
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
-43% $14.22$14.22
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Blake Academic
Save with Used - Very Good
$1.74$1.74
$3.98 delivery Wednesday, January 8
Ships from: glenthebookseller Sold by: glenthebookseller
Learn more
1.76 mi | Ashburn 20147
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Why Terrorism Works: Understanding the Threat Responding to the Challenge Hardcover – September 4, 2002
Purchase options and add-ons
Analyzing recent acts of terrorism and our reaction to them, Dershowitz explains that terrorism is successful when the international community gives in to the demands of terrorists?or even tries to understand and eliminate the ?root causes of terrorism. He discusses extreme approaches to wiping out international terrorism that would work if we were not constrained by legal, moral, and humanitarian considerations. And then, given that we do operate under such constraints, he offers a series of proposals that would effectively reduce the frequency and severity of international terrorism by striking a balance between security and liberty.
- Print length256 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherYale University Press
- Publication dateSeptember 4, 2002
- Dimensions6.5 x 1 x 9.5 inches
- ISBN-100300097662
- ISBN-13978-0300097665
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
War Against the Jews: How to End Hamas BarbarismHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3
The Price of Principle: Why Integrity Is Worth the ConsequencesHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3Only 16 left in stock (more on the way).
After the Pogrom: 7 October, Israel and the Crisis of CivilisationPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3
The Legacy of Islamic Antisemitism (Updated): From Sacred Texts to Solemn HistoryPaperbackFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 3
Case Against the New Censorship: Protecting Free Speech from Big Tech, Progressives, and UniversitiesHardcoverFREE Shipping on orders over $35 shipped by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Jan 6
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 2002 Cahners Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
James R. Holmes, Ph.D. candidate, Fletcher Sch. of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts Univ., Medford, MA
Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
A provocative, well-written book, destined to become a major source for understanding this modern plague. -- Aaron Leibel, Washington Jewish Week
As always, Dershowitz is provocative and controversial. -- (Choice)
Dershowitz brings...a clarity of vision impelled by a sense of outrage and an advocacy...as clear as his perceptions. -- Arnold Ages, Midstream: A Monthly Jewish Review
[A]nalysis reflects years of wrestling with the moral and legal questions involved; it is deep, clear and fair. -- Paul Pillar, The New Leader
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Yale University Press (September 4, 2002)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 256 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0300097662
- ISBN-13 : 978-0300097665
- Item Weight : 1.23 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,317,118 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,425 in Terrorism (Books)
- #2,791 in National & International Security (Books)
- #32,907 in Law (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ is a Brooklyn native who has been called 'the nation's most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer' and one of its 'most distinguished defenders of individual rights,' 'the best-known criminal lawyer in the world,' 'the top lawyer of last resort,' and 'America's most public Jewish defender.' He is the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Dershowitz, a graduate of Brooklyn College and Yale Law School, joined the Harvard Law School faculty at age 25 after clerking for Judge David Bazelon and Justice Arthur Goldberg. While he is known for defending clients such as Anatoly Sharansky, Claus von B'low, O.J. Simpson, Michael Milken and Mike Tyson, he continues to represent numerous indigent defendants and takes half of his cases pro bono. Dershowitz is the author of 20 works of fiction and non-fiction, including 6 bestsellers. His writing has been praised by Truman Capote, Saul Bellow, David Mamet, William Styron, Aharon Appelfeld, A.B. Yehoshua and Elie Wiesel. More than a million of his books have been sold worldwide, in numerous languages, and more than a million people have heard him lecture around the world. His most recent nonfiction titles are The Case For Peace: How the Arab-Israeli Conflict Can be Resolved (August 2005, Wiley); Rights From Wrongs: A Secular Theory of the Origins of Rights (November 2004, Basic Books), The Case for Israel (September 2003, Wiley), America Declares Independence, Why Terrorism Works, Shouting Fire, Letters to a Young Lawyer, Supreme Injustice, and The Genesis of Justice. His novels include The Advocate's Devil and Just Revenge. Dershowitz is also the author of The Vanishing American Jew, The Abuse Excuse, Reasonable Doubts, Chutzpah (a #1 bestseller), Reversal of Fortune (which was made into an Academy Award-winning film), Sexual McCarthyism and The Best Defense.
