Brilliant book. Fry demonstrates that war is a choice not an inevitability. As such, we see that we can do something about it if we have the political (this is a biggie) will to end war. Well researched, well thought out, credible conclusions.
Buy new:
-18% $79.93$79.93
FREE delivery January 28 - February 12
Ships from: GrandEagleRetail Sold by: GrandEagleRetail
Buy new:
-18% $79.93$79.93
FREE delivery January 28 - February 12
Ships from: GrandEagleRetail
Sold by: GrandEagleRetail
Save with Used - Acceptable
$39.01$39.01
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Shakespeare Book House
Save with Used - Acceptable
$39.01$39.01
Ships from: Amazon
Sold by: Shakespeare Book House
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Human Potential for Peace: An Anthropological Challenge to Assumptions about War and Violence 1st Edition
by
Douglas P. Fry
(Author)
Sorry, there was a problem loading this page. Try again.
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$79.93","priceAmount":79.93,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"79","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"93","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"3BNkJBDf5ERF5pyONxSLm4yHDayxmCP3xV7zfJMqA3pD2BA0jy7yVR0ixF%2FWTI%2FNn9EDB9%2FCgvASJ1QMBtDlEJfBVh7NLnI4eDjEqa4JzkSH17z8iIUKTGkTYwCFUr%2BtQ%2B%2Fis0pAqVllrS6cOHCIomcAZtuxSTnH5Gu7cgy1AdkHa9bsTKgHRM%2Fn3KTOM5RD","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$39.01","priceAmount":39.01,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"39","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"01","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"3BNkJBDf5ERF5pyONxSLm4yHDayxmCP3WVhac1yFPQKDK2G%2BstePzk2DYPep5dtATuSWpz%2BQc4msPQI0jtL%2BnJHSFL85tlXmDR%2BoI%2FTlpcYrwRUEbplBIRDgrpcdWhZipVQQv4PBnHdsaT4OnLA9rTyHGrHZiJ8ZWpSPNAT0OyV0rsePkDtwG88lxF6QtUFy","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}
Purchase options and add-ons
In The Human Potential for Peace: An Anthropological Challenge to Assumptions about War and Violence, renowned anthropologist Douglas P. Fry shows how anthropology--with its expansive time frame and comparative orientation--can provide unique insights into the nature of war and the potential for peace. Challenging the traditional view that humans are by nature primarily violent and warlike, Professor Fry argues that along with the capacity for aggression humans also possess a strong ability to prevent, limit, and resolve conflicts without violence. Raising philosophy of science issues, the author shows that cultural beliefs asserting the inevitability of violence and war can bias our interpretations, affect our views of ourselves, and may even blind us to the possibility of achieving security without war. Fry draws on data from cultural anthropology, archaeology, and sociology as well as from behavioral ecology and evolutionary biology to construct a biosocial argument that challenges a host of commonly held assumptions.
The Human Potential for Peace includes ethnographic examples from around the globe, findings from Fry's research among the Zapotec of Mexico, and results of cross-cultural studies on warfare. In showing that conflict resolution exists across cultures and by documenting the existence of numerous peaceful societies, it demonstrates that dealing with conflict without violence is not merely a utopian dream. The book also explores several highly publicized and interesting controversies, including Freeman's critique of Margaret Mead's writings on Samoan warfare; Napoleon Chagnon's claims about the Yanomamö; and ongoing evolutionary debates about whether "hunter-gatherers" are peaceful or warlike. The Human Potential for Peace is ideal for undergraduate courses in political and legal anthropology, the anthropology of peace and conflict, peace studies, political sociology, and the sociology of war and violence. Written in an informal style with numerous entertaining examples, the book is also readily accessible to general readers.
The Human Potential for Peace includes ethnographic examples from around the globe, findings from Fry's research among the Zapotec of Mexico, and results of cross-cultural studies on warfare. In showing that conflict resolution exists across cultures and by documenting the existence of numerous peaceful societies, it demonstrates that dealing with conflict without violence is not merely a utopian dream. The book also explores several highly publicized and interesting controversies, including Freeman's critique of Margaret Mead's writings on Samoan warfare; Napoleon Chagnon's claims about the Yanomamö; and ongoing evolutionary debates about whether "hunter-gatherers" are peaceful or warlike. The Human Potential for Peace is ideal for undergraduate courses in political and legal anthropology, the anthropology of peace and conflict, peace studies, political sociology, and the sociology of war and violence. Written in an informal style with numerous entertaining examples, the book is also readily accessible to general readers.
- ISBN-100195181786
- ISBN-13978-0195181784
- Edition1st
- PublisherOxford University Press
- Publication dateJuly 28, 2005
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions9.21 x 6.14 x 0.8 inches
- Print length384 pages
Frequently bought together

This item: The Human Potential for Peace: An Anthropological Challenge to Assumptions about War and Violence
$79.93$79.93
Get it Jan 28 - Feb 12
Only 3 left in stock - order soon.
$19.52$19.52
Get it as soon as Thursday, Jan 16
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$23.01$23.01
Get it as soon as Thursday, Jan 16
In Stock
Total price: $00$00
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Try again!
Added to Cart
Some of these items ship sooner than the others.
Choose items to buy together.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Beyond War: The Human Potential for PeacePaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Thursday, Jan 16Only 2 left in stock (more on the way).
Customer reviews
4.3 out of 5 stars
4.3 out of 5
14 global ratings
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star50%33%17%0%0%50%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star50%33%17%0%0%33%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star50%33%17%0%0%17%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star50%33%17%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star50%33%17%0%0%0%
How customer reviews and ratings work
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on December 27, 2016
- Reviewed in the United States on February 1, 2013The book is interesting, has a lot of information regarding different cultures, tribes, villages, and their peaceful efforts. The author traveled to so many places himself, so it is interesting to read his own observations.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 19, 2017It was exactly as expected, used in very good conditions
- Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2015Everyone needs to read this book!
- Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2015This is an excellent book. The author argues convincingly that the human being is not inherently warlike. We have a great capacity to create peace and live in harmony. This may at first seem strange and an utopian dream, but, looking at the data that the author provides it turns out to be undeniable, the evidence is truly overwhelming. We see war and violence every day in the news, we study the history of our civilization and others and discover that they all had war. So, why wouldn't we assume that human is inherently violent? Our cultural beliefs, as Douglas P. Fry argues, constrain us in our search for the truth. Many times, we make the mistake of portraying sedentary agricultural tribes as windows of the past. These tribes are predominantly warring and hierarchical. Warfare, as Fry states, increases with social complexity. The truth is that, despite being a small minority today, all humans were nomadic hunter-gatherers until around 12,000 years ago and lived in a sparsely populated planet (the highest estimates say that humans numbered about 10 million at the time). There were plenty of resources back then contrary to our beliefs due to the low population density (1 person per 8 sq. miles). In the worst Australian desert conditions that's the exact density needed to support a hunter-gatherer. Surely there were much more abundant places than Australia's harshest desert back then. Hunter-gatherers are predominantly non-warring and egalitarian. Individuals may fight over women but groups don't. Normally, in these societies, women possess as much power as man Fry also demystifies many writings of the so-called "realists" with powerful arguments and evidence and denounces how they tend to overlook peaceful pre-industrial societies overlooking them or explaining them away as they constitute a nuisance to the theories of warfare. My favourite chapter is the one in which he criticizes (and, indeed, demolishes) some assumptions people make about the past. These are 'The assumption of warring over scarce resources', 'The assumption of warring over women' and 'the assumption of warring over land'. Moreover, in conditions where resources are scarce (such as access to waterholes in the Kalahari Desert), cooperation rather than fighting is the chosen option for nomadic hunter-gatherers and much more advantageous.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 12, 2016This book represents an informed and well-reasoned attempt to articulate many of the problems with prevailing cultural assumptions about human warfare. Fry is deliberate about defining terms appropriately, looking to a wide body of particularly ethnographic data, and challenging flawed arguments. He argues persuasively that warfare correlates with different degrees of social scale and complexity, and ultimately asserts the importance of conflict resolution over lethal aggression in many societies.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 30, 2008This book convincingly challenges assumptions about war and violence by drawing upon a vast amount of anthropological evidence. The overall theme of the book is that Western culture has been and continues to be heavily influenced by an assumption that man is naturally warlike. However, a careful re-examination of the actual anthropological evidence leads to a different conclusion. Humans obviously have a capacity for violence and war, but they also have a huge potential for peacemaking, reconciliation, and avoiding violence in the first place.
