
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-45% $12.09$12.09
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$8.26$8.26
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Books For You Today
Learn more
0.27 mi | MANASSAS 20110
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam Paperback – May 8, 1998
Purchase options and add-ons
"The war in Vietnam was not lost in the field, nor was it lost on the front pages of the New York Times or the college campuses. It was lost in Washington, D.C." —H. R. McMaster (from the Conclusion)
Dereliction Of Duty is a stunning analysis of how and why the United States became involved in an all-out and disastrous war in Southeast Asia. Fully and convincingly researched, based on transcripts and personal accounts of crucial meetings, confrontations and decisions, it is the only book that fully re-creates what happened and why. McMaster pinpoints the policies and decisions that got the United States into the morass and reveals who made these decisions and the motives behind them, disproving the published theories of other historians and excuses of the participants.
A page-turning narrative, Dereliction Of Duty focuses on a fascinating cast of characters: President Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, General Maxwell Taylor, McGeorge Bundy and other top aides who deliberately deceived the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the U.S. Congress and the American public.
McMaster’s only book, Dereliction of Duty is an explosive and authoritative new look at the controversy concerning the United States involvement in Vietnam.
- Print length480 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMay 8, 1998
- Dimensions6.12 x 1.2 x 9.25 inches
- ISBN-100060929081
- ISBN-13978-0060929084
Frequently bought together

Products related to this item
Editorial Reviews
Review
From the Back Cover
- H. R. McMaster (from the Conclusion)
Dereliction Of Duty is a stunning new analysis of how and why the United States became involved in an all-out and disastrous war in Southeast Asia. Fully and convincingly researched, based on recently released transcripts and personal accounts of crucial meetings, confrontations and decisions, it is the only book that fully re-creates what happened and why. It also pinpoints the policies and decisions that got the United States into the morass and reveals who made these decisions and the motives behind them, disproving the published theories of other historians and excuses of the participants.
Dereliction Of Duty covers the story in strong narrative fashion, focusing on a fascinating cast of characters: President Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, General Maxwell Taylor, McGeorge Bundy and other top aides who deliberately deceived the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the U.S. Congress and the American public.
Sure to generate controversy, Dereliction Of Duty is an explosive and authoritative new look at the controversy concerning the United States involvement in Vietnam.
About the Author
H. R. McMaster is the Fouad and Michelle Ajami Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. McMaster served as a U.S. Army officer for thirty-four years and retired as a lieutenant general in 2018. He remained on active duty while serving as the twenty-sixth assistant to the president for national security affairs. He is the author of three bestsellers, Dereliction of Duty, Battlegrounds, and At War with Ourselves.
Product details
- Publisher : Harper Perennial; Reprint edition (May 8, 1998)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 480 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0060929081
- ISBN-13 : 978-0060929084
- Item Weight : 1.2 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.12 x 1.2 x 9.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #42,912 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #19 in Southeast Asia History
- #66 in Vietnam War History (Books)
- #184 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Related products with free delivery on eligible orders
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book engaging and informative. They appreciate the author's clear presentation style and enlightening insights into leadership. Many describe the book as thought-provoking and interesting. However, some readers feel the pacing is uneven and repetitive.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book compelling and well-written. They appreciate the author's clarity and thorough documentation. The book provides an excellent recounting of a troubled time in American history.
"This book is extremely important and valuable for two reasons...." Read more
"...by H. R. McMaster is an exceptionally well researched and well written book...." Read more
"...In the easy to read few pages of the introduction to this book, General McMaster explains what it was like to pin on his Second Lieutenant bars in..." Read more
"...The utility of this book is that McMaster writes in a very clear and cogent way...." Read more
Customers find the book informative and enlightening. They appreciate the author's thorough research and clear writing style. The book provides a coherent explanation of developments and commentary in the early days of what came to be.
"...McNamara convinced the president, and the strategy worked out pretty well, emboldening McNamara to be more assertive over the JCS...." Read more
"...and the Lies That Led to Vietnam by H. R. McMaster is an exceptionally well researched and well written book...." Read more
"...He was a master of numbers, and a great proponent of systems analysis, to the point where he trusted his "number-crunchers" more than the Joint..." Read more
"...He has a distinct point of view that seems to have been applauded by some of the more right wing persuasion...." Read more
Customers find the book insightful about leadership. They appreciate the thoughtful and talented author as a military advisor. The book provides a clear picture of leadership in the United States during the war. Readers also mention that the book reveals the duplicity of top military leaders.