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 30, 2004I titled this review "A Voice of Reason." Because, if anything, Alan Dershowitz is a thinker, and a very good one. I did not mean to imply, however, that I agree with all his reasoning. But, oh how refreshing to hear a non-combative voice of reason on the issue of how to deal with terrorism. Everyone wanting to know more about what we should do and should not do should read Dershowitz' book first. It will set up the mind constructs you need for thinking about the problem.
Some reviewers claim Dershowitz is biased; i.e.--that he focuses too much on Palestinian terrorists. I disagree. His 21 pages enumerating Palestinian terrorist attacks convince me that Dershowitz focuses his attention right where it needs to be. He does not neglect Al Quaeda. He gives them the attention they deserve. And he gives the Palestinian terrorists the attention they deserve.
Dershowitz proposes that there be a world-wide debate about what defensive techniques should be allowed against terrorists. He includes a most thoughtful discussion about whether or not a country is justified in torturing a terrorist if the country feels that a massive terrorist attack is eminent. He argues that history proves that all countries will use torture in such a situation, but it will be sub-rosa torture in the countries where it is outlawed. He argues for a formalized system where the Federal court system gives the okay in extreme situations, so that the protections the judicial branch afford to us are afforded in these extreme situations too. He argues that judges are far less likely to approve such extreme tactics as are heads of intelligence agencies.
Detractors of his argument claim Dershowitz is proposing a reversion from civilized morality back to a darker era. He asserts, however, that he is not proposing anything new or reversionary. Rather, he is protesting the fact that torture occurs sub-rosa instead of being subject to judicial review. Disagree if you will, but it is wrong to mischaracterize what Dershowitz proposes. It is, after all, the same kind of argument as the "condoms for kids" issue. One side argues that premarital sex is happening anyway, so we should provide condoms to help prevent pregnancy and disease. The other side argues that the condoms themselves promote ever more promiscuity. There is truth on both sides of the argument. Dershowitz is fully cognizant of both sided of the issue. I wonder if some of the reviewers here are.
Dershowitz' argument for NICs (national identity cards) is the single area where I think he may have missed a critical point. Undoubtedly, NICs would help us control who gets into and stays in the United States. They also would stop lots of identity theft, fraud, and abuse. No arguments there. No arguments with his rationales either. But, just like the Social Security number, soon businesses would require the NIC as proof of person. Can you imagine the economic damage that could be done to a person if his/her NIC came up "invalid?" You could buy nothing without cash, and you couldn't get the cash without a valid NIC. Hmmm! That gives the government power to economically sanction individuals that voice opposition to their policies. The invalidation of your NIC would, of course just be an "unfortunate mistake" should you be successful in drawing the media's attention to it. Dershowitz says nothing about this possibility, which surprised me, because no fundamentalist Christian would ever miss this "mark of the beast" issue.
Notwithstanding the one omission just mentioned, I heartily recommend this book. The author makes you think, and leaves you enlightened and assured that we can manage terrorism and still preserve our liberties if we approach the problem with non-partisan rationality.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 6, 2016I bought this book for my terrorism studies class. I got exactly what I was loking for, good condition
- Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2012another one of the excellent books on the topic.l Worthwhile to read anhd keep as a reference book in your library
- Reviewed in the United States on May 1, 2013A most fact not widely known is the first recorded act of terrorism was in fact, -wait for it- jewish zealots in 70bce. They would stab people in crowds who were against them or even people (jews) who were collaborating with them. Look up "Sicarii" for your own proof.
Terrorism works as it worked for the lehi, irgun, haganah, stern gang, palmach, or whatever name they have. But they tell you they were peaceful and united...
One more book on a shelf showing Dershowitz defending murderers. Get permission from AIPAC to read it first.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 9, 2016Excelent!
- Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2015great read
- Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2003Dershowitz's argument is that we reward terrorism and that is why it works. If we would stop rewarding terrorism, then it would be ineffective and those using it would have to find other means to achieve their ends.
Focusing mostly on the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, Dershowitz recalls how acts of terrorism, the hijacking of airplanes, for example, led to wider recognition of the Palestinian cause and gained sympathy for the Palestinian people, whereas nothing else they did worked at all. When they began the suicide bombings Arafat became something close to a hero in many parts of the world.
The "we" Dershowitz is particularly addressing includes France, Germany, Italy, and the UN General Assembly. He believes if they would join the United States and Israel in forming a united front against terrorism by always responding unfavorably to terrorist acts, terrorism would lose its currency and we'd all be better off.
