Buying Options
| Print List Price: | $12.49 |
| Kindle Price: |
$6.93
Save $5.56 (45%) |
| includes VAT* |
You’ve got a Kindle.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Enter your mobile phone or email address
By pressing "Send link," you agree to Amazon's Conditions of Use.
You consent to receive an automated text message from or on behalf of Amazon about the Kindle App at your mobile number above. Consent is not a condition of any purchase. Message & data rates may apply.
The Plan That Broke the World: The “Schlieffen Plan” and World War I (What Were They Thinking? Book 2) Kindle Edition
|
Price
|
New from | Used from |
-
LanguageEnglish
-
Publication dateMarch 10, 2014
-
File size6363 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Customers who read this book also read
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
William D. “Will” O’Neil studied math and business economics; served 4½ years as a U.S. naval officer (plus another 26 years in the Naval Reserve, retiring as a captain); was a systems engineer in industry and government, working on development of many sensor systems, command and control systems, ships, and aircraft; and became first an engineering manager and then an executive in government and industry. Since the 1970s he has worked very closely as an advisor to top-level officials, commanders, and executives in government and industry.
He made his living by knowledge and worked tirelessly to expand it—technology, war, management, and the physical, biological, and social sciences.
Along the way O’Neil has written a great deal. Much in the form of reports that are secret, or at least not available for public viewing, but there have been dozens of open reports, articles, novels and various other pieces.
His Web site is at analysis.williamdoneil.com
--This text refers to the paperback edition.Product details
- ASIN : B00IXRCC4Y
- Publication date : March 10, 2014
- Language : English
- File size : 6363 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 205 pages
- Lending : Enabled
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,262,936 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #1,320 in World War I History (Kindle Store)
- #2,674 in Business Decision-Making
- #3,757 in World War I History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The author argues that the Schlieffen Plan, such as it was, failed because the German army could not effectively adjust operations as the campaign unfolded. This deficiency resulted from a lack of reconnaissance to gain useful intelligence, communications to exercise command and control, and motorization to rapidly move forces. Thus, once the field armies went into the attack, senior commanders were unable to bring their combat strength to bear on the French army's vulnerabilities.
Because of its easy-reading style and unique focus on campaign planning and decision-making, this book will appeal to generalists and specialists alike.
General Schlieffen was the German war theorist who in 1906 produced a short memo describing a possible scenario for German victory in a war against France. The proposal was for German troops to invade northeastern France by launching massive assaults which cut through the territory of neutral Belgium. Belguim was created in 1839, following the Napoleonic wars, to provide a buffer small nation between France, Germany and Great Britain across the English channel.
O';Neill teaches us that the plan was never put into practice as General von Moltke was unable to mount the necessary troops and provide the proper transportation and logistical support to make it work. Though the Prussian military tradition had produced an efficient and deadly fighting army plans did not go according to Hoyle for the Kaiser's troops. Stalemate rather than swift movement became the sanguinary norm on the Western Front until allied victory in 1918.
The books with strategy and briefly profiles the political and military leaders of the combatant nations. Nevertheless, it is an easy read as the author has the ability to convey complex matters in an easily grasped format. The book is lavishly illustrated containing many well drawn maps. Anyone who is studying the genesis of World War I would do well to buy this succinct and valuable work
which has more information than many other longer and more expensive books on the topic. Recommended.
This new book offers an atypical and highly readable focus directly on the Schlieffen Plan itself. The author's upfront disclaimer, that he is not a professional historian and has not relied upon new archival research, is important, valid, and welcome, but should not obscure that this crisp and cogent study also develops valuable historical insights. The thoughtful and logically flowing text is neatly augmented by clear, well-positioned maps, judiciously-chosen photographs, and sparse yet adequate end notes.