"...the Vietnam War was handled by the politicians and the highest ranking military officers...." Read more
"Major General H.R. McMaster's book provides great insight into the political leadership and civil-military dysfunction that led to America's full..." Read more
"...It is encouraging that we have a thoughtful person as a military advisor who is highly unlikely to repeat the errors he describes so well." Read more
"...methods used by LBJ to deceive the congress and the American people were a real eyeopener and a very tough read for me...." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's presentation style. They find the exposition well-laid out, carefully thought-out, and insightful. The book details how the decisions to go to war were made in a clear, concise way. Readers also mention that the author's style is excellent, clear, and engaging.
"...If that is true, than Col McMasters has drafted a great masterpiece based on the other Amazon reviews...." Read more
"...First of all, it is too drawn out. It's thoroughness in drawing from documents that were not available at the time is laudable--for a while...." Read more
"This highly researched book does an excellent job of laying out what many of us have long believed -- that the Vietnam War became a morass because..." Read more
"H. R. McMaster did an excellent job "exposing" the real inspirations and behind the scene actions of what our government has unfortunately become...." Read more
Customers find the book interesting and thought-provoking. They say the title is compelling, but some readers feel the author has poor judgment.
"...While the title is compelling and likely helped sales, "Poor Judgment" or "Gross Ineptitude" would have been more accurate...." Read more
"...I found it interesting and a good explanation of why we lost that war...." Read more
"...The subject matter of the book was interesting and revealing...." Read more
"..."Dereliction of Duty" is an apt title, as no one amongst the principal actors was willing to step up as a reality check to voice doubts..." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the book. Some find the narrative compelling and fascinating, with a high drama that breaks their hearts. Others find the content disturbing and sobering, especially for those who were young in 1966.
"...This book is enlightening and disturbing. It's difficult to envision a worse way that the situation in Vietnam could have been handled...." Read more
"...You have the makings of a great Greek Tragedy here. Pity the author didn't take advantage of it." Read more
"I just finished H.R. McMasters’s Dereliction of Duty and it’s a terrifying book...." Read more
"...the book is pretty compelling reading, and all the behind-the-scenes stories are fascinating...." Read more
Customers have different views on the political content. Some find it a thoughtful and critical analysis of deceptions, maneuverings, and short-sighted decisions in the Vietnam War. Others describe it as revealing political selfishness, dangerous deceptions for democracy, and a depressing catalog of deceit and betrayal.
"Incompetent, deceitful, arrogant, and wrong ("terribly wrong" as Robert McNamara admitted later)...." Read more
"...were many and reinforcing: arrogance, weakness, lying in the pursuit of self-interest and above all, the abdication of responsibility to the..." Read more
"A thoughtful and highly critical analysis of the deceptions, maneuverings and short-sighted decision making that led to our deepening involvement in..." Read more
"...were many and reinforcing: arrogance, weakness, lying in the pursuit of self-interest, and, above all, the abdication of responsibility to the..." Read more
Customers find the book's pacing slow. They mention it's not well-reasoned, depressing, repetitive, and boring. The subject matter is also mentioned as failing repeatedly.
"...The book is getting pretty repetitious here. Chapter Seven includes quite a bit about William Bundy, younger brother of McGeorge Bundy...." Read more
"Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam by H. R. McMaster is an exceptionally well..." Read more
"Unlike some of the reviewers here, I got a professional quality book with clear type and a strong spine...." Read more
"Incompetent, deceitful, arrogant, and wrong ("terribly wrong" as Robert McNamara admitted later)...." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 15, 2017This book is extremely important and valuable for two reasons. First, I believe it is a very honest and accurate description of how Eisenhower, JFK, and LBJ got America into the Vietnam War. There are a lot of biased books, but this book is heavily documented, based on declassified memos and communications from the highest ranking civilian and military leaders. It seems to me that both “war hawks” and “war doves” will find it honest and informative. Second, the author was recently appointed as National Security Advisor to Donald Trump. So it reveals some of the thinking of this important advisor. We should not expect that H.R. McMasters will be derelict.
