Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion (Evolution and Cognition Series)
- ISBN-100195149300
- ISBN-13978-0195149302
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateNovember 14, 2002
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.3 x 1.3 x 6.3 inches
- Print length400 pages
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Similar items that ship from close to you
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book offers good value for money and is an enjoyable read. However, some find the language technical and obscure, making it difficult to understand. There are mixed opinions on the information quality - some find it insightful and interesting, while others describe it as complicated and presented in an academic manner.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers appreciate the book's value for money. They find it a worthwhile read and consider it a good introduction to further reading.
"...to understand, more compelling, and overall I'd say that book was a more enjoyable read...." Read more
"...a threat to societies all over the world this book would be a good stepping stone to move on to a more compassionate and human environement." Read more
"...It is fairly hard work but worth it." Read more
"Academic, but Worth the Effort..." Read more
Customers have different views on the information quality. Some find it insightful, with facts and objective analysis, making it compelling. Others describe it as a complicated study presented in an academic manner with an awkward writing style. Overall, opinions are mixed regarding the level of difficulty and value of the book.
"...But those willing to make the effort will find a sophisticated objective analysis and striking insights into religious origins and behaviors...." Read more
"Heavily academic work. Command of basic sociological, anthropological, biological, and psychological terminology is helpful, if not necessary...." Read more
"...Scott's observations are, because I'm telling you, this book is the objective path forward & will lead the the COMPLETE REFORMING of psychiatry &..." Read more
"Very interesting topic...." Read more
Customers find the book's language technical and obscure. They say it's a difficult read, with an awkward writing style.
"...The language is technical and the vocabulary obscure; I was constantly consulting a dictionary for definitions of words like autochthonous,..." Read more
"...Not an easy read." Read more
".../history/psychology/evolutionary biology will have a difficult time translating this work, I sincerely hope folks eventually realize that this work..." Read more
"Writing style is awkward, a little obtuse." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 29, 2008After reading In Gods We Trust, Daniel Dennett's Breaking the Spell, and Pascal Boyer's Religion Explained (in that order), I have to recommend my favorite on this topic, Religion Explained. Boyer covers a lot of the same territory as Atran, but Boyer's explanations are easier to understand, more compelling, and overall I'd say that book was a more enjoyable read. If you are only going to read one book on the topic I'd recommend Religion Explained. That's not to say, however, that In Gods We Trust is not a worthwhile read.
In Gods We Trust is a highly technical and thoroughly scientific book whose aim is to explain how humans have evolved to invent and practice religions. With nearly 1,000 references, Atran has encyclopedic knowledge of the literature on his subject and supports every argument with studies and experiments. In Gods We Trust is exemplary of the rigid objective scrutiny of the scientific method.
This is by no means an introductory book, nor is it easily accessible to the general reader. The language is technical and the vocabulary obscure; I was constantly consulting a dictionary for definitions of words like autochthonous, epiphenomenon, nomological, internecine, tendentious, profligacy, endogenous, fecundity, and pedagogic, to name a few. But those willing to make the effort will find a sophisticated objective analysis and striking insights into religious origins and behaviors.
Humans' religiosity presents an evolutionary riddle: all human cultures practice religions and religious practice is materially costly and always includes sacrifice on the part of believers. But natural selection tends to stamp out waste and produce highly efficient organisms, so how did the human race evolve to habitually form and practice religions? Atran rejects various previously proposed explanations for religion, while also denying that it is naturally selected as an adaptation with benefits which outweigh its costs. Instead, he suggests that some aspects are byproducts of adaptations while other aspects are plausibly adaptive; "both adaptations and by-products, in turn, have been culturally co opted...by religion to new functions."
The evolutionary byproduct I thought was most striking and explanatory is that of hyperactive agency detection. An agent is an entity that "instigates and controls its own actions," such as a person or an animal. Atran explains that humans have evolved generally advantageous abilities to recognize that other people and animals are agents as opposed to inanimate objects, which helps us to predict what they will do (IE a predator might attack us, prey will run away when attacked, a person could be a friend or foe). It makes sense that we would evolve this trait, since if you hear a rustle in a bush and you think there is an animal there but it turns out to just be the wind, then no harm done. But if there is a predator in the bush and you think nothing of the noise, you may not survive. Thus, there is little penalty for over-detecting agency but sometimes severe penalties for under-detecting agency, which leads to a "hair-trigger" on our agency detection abilities.
