Buy new:
$44.91$44.91
Delivery Friday, July 26
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Shelf Safari
Save with Used - Good
$9.13$9.13
Delivery July 29 - August 6
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: -OnTimeBooks-
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error Hardcover – June 8, 2010
Purchase options and add-ons
“Both wise and clever, full of fun and surprise about a topic so central to our lives that we almost never even think about it.”
—Bill McKibben, author of Earth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet
In the tradition of The Wisdom of Crowds and Predictably Irrational comes Being Wrong, an illuminating exploration of what it means to be in error, and why homo sapiens tend to tacitly assume (or loudly insist) that they are right about most everything. Kathryn Schulz, editor of Grist magazine, argues that error is the fundamental human condition and should be celebrated as such. Guiding the reader through the history and psychology of error, from Socrates to Alan Greenspan, Being Wrong will change the way you perceive screw-ups, both of the mammoth and daily variety, forever.
- Print length416 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherEcco
- Publication dateJune 8, 2010
- Dimensions6 x 1.25 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100061176044
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly

The Gift of Therapy: An Open Letter to a New Generation of Therapists and Their PatientsIrvin YalomPaperback$11.85 shipping
As soon as we know that we are wrong, we aren’t wrong anymore, since to recognize a belief as false is to stop believing it. Thus we can only say “I was wrong.” Call it the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle of Error: we can be wrong, or we can know it, but we can’t do both at the same time.Highlighted by 1,249 Kindle readers
This was the pivotal insight of the Scientific Revolution: that the advancement of knowledge depends on current theories collapsing in the face of new insights and discoveries. In this model of progress, errors do not lead us away from the truth. Instead, they edge us incrementally toward it.Highlighted by 1,107 Kindle readers
So I should revise myself: it does feel like something to be wrong. It feels like being right.Highlighted by 912 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
Review
“A mirthful and wise diagnosis of what ails us: Schulz dances us through science, psychology, and literature in a sparkling history of (and ode to) human error.” — Publishers Weekly
“[A]n insightful and delightful discussion of the errors of our ways. . . . Schulz remains good company -- a warm, witty and welcome presence. . . . [S]he combines lucid prose with perfect comic timing. . . . Being Wrong is smart and lively.” — New York Times Book Review
“So, please take this advice: Read BEING WRONG, because it’s the right thing to do.” — Lisa Ko, author of The Leavers
“Kathryn Schulz’s brilliant, spirited, and necessary inquiry into the essential humanity of error will leave you feeling intoxicatingly wrongheaded.” — Tom Vanderbilt, bestselling author of TRAFFIC
“[A]n unusual examination of the virtue and peril of being wrong and of all the ways we think we know things that just ain’t so.” — Boston Globe
“Engrossing.... In the spirit of Blink and Predictably Irrational (but with a large helping of erudition)... Schulz writes with such lucidity and wit that her philosophical enquiry becomes a page-turner.” — Publishers Weekly (starred review)
“Kathryn Schulz has given us a brilliant and remarkably upbeat account of the long history of human error. If Being Wrong is this smart and illuminating, I don’t want to be right!” — Steven Johnson, bestselling author of THE GHOST MAP and EVERYTHING BAD IS GOOD FOR YOU
“Kathryn Schultz is engaging, witty and fascinating as she uses a full arsenal of academic research, colorful stories, philosophical arguments and personal anecdotes to create a riveting account of why we, mostly, have been wrong about being wrong.” — Frans Johansson, author of THE MEDICI EFFECT
“Both wise and clever, full of fun and surprise...[BEING WRONG] could also be enormously useful―there are very few problems we face...that couldn’t be helpfully addressed if we we were willing to at least entertain the idea that we might not be entirely right.” — Bill McKibben, author of EAARTH: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet
“A funny and philosophical meditation on why error is mostly a humane, courageous and extremely desirable human trait. [Schulz] flies high in the intellectual skies, leaving beautiful sunlit contrails....It’s lovely to watch this idea warm in Ms. Schulz’s hands.” — Dwight Garner, New York Times
“Schulz possesses playfulness even as she brings the reader to tears... Being Wrong has a heartbeat.” — Huffington Post
“Intellectualism made fun! . . . Schulz’s call to embrace flaws and errors as potentially beneficial will surely draw legions of follwers.” — Newsweek
“Schulz draws on philosophers, neuroscientists, psychoanalysts and bit of common sense in an erudite, playful rumination on error.” — Washington Post
“An amazing book. . . . I don’t know when I last read a book as stimulating, as thoughtful, and as much fun to read.” — Harold S. Kushner, author of When Bad Things Happen to Good People
From the Back Cover
To err is human. Yet most of us go through life assuming (and sometimes insisting) that we are right about nearly everything, from the origins of the universe to how to load the dishwasher. If being wrong is so natural, why are we all so bad at imagining that our beliefs could be mistaken, and why do we react to our errors with surprise, denial, defensiveness, and shame?