So who was derelict? LBJ and McNamara most importantly, because they cared about winning the 1964 election and passing the Great Society legislation, way more than what was the right thing to do in Vietnam, way more than the lives of those who would die. They lied and manipulated to get their way. All of the JCS were derelict for not standing up to LBJ and McNamara, allowing themselves to be manipulated. But I don’t think we should be too hard on the JCS, because they are required to follow the orders of the president and SecDef.
Chapter One is about the early days of the Kennedy administration and the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. Eisenhower and Congress had established formal structures for Defense decision making, with the JCS advising the president. JFK gutted that apparatus, using a few close friends for advice and using the JCS to support decisions that were already established. Eisenhower had set in motion the preparations for the Bay of Pigs invasion. JFK let it proceed but denied it the kind of support it needed for success. Then he blamed the JCS for failure. Kennedy and McNamara strengthened the role of the SecDef at the expense of the JCS. Kennedy established Maxwell Taylor as his Military Representative, a new postion. JFK fired or “kicked upstairs” the service chiefs, putting in his own men.
Chapter Two is about the Cuban Missile Crisis, then shifts to Vietnam. The JCS wanted a more muscular military response to the Soviets. McNamara advocated a naval “quarantine” and a secret deal to remove nukes from Turkey in exchange for the removal of nukes from Cuba. McNamara convinced the president, and the strategy worked out pretty well, emboldening McNamara to be more assertive over the JCS. There is a quick review of Vietnam history from 1940 to 1963. The French were defeated at Dien Bien Phu, Vietnam was partitioned, elections were to be held but never happened. Ho Chi Minh consolidated power in the north and started directing revolt in the south. The U.S. supported Diem, a Roman Catholic who did not treat the Buddhist majority well. In 1963 the U.S. started sending uncertain feelers for a coup. The coup finally occurred on Nov 1, 1963.
Chapter Three includes the Nov 1, 2914 coup that killed Diem, and the assassination of JFK on Nov 22, 1963. JFK did not communicate clearly to Ambassador Henry Lodge, and Lodge thought there was a green light from Washington for the coup. JFK was upset when he learned of Diem’s death.
Chapter Four covers the initial months of the Johnson administration. LBJ had big plans for the Great Society legislation and wanted to limit military spending so that the country could afford the Great Society. LBJ also didn’t want to lose Vietnam to the communists. Maxwell Taylor continued to strengthen his power as chairman of the JCS. McNamara was happy to deceive the public with an optimistic assessment of Vietnam, allowing the U.S. to limit spending on Vietnam, leaving funds for domestic spending. McNamara championed a strategy of gradually increasing military force. The JCS advocated a sudden and vigorous military response to achieve victory. Special Forces were used to raid North Vietnam.
Chapter Five explores the tension between the Joint Chiefs and the President and SedDef in the spring of 1964. LBJ appointed Lemay to serve an additional year as the AF chief, reasoning that as long as (but only as long as) he was in uniform he would not publicly oppose LBJ’s Vietnam policy. The Pentagon conducted a war game, SIGMA 1-64, to test the strategy of graduated pressure. The war game accurately predicted the future events – the introduction of large U.S. ground forces into the war, the lack of support from Congress and the American people, and the underestimation of Hanoi’s resolve. (This study crushes a prominent claim of the book A Bright and Shining Lie, which claims that the U.S. did not understand Hanoi’s resolve. The Pentagon understood it.) McNamara made sure that LBJ never saw this report.
