Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Symmetry and the Monster: The Story of One of the Greatest Quests of Mathematics First Edition
There is a newer edition of this item:
$19.80
(65)
Only 3 left in stock (more on the way).
Ronan describes how the quest to understand symmetry really began with the tragic young genius Evariste Galois, who died at the age of 20 in a duel. Galois, who spent the night before he died frantically scribbling his unpublished discoveries, used symmetry to understand algebraic equations, and he discovered that there were building blocks or "atoms of symmetry." Most of these building blocks fit into a table, rather like the periodic table of elements, but mathematicians have found 26 exceptions. The biggest of these was dubbed "the Monster"--a giant snowflake in 196,884 dimensions. Ronan, who personally knows the individuals now working on this problem, reveals how the Monster was only dimly seen at first. As more and more mathematicians became involved, the Monster became clearer, and it was found to be not monstrous but a beautiful form that pointed out deep connections between symmetry, string theory, and the very fabric and form of the universe.
This story of discovery involves extraordinary characters, and Mark Ronan brings these people to life, vividly recreating the growing excitement of what became the biggest joint project ever in the field of mathematics. Vibrantly written, Symmetry and the Monster is a must-read for all fans of popular science--and especially readers of such books as Fermat's Last Theorem.
- ISBN-100192807226
- ISBN-13978-0192807229
- EditionFirst Edition
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateJuly 1, 2006
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.25 x 1 x 8 inches
- Print length272 pages
Products related to this item
Editorial Reviews
Review
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Oxford University Press; First Edition (July 1, 2006)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0192807226
- ISBN-13 : 978-0192807229
- Item Weight : 11.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.25 x 1 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #679,385 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #451 in Mathematics History
- #1,478 in Scientist Biographies
- #20,654 in Unknown
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
There are many parts of the book whether the author gives really good explanations and motivations for various mathematical concepts. One is where he introduces the concept of symmetry via solid geometry and the `Platonic solids', which allows a more straightforward comprehension for readers without extensive mathematical preparation. He also uses it to introduce the concept of `duality', which is actually something that even readers with a good background in mathematics will appreciate. Although he does not define what it means for objects to be dual to each other rigorously, he gives examples, and for the purposes of the book merely notes that such objects will have the same symmetries. Another one is the use of the Sam Loyd tile game to explain the difference between even and odd permutations. Still another is the introduction of Lie groups as being a generalization of Galois theory for differential equations.
The author also discusses briefly the life histories of the mathematicians involved in the relevant group theory including their idiosyncrasies and different methods for doing mathematical research (and also the famous fictional mathematician `Bourbaki' who in reality was a group of highly respected mathematicians). Readers curious about the publishing habits of mathematicians will find out, interestingly, that they usually publish alone, and when they do publish together there is no arguing about whose name comes first: the listing of names is done in alphabetical order. Also interesting is the discussion on the role of reviewers of the research papers that led to the Monster. Since only a tiny minority of individuals understood (or were interested in) the relevant constructions, the anonymity of the reviewers was essentially compromised. But this did not act as a retardant to the research, and these events are another strong argument against anonymous reviewing.
The author also makes strong commentary against the use of computers in doing proofs of mathematics. He insists on being able to check the papers by hand, and details a fascinating story about how complicated calculations that seemed to formidable to do without the assistance of a computing machine were actually accomplished by some of the mathematicians involved in research into the Monster. One can't help but be impressed by their achievements in this regard. However, proofs done by computing machines are just as good as those done by humans. In fact, one might argue that machine proofs are always better, since their logic is impeccable and the likelihood of committing mistakes is very small. In addition, the intermixture of colloquial language with mathematical symbolism that is typical of human proofs makes totally rigorous proof unattainable, if one insists on a strict interpretation of deduction.
Everything in this book is therefore interesting, but the author does not want to leave the reader with the impression that there is no further work to be done on the Monster. This work he says involves obtaining a real understanding of the mathematical constructions behind the Monster. Also, there are further "coincidences" of a number-theoretic nature that need elucidation (one of these, interestingly, involves the integer 163). These issues will no doubt motivate a few young mathematicians to investigate the Monster in even more detail. It will be interesting to see what they find.
The book was a good short read. It took me a day to finish it. The people involved in the classification along with some hints on the technical issues involved form the backbone of the story. I found it entertaining but wish that it had covered the mathematics in greater depth (at the level of an undergraduate) and had a better bibliography to guide future readings of a curious reader.
Leonti H. Thompson, M.D.
Top reviews from other countries
The author takes great pains to make the subject as simple as possible, but not simpler (to echo the quotation from Einstein which heads the penultimate chapter). Such a compromise cannot be perfect, and as someone who knows a little maths, I found it mildly irritating to have to replace each occurrence of the phrase "atom of symmetry" with "simple group", rather than have the metaphor explained once, and the correct term used thereafter. On the other hand, I was quite happy to keep reading about "cross-sections", rather than have to keep stumbling over the phrase "involution centralizer" and be thereby reminded of how little I know about group theory! If I would take issue with any of the author's choices of vocabulary, it is his use of the term "deconstruction" instead of "decomposition", which is an equally familiar word, with one less letter (but one more syllable), and it is one which doesn't cause the susceptible reader to imagine that Jacques Derrida was somehow involved in the project. (God forbid!)
Each reader, at whatever level of knowledge, will have his or her own preference as to the appropriate amount of technical vocabulary to use, and the author has clearly struck a considered balance in this respect. The result is, I think, an easy read even for complete non-mathematicians, but which still contains plenty to fascinate even the professional who is not a specialist in this most specialised of areas.
It is, indeed, a specialised field; the classification of finite simple groups is not your average piece of mathematical research. I was already aware of the length of the famous (notorious?) Feit-Thompson "odd order paper", but was not aware that, at 255 pages (occupying an entire issue of a mathematical journal), this was a mere bagatelle compared to some of the prodigiously (monstrously?) long papers and typescripts (some not yet published, and never likely to be) which played an essential role in this heroic project. One shivers when one reads of the fears of those involved that the dismayingly formidable techniques required for this area of mathematics - and apparently for it alone - would not be passed on orally to future generations, and the understanding of them would be lost, like that of hieroglyphics. (A second vast project, the Revision of the Classification, is still underway to try to ensure that this does not happen.)
But often the best way to understand something is to look at extreme cases, and I think it is no accident that this is the best popularisation of mathematics that I have read. Something of the soul of mathematics is laid bare here.