This argument, like that of not rewarding children for their unsocial behavior, is substantially correct and would indeed lessen the amount of terrorism in the world. I don't want to call Dershowitz's understanding trivial. It is not. It is important to appreciate that rewarding terrorism does indeed lead to more terrorism. But knowing this is the easy part. Getting the various peoples of the world to unite against terrorism is the hard part.
Dershowitz does not persuasively address this problem. To use the sort of real world hypotheticals that the esteemed and very readable Harvard Law School professor is fond of, let me offer this scenario to illustrate the extent of the problem. Let's say that a country has multi-billion dollar oil contracts with Iraq under the current situation. They are called upon to fight terrorism in the form of Iraq's support of Palestinian suicide bombers (and its possible future terrorism using possible weapons of mass destruction). They add up the pros and cons in terms of national self interest (as all nations routinely do, including the US) noting that somebody else's country is more likely to be hit, and what is their response? They decide to take their chances with the current situation.
Or , to use an example from the book, suppose a country has captured some terrorists who have hijacked an airplane. The government of this country is advised diplomatically that if the terrorists are let go that country's airplanes and its citizens will not be future targets. But if the terrorists are put on trial and convicted, the terrorists will hijack and blow up airplanes coming from that country.
This is blackmail and should be resisted, but the leader of this country is facing re-election soon and decides that letting a couple of terrorists go free is better than getting possibly hundreds of his countrymen killed.
Dershowitz's reiteration of this intractable problem is perhaps valuable for those who are new to the debate, and it certainly bears repeating. But this issue is not what is significant in this book. Dershowitz's advocacy of issuing warrants to torture "ticking bomb suspects" and his support for a non-mandatory national ID card, and his arguments for those positions, is really what this book is all about.
Here is the "ticking bomb suspect" hypothetical: a terrorist has knowledge of a nuclear bomb hidden somewhere in a large American city. It is ticking away, set to go off in a matter of hours. The FBI has a suspect who knows where the bomb is. He won't talk. Should we torture him?
Dershowitz's position is that is we will, count on it. On page 163 he gives us our choices in general: (1) no torture; (2) no officially approved torture, "but its selective use beneath the radar screen"; or (3) the issuance of a warrant by a magistrate "authorizing nonlethal torture." Because we will in some cases--the infamous ticking bomb suspect case being the most obvious--use torture regardless of legalities, Dershowitz's argument is that it is better to have the use of torture legalized and subject to the discretion of a representative of the legal establishment than to have it done in secret.
Others people believe that issuing warrants in effect condones torture and that it is better to have such horrendous necessities remain illegal exceptions that it is better not to talk about.
On the other issue, Dershowitz has persuaded himself that national ID cards are not the great threat to civil liberties that he once thought, and that they would be valuable tools in the fight against terrorism. It is interesting to read his arguments.
In the final analysis, my mind and heart say what they have said for decades, that there are no absolute rules that always work when it comes to human behavior. When the stacks are high people will do just about anything to achieve their ends, the niceties of law and morality notwithstanding. Perceived necessity trumps cogent argument. Human history is ample proof.
Let me close by disagreeing with Professor Dershowitz and say that I don't think terrorism works in the long run. What has it gotten the Palestinian people? True, the UN recognized Arafat, and many people in the world now sympathize with the plight of the Palestinians. So what? Many other people, myself included, have little sympathy for people who would use their children to murder other people's children. Are the people of Palestine any better off than they would have been without terrorism? I don't think so.
What would work in Palestine is a massive non-violent protest in the spirit of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. Too bad the Palestinian leadership is too enamored of violence to even conceive of such an approach.
Top reviews from other countries
-
recluseReviewed in Japan on October 6, 20044.0 out of 5 stars テロとの戦い
harvard law schoolの教授が現代のテロリズムにどのように対処すべきかを説いた力作です。the case for israelに続いて挑戦してみました。この著者は、決して論理と理想を紙の上でもてあそぶ著作ではありません。現実的な課題である非戦闘員の安全保障と法の支配を極限状況でもできるだけ両立させようとする教授の熱意がひしひしと伝わってくる力作です。教授は、なぜこれほどまでにテロリズムが現代において重大な争点になってしまったかを、テロリズムに対する西欧各国並びに国連の対応にその鍵を求めます。テロリズムに対する甘い対応が、結果として政治的にペイする効果的な手段としてのテロを引き起こしているというわけです。この構図に変化がない限り、テロを政治手段として用いる政治的な勢力の合理的な計算に変化を引き起こすことはできないというわけです。関連して、文中にまとめられている1968年のライラ・ハレドに始まるパレスチナのテロの時系列的な歴史は、散文的ながらも西欧並びに国連の場当たり的な対応を時間の流れに位置づけることができ圧巻です。さらに、教授はテロ防止の上で、拷問の効用とその悲劇的な役割についても、法学者らしく、その限界的な効果をある一定のaccountabilityの下で行われる限り、決して否定しません。この悲劇的なlesser evilの選択こそ、法のdue processの中で行われるべきだと主張するわけです。日本の北朝鮮への対応についても示唆に富む作品です。
M. D RobertsReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 15, 20035.0 out of 5 stars Fighting terrorism without appeasement.