Chapter Six covers the summer of 1964, with the same themes. LBJ viewed everything in terms of its effect on the election. Maxwell Taylor maneuvered to give himself more influence and authority. He became Ambassador to SVN in July, securing a memo from LBJ giving him authority over military operations. Taylor got LBJ to appoint Earl Wheeler to Chairman of the JCS – the third consecutive Army general to hold the position. Wheeler had no combat bona fides and was compliant towards McNamara, LBJ, and Taylor. There was a big conference in Honolulu, and Taylor shut out the views of the JCS. LBJ asked the JCS for recommendations, but constrained their response to limited actions. The Gulf of Tonkin incident occurred during this period. On one night, NVN patrol boats attacked a US Navy destroyer. A couple of days later there was confusion, and a NVN attack was thought to have occurred, but almost certainly did not. When LBJ was first notified of the second attack, he ordered the Navy to respond with a strike on the NVN navy base, thinking that would help is election campaign. One Navy pilot was killed and another taken prisoner – the first POW of the war. The incident resulted in a Congressional resolution giving the president authority to respond. Campaign surrogate speakers were told to emphasize that things are going well in Vietnam now but to hold open the possibility of escalation later. LBJ wanted some freedom to escalate after the election, so everyone basically lied about how well things were going in the summer and fall. The book is getting pretty repetitious here.
Chapter Seven includes quite a bit about William Bundy, younger brother of McGeorge Bundy. William Bundy advocated graduated pressure on NVN, with a bombing campaign to start on Jan 1, 1965. Once Maxwell Taylor got established in SVN as the ambassador, he saw the need for a more vigorous military response, but he had little success getting support for this from LBJ and McNamara. Throughout the book to this point, a major theme is the inter-service rivalries, the inability of the Joint Chiefs to agree, and the ability of McNamara and Maxwell Taylor to use the rivalries to neutralize any effectiveness the Chiefs might have had in influencing decisions. Air Force General LeMay and Marine General Greene often teamed up to advocate vigorous military action. Army General Johnson opposed the most vigorous actions and feared that escalation could cause China to intervene or increased violence from the Viet Cong. General Johnson was skeptical of the ability of air power to interdict the supply routes or to coerce NVN. General Greene wanted the Marines to secure all of the coastal areas of SVN.
Chapter Eight starts with a Pentagon simulation, Sigma II. Its results were similar the earlier Sigma I simulation. Graduated pressure, implemented through controlled bombing of NVN, did little to hinder the military capability of the communists and did nothing to weaken their resolve to win. It resulted in escalation, with the introduction of U.S. ground combat units into SVN and erosion of support from the American public. But graduated pressure fit with the domestic political objectives of Johnson, McNamara, and the rest, so LBJ continued to follow it. McNamara continued to look back to the success of graduated pressure in the Cuban Missile Crisis. [I interject that it was easy to isolate Cuba because it is an island close to the U.S. NVN had land routes and short sea routes to send munitions to SVN.]
Up to this point, McMasters does not seem to take sides. He has shown that JFK and McNamara and their civilian associates, and Maxwell Taylor were dishonest and valued winning the election over everything else. The options were to vigorously strike the enemy in NVN and Laos, graduated pressure, or negotiated withdrawal (giving up.) McMasters clearly sees graduated pressure as the worst choice, but hasn’t really taken a stand between vigorous strikes and withdrawal. History shows that graduated pressure did not work and cost the U.S. dearly, so any author would have to oppose that strategy in retrospect.
Chapter Nine starts after the election. “McNaughton and William Bundy rationalized that committing the U.S. to a war in Vietnam and losing would be preferable to withdrawing from what they believed was an impossible situation.” Location 3706. (Gasp!) Johnson was determined to pass the Great Society legislation at any cost. He won the election in a landslide and picked up seats in the House and Senate. LBJ spent most of the month at the ranch to avoid dealing with the war and to work on the Great Society. The JCS continued to favor a sudden and vigorous application of force on NVN but the civilian leadership slow-rolled them and stuck to slow escalation.
Chapter Ten – A Fork in the Road - goes from December 1964 to February 1965. Taylor tried to straighten out the SVN government with tough talk, but they saw it as colonial interference and dissolved the national council. The Viet Cong were having a lot of success and McGeorge Bundy and McNamara thought that the U.S. needed to escalate its efforts to prevent a collapse of SVN. But the administration had been constantly telling the American people and the world that things were going quite well in Vietnam, so justification was need for the escalation. The Navy was sent north to try to provoke something, but it was a wimpy effort. Unrelated to that, the VC attacked Pleiku (a place where I landed many times) on February 6, killing and wounding some Americans. LBJ ordered air strikes on barracks in southern NVN the next day.
