expect these new sources to be either less productive than the sources they replace or made to produce only with more effort, greater risks and higher costs. Arctic drilling and mining provide the exemplary cases of this problem. They are not the only cases, however. Worst of all, the race for what's left can never end given the nature of a modern and global economic system. Resource use today necessarily generates the scarcity of tomorrow.
Klare, oddly enough, gives little attention to one resource now in decline: An environment fit for human habitation. Global warming can and will likely become a species threat. Industrial waste befouls the land, water and atmosphere. A proud humankind may not survive the externalities generated by its supposed achievements. Of course, the global warming catastrophe has already begun, and the task humans must complete to survive goes well beyond taking measures that will ensure we avoid that dire situation. There is no magic bullet solution to this situation. The task instead requires pulling on the brake handle before it becomes too late to save ourselves and the world we have long inhabited.
It may have been inevitable that "The Race for What's Left' will not inspire hope for the future. The race is driven by the need to conserve the industrial method of production, techniques and resource usage which cause global warming and resource depletion. The sense I got from reading Klare's book is that we can expect national states to seek to secure the resources they need before it is too late to do so, too late to keep pace in a increasingly ruthless world economic system. Capitalist firms, on the other hand, will continue to seek out profitable uses for their technological capabilities and, of course, their property in general. The fortunate ones may take superprofits from their efforts, using resource scarcity to extract rents from the consumers of their goods. The stakes for these firms are very high and will increase in the future since countries and firms that fail to compete in the emerging markets can end in social disintegration, subjugation and bankruptcy because of their failure. Path dependent development entails confronting a socio-political rigidity that can prove fatal. Why fatal? At present, the world devotes little to the effort to pull on the brake handle, to radically alter the direction of material progress. Rather, it devotes treasure and blood reproducing the disaster.
The situation grows increasingly dire, and hopes for the future depend upon the human capacity for reasonable thought and action as well as for generating solidarity among humanity's diverse parts. In this situation -- yoked as we are to techniques and social forms which cannot sustain themselves -- gaining hope for the future entails confronting the hopelessness of our very modern predicament.
I gave "Race for What's Left" four stars. It is an accessible, well-researched and timely intervention into the world public sphere. I deducted a star because it is not the definitive work on the subject, although I should state that Klare clearly did not mean it to be such.
I shall add no "images," as apparently Amazon's screening of reviews believes I did and refused to publish this review of this crucial book.
However I would argue that even if the world population had remained at say the size it was before the Industrial Revolution, wars would still be caused primarily by economic competition between nation states, reflecting competiton between industries and businesses, and above all by competition for profit..
Top reviews from other countries
Then there's about four pages where he offers his 'solution': renewable energy.
At this point there is still quarter of the book left to read, and you are expecting him to put some meat on the bones of the framework he has laid out for the reader. Surely now the book will really get interesting. Where is all this going to lead? What is the future for mankind? But no! The book ends there. Fully a quarter of the book, the final 70 pages are taken up with notes and references.
He has spent the whole book telling us we can't carry on growing our population and consuming all the resources, because eventually we'll run out of not only energy, but also something even more critical and which certainly cannot be replaced with renewable resources: agricultural land (and living space). But he never once considers that the problem is caused by there being too many people, and the solution isn't merely to switch to renewable energy sources (although undoubtedly, a not only desirable step but one which we will eventually have no choice about), but to control our numbers! Should we grasp the nettle and do it now, when it would be challenging but doable, gradually, over time? Or should we wait for nature to enforce harsh limits on our numbers by one day finding that the planet can't produce enough food for 10 or 12 or 15 billion people? But he never asks this question, nor offers any solutions, commentary or analysis.
The book quickly becomes monotonous, offers no particular insight and I did not find it of much value.





