Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Anarchy, State, and Utopia Kindle Edition
First published in response to John Rawls' A Theory of Justice, Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia has since become one of the defining texts in classic libertarian thought. Challenging and ultimately rejecting liberal, socialist, and conservative agendas, Nozick boldly asserts that the rights of individuals are violated as a state's responsibilities increase—and the only way to avoid these violations rests in the creation of a minimalist state limited to protection against force, fraud, theft, and the enforcement of contracts.
Winner of the 1975 National Book Award, Anarchy, State and Utopia remains one of the most philosophically rich defenses of economic liberalism to date. With a new foreword by Thomas Nagel, this revised edition introduces Nozick and his work to a new generation of readers.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBasic Books
- Publication dateNovember 12, 2013
- Grade level8 and up
- File size1070 KB
Editorial Reviews
Review
"[Nozick's] critique of America's social welfare system...continues to define the debate between conservatives and liberals."―Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, New York Times
"[S]imply and elegantly written, with charm and wit...brilliantly reasoned and contrary."
―Washington Post"No contemporary philosopher possesses a more imaginative mind, broader interests, or greater dialectical abilities than Robert Nozick."―Harper's
"Complex, sophisticated and ingenious."―The Economist
"[Nozick's] powers of argument are profound, and his insights are at times staggering in their brilliance."―New Republic
"[Nozick is] one of the 20th century's greatest political theorists."―The Guardian
"[A] powerful critique of the Left-liberal moral philosophy that underpinned the welfare state...a kind of libertarian manifesto."―Telegraph (UK)
"This book is the best piece of sustained analytical argument in political philosophy to have appeared for a very long time."―Mind
"[Nozick's] faculties of reasoning and imagination are rare; his learning is enormous and interconnected...His ability to surround a subject, to anticipate objections, to see through weakness and pretense, to extract all the implications of a contention, to ask a huge number of relevant questions about a seemingly settled matter, to enlarge into full significance what has only been sketched by others, is amazing."―George Kateb
"A brilliant and important book, bound to contribute notably both to theory and, in time, to the good of society."―W. V. Quine, Harvard University
Review
"...complex, sophisticated and ingenious." Economist
About the Author
Robert Nozick was Pellegrino University Professor at Harvard University. His book Anarchy, State, and Utopia received a National Book Award.
Product details
- ASIN : B06XCF7RY1
- Publisher : Basic Books (November 12, 2013)
- Publication date : November 12, 2013
- Language : English
- File size : 1070 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 386 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,129,094 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #131 in Libertarianism
- #341 in Radical Thought
- #346 in Political Freedom (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the content to be a good philosophical approach to what happened in the 1960s. Opinions are mixed on readability, with some finding it a very good read and concise, while others say it's difficult to appreciate.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book's content good, interesting, and sensible. They also say it contains ingenious arguments and a very interesting political perspective. Customers also describe the utopia section as interesting.
"...and the narrative is not always easy to follow, but the conclusions are well thought out and compelling...." Read more
"...Nozick's book is an outstanding logical development, building a philosophical framework upon a presuppositional base of preeminence of individual..." Read more
"A very challenging work of philosophy...." Read more
"...Nozick is an excellent and insightful critic of the state; between just the two of them, his Wilt Chamberlain and Tale of a Slave illustrations..." Read more
Customers find the style elegant and difficult to argue with.
"...He advances a simple, elegant, and difficult-to-argue-with libertarianism, one that forms a foundation for libertarian thinking today...." Read more
"...It is bright and shiny and attractive...." Read more
"Lucid, insightful, and funny!..." Read more
Customers are mixed about the readability. Some find the book very good, engaging, and worth the effort. They also say the book is concise in its arguments. However, others say it's difficult to appreciate, comprehend, and the author's argument is too sketchy.