In Being Wrong, journalist Kathryn Schulz explores why we find it so gratifying to be right and so maddening to be mistaken, and how this attitude toward error corrodes relationships—whether between family members, colleagues, neighbors, or nations. Along the way, she takes us on a fascinating tour of human fallibility, from wrongful convictions to no-fault divorce; medical mistakes to misadventures at sea; failed prophecies to false memories; "I told you so!" to "Mistakes were made." Drawing on thinkers as varied as Augustine, Darwin, Freud, Gertrude Stein, Alan Greenspan, and Groucho Marx, she proposes a new way of looking at wrongness. In this view, error is both a given and a gift—one that can transform our worldviews, our relationships, and, most profoundly, ourselves.
In the end, Being Wrong is not just an account of human error but a tribute to human creativity—the way we generate and revise our beliefs about ourselves and the world. At a moment when economic, political, and religious dogmatism increasingly divide us, Schulz explores with uncommon humor and eloquence the seduction of certainty and the crises occasioned by error. A brilliant debut from a new voice in nonfiction, this book calls on us to ask one of life's most challenging questions: what if I'm wrong?
About the Author
Kathryn Schulz is a journalist whose work has appeared in the New York Times Magazine, Rolling Stone, Foreign Policy, the Nation, the Boston Globe, and the "Freakonomics" blog of the New York Times. She lives in New York's Hudson Valley.
Product details
- Publisher : Ecco; 1st edition (June 8, 2010)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 416 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0061176044
- Item Weight : 1.3 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.25 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #944,648 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,562 in Medical Social Psychology & Interactions
- #2,184 in Popular Social Psychology & Interactions
- #4,037 in Medical General Psychology
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

KATHRYN SCHULZ is a staff writer at The New Yorker and the author of Lost & Found, forthcoming from Random House on January 11, 2022. Her previous book was Being Wrong: Adventures in the Margin of Error. She won a National Magazine Award and a Pulitzer Prize in 2015 for “The Really Big One,” an article about seismic risk in the Pacific Northwest. Lost & Found grew out of “Losing Streak,” which was originally published in The New Yorker and later anthologized in The Best American Essays. Her other essays and reporting have appeared in The Best American Science and Nature Writing, The Best American Travel Writing, and The Best American Food Writing. A native of Ohio, she lives with her family on the Eastern Shore of Maryland.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the insights in the book enlightening, showing the author's heart. They also describe the writing style as well-written in conversational tone, witty, and enjoyable. Readers also mention the book is wonderfully accessible and smart enough for academics.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the insights in the book enlightening, defining her ideas, and explaining the roots and ramifications of belief. They also appreciate the underlying values and stories. Readers say the book has heart and gives them stronger empathy for their fellow man.
