Buy new:
-57% $9.98$9.98
Delivery Monday, November 11
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Shakespeare Book House
Save with Used - Good
$6.27$6.27
Delivery Monday, November 11
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Borden's Ecommerce
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush Hardcover – April 6, 2004
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length272 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherLittle, Brown and Company
- Publication dateApril 6, 2004
- Dimensions5.75 x 1 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-10031600023X
- ISBN-13978-0316000239
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought
Conservatives Without ConscienceHardcover$10.28 shippingGet it as soon as Monday, Nov 11Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Broken Government: How Republican Rule Destroyed the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial BranchesHardcover$10.21 shippingGet it as soon as Friday, Nov 22Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Authoritarian Nightmare: Trump and His FollowersHardcover$10.21 shippingGet it as soon as Monday, Nov 11Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Holding the Line: Inside the Nation's Preeminent US Attorney's Office and Its Battle with the Trump Justice DepartmentHardcover$10.28 shippingGet it as soon as Wednesday, Nov 20Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From the Publisher
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Little, Brown and Company; 1st edition (April 6, 2004)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 272 pages
- ISBN-10 : 031600023X
- ISBN-13 : 978-0316000239
- Item Weight : 13.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.75 x 1 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #438,979 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #439 in Terrorism (Books)
- #812 in United States Executive Government
- #13,473 in United States History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

John Dean served as Counsel to the President of the United States from July 1970 to April 1973. Before becoming White House counsel at age thirty-one, he was the chief minority counsel to the Judiciary Committee of the US House of Representatives, and an associate deputy attorney general at the US Department of Justice. His undergraduate studies were at Colgate University and the College of Wooster, with majors in English Literature and Political Science; then a graduate fellowship at American University to study government and the presidency before entering Georgetown University Law Center, where he received his JD with honors in 1965.
John recounted his days at the Nixon White House and Watergate in three books: Blind Ambition (Open Road 2016), Lost Honor (1982) and The Nixon Defense (2014). After retiring from a business career as a private investment banker doing middle-market mergers and acquisitions, he returned to full-time writing and lecturing, including as a columnist for FindLaw's Writ (from 2000 to 2010) and Justia’s Verdict (since 2010). Donald Trump’s election and presidency resulted in John’s 12th book by return to American authoritarianism, which he examined earlier New York Times best-sellers Conservatives Without Conscience (2006), because authoritarianism is on the ballot in 2020. Thus his study with Bob Altemeyer, Authoritarian Nightmare: Trump and His Followers.
John held the Barry Goldwater Chair of American Institutions at Arizona State University (academic years 2015-16), and for the past decade and a half he has been a visiting scholar and lecturer at the University of Southern California's Annenberg School of Communications. John is a CNN News contributor and analyst, and teaches continuing legal education (CLE) programs examining the impact of the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct on select historic events from Watergate and the Trump presidency with surprising results – see www.WatergateCLE.com
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book well-researched, engaging, and exceptionally well-informed. They also appreciate the great insight, revealing information, and writing clarity. However, some customers feel the Bush administration is obsessed with secrecy and blocking bipartisan investigations.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book well-researched, engaging, and well-informed. They say it's a great read and one they urge others to read before the election.
"...His credentials are sparkling. This is a must-read book. It explains the facts clearly. And it connects the dots extremely well...." Read more
"For a convicted felon, John Dean is an exceptional author...." Read more
"...The contents of this book are very well researched and presented in a clear, concise and non-inflammatory manner...." Read more
"...lack of pages, the information contained within is wonderful and quite engaging...." Read more
Customers find the book's insight great, revealing, and wonderful. They also say it's interesting and informative about evil.
"...facts under the rug and out of sight and this book contains very critical information that should be understood by the electorate...." Read more
"...although disappointed with the lack of pages, the information contained within is wonderful and quite engaging...." Read more
"...John Dean writes clearly and with great insight. We should all be concerned about the "imperial presidency," that he speaks of...." Read more
"...This was a good book, very interesting and informative about the evil tenure of Bush/Cheney...." Read more
Customers find the writing clear, concise, and non-inflammatory. They also say the book is well organized as a polemic.
"...Dean's writing is clear. His argumentation exacting. His documentation is painstaking. His credentials are sparkling. This is a must-read book...." Read more
"...The contents of this book are very well researched and presented in a clear, concise and non-inflammatory manner...." Read more
"...This book is extremely well written and although disappointed with the lack of pages, the information contained within is wonderful and quite..." Read more
"...Watergate" is one of the earliest (2004), best argued, most easily understood critiques of the Bush administration available...." Read more
Customers find the book well-paced and easy to read. They say it's a quick read.
"...The book is well paced and easy to read and engaging which makes for a very quick read...." Read more
"John Dean know of what he writes. The book, while a relaively easy read, backs up every allegation with sources and endnotes that in of themselves..." Read more
"Slow start, good finish..." Read more
Customers dislike the Bush administration's obsession with secrecy and blocking bipartisan investigations.
"...Such secrecy is antithetical to democratic government and unworthy of any modern presidency" (p. 185). Sunlight is the best disinfectant...." Read more
"...The worst trait of the Bush administration is it's obsession with secrecy...." Read more
"...In this book you see an administration that not only is highly secretive, but also totally disrespects the legislative branch of government...." Read more
"Secrecy, Lying, Stonewalling & Blocking Bipartisan Investigations..." Read more
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The book's thesis is that the exteme level of secrecy exercised by the executive branch under Bush is dangerously corrosive to the liberties of Americans and to the Constitutional form of government we enjoy. Framers of the Constitution understood that the flame of liberty is fed by the fresh air of truthful information. Choke off that flow and the flame quickly dies, suffocating with it all those nearby. This is the reason for having a free press, for having freedom of association, for having elections. This purpose is subverted when the executive either systematically misleads Congress and the electorate or systemmatically shields them from essential information. James Iredell was one of George Washington's picks for the supreme court. He expressed their views when he asserted "The President must certainly be punishable for giving false information to the Senate." (p 155)
I imagine many people who start reading the book will be inclined to react as I did "Secrets and half truths .. so what? It's just standard fare for politics." But if democracy is to produce good policy we must expect much better than what we have recently gotten used to. And the Bush Whitehouse's practices in secrecy and falsification lie in a completely different league from anything that could have heretofore been imagined. The Bush Whitehouse's primary business, Dean argues, is to manufacture perceptions that belie its actions. (Government by misdirection is an art pioneered by his father under Reagan with the 'War of the Winter Club" - a war waged against a small nation during the lull between football and baseball season, and parodied in the movie "Wag the Dog") At one point Dean suggests that simply documenting all the falsity manufactured by the Bush administration would require a book of many hundreds of pages longer than this one. And he gives an online reference of a non-partisan group that has done just this.
The first chapter compares Nixon and Bush. Nixon was more paranoid - almost pathologically so. But his legislative record makes him look, in comparison to Bush, like a sociallist. Nixon worked hard and mastered vast amounts of information, and had a keen grasp of international and national politics. Bush is by comparison a quickstudy. But according to Dean he never exerts himself and therefore is essentially clueless about any area of inquiry outside those of 'spin' and baseball.
The next chapter is about 'Stonewalling' It makes the point that there are issues about Presidents and Vice Presidents that the electorate ought to know and have generally known about others in the same offices, but which Cheney and Bush have obscured. The issue of Cheney's long history of heart trouble - not the least of which was a heart attack during the Florida recount that Bush information officers denied ever taking place - is one instance. The case of how Bush accumulated his small fortune through a scheme that materially misrepresented the financial structure of the deal, defrauding the taxpayers and sports enthusiasts of Arlington out of tens of millions of dollars, TX is another. Since the issue of privacy and how much of it one needs to give up to serve in public office is an unsettled issue, this may be the weakest chapter in the book. Still, Dean raises some questions that need answers.
Dean starts chapter three with the story of Bush's illegal treatment of his own gubernatorial papers as Governor of Texas. State law requires them to be disclosed and catalogued. He sent them to his father's Presidential library and claimed they were beyond reach. In the end the rule of law prevailed, but the whole ordeal took years to sort out. It is a case where Bush intentionally, knowingly, openly, blatantly broke Texas law.
Any of these issues and several more are considerably more serious than the 'Whitewater' scandal that embroiled the Clinton Whitehouse. Yet there is no ongoing work to resolve their legal status. Still, these are small potatoes compared to the most eggregious abuses. The big issues involve 9/11 and Iraq.
The illogic of the Whitehouse's obsession of Iraq is illustrated most laughably by the shopworn story about the Rumsfeld Proposition . Early on September 12th 2001 Rumsfeld proposed as a response to 9/11 that we bomb Iraq because it at least has some 'good targets.' Or by Bush's telling counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke to find links between Saddam and the twin towers incident. Everyone in the Whitehouse knew there were none. But this version of the truth was inconvenient. It did not support the conclusion that Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld held when they entered the Whitehouse nine months earlier - that America ought to invade Iraq and install a puppet government.
Dean argues that this obsession with Iraq was not simply some personal vendetta against Saddam; it was the implementation of Cheney's radical neoconservative agenda. In this view of the world the US is the singular and supreme Imperial power. Being able to topple governments and install puppets to do our bidding is the means to ultimate, unstoppable, and unchallengeable American hegemony. Installing a puppet in Iraq was just the first step. Iraq was about the oil, yes. But it was much, much more. It was about RULING THE WORLD.
(( It is sad to think about how little some of our leaders learn from history. It was, after all, the CIA who installed the Shah of Iran using violent and unlawful means and justifying them on the basis of access to oil. Since then the shah has been toppled and Iran has an elected government of the sort we appear to be setting up in Iraq - one run by Shiite moslems and based on Islamic law. Is this the outcome Cheyney and his neocon pals are aiming for? If so, then the war was nothing but a very expensive and cynical re-election campaign. If not, what was he expecting? His own crown? One is tempted to wonder out loud whether Cheyney's visions of grandeur are not pathologically delusional. Or am I the only one who's been watching too much 'Pinky and the Brain?' ))
It was in justifying this war to the American people that the Bush Whitehouse commited its most eggregious crimes. For example, Dean reconstruct's Colin Powell's presentation to the UN security council regarding Iraq's WMD. He discusses something like a dozen slides that Powell knowingly misrepresented, turning mere water trucks into weapons of mass distruction. And representing as current stockpiles, photos of arms once in Iraq but known and documented to have long since been destroyed under the auspices of weapons inspectors . It is not that the Bush administration was merely mistaken about WMD. It is that they intentionally fabricated a case in order to further a hidden agenda.
This, by any standard, is an impeachable offense. For it sold Americans a war based on a premise known to the President to be false. And this was not any old war. This is the first war in the history of the United States to be started as a preventitive war, which is illegal under international law, rather than a preemptive war, which legal under international law (p 133). Clearly, using fraudulent means to drag America into an illegal war ought to be an impeachable offense. Perhaps it ought to be a capital offense, for at its core it is a conspiracy to kill people for reasons judged by the perpetrator to be unacceptable by his society.
Speaking of capital offenses, Dean also presents the Valerie Plume incident in which a Whitehouse Staffer committed an act of treason - revealing the identity of a spy is a treason. The reason, of course, was because her husband published an Op-Ed piece in the NYT demostrating that Saddam really was not engaged in buying 'yellowcake' the raw material from which nuclear fuel and bombs are manufactured as the Bush Whitehouse had publically asserted.
Dean's writing is clear. His argumentation exacting. His documentation is painstaking. His credentials are sparkling. This is a must-read book. It explains the facts clearly. And it connects the dots extremely well. Far beneath the surface, it also explains why I have been feeling a kind of yearning for the 'bad old days' of Nixon and the Cold War. Back then the press actually tried to get the story right. Politicians tried to act civilized. There was a commonly held notion that policy was important. There was debate about issues and policies. We were not obsessing over winners and losers. Spin, if it existed was subtle. Framing was not ironic. And Nixon, for all his paranoia and megalomania, really worked hard to understand the world and sometimes do the right thing.
I started the book skeptical that one could prove the current situation 'worse than Watergate.' I came away from the book thinking "saying it is worse than Watergate is like saying Katrina was a 'spot of bad weather.'" Democracy would almost certainly have survived were the high crimes and misdemeanors of the Nixon Whitehouse not revealed and prosecuted. If, however, the Bush standard for fraud, secrecy, vindictivenss, and deception is what we can expect of the Presidency from here on out, and the erosion of standards continues at the same pace, there is no question in my mind that the flame of liberty will be snuffed out in my own lifetime.
Dean argues that in asking Congress for a Joint Resolution authorizing the use of American force in Iraq, President Bush made a number of "unequivocal public statements" regarding the reasons this country needed to pursue military force in pursuit of national interests. Dean, now an academic and noted author, shows how through tradition, presidential statements regarding issues of national security are held to an expectation of "the highest standard of truthfulness". Therefore, according to Dean, no president can simply "stretch, twist or distort" the facts of a case and then expect to avoid resulting consequences. Citing historical precedents, Dean shows how Lyndon Johnson's distortions regarding the truth about the war in Vietnam led to his own subsequent withdrawal for candidacy for re-election in 1968, and how Richard Nixon's attempted cover-up of the truth about Watergate forced his own resignation.
Dean contends that while President Bush should indeed receive the benefit of the doubt, he must also be held accountable for explaining how it is that he made such a string of unambiguous and confident pronouncements to the American people (and to the world as well) regarding the existence of WMD, none of which have been substantiated in the subsequent searches that have been conducted by either Untied Nations nor American Military investigators. Dean explains how the vetting process for any public staement is processed within the executive branch.
[...] Moreover, Dean contends, others such as Donald Rumsfeld were even more emphatic in claiming Saddam Hussein had WMD, even claiming to know the locations as being in the Tikrit and Baghdad areas. Finally, he concludes, given the huge implicit political risk to Mr. Bush, it would inconceivable that Mr. Bush would be so brazen as to make such statements without some intelligence to back them up.
Yet, according to Mr. Dean, we are left with a dilemma; either Mr. Bush's statements are grossly inaccurate, given the tons and tons of chemical agents he claimed Saddam possessed which can be neither located nor substantiated, or Mr. Bush has deliberately misled us. How do we reconcile what seem to be quite unequivocal statements from both the President and his agents and the evidence to date regarding the existence of WMD? According to Mr. Dean, there are two possibilities; first, that there is something devilishly wrong with the current administration's national security operations, a prospect Dean finds hard to swallow, or, second, the President has deliberately misled the American people and the world regarding the evidence supporting taking preemptive military action against the sovereign nation of Iraq.
Bluntly stated, if Mr. Bush led this country into war based on bogus intelligence data, he is liable under the Constitution for manipulation and deliberate misuse of that data under the "high crimes" statute of that document, given the fact it is a felony to defraud the United States through such a conspiratorial action. According to Mr. Dean, It is time for both Congress and the American people to demand of Mr. Bush the same kind of high-minded honesty he pledged to us under the oath of office. This is an important book, and one I urge you to read!
Top reviews from other countries
Mr. Dean's later work Conservatives Without Conscience is prescient, and I strongly recommend it to anyone who wants to understand what is going on in the 2016 Presidential Election in general, and Donald Trump in particular.