Chapter 11 – The Foot in the Door: February – March 1965, and Chapter 12 – A Quicksand of Lies: March – April 1965. The administration came to believe that SVN would, in the end, fall to the Communists but that it was important to support SVN for a while and delay the outcome, that this would be better for U.S. prestige, respect, and credibility than an immediate withdrawal. VP Humphrey told LBJ what he thought and was barred from all future discussions on Vietnam. Taylor opposed using Army and Marine combat units. There was haggling over using one, two, or three Marine battalions and where to put them. A battalion was sent to defend Danang. The JCS quarreled over air power and ground combat units and which to use first. John McConnell replaced Curtis Lemay as AF Chief of Staff. The Viet Cong controlled more and more of the country and there was danger that the Saigon government would fail, but LBJ kept lying that they were doing well. LBJ would give pep talks to the military leaders, telling them to kill more VC, and then keep in place the restrictions that kept them from killing more VC. A few of the civilian and military leaders noticed that the U.S. had not defined its objective in Vietnam. Beat NVN into submission to the point they would stop aiding the VC and order the VC to cease and desist? Prop up the SVN government for a while and then find a reason to pull out? Negotiate some kind of settlement? LBJ wouldn’t really discuss the topic or commit to any objective. Chapter 12 ends with a pretty good summary of the book. The JCS had estimates of the number of troops needed to win in Vietnam – 700,000, but did not give those estimates to their civilian superiors. Johnson maneuvered the JCS to give him the advice he wanted to hear, not the advice they knew he needed. A slow escalation, with minimal air strikes on NVN and small troop deployments proceeded, with LBJ refusing to acknowledge to himself or to the American people where it was going.
Chapter 13 – The Coach and His Team: April – June 1963. Chapter 14 – War without Direction: April – June 1965. Chapter 15 – Five Silent Men: July 1965. LBJ gave the JCS a pep talk about how they are the team and he is the coach and they are supposed to do what he says. Nobody knew what the objective of the war was, or if they had an opinion, there were different and conflicting opinions. Destroy NVN’s ability to wage war and compel them to call off the rebellion in SVN? Hang on a little longer, propping up the SVN government? Show the world that we are a dependable ally, then figure out a way to exit SVN with honor? There was a lot of haggling about how many more battalions and air squadrons should be sent to Vietnam. Maxwell Taylor, the ambassador, opposed any combat units, thinking (correctly it turns out) that U.S. combat units would cause the ARVN to cede the fighting to the Americans, and Americanize that war. There was haggling about Rolling Thunder, the air war against NVN. Johnson and McNamara wanted to control the air war from Washington and limit strikes to minor installations that wouldn’t provoke NVN, the U.S.S.R, and China too much. The JCS wanted to send more sorties against move important targets. The peace movement was cranking up in the U.S. and abroad, and LBJ thought that sending more troops to SVN would cause less opposition from the peace movement than air strikes against NVN. By July, LBJ approved about 200,000 total American troops in SVN. In May there was a seven-day halt to Rolling Thunder to see if NVN would respond favorably diplomatically (they didn’t) and to placate the peace movement.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 24, 2006Dereliction of Duty: Johnson, McNamara, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Lies That Led to Vietnam by H. R. McMaster is an exceptionally well researched and well written book. One certainly gets the impression that McMaster has studied the main decision makers of Vietnam so well that he wrote about them with the familiarity and insight that is normally only reserved for siblings. While a bit long, this book explains the blow-by-blow decision making that led to the Vietnam War.
Most military strategists look back at Vietnam and recommend one of two strategies. The first of these strategies would have been an all out conventional war against North Vietnam. The risk of this strategy is that it might have resulted in China and/or Russia intervening. If that had happened, the results could have ranged from Nuclear War to a repeat of the Korean conflict. Either result would have been suicide for Johnson. The second strategy is the so-called ink blot strategy. The risk of this strategy is that small American units working with local forces would, from time to time, be destroyed by larger North Vietnamese units that infiltrated the south. This combined with the large ongoing manpower requirements and lack major combatant operations would have meant that Johnson would have been open to criticisms of being soft on Communism. Given the unique situation of the war in Vietnam, it is unclear if either strategy would have been successful in the long run.