This excellent study on modern day terrorism perhaps appropriately bears the smiling portraits of Yasser Arafat and Osama bin Laden on it's cover. How appropriate the reader must decide for themselves as they assess the information presented in this analysis of how terrorism actually "works".
Amongst the chilling conclusions illustrated in this extremely interesting research is that perhaps the gravest danger facing the world today emanates from state sponsored, religiously inspired terrorist groups, in possession of weapons of mass destruction.
This declaration by the author might seem rather obvious to those who are only too aware of today's political climate, recent atrocities and the 'war against terror'.
However, the author takes a rather unique approach in that he considers that such organised global terrorism is largely of our own making. This seemingly ludicrous statement takes on a chilling relevance as one listens to the writer's arguments as he proceeds to scrutinize recent acts of terrorism, our reactions to them and the relative consequences/reactions by the terrorists themselves to our attitude of apparent appeasement.
The author maintains that merely trying to 'understand' terrorism, instead of overtly facing it head-on, presents a victory to the terrorists in itself.
The book attaches considerable blame to the UN and the international community in politicising the phrase "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" and selectively applying it to causes which serve the purpose of the day.
Also demonstrated is how the international community has served as midwife to the birth of international terrorism since the late 1960's, through appeasement and a declared 'recognition' of the so-called 'root causes' of many terrorist struggles. Thus simultaneously providing the necessary recognition/incentive for the terror to continue, whilst refusing to take the steps necessary to actually curtail the terror.
The book shows how much of our attitude towards terrorist groups has to some extent rationalised such terrorism as a valid response to certain 'root causes' in some parts of the world, where repression or desperation are perhaps recognised by some sympathetic entities.
A response that the author shows only serves to reward and encourage the continuation of the terrorism associated with the groups concerned. The Middle East being a prime example. Indeed, much reference is made to the Arab-Israeli issue, with Palestinian and Islamic terrorism being the core issues.
The book establishes that in a world where suicide/homicide attacks are now seen by some as a new political weapon/tool & which even attract sympathetic murmurings from some senior political figures & public acclaim from others, action must be taken before the world is swept by a current of violence and terrorism never seen before.
The reader is left in no doubt as to the intricacies of fighting terrorism. The book describes the terrorists' intent upon influencing the actions and attitudes of their intended audiences through the media. The difficulties in retaliating against terrorist are also ably dealt with, when the actual attacker now just as likely to be a woman, teenager or child,.
We are also left in no doubt as to the difficulties in facing perpetrators who can effectively disappear by blending into a welcoming, surrounding civilian population, and where any retaliation to prevent further attacks can be labelled by some as 'collective punishment' and forcibly condemned. The difficulties of rooting out terrorist groups as well as individuals from the midst of civilian populations, amongst whom the terrorists hide & shelter behind is also referred to.
The author insists that the terrorists themselves must bear and carry the full moral responsibility for their murderous atrocities. He then delves into an in-depth study of how terrorism should & could be fought, if not constrained by moral, legal and humanitarian considerations. (An interesting, thought provoking approach). Then on another level he devotes a whole section of the book to the anti-terrorism procedures that should in fact be adopted that will actively reduce the severity and frequency of international terrorist attacks, by striking a sobering balance between liberty and security.
Highly recommended...required reading !
JenniferReviewed in the United Kingdom on August 11, 20045.0 out of 5 stars Scary Stuff
Much, much easier to get into than most other books of this genre. Definately a good one to start the Dissertation with! Not too much jargon or specific (and therefore not relevant) case studies. Very scary truths about the world, but exceptionally well written and definately interesting.
Mr. G. F. MclavertyReviewed in the United Kingdom on May 29, 20165.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Great book great service

