Shop Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
Buy used:
$9.99
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime
FREE delivery Wednesday, January 8 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Solid copy with some shelf wear and/or markings scattered throughout.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Seven Sins of American Foreign Policy Paperback – June 19, 2006

4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars 18 ratings

The empathy that flooded into America from around the globe after 9/11 has faded, and now America is arguably more unpopular that it has ever been. As global anti-Americanism threatens the modern world, Loch Johnson explains how the U.S. has drifted away from the principles that made it a highly regarded global leader at the end of the Second World War. Seven Sins of American Foreign Policy explores the negative worldwide attitudes toward the U.S., identifying how the antipathy runs much deeper than American political leaders' response to the 9/11 attacks.

Johnson's compelling insight isolates seven key foreign policy issues that are at the root of America's problematic global image, causing an alarming loss of allies across the globe:

Ignorance

Veneration of the president

Militarism

Unilateralism

Isolationism

Lack of empathy

Arrogance

The%20Amazon%20Book%20Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

In this insightful but plodding critique of American foreign policy, national security scholar Johnson (America's Secret Power) worries that the United States is the world's most unloved "sinner." Patriots need not fear any sweeping moral condemnations of the U.S. from Johnson, however. He is just as concerned with whether U.S. policies enhance the nation's security as with whether they are righteous. The "seven sins" he warns against are American ignorance of the rest of the world; the executive branch's dominance of foreign policy; an overreliance on military solutions; a tendency to act unilaterally; a penchant for isolationism; lack of empathy for others; and a generalized arrogance. Johnson argues that in the post-9/11 era, these traits have hardened into a national "syndrome," leading much of the world to "doubt the wisdom of the United States and its capacity for global leadership." Blending liberalism and realism, his critique is strongest when examining specific policies in detail—such as U.S. arms dealing to other nations (too much) and U.S. foreign aid (not enough). Unfortunately, overly schematic analysis produces a simplistic portrait of America's international role. Despite some persuasive critiques of U.S. foreign policy, this pedantic book leaves the reader with a narrow vision of how this alleged "sinner" might find redemption. (Aug.)
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Loch Johnson a widely known and cited foreign policy expert is Regents Professor at the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Georgia. He has written and published a variety of books and articles, including some seminal works in on U.S. intelligence, such as America's Secret Power: The CIA in a Democratic Society.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Longman (June 19, 2006)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 176 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0321397940
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0321397942
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 13.6 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.5 x 0.75 x 7.75 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars 18 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Loch K. Johnson
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
18 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on April 12, 2009
    This is not a perfect book. It has more than its fair share of flaws. There are a number of glaring factual, terminological, and stylistic errors that are downright cringe-worthy. For example, in one place, the author refers to James Madison as the second President of the United States (Madison was actually the fourth president); in another place, he refers to "ionized" radiation from nuclear weapons (the correct term is "ionizing" radiation); and, in another place, he refers to the British foreign intelligence service as the "Strategic Intelligence Service" (it is actually called the "Secret Intelligence Service"). I blame poor editing more than anything else. The errors in this book are mistakes that any writer (even a noted foreign policy, national security, and intelligence expert like Loch Johnson) is liable to make when quickly throwing together a first draft. But these errors should have been caught and corrected in the editing process before the book went to print. The errors are certainly a distraction; but their significance should not be overstated. This is NOT a perfect book; but it IS a good book. And, as the saying goes, the perfect is the enemy of the good. To dismiss this book because of its imperfections would be to toss the baby out with the bathwater. Some of the most informative books I've ever read have been riddled with far worse errors than are found in this text. So, if we are willing to overlook the annoying factual, terminological, and stylistic errors -- which can be attributed to poor editing -- and focus instead on the substantive points that Johnson is trying to make, we find a book that is worthy of serious consideration.