Uncertain and "emotionally eruptive" events such as earthquakes, floods, disease, and death prompt humans to search for a reason or purpose behind them. But since these important events have no apparent controlling force, they are quickly associated with supernatural agents. "In all cultures, supernatural agents are readily conjured up because natural selection has trip-wired cognitive schema for agency detection in the face of uncertainty." There is much, much more to religion than hyperactive agency detection, and Atran gives compelling explanations for a wide variety of other aspects as well.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 22, 2017Heavily academic work. Command of basic sociological, anthropological, biological, and psychological terminology is helpful, if not necessary. A dictionary will be needed as a supplement. The writing style is approachable so as not to deter curious, non-academic readers. The author does take time to explain difficult concepts with clarity. Overall the book does not offer much by way of explanation of religion, but does offer a cognitive basis for the "fitness" of religious belief. An evolutionary framework is the assumption, however the author takes pains to clarify that the cause/presence of religion cannot be reduced to simple Darwinian principles (a la Dawkins). The author is keen to suggest that religion is here to stay based upon persuasive points of argument, especially that lack of any secular ideology's ability to confront and comfort in the face of "existential anxieties" and the human impulse to find "agency" and impose "metarepresentation" in random and natural events.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 25, 2014Excellent information but presented in a very academic, circuitous manor. Not an easy read.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 1, 2023Most important scholarly work of this century, hands down, no competition. The vast majority of the observations Scott makes I also made while studying Psychology as an historian/religious scholar. This book is THICK & academic, so, I expect folks not completely engrossed in anthropology/history/psychology/evolutionary biology will have a difficult time translating this work, I sincerely hope folks eventually realize that this work will change the world for the better. Why? Because it's true. Scott identified the *missing link* between the hard & "soft" (social) sciences. At present, psychologists/psychiatrists/therapists have been ignoring evolution & our tribal nature as having importance, 95% of those academic disciplones have been COMPLETELY ignoring evolution & our tribal nature, & in doing so, risking the lives & mental health of our species. Scott provides clues to the way out of that mess. Notice anylne with a low star rate was probably unfamiliar with the topics discussed, beacause it's HIGHLY interdisciplinary, but it HAS to be. In the future folks won't be as suprised by his findings & it'll be an wasier read once the global academic community realize that Scott wrote the MOST IMPORTANT scholarly work on this entire century, & perhaps the next few thousand years right under their noses. Nobel Prize worthy, revolutionary, the new onjective standard for understanding human behavior. Pair this with a comprehension of Dunbar's Number & the past several thousand years & modern human behavior start to make perfect sense. I hope you trust me & Scott, folks. I pray more folks will realize how brilliant Scott's observations are, because I'm telling you, this book is the objective path forward & will lead the the COMPLETE REFORMING of psychiatry & psychology, both studies that made the mistake of examining human behavior WITHOUT realing we evolved as hunter gatherers. Future generations will realize we were idiots, Scott's book will provide them the intellegence to be justified in that opinion. World changing, absolutely world changing, because it's TRUE.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2014Very interesting topic. Only a mild interest here got me to try it but I was sucked into wanting to know so much more, I read this years ago and only now got around to reviewing it - this boo, was responsible for a love of the topic I have now.
Top reviews from other countries
dghawkReviewed in Canada on June 15, 20155.0 out of 5 stars I really enjoyed this one by Scott Atran
I really enjoyed this one by Scott Atran. Beware that it is an academic read, lots of citations to consider.
Adam CarltonReviewed in the United Kingdom on May 20, 20133.0 out of 5 stars Compellingly argued but unfocussed
All societies at all times have exhibited religions but it is hard to really understand why. Scott Atran characterises a religion as ‘a community’s costly and hard-to-fake commitment to a counter-intuitive world of supernatural causes and beings’ (p. 264). Why would natural selection have permitted the evolution of such costly and pointless behaviour? Many theories have been advanced and Atran devotes substantial space to rebutting most of them and advancing his own rather compelling idea.
