Buy new:
$8.99$8.99
Delivery Thursday, January 16
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$6.19$6.19
$8.39 delivery January 24 - February 14
Ships from: ThriftBooks-Seattle Sold by: ThriftBooks-Seattle
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Stalking the Vietcong: Inside Operation Phoenix: A Personal Account Mass Market Paperback – November 23, 2004
Purchase options and add-ons
Stuart A. Herrington was an American intelligence advisor assigned to root out the enemy in the Hau Nghia province. His two-year mission to capture or kill Communist agents operating there was made all the more difficult by local officials who were reluctant to cooperate, villagers who were too scared to talk, and VC who would not go down without a fight. Herrington developed an unexpected but intense identification with the villagers in his jurisdiction–and learned the hard way that experiencing war was profoundly different from philosophizing about it in a seminar room.
- Print length304 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPresidio Press
- Publication dateNovember 23, 2004
- Dimensions4.19 x 0.79 x 6.75 inches
- ISBN-100345472519
- ISBN-13978-0345472519
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Phoenix and the Birds of Prey: Counterinsurgency and Counterterrorism in VietnamPaperback$14.68 shippingOnly 7 left in stock (more on the way).
The Men We Left Behind: Henry Kissinger, the Politics of Deceit and the Tragic Fate of Pows After the Vietnam WarHardcover$14.63 shippingGet it as soon as Friday, Jan 17Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Review
–The New York Times
From the Back Cover
Stuart A. Herrington was an American intelligence advisor assigned to root out the enemy in the Hau Nghia province. His two-year mission to capture or kill Communist agents operating there was made all the more difficult by local officials who were reluctant to cooperate, villagers who were too scared to talk, and VC who would not go down without a fight. Herrington developed an unexpected but intense identification with the villagers in his jurisdiction-and learned the hard way that experiencing war was profoundly different from philosophizing about it in a seminar room.
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The closer the World Airways charter jet got to Vietnam, the quieter the two hundred GIs on board became. We approached Saigon’s Tan Son Nhut Air Base at 5:00 A.M. Flares lit up the horizon sporadically as we glided down our approach, and we could see that the entire base was blacked out as we taxied to the reception area. The glow from the exhausts of the F-4 Phantoms in the concrete revetments reminded me of something I didn’t need to be reminded of—we were in a war zone. My stomach knew it before I did, and I felt lousy as we disembarked into the tropical heat and followed the MPs’ directions to the in-processing hangar.
Three days in Saigon convinced me that I didn’t want to draw an assignment there. The city was filthy, overcrowded, hectic, and overrun with hustlers of all types. You name the negative modifier, it fit Saigon in early 1971. Not even the graffiti on the latrine walls at the reception center could dampen my enthusiasm for getting out of Saigon—the sooner the better.
The Vietnamese flag is well-designed.
Where they’re not red, they’re yellow.
If the good lord had wanted me to come to this stinking land and walk through the swamps for a year, he would have given me baggy green skin.
[Penned in immediately below:]
Don’t worry. After one year, you’ll have baggy green skin!
I had a game plan to get a good assignment, if indeed there was such a thing in Vietnam. A friend of mine had just returned from a tour in Phuoc Tuy, a coastal province southeast of Saigon best known for its resort town of Vung Tau. He had described duty in Phuoc Tuy in glowing terms—silver beaches, giant lobsters, and not too many Vietcong. There was even a contingent of fun-loving Australians stationed in the province, and my friend told incredible tales of their nonmilitary exploits. The plan was for me to go to the officer assignment folks at headquarters, rattle off a few words of Vietnamese, and Vung Tau, here I come.
It didn’t work. The sergeant in the assignments branch merely laughed as he explained that Phuoc Tuy province would not hold all of the men who had volunteered to go there in the defense of democracy. The best I was able to do was to wrangle orders to Military Region III, the area around Saigon. I was to report the following morning to Bien Hoa city, a few miles north of Saigon, for an interview with a colonel who would decide where I would actually be assigned.
The colonel turned out to be the officer who was responsible for the “Phoenix” program in Military Region III. Phoenix was the code name for the attack on the Vietcong shadow government. The interview lasted only a few minutes. The colonel told me that since I had done so well at language school, Hau Nghia province would be the perfect assignment for me. Province Senior Advisor Colonel Jack Weissinger was a “hard-charger” who had already served almost two years in Hau Nghia. The colonel explained that Weissinger “needed good people,” and I was to fly the following morning to Hau Nghia on the daily courier flight.
I went to the club that last night in Bien Hoa and sat at the bar downing Budweisers in a futile attempt to conceal my concern for what lay ahead. I had already figured out what “Weissinger needs good men” meant. Hau Nghia was not Phuoc Tuy. I was scared, and the Vietnamese and Americans at the club didn’t offer much solace. The Americans nodded knowingly when I told them I was going to Hau Nghia. It seemed that Hau Nghia province was famous for two things—Colonel Jack Weissinger and the Vietcong. The issue was in doubt whether it was Colonel Weissinger or the Vietcong that was the most feared thