Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
What Went Wrong?: The Clash Between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East Paperback – Bargain Price, January 1, 2003
For centuries, the world of Islam was in the forefront of human achievement -- the foremost military and economic power in the world, the leader in the arts and sciences of civilization. Christian Europe was seen as an outer darkness of barbarism and unbelief from which there was nothing to learn or to fear. And then everything changed. The West won victory after victory, first on the battlefield and then in the marketplace.
In this elegantly written volume, Bernard Lewis, a renowned authority an Islamic affairs, examines the anguished reaction of the Islamic world as it tried to make sense of how it had been overtaken, overshadowed, and dominated by the West. In a fascinating portrait of a culture in turmoil, Lewis shows how the Middle East turned its attention to understanding European weaponry, industry, government, education, and culture. He also describes how some Middle Easterners fastened blame on a series of scapegoats, while others asked not "Who did this to us?" but rather "Where did we go wrong?"
With a new Afterword that addresses September 11 and its aftermath, What Went Wrong? is an urgent, accessible book that no one who is concerned with contemporary affairs will want to miss.
- Print length208 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2003
- Dimensions5.31 x 0.47 x 8 inches
- ISBN-109780060516055
- ISBN-13978-0060516055
- Lexile measure1370
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy TerrorPaperback$8.36 shippingGet it as soon as Tuesday, Apr 30Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
History Through the Eyes of Faith: Christian College Coalition SeriesRonald A WellsPaperback$8.50 shippingOnly 12 left in stock - order soon.
Semites and Anti-Semites: An Inquiry into Conflict and PrejudiceBernard Lewis Ph.D.Paperback$8.55 shipping
Worlds Together, Worlds Apart: A History of the World: From the Beginnings of Humankind to the PresentRobert TignorHardcoverOnly 7 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : 0060516054
- Publisher : Harper Perennial (January 1, 2003)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 208 pages
- ISBN-10 : 9780060516055
- ISBN-13 : 978-0060516055
- Lexile measure : 1370
- Item Weight : 7.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.31 x 0.47 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #335,351 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #379 in Middle Eastern Politics
- #669 in Deals in Books
- #1,103 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The author discusses the need for the citizens of the Ottoman empire to emulate the technology of Western Europe. The underlying theme of the book is that European power, resulting from innovation and experiment, changed the balance of power between the Ottoman empire and Europe. But for a Muslim, living in Europe was an abomination. One should not mix with the infidels. The author explains the need though for Muslims to do just this, due to the threats from the West.
[The disciples of hate in 911 clearly did not mind living in Western society and learning of Western devices. One can only wonder if at any moment they may have connected with some of the people in the area in which they were living and then perhaps had second thoughts about what they were going to do. Anger and hate are emotions that are hard to sustain for long periods of time. They require much concentration to preserve. But a little religion always helps in this regard].
The Ottoman's solution to the threat of the West, was, according to the author, to return to the basics of the Islamic religion, a belief he reminds the reader is still predominant in the Middle East. What is most interesting from the standpoint of today is the role of France as being the dominant European influence. In the book the rise of the modern Middle East begins with the invasion of Egypt by Napoleon in 1798. Even before that time French schools existed in the Middle East and the French language was compulsory for military students.
One inevitably compares the three major religions of the West when reading the book. Interestingly, Islam "wins" if judged by tolerance for those of different beliefs and equal rights, but fails miserably when notice is made of the attitudes towards slaves and women. But as the author points out, a slave can become free by choice of his master. The status of woman in Islamic society though is static and immutable, unfortunately.
Clearly Middle Easteners were perplexed by the rise of the West and its achievements. What accounted for the superiority of the West? What is the source of Western success? Clearly, as the book brings out, Middle Easteners were seeking answers beyond that which religion gave them, and, in retrospect, they were certainly correct to doubt the efficacy of religion in this regard. For, as the author notes, it was the infidels who benefited from the changes taking place.
The author also addresses the role of technology in the modern Middle East in bringing about change, imposing limits on both rulers and teachers. But the cowards of 911 used technology in an attempt to bring about the demise of the West. However they could not use it without meeting their own demise, and have thus proven again the sterility of their belief system, and those that supported them.
Another interesting commentary in the book is the role of young people, particularly in Iran. Educated in the West, they brought to Iran the then alien ideas of freedom. With the turmoil now facing the leaders of Iran this very day, this is a special irony. Should one call the young people now battling in the streets of Iran the "New Young Ottomans", in reference to the "Young Ottomans" described in this book? The comparison might be too loose, since the street fighters now were not educated in the West (but they do have access to a huge information base of "corrupting" influences: the Internet).
The biggest tragedy in the history of Middle East is the reluctance of Islamic society to accept the science of the West, given the incredible contributions of the Middle East to modern science and mathematics. The author asks the reader to consider the question as to why one would accept Islam as being an obstacle to freedom, science, and economic development, when in the past, and at that time closer to the sources of Islamic faith than now, it was a pioneer in all three of these? The answer is quite straightforward from the standpoint of science: those that were introducing science were not acting like Muslims when they carried it out. Shall we call them Muslims who sometimes practiced science or scientists who sometimes acted like Muslims? Either designation will hold, for the two are diametrically opposed: no amount of prayer or supplication will bring about the results of science, for that is to be done with discipline of thought and painstaking experimentation...and no scientific experiment can illustrate the soundness of Islam, or indeed of any other religion, Western or otherwise.
In an afterword to the book, the author expresses grief and concern of course over the events of 911. He points out correctly that the followers of bin Laden are only a minority, and that most adherents of Islam are concerned with living in freedom, in living in a world that allows them to live their own lives under a responsible government. The author expresses hope that freedom will triumph as it did over the repressive regimes of the twentieth century.
But it will. The human mind of the twenty-first century is too efficacious to fail in its cause in this regard. And with billions of such minds populating our planet, the odds are against a grim future. Now more than ever is the time to be proud of being a member of the human species.
My notes on this book:
INTRODUCTION
Islam thought it was superior to the West. It failed to notice the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Scientific Revolution, or the Industrial Revolution. For centuries, Islam was dangerously blind to reality.
Islam was outflanked in Asia in the 1600’s: Vasco daGama, then seaports, then colonies, then empires
Western victories: battlefields, high seas, marketplace (p 15)
CHAPTER 1
European creativity (invention and experimentation) changed the balance of power (20)
The Ottomans ask “What are we doing wrong” AND “What are they doing right?” (25)
Typical Lewis baloney on Islamic “tolerance” on page 33. And on pages 48, 72, 85, 89, 111, 114, 156. It’s his magical incantation, uttered repeatedly so muslim imams will not issue a fatwa against him.
CHAPTER 2
Diplomacy, commerce, and war were the main points of contact
The West maintained embassies in the east.
Westerners frequently traded in the east.
Gradually, many western implements – practical Westernization (p 40). The Infidels introduce new devices – why? (45)
Then languages – opened up doors to ideas (45)
Islam = economic stagnation (47) Why? West has creativity.
The religious leaders lost precedence/intellectual dominance because:
Journalists recorded and disseminated truth
Lawyers interpreted and argued the laws
Professors taught
The ideas of freedom and self governance:
In the west, this is the scale between tyranny and liberty. In Islam, the scale is between tyranny and justice (54)
CHAPTER 3 Social and Cultural inferiority
The status of women
The continuity of slavery into the present day
Political rights: parliamentary and constitutional systems turn autocratic and sometimes socialist, fascist, theocratic
Scientific and technological advances
Literacy
Islam squelches independent inquiry (79)
Islam has a reluctant and resentful approach to creative ideas (81) like astronomical observatories and medical advances
CHAPTER 4
Modernization and Social Equality
Ottoman reforms of 1839 and 1854 (91) meant the shocking and dismaying elimination of social discrimination against (never women) slaves, and infidels
Social equality for slaves and unbelievers! Meant the loss of status for muslims (94)
CHAPTER 5
Secularization/Civil Society
In the West, there is separation of church and state. All people are equal before the Law.
In Islam, authority comes from Allah; God is the supreme sovereign. No part of life is outside the scope of religion.
In Islam, MOST PEOPLE depend on the state for income. (111)
The muslim world has a medieval orientation for the church governing the state. (112)
CHAPTER 6
Time/Space/Modernity
The west eclipsed islam in science, precision, innovation, and creativity
The western calendar has been almost universally adopted; western clocks also
The use of perspective in art is Western
Western music is modernity: polyphony, harmony – many instruments, playing off separate scores, make music together. There are parallels with team sports, corporations, literature (novels), theater, representative governance, and scientific accomplishments,.
Polyphony requires synchronization. Timekeeping is a requirement of modernity. Railway timetables as an example (130)
Life is transformed by the measurement of time: exactitude, precision, hurry
CHAPTER 7
Culture change
Westernization as distinct from modernization
Orchestras and classical music readily adopted in Japan, China, India – totally absent in Islamic world.
Architecture shows Islamic world lacks confidence
Artistic realism & accuracy
Translated works: what gets translated? In islam, geography, some military history. No philosophy!
Non-muslim minorities bring western innovations
Translations from the west – very few, and LATE
Islam still avoids “western” science and music
THE WORLD OF ISLAM IS POOR, WEAK, AND IGNORANT
The decline of the middle east led to its being conquered: Mongols, French & English
Israel proves the weakness of Islamic culture (155)
Islamic governance is horrible and capricious and corrupt (158) – there is an absence of individualism or private property or contract law
Why all the blaming and conspiracy theories? 159 INFERIORITY