A community sincerely practising religion obtains benefits. These include: social solidarity, lowering economic transaction costs (due to increased trust), political effectiveness through group cohesion, intellectual closure (of a kind) on life’s intractable mysteries, and emotional solace. But why do people feel able to believe in the supernatural in the first place? The author looks to folk psychology and the innate human propensity to see agents everywhere: in a shaking bush, in a face in the clouds, in dream imagery. It appears easy for humans to believe that agents can exist which are insubstantial and incorporeal, and all religions are populated by myriads of these (think of angels and demons in Christianity).
So if believing in supernatural entities is hard-wired into our nervous systems, how do we deal with the apparently nonsensical fairy stories of theology? Atran argues that sacred texts are different from secular ‘theories’ in one crucial regard. Secular writing is authored by specific people with personal intentions to convey their message, whether it be political, scientific or dramatic; such texts are in principle rebuttable by future work or are known to be fictions. Religious texts, on the other hand, are authorless, timeless and true by definition (authorless means that the actual writer was inspired by the divine). Consequently, believers do not attempt to assess the real-world credibility of religious text: it is, after all, assumed to be true. Where the text is ‘difficult’, the problem believers actually address is to work out what it must ‘really mean’.
An overarching supernatural world of superior and controlling agents, built on irrefutable foundations delivers important advantages. Humans are unique in living in social groups larger than close kin. This means that there is always the danger of your exploitation by someone unrelated to you. How do you know whom to trust when surveillance of behaviour can only ever be partial? Atran argues that the kind of expensive commitments shown in the practice of religion (time spent at collective worship, the expenses of sacrifices) are a costly demonstration of non-selfish commitment to the community. The sincere believer also accepts that they are under the surveillance of God even when no-one else is present. Religion is being considered here as an underpinning for ‘reputation’ within the paradigm of reciprocal altruism.
In summary: humans have a propensity to see agency everywhere in the natural world via the mental module of folk-psychology. This easily leads to stable beliefs in a pantheon of spirits which, although supernatural, are all-too-typically human-like in their beliefs, desires, intentions and interactions with human-kind: they can be placated, asked for help and thanked. Once religion has become somewhat institutionalised it delivers a number of social benefits which can be leveraged for morality, economics, politics, social-cohesion and war. It also delivers personal benefits in dealing with life’s existential dilemmas of grief, loneliness, loss, sickness and death. Religion is therefore part of the human condition and attempts by scientific rationalists to debunk it are entirely beside the point and speak only to unbelievers: sacred texts by definition are irrefutable by rational analysis.
Now, putting aside the entirely interesting message of this book, its actual reading is difficult. ”In Gods We Trust” is an academic book, assuming familiarity with a number of relevant disciplines including language syntax, semantics and pragmatics; anthropological theories; cognitive science; cognitive psychology together with some neuroscience thrown in. The author is keen to refute many other theorists and to this end discursively summarises competing positions at length in order to then pursue a leisurely demolition: it’s easy to get lost. He’s diligent in buttressing his arguments with plenty of hard data, so we get many pages of description of his fieldwork (he is an anthropologist) and his university research on transmissibility of counter-factual beliefs. Although Atran is immensely scholarly and well-read, he has his blind spots. I didn't recognise, for example, his cavalier dismissal of the concept of IQ (he seems unaware of the critical role factor analysis plays in the definition of the g-factor and his negative remarks are quite wrong-headed – p. 298).
This is an important book to read if you have a broad background in the fields mentioned above, if you are prepared to wade through the lengthy digressions and if you are prepared to do a lot of the work to reconstruct the main lines of his argument yourself. The central problem with this book is that it’s hard to see the wood for the trees!
J.Reviewed in the United Kingdom on April 1, 20213.0 out of 5 stars A tough read
A tough cookie to get through. This is clearly for the more dedicated on the topic. The small print was very annoying and I gave up reading it several times.
Amazon CustomerReviewed in Canada on March 9, 20161.0 out of 5 stars did not enjoy this book
Interesting subject matter, extremely academic writing style yet disjointed. did not enjoy this book.