My previous understanding of the Schlieffen Plan was shaped by reading, decades ago, Barbara Tuchman's "Guns of August" (now more than half as old as the war's outbreak itself) which implies that failures in execution were important: Schieffen's dying word advice, a year before the war's outbreak, "make the right [flank] strong," was undermined by Germany shifting some of its forces from the right to the center/middle flank and to the eastern front, and by von Kluck's First Army "turning" before Paris instead of proceeding further west to "envelope" the French capital from the side or rear. This new work builds on convincing elements of more recent studies, such as that of Terence Zuber, to argue not only that, even with more skillful execution, the Schlieffen Plan was impractical and imprudent (the downside risks of failure were disproportionate to the upside potential of success, and the odds of success were small anyway), but also that it really wasn't even a plan at all, but more of a "thought experiment," used by German strategists even more reliant upon doctrine, training, and wishful thinking.
In place of professional historical training, the author promises to deploy "other qualifications of value," and this book does not disappoint. The ability to explain military strategy in clear layman's terms is repeatedly brought to bear, as in "have you ever walked fifteen miles...[per day, carrying] fifty pounds...in blazing heat...for four weeks?" Or, in estimating that "to deploy for battle" promptly, the main thrust of Germany's invading army needed transit corridors double the width actually available.
Author William O'Neil persuasively indicates that not optimally exploiting existing transport and communication technologies essential to the "war of movement" envisaged by its planners contributed to the failure of Germany's initial attack. There was sufficient stationary thunder, but not enough Blitzkrieg. This limitation was compounded by a lack of sufficient troops to defeat France fast enough to thereafter shift large numbers to shore up the (initially) lightly-manned eastern front against Russia. To the extent that Schieffen's thought experiment might have been an argument for a larger German army, it had failed even before the war began. At any rate in place of the theoretical "Schlieffen bear-hug" envelopment, the actual German assault was more like a "billy goat...doing a lot of damage but never delivering an annihilating blow and ultimately exhausting itself."
Going beyond straight historical analysis, the book counterfactually and plausibly suggests that investing in trucks rather than dreadnought warships might have given Germany's rightwing attack on France a decisive edge, and more radically, that an altogether different strategy, consistent with dynamic Bismarckian flexibility, and based on a mobile "active defense," would have had better chances. Instead Germany, and its Austro-Hungarian ally, pursued the "glittering payoffs" of neutralizing their opponents for a long time, but in so doing undertook "extraordinary risks." The German war planners "strained at gnats of principle and swallowed camels of aggression."
O'Neil's argument points to a fatally rigid path dependency in early twentieth century German military thinking. Prussian strategies (active reserves, mass education, mass conscription, skill training, flexible and rapidly deployed defense through attack, etc.) that worked so brilliantly in Bismarck's mid-19th century wars of unification were misapplied in 1914 on a catastrophic scale that "broke the world." Only at the final stage of proceeding from his logical and well-formulated argument to such conclusions does O'Neil seriously part from historical analyses, to make (plausible but tentative) psychological observations about the general limitations of human risk-taking on a massive and modern scale. The book series promised along such lines seems likely to offer further value to historians, however, and I will be looking forward to seeing future volumes come forth.
O'Neil understandably dodges the "war guilt" minefield, as have most other recent historians, but this book also has implications there worth noting briefly. Few commentators now hold Germany either solely responsible or blameless for the Great War's outbreak, but the question of relative severity amongst the multitude of blunders made by all parties (and thereby over-determining the war's causes) still has relevance. This book modestly, yet persuasively, strengthens the case that Germany's errors were not only more significant in scale and import than those of other countries, but also that the "Schlieffen Plan's" flaws were rather more irremediable and predictable than has been generally appreciated.
Top reviews from other countries
第一次世界大戦の本は第二次世界大戦に比べると確かに少ないのですが、それでも星の数ほど
ありますので、特徴が際立っていないと記憶にも残りません。
この本は開戦時の各国の国境線変化や勢力の変化を豊富なカラー地図で説明しつつ、
シュリーフェンプランの説明(原案と現実の違い)に加え、第一次世界大戦当時の銃器、
重砲、偵察方法、輸送機器についての説明と写真迄備わっています。
特に開戦前のプロシアの国境線図の推移は大変に楽しめます。
第一次世界大戦は地図が豊富でないと、テキストだけでは訳が分かりませんから!