Basically, anthropologist Douglas Fry argues that we have been sold on a bunch of assumptions and presumptions that do not match the actual facts. One chapter points out how a widely cited study on the Yanomamö people of South America, that supposedly shows that "killers have more kids," is analytically flawed. Fry presents a re-analysis and poses the question: Why does this obviously flawed study continue to be widely cited? The answer seems to be that it matches preconceived notions about a violent human nature.
The book is extremely well documented. A listing of societies that do not engage in warfare is provided in support of the thesis that humans are not naturally warlike. Fry's writing style is fun to read. He takes the reader along on adventures in anthropology to discover some surprising findings. He also uses anecdotes very effectively as a literary device to keep the reader's interest. One of my favorite chapters is when he tells of his own fieldwork experiences in Mexico and is not afraid to point out his own follies in the field.
In sum, this is a very well documented re-evaluation of very commonly held assumptions about human nature and war. In is an important book. It also is interesting, and in places down right funny. I recommend it not only to all the people who "wished that they had majored in anthropology in college" but also to anyone who ponders why men continue to go to war. This book provides some insightful, "unconventional wisdom" on this timely topic.
Top reviews from other countries
MayReviewed in Canada on October 19, 20144.0 out of 5 stars Interesting read!
Really interesting book about different societies and their tendencies for peacekeeping.
HugoReviewed in the United Kingdom on August 27, 20145.0 out of 5 stars Demystifies self-proclaimed realists
This is an excellent book. The author argues convincingly that the human being is not inherently warlike. We have a great capacity to create peace and live in harmony. This may at first seem strange and an utopian dream, but, looking at the data that the author provides it turns out to be undeniable, the evidence is truly overwhelming. We see war and violence every day in the news, we study the history of our civilization and others and discover that they all had war. So, why wouldn't we assume that human is inherently violent? Our cultural beliefs, as Douglas P. Fry argues, constrain us in our search for the truth. Many times, we make the mistake of portraying sedentary agricultural tribes as windows of the past. These tribes are predominantly warring and hierarchical. Warfare, as Fry states, increases with social complexity. The truth is that, despite being a small minority today, all humans were nomadic hunter-gatherers until around 12,000 years ago and lived in a sparsely populated planet (the highest estimates say that humans numbered about 10 million at the time). There were plenty of resources back then contrary to our beliefs due to the low population density (1 person per 8 sq. miles). In the worst Australian desert conditions that's the exact density needed to support a hunter-gatherer. Surely there were much more abundant places than Australia's harshest desert back then. Hunter-gatherers are predominantly non-warring and egalitarian. Individuals may fight over women but groups don't. Normally, in these societies, women possess as much power as man Fry also demystifies many writings of the so-called "realists" with powerful arguments and evidence and denounces how they tend to overlook peaceful pre-industrial societies overlooking them or explaining them away as they constitute a nuisance to the theories of warfare. My favourite chapter is the one in which he criticizes (and, indeed, demolishes) some assumptions people make about the past. These are 'The assumption of warring over scarce resources', 'The assumption of warring over women' and 'the assumption of warring over land'. Moreover, in conditions where resources are scarce (such as access to waterholes in the Kalahari Desert), cooperation rather than fighting is the chosen option for nomadic hunter-gatherers and much more advantageous.