"...Many stories along with the deeper psychological or philosophical explanations.Well done." Read more
"...These notes alone are valuable, a short summary of dozens and dozens of philosophers, artists, novelists, psychologists, and scientists on the..." Read more
"...a look at inductive reasoning and how it's so efficient and serves us so well, but when it fails, it can fail hard...." Read more
"...Shulz is an amazingly insightful, humorous, and quotable book, drawing on philosophy, science, history, politics, literature, and pop culture...." Read more
Customers find the book well-written in a conversational tone, with a stunning vocabulary. They also say it's thorough yet illuminating, filled with honesty and humility, and a right mix of human stories and serious discussions. Readers also mention that the overall result is a very vivid picture of how and why we are wrong.
"...Author is a experienced journalist, not an academic. And reads like it, smooth, interesting, humorous and catchy...." Read more
"...the Margin of Error" by Kathryn Shulz is an amazingly insightful, humorous, and quotable book, drawing on philosophy, science, history, politics..." Read more
"...Conclusion:The book is well written in conversational tone if not a little long winded and wordy...." Read more
"...Though voluminous, it is well-written, helpful reading, and captivating to the end; it can be read over a weekend." Read more
Customers find the book wonderfully accessible, thorough, and illuminating. They also say it's easy to obtain.
"...Though voluminous, it is well-written, helpful reading, and captivating to the end; it can be read over a weekend." Read more
"I’m still only partway through this book but so far it has heart, is easy to read, is well-researched, and makes me feel like I am becoming a better..." Read more
"...But it is not tedious, boring or difficult to read. i hate to put it down." Read more
"...Written in a friendly, accessible, intelligent, articulate voice, Ms. Schulz makes a case for accepting error as an opportunity to get better...." Read more
Customers find the book monotonous, repetitive, and incoherent. They also say the problem of error is infinitely complicated and the margin of error too large.
"...Philosophically the problem of error is almost infinitely complicated because it isn't just that we can be wrong about almost everything, but also..." Read more
"...in the fifteen minute or so TED Talk, I got the dry, bloated, repetitive version...." Read more
"...All I had to do was read the book. Alas, my margin of error was way too large...." Read more
"this was such a boring book and i had no idea what she was saying half of the time (required to read it for school)" Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
(wrong thinking is from me — inside. Awful!)
“That’s part of why recognizing our errors is such a strange experience: accustomed to disagreeing with other people, we suddenly find ourselves at odds with ourselves. Error, in that moment, is less an intellectual problem than an existential one—a crisis not in what we know, but in who we are. We hear something of that identity crisis in the questions we ask ourselves in the aftermath of error: What was I thinking? How could I have done that?’’ (20)
Yep . . . that is me! Am I really . . . really . . . that . . . stupid? Nope! (right?)
Well . . .
“A whole lot of us go through life assuming that we are basically right, basically all the time, about basically everything: about our political and intellectual convictions, our religious and moral beliefs, our assessment of other people, our memories, our grasp of facts. As absurd as it sounds when we stop to think about it, our steady state seems to be one of unconsciously assuming that we are very close to omniscient.’’
Right! I love that! Me and God — both know everything!
Absurd? Well . . . I guess . . .
Is this a new problem?
“If you commit a moral transgression, you can turn to at least a handful of established options to help you cope with it. Virtually every religious tradition includes a ritual for penitence and purification, along the lines of confession in Catholicism and Yom Kippur in Judaism.’’
(only religion?)
“Twelve-step programs advise their participants to admit “to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.” Even the criminal justice system, although far from reform-minded these days, has one foot rooted in a tradition of repentance and transformation. By contrast, if you commit an error—whether a minor one, such as realizing halfway through an argument that you are mistaken, or a major one, such as realizing halfway through a lifetime that you were wrong about your faith, your politics, yourself, your loved one, or your life’s work—you will not find any obvious, ready-to-hand resources to help you deal with it.’’
This seems so odd. Errors, wrong decisions, false conclusions, are always with us and constantly hurting. Yet, we don’t know how to react. Or maybe we do know — and just . . . refuse.