It is said that a masterpiece is something that many people can read different meanings into. If that is true, than Col McMasters has drafted a great masterpiece based on the other Amazon reviews. Col McMasters has a pretty equal criticism of both the JCS and Johnson/McNamara. Likewise, many senior folks today have used this book as a justification to criticize the current war in Iraq. In the mind of this reviewer, the education, experiences, and background of Johnson, McNamara, and the JCS members were almost a guarantee that they would be unable to craft an effective strategy for Vietnam. Johnson's role models for war presidents were Truman and Wilson. He crafted policies and political messages to avoid the mistakes that they had made not realizing how different his situation was. Likewise, McNamara and his whiz kids were uniquely unqualified to lead a war in a largely agrarian state that was motivated more by ideology than by profits/loss statements. Moreover, WWII which was the shaping experience for most of the JCS was exactly the wrong kind of war to model Vietnam after.
Col McMasters, recently of the 3rd ACR in Iraq, has a well earned reputation as one of the leading intellectuals in the modern Army. However, the lesson of his book is the unintended one that means and ends are also measured in terms of political influence and ideology. In the end, Vietnam was a war lost as much to lack of imagination and creativity than to political expediency.
On a side note (and beyond the scope of this review), I'm always amazed that historians including McMasters, so quickly give Truman, Eisenhower, and, especially, Kennedy a bye on the failure to formulate a comprehensive policy in Vietnam. Under Truman, we had Joint Army Navy Intelligence Units and OSS Units actually fighting each other because they were supporting different elements that were nominally fighting the Japanese. Eisenhower actually sent an air mobile battalion to Vietnam to test helicopters in combat just so we could develop combat doctrine without going to the expense of actually being in a war. Kennedy increased the 500 or so military folks (advisors, Special Forces, and Eisenhower's air mobile battalion) to 16,000 advisors. Anyone of these Presidents could have crafted a more effective and thoughtful strategy for Vietnam, but failed to do so.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2025The book was well written, easy to read, and deeply researched. I expounded the inner workings of the Johnson administration and it's approach to the Vietnam war. Johnson's desire for the Great Society legislations was a contributor to the entry in to the war.
I recommend this book to anyone who desires to understand how the government drive the country into the morass of the Vietnam war.
Top reviews from other countries
-
AnynoymReviewed in Germany on September 13, 20225.0 out of 5 stars Lesenswert.
Sehr detailliert, zeichnet aber ein anderes Bild als man in Europa gemeinhin hat vom Krieg in Viet Nam.
Gopi KarunakaranReviewed in India on July 5, 20214.0 out of 5 stars Great book on why America failed in Vietnam
Absolutely a great book. A no holds barred account of the US Secretary of Defence, Robert McNamara's policies in Vietnam based on research and study of documents. An in-depth analysis of why America went to war on the basis of the flawed thinking of one man and his ego. Sadly, the Chiefs of Staff failed to stand up and confront him. McNamara and his boys reduced fighting wars with time tested doctrines to fighting with statistical data and analysis. The other actors too do not pass muster.
Robert G McPhersonReviewed in Canada on September 22, 20175.0 out of 5 stars A terrific account of how political
A terrific account of how political, financial and military over-indulgence and hubris got the US into such hot water in Vietnam,. The whole experience was basically repeated by George Bush and crew in Afghanistan and Iraq, and as was the case in VIetnam, the trouble continues seemingly endlessly.
PONZETTO GReviewed in Italy on June 30, 20175.0 out of 5 stars The measure of a man
I bought the book both to read the first comprehensive review based on recently disclosed records, and on the Author being selected as National Security advisor. I was very satisfied on both counts. The book makes a very persuasive case in favour of speaking truth to power, however unpalatable, and he also has a track record on that score. His being selected for that post makes me think that the present administration might be way more pragmatic than commonly thought
Eur Ing H. HowardReviewed in Australia on August 12, 20215.0 out of 5 stars Food for thought
Wish I’d read this when I was still in the military. Politicisation of the top brass is always problematic anywhere

