Tory Burch on Shopbop
Buy used:
$14.99
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime
FREE delivery January 27 - February 10 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or fastest delivery January 23 - February 6
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Good Condition. Fast Shipping.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville, and the Modern Prospect Hardcover – April 16, 2009

4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 19 ratings

In 1989, the Cold War abruptly ended and it seemed as if the world was at last safe for democracy. But a spirit of uneasiness, discontent, and world-weariness soon arose and has persisted in Europe, in America, and elsewhere for two decades. To discern the meaning of this malaise we must investigate the nature of liberal democracy, says the author of this provocative book, and he undertakes to do so through a detailed investigation of the thinking of Montesquieu, Rousseau, and Tocqueville.

Paul A. Rahe argues that these political thinkers anticipated the modern liberal republic's propensity to drift in the direction of “soft despotism”—a condition that arises within a democracy when paternalistic state power expands and gradually undermines the spirit of self-government. Such an eventuality, feared by Tocqueville in the nineteenth century, has now become a reality throughout the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. So Rahe asserts, and he explains what must be done to reverse this unfortunate trend.

The%20Amazon%20Book%20Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now

Editorial Reviews

From School Library Journal

Rahe (history & political science, Hillsdale Coll.; Republics Ancient and Modern) has actually written two books in one: the first three quarters are a detailed reading of the great 18th- and 19th-century political and social theorists Montesquieu, Rousseau, and Tocqueville on the nature of government, the glue that holds the polity together, and the difficulty maintaining political virtue and, with it, individual freedom, in a democratic republic. The threat to liberty and civic virtue, as Tocqueville saw it, lay in the elimination of intermediate bodies (like townships) that directly involved citizens in governing. Without such intermediate bodies, democracy would drift into soft despotism, with a central government regulating the smallest details of the citizen's life. This part of the book is tightly reasoned, relying on a thoughtful reading of texts that still have great merit for our own age. The final section of the book is an impassioned, occasionally intemperate, but largely successful attempt to describe the malaise gripping democratic governments today, combined with a plea to limit government's intrusion into our lives. (The author quite evidently holds libertarian views.) Many scholars and serious readers will find this essential reading.—David Keymer, Modesto, CA
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Review

"Acute analysts of emergent commercial republicanism found much to praise, even while foreseeing (and showing how one might avert) its slide into mindless self-absorption. With this expert, engrossing account, Paul Rahe joins that honorable company who resist the further degradation of democratic souls."—Ralph Lerner, The University of Chicago

(Ralph Lerner)

"This is an exemplary deployment of great past thinkers in an intensely provocative, deliberately controversial meditation on the profound strengths and weaknesses or dangers in our political culture."—Thomas L. Pangle, author of
Montesquieu's Philosophy of Liberalism: A Commentary on the Spirit of the Laws

(Thomas L. Pange)

"A remarkable book."—Kenneth Minogue,
Times Literary Supplement (Kenneth Minogue Times Literary Supplement)

“Valuable. . . impressive and provocative. . . deserves to be widely read. . . a fine book.”—William Voegeli,
National Review (William Voegeli National Review)

“Paul Rahe is a distinguished and prolific historian in the field of intellectual history who ventures with deliberate intent into political philosophy, judging what he sees.”—Harvey Mansfield,
Weekly Standard
(Harvey Mansfield
Weekly Standard)

“Intelligent [and] well-reasoned.”—Cynthia Grenier,
Human Events
(Cynthia Grenier
Human Events)

"Outstanding."—David Gordon,
The Mises Review (David Gordon The Mises Review)

Chosen as an Outstanding Academic Title for 2009 by
Choice Magazine (Choice 2010-01-01)

"Rahe's volume does the further service...of exposing this dilemma regarding how to break through the amnesia of the late-modern liberal era without reinforcing its disdain for those backward minds that have not yet caught the wave of egalitarian and perpetually self-constructed liberation."--Paul O. Carrese,
Journal of the Review of Politics (Paul O. Carrese Journal of the Review of Politics)

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Yale University Press; 0 edition (April 16, 2009)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Hardcover ‏ : ‎ 400 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 030014492X
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0300144925
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 1.6 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.13 x 1.19 x 9.25 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.5 4.5 out of 5 stars 19 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Paul A. Rahe
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

After reading Litterae Humaniores at Wadham College, Oxford, on a Rhodes Scholarship from 1971-1974, Paul A. Rahe completed a Ph.D. in ancient history at Yale University under the direction of Donald Kagan in 1977. In subsequent years, he taught at Cornell University, Franklin and Marshall College, and the University of Tulsa, where he spent twenty-four years before accepting a position at Hillsdale College, where he is Professor of History and holds The Charles O. Lee and Louise K. Lee Chair in the Western Heritage.

Professor Rahe's entire scholarly career has been focused on two subjects: the origins and evolution of self-government within the West, and the interplay between politics, diplomacy, and war. His range is considerable. His first book, Republics Ancient and Modern: Classical Republicanism and the American Revolution (1992), was 1200 pages in length and surveyed the origins and development of self-government in ancient Greece and Rome, its re-emergence in a new form in the Middle Ages, the transformation it underwent at the hands of the political philosophers of early modernity, and the statesmanship of the American Founding Fathers. Within the first thirteen months of publication, the hardback edition sold out. Thereafter, it reappeared as an alternative selection of the History Book Club. In 1994, it was reissued in a three-volume paperback edition by the University of North Carolina Press, and it remains in print.

In the course of his career, Professor Rahe has published dozens of chapters on related subjects in edited books and scholarly articles in journals such as The American Journal of Philology, Historia, The American Journal of Archaeology, The American Historical Review, The Review of Politics, History of Political Thought, The American Journal of Business and Professional Ethics, The Journal of the Historical Society, Social Philosophy & Policy, Security Studies, The National Interest, The American Interest, and The Woodrow Wilson Quarterly. He spent two years in Istanbul, Turkey in the mid-1980s as a fellow of the Institute of Current World Affairs; he has been awarded research fellowships by the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Earhart Foundation; and he has held research fellowships at the Center for Hellenic Study, the National Humanities Center, the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D. C. , Clare College at Cambridge University, All Souls College at Oxford University, the American Academy in Berlin, and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University; and he has given a host of public lectures at universities in the United States and abroad--most recently at the Hebrew University, at Al-Quds University, at Shalem College in Jerusalem, at the Sorbonne in Paris, at the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst in England, at the Free University in Berlin, and at the Marine Corps University in Quantico. In 1997-98, he was named to the Templeton Honor Rolls for Education in a Free Society by The John M. Templeton Foundation. In 2006 the Society for French Historical Studies awarded him the Koren Prize for the Best Article Published in French History the preceding year. In October 2019, the Mackinder Forum named his book Sparta's First Attic War: The Grand Strategy of Classical Sparta, 478-446 B.C. the book of the year for excellence in geopolitical analysis. And, in April 2022, the University of Piraeus in Athens, Greece conferred on him the Themistocles Statesmanship Award.

Professor Rahe co-edited Montesquieu's Science of Politics: Essays on the Spirit of Laws (2001) with David W. Carrithers and Michael A. Mosher, and he edited Machiavelli's Liberal Republican Legacy (2006). His second book, Against Throne and Altar: Machiavelli and Political Theory under the English Republic, which examines the political thought inspired by the abortive republican experiment that took place in England in the period stretching from 1649 to 1660, was published by Cambridge University Press in April, 2008. His third and fourth books, Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty: War, Religion, Commerce, Climate, Terrain, Technology, Uneasiness of Mind, the Spirit of Political Vigilance, and the Foundations of the Modern Republic and Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, and Tocqueville on the Modern Prospect, were published by Yale University Press in 2009.

Since that time, Professor Rahe has been working on a series of volumes focused on the grand strategy articulated and re-articulated time and again by ancient Sparta. Four of these volumes -- The Spartan Regime: Its Character, Origins, and Grand Strategy; The Grand Strategy of Classical Sparta: The Persian Challenge; Sparta's First Attic War: The Grand Strategy of Classical Sparta, 478-446 B.C.; and Sparta's Second Attic War: The Grand Strategy of Classical Sparta, 446-418 B. C.-- have been published by Yale University. Sparta's Sicilian Proxy War: The Grand Strategy of Classical Sparta, 418-413 B. C. was published by Encounter Books in September, 2023 and Sparta's Third Attic War: The Grand Strategy of Classical Sparta, 413-404 B.C. is slated for publication in 2024. He hopes to complete the series with a volume on Sparta's Imperial Venture.

Customer reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
19 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on August 26, 2009
    Dr. Rahe, a Rhodes scholar, is a well-respected political historian and professor of history at Hillsdale College, an institution noted for its fierce independence and unbiased stance on many of today's key issues. This, his seventh book, is perhaps his most significant.

    Although it is a scholarly work, it effectively demonstrates the slippery slope the US and other Western democracies have been on as they've slid semi-consciously towards depotism and tyranny at the hands of an ever more powerful nanny state. While this is clearly be the author's personal belief, the most compelling testimony comes from the likes of Alexis de Tocqueville, who anticipated today's trends over a century ago. Seeing today's reality as the manifestation of the worst fears of yesterday's best minds proves to be a powerful message.