“In Part One, I trace the history of how we think about wrongness and the emergence of two opposing models of error—models that also reflect our ideas about what kind of creatures we are and what kind of universe we live in.’’
“In Part Two, I explore the many factors that can cause us to screw up, from our senses to our higher cognitive processes to our social conventions.’’
“In Part Three, I move from why we get things wrong to how we feel when we do so. This part of the book traces the emotional arc of erring, from the experience of realizing we went astray to how that experience can transform our worldviews, our relationships, and—most profoundly—ourselves.’’
Part I The Idea of Error
1 Wrongology
2 Two Models of Wrongness
Part II The Origins of Error
3 Our Senses
4 Our Minds, Part One: Knowing, Not Knowing, and Making It Up
5 Our Minds,
Part Two: Belief
6 Our Minds,
Part Three: Evidence
7 Our Society
8 The Allure of Certainty
Part III The Experience of Error
9 Being Wrong
10 How Wrong?
11 Denial and Acceptance
12 Heartbreak
13 Transformation
Part IV Embracing Error
14 The Paradox of Error
15 The Optimistic Meta-Induction from the History of Everything
Author is a experienced journalist, not an academic. And reads like it, smooth, interesting, humorous and catchy.
Many stories along with the deeper psychological or philosophical explanations.
Well done.
This is not so much a philosophical investigation as a psychological one and as such I think she does a good job, but I would have been much happier with a more considered philosophical treatment for she misses much as well. Philosophically the problem of error is almost infinitely complicated because it isn't just that we can be wrong about almost everything, but also that we can be partly right and partly wrong about something and in fact this is often the case. She doesn't get into this much rather tending to treat any partial case as a case of error because it is not entirely right. This truth has implications for so much. It is afternoon on a sunny day here on the west coast of the U.S. but I might say "the sun did not rise this morning". What? Surely such a statement is wrong as concerns the meaning of the English word 'sunrise'? On the other hand, my observation is perfectly truthful as concerns the astronomical relation between Earth and Sun. Something can be correct on one level and at the same time wrong on another. Schultz notes this, but doesn't much deal with it.
There are a few items about which we cannot be wrong. Dr. Schultz says that if we feel depressed, we are depressed, and if we feel in love then we are in love. Yes tomorrow we might change our mind about that being in love business. We say that "I was wrong, I was not in love" but in fact we were yesterday. What was wrong is reflected in an ever present, hidden, second clause: "I am in love with X, AND I will be forever!" These second clauses are usually invisible and only that part was wrong about the love I felt yesterday. She addresses Descartes and notes that he declared he could not be wrong about being a thinking being. Today that might be more appropriately rendered as "I cannot be wrong about having an experience NOW, even if I can be wrong about what I take to be the content of that experience". Schultz doesn't really get into this, but it is the foundation from which point we judge all of our beliefs (right or wrong) about the world.
At the end of the book she addresses comedy and art. Her view is that both convey their value to us by being wrong. There is a digression to Plato in this, but Schultz never notes that it isn't always the wrongness per se that is funny in comedy or profound about art, but rather that the wrongness is used to highlight truth otherwise obscured by the flow of our lives or perceptions. Shakespeare's "Comedy of Errors" is not funny merely because of the errors, but because it shows us the truth that we too can be like this. The distortions of art, both classical and modern, are supposed to bring to our minds associations, truths, to which we are often blind.
This is a long book, but not as long as it seems by the number of pages. The text proper ends at the 70% point (I am always reading these books on a Kindle) and there follows from that point many pages of notes taken from the various sources the author read in the process of writing the book. These notes alone are valuable, a short summary of dozens and dozens of philosophers, artists, novelists, psychologists, and scientists on the subject of error. A very valuable compendium. What she doesn't give us is a table, a "classification of errors". There is here in this book all the material she needs to produce it.





