"War appears to be as old as mankind, but peace is a modern invention," claimed Sir Henry Maine in the middle of the 19th century. In his short, polemic book The Invention of Peace: Reflections on War and International Order, Michael Howard develops Maine's argument, and while not completely endorsing it, he convincingly argues that peace "is certainly a far more complex affair than war." At just over a hundred pages, The Invention of Peace is more of an essay than a book, and its massive historical sweep will undoubtedly irritate some readers. Beginning in A.D. 800, when war "was recognized as an intrinsic part of the social order," it extends to 2000, when "militant nationalist movements or conspiratorial ones" suggest that in the near future "armed conflict becomes highly probable." However, Howard's credentials for writing this type of macro reflection on war and international relations are impeccable. Having fought in Italy during the Second World War, he has held several chairs of History and War Studies, and remains the president of the International Institute for Strategic Studies. His many books include War in European History and a translation of von Clausewitz's classic On War.
With such qualifications, it is hardly surprising that Howard remains tied to the beliefs of the European Enlightenment, while also acknowledging that "the peace invented by the thinkers of the Enlightenment, an international order in which war plays no part, had been a common enough aspiration for visionaries throughout history, but it has been regarded by political leaders as a practicable or indeed desirable goal only during the past two hundred years." As Howard thoughtfully picks his way through the complex negotiations throughout European history that led to the brief eruption of peace into an otherwise uninterrupted state of war, he hopes that "Kant was right, and that, whatever else may happen, 'a seed of enlightenment' will always survive." Let's hope that he's right. --Jerry Brotton, Amazon.co.uk
As astute essay on peace as an objective in international affairs, Howard's analytically sharp discourse is ultimately pessimistic. Observing that people divide into two camps about peace--those who believe it must be preserved and those who believe it must be attained--Howard inspects that dichotomy as expressed in diplomatic settlements from the Peace of Westphalia onward. Peace preservers tend to be conservatives like Metternich; peace attainers, liberals like Wilson. Regardless of statesmen's proclivities (except those of prophets of class warfare or racial empire), peace came to be conceived as an achievable outcome of a rational ordering of international politics. Yet neither balance-of-power conservatism nor liberal internationalism has, save for a few decades here and there, delivered humanity from war. With the totalitarian ideologies vanquished, Howard still handicaps liberalism's current opportunity, through international organizations and global commerce, to shape a stable world order. Noting resentment of American preeminence and visceral rejection of Western values, his cold-bath conclusion is that "it would be unwise to expect anything of the kind." A pointed big-think tract. Gilbert Taylor
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
"A brilliant book. . . . [Howard's] argument about what is required for peace is complete and satisfying." -- Max Wilkinson, Financial Times, London
"A brilliant reflection on the world in which we live, and the potential threats to it ." -- Max Hastings, Evening Standard , London
"Always a delight to read . . . Howard [is] . . . the foremost historian of our time, he . . . writes with elegance, grace, and erudition." -- Thomas Owens, Washington Times
"An exhilarating gallop across 1,500 years of European history [The book] is delivered with considerable clarity and grace." -- Fritz Lanham, Houston Chronicle
"Howard's sweeping narrative reveals the intricate relationships between warriors, capitalists, religious authority, intellectuals, state elites, and postwar order." -- G. John Ikenberry, Foreign Affairs
"The foremost military historian of our time, [Howard] writes with elegance, grace, and erudition a distillation of his immense knowledge." -- Mackubin Thomas Owens, Washington Post
"The greatest military historian of our time calmly and patiently lays out the real dialectic between war and peace." -- David Rieff, Los Angeles Times Book Review
"[Howard's] slim work beautifully explains both the horror and the fatal attraction of war." -- William Shawcross, Sunday Times, London
About the Author
Sir Michael Howard is Robert A. Lovett Professor Emeritus of Military and Naval History at Yale University and was Regius Professor of History at Oxford University. He is the author of many books, including The Franco-Prussian War (1961), War in European History (1976), War and the Liberal Conscience (1978), and The Lessons of History (1991, Yale University Press). He is life president of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, which he helped found.