    First of all, the introductory chapter presents a truly excellent overview of the history of American foreign policy from the founding of the republic to the present day. It is succinct, and doesn't get bogged down in unnecessary details; yet it is thorough and nuanced enough to provide readers with a good understanding of how American foreign policy has developed over the years -- what has remained constant, what has changed, and what forces have shaped America's relations with the rest of the world. After this excellent introduction, Johnson turns to his critique of American foreign policy; focusing on seven "sins" that have plagued American foreign policy throughout recent history, and devoting a chapter to each: 1) Ignorance; 2) Executive Branch Dominance; 3) Excessive Emphasis on the Military; 4) Unilateralism; 5) Isolationism; 6) Lack of Empathy; and 7) Arrogance. In his concluding chapter Johnson identifies "the good, the bad, and the ugly" of American foreign policy since the end of World War II -- i.e. where we got it right, where we got it wrong, and where we shot ourselves in the foot. You may not agree with all of Johnson's conclusions; but you cannot dismiss the importance of his critique. The issues that Johnson addresses represent the most salient debates in American foreign policy today.

    Johnson tries to be evenhanded; giving credit where he believes credit is due, and criticism where he believes criticism is due, in a non-partisan and non-ideological manner. This is neither a harangue against, nor a paean for, any particular president, party, or political philosophy. Johnson has plenty of constructive criticism to spread around; acknowledging the foreign policy blunders of every president since the end of the Second World War. But he is also quite willing to recognize the good along with the bad. While he is highly critical of the Bush Doctrine, the war in Iraq, and the neoconservative approach to foreign policy, he is no Bush basher. His view of American foreign policy under the Bush administration is mixed -- more negative than positive, perhaps; but not entirely negative by a long shot. The same could be said for his view of American foreign policy under the Clinton administration, the Reagan administration, the Carter administration, etc. He is not an apologist for any administration, recognizing that all American presidents have been guilty of the "sins" he identifies.

    Johnson advocates a pragmatic foreign policy that will advance American interests without provoking unnecessary conflict or animosity abroad. He is neither a quixotic idealist nor a coldblooded realist. Rather, he steers a prudent middle course -- one that is consistent with our core values, but that is cognizant of the realities of the world we live in, and of the extent and limits of our power. Johnson makes a good argument in support of his conclusions; but he also gives a fair shake to opposing points of view. You may not agree with all of Johnson's conclusions; but you should find his discussion very thought provoking. This book is ideal as a catalyst for discussion; and would be very suitable for classroom use. I plan to use this book in my own foreign policy courses; and would certainly recommend it to anyone interested in American foreign policy.
    8 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on November 14, 2020
    I got this book for my class, and I love it. I have a senior studying political science and this has been my favorite assigned reading throughout college. The author makes great arguments that are backed up sufficiently with historical evidence. A great read regardless if you are in school or not.
  • Reviewed in the United States on September 13, 2006
    This book is fair and objective, but Dr. Johnson's criticisms are sharp. We Americans are largely ignorant of the world's geography, different cultures and foreign languages. Executive powers are inadequately checked by congress where foreign policy is concerned. We've come to rely on our military forces as our only policy tool, rather than our tool of last resort. We don't provide enough foreign aid to developing countries. We've recently been all too willing to go it alone when employing our military. That's five of the seven sins. Here is where his Seven Sins framework starts to feel a bit forced. The last two sins, Arrogance and Isolationism, could have just as well been incorporated into the Unilateralism chapter. He acknowledges this, and does a pretty fair job of coming up with sufficient material to make seven distinct sins.

    I only have two small complaints with this book. The first is that he didn't place enough emphasis on the problems encountered distributing foreign aid. Much of U.S. reluctance to increase foreign aid stems from the fact that there is no good way to ensure that it is distributed to the people who need it. There are alternatives to Jeffrey Sachs' Big Plan that should have been considered in this chapter. My second complaint is that the current administration is cited as a violator of what seemed like all seven sins. Granted, they probably should step into the confessional, and he affords them adequate praise where it is due, but leaving them out of a chapter or two wouldn't have harmed the integrity of this book.

    Overall, 'Seven Sins' is a calm, objective and reasoned analysis that stands out among the shrill partisan rhetoric we are regularly subjected to. Dr. Johnson's book is a welcome contribution to the debate.
    2 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on September 7, 2015
    This was a great read. I'm glad I made this purchase.
  • Reviewed in the United States on January 15, 2015
    good
  • Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2018
    Many of the pages in the beginning of the book we're not attached to the spine, I had to tape them all in.