    The book is full of wonderful quotations from Tocquevill and others, including one of my favorites: "...finally it reduces each nation to nothing more than a herd of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd". If you've never been exposed to the likes of Montesquie or Rousseau, their thoughts will prove haunting when you think about them in today's context.

    Unfortunately, while Dr. Rahe's work is well-written and no doubt meticulously researched, it's not likely to be subject matter for some mass-market TV series. His important message is therefore likely to remain unheard, until perhaps it becomes too late to reverse the trends he speaks about. That is the real tragedy of our times.

    Recommended without reservation.
    29 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on August 23, 2009
    I highly recommend this book to anyone interested in conservatism, our founding, and what could be done to get our country back on the right track towards liberty for all. The author offers a few very specific steps we can take in his conclusion.

    It took a while to get used to the "academic" style of writing. This is not an easy read, at least for me. But it is a very worthwhile read.
    2 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on June 5, 2009
    Prof. Paul Anthony Rahe does service to the cause of freedom by producing a profoundly useful work entitled _Soft Despotism, Democracy's Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, de Tocqueville and the Modern Prospect_. The author attempts to explain what de Tocqueville called many years ago, "democracy's drift." Meaning its descent into a "soft despotism" of centralized administration, barely perceptible over time. Rahe seeks serious philosophical support for his libertarian conclusions by appealing to the works of three great French thinkers. Montesquieu, whose work _The Spirit of the Laws_ reflected his study of the English national constitution and first suggested the efficacy of separation of powers. Rousseau, who was voluminous works, including the _Discourse on the Origins and Foundations of Inequality Among Men_, provided for an attack on individual liberty as the safeguard of societal progress, and argued that societies need to trade liberty for equality. And of course, the great de Tocqueville, in whose magnum opus, _Democracy in America_ astutely observed the habits of the early 19th century American population and through which he developed a theory of how societies can avoid democratic drift.

    It is useful to review a quote from de Tocqueville that the author puts in his conclusion:

    "Certain peoples pursue liberty obstinately in the face of all sorts of perils and misfortunes. It is not the material goods that it offers them that these peoples then love in it; they consider it itself as a good so precious and so necessary that no other good console them for its loss and that they find, in tasting it, consolation for everything that occurs. Other peoples tire of it in the midst of their prosperity; they allow to be snatched from their hands without resistance: for fear of jeopardizing by such an effort the very well-being they owe to it. What do they lack with regard to remaining free? What, indeed? The taste itself for being free. Do not ask me to analyze this sublime taste, it is necessary to experience it. It enters of its own accord into the great hearts that God has prepared to receive it: it fills them, it inflames them. One must renounce making mediocre souls understand what they have never felt."

    In short, de Tocqueville is stating Rahe's hypothesis that with time and prosperity, free societies allow their Liberties to be selectively chipped away, which the author sees as having been happening to the United States for the past 75 years.

    Rahe breaks his book down into four distinct parts; the first three dealing with the works and political insights of the philosophers mentioned above. In this he provides a valuable service for people who are interested in *why* these philosophers are important to the history of political thought and of Liberty, but don't necessarily want to slog through the large amount of material produced by them.

    In this, the author is similar to others like Karl Popper, who digested Plato and Hegel in his _The Open Society and its Enemies vols I & II_, Allan Bloom, who provides for an excellent review of Nietzsche in _The Closing of the American Mind_, and Francis Fukuyama, who does similar work for Hegel and Koejeve in _The End of History and the Last Man_.

    The last section of "Soft Despotism..." synthesizes the political insights of these authors in support of Rahe's conclusion that democratic society essentially harbors the seeds of its own destruction. That a drift towards a centralized administrative "soft despotism" is a natural part of the life-cycle of a free society and must be actively resisted. His arguments are not new, but they are convincing, and he has done a great service by demonstrating that the fear of democratic drift is not a recent phenomenon. In fact the three great French philosophers that are the focus of this book had no trouble in discerning the possibility of it.

    A key concept that runs through each of the philosopher's thought is that of "uneasiness" (inquietude) that all three mark as a characteristic of all free societies. It is this uneasiness, about one's place in society, one's future prospects (the treadmill effect to be more modern about it) that is the force that drives free men to slowly proffer up their Liberties to an administrative despotism that convinces them it can relieve their insecurities.

    Rahe's remonstrances against gently accepting the administrative despotism in which one could argue we are currently living is an important clarion call for all those who are interested in the cause of Liberty. Backed up by serious political philosophy and analysis, it deserves to be widely read.
    60 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on July 31, 2016
    For any reader who truly wants to understand the roots of American exceptionalism and what has been happening to undermine those very roots.
    One person found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2018
    Excellent all te way round ...content through writing.
    One person found this helpful
    Report