"A very challenging work of philosophy. Not an easy read, but a very rewarding one; Robert Nozick clearly and exhaustively lays out the groundwork..." Read more
"...Overall, this is a highly engaging book, and a must-read for any serious student of political philosophy." Read more
"...The reasoning is complex at times and the narrative is not always easy to follow, but the conclusions are well thought out and compelling...." Read more
"...He advances a simple, elegant, and difficult-to-argue-with libertarianism, one that forms a foundation for libertarian thinking today...." Read more
Reviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Definitely recommended for everyone interested in political philosophy no matter what your current opinions are on the subject. The book is not just presenting one “truth”, but explores a number of alternative views with a conclusion well grounded in the arguments presented. I don’t think you need to agree with the author’s conclusions, at least I enjoyed and was impressed by the quality of the argumentation as such.
Nozick's book is an outstanding logical development, building a philosophical framework upon a presuppositional base of preeminence of individual rights. I've read it cover-to-cover with interest and profit. This book provides an intellectual base to the school of Libertarianism that so attracts people in Ayn Rand's prose. Notably, I have read late-in-life interviews with Nozick in which he said that he became less libertarian as he got older.
This book really should be read in conjunction with John Rawls' "A Theory of Justice," which I have not yet finished cover-to-cover due to its length and unavailability as an audiobook. After reading the most famous parts in Rawls book, I did finish a few good summaries and commentaries on the "Theory of Justice." Rawls and Nozick were contemporaries in the Philosophy Department at Harvard, and are leading minds on the left and right, respectively, of the American philosophical spectrum.
The Nozick logic leads to a world of perfect individual rights. In this world, charity becomes dependent on the free will of individuals who choose to grant charity. In this world, the more harsh aspects of Social Darwinism become morally permissible. However, the economist's problem of Moral Hazard (the freeloader problem) is completely solved. One who holds individual rights to be preeminent sees this Nozick system as perfectly satisfying the Golden Rule (aka principle of reciprocity), because at the formation of the social contract, all agree to accept individual rights as preeminent, thus "doing unto others as we would have them do to us."
The Rawls logic stems from applying the Golden Rule prior to developing the social contract behind a "veil of ignorance," in which founders/citizens do not yet know the circumstances and advantages of their birth. While complete individual rights may have been present while drawing up the social contract "behind the veil of ignorance," once out in society a measure of compassion and charity becomes almost obligatory, due to agreements made behind the veil of ignorance. In this world, the more harsh aspects of Social Darwinism will not be allowed by the social contract. However, this world is more susceptible to economist's problem of Moral Hazard (the freeloader problem) than Nozick's world.
Interestingly, both the Nozick and Rawls approach can be reconciled with both the Golden Rule and Kant's Categorical Imperative, as can Ayn Rand's thesis (and I've read papers by philosopher graduate students and Ph.D graduates doing so).
My bottom line? If men and women were gods and goddesses, either of these systems could make a happy world. The problem is that we are not.
The final section -- Utopia -- is rather interesting, as Nozick takes a somewhat eclectic viewpoint, arguing that utopia is the journey and not the destination. He spends little time on existing utopian theory, instead pointing out (rightly) the flaws common to virtually all of it, and then discussing an alternative way of considering the idea.
Where Nozick is weakest is his treatment of the alleged necessity of the minimal state; despite thinking he has answered the objections of individualist anarchists, he has at best dodged them. He finishes his treatment of the subject with an entire chapter full of silly utilitarianism, theorising about means of maximising total utils without ever explaining what a util is or how one could possibly measure it, and declares the matter settled. Yet never does he explain what mechanism actually makes it okay to put a gun to somebody's head and extract revenue; perhaps that makes the utils come out.
Overall, this is a highly engaging book, and a must-read for any serious student of political philosophy.
Top reviews from other countries
E, prima ancora degli spunti, quel che resta (e sempre resterà) del libro è il suo valore letterario.
Just wouldn't purchase anything from PBC Distributors. Had a terrible experience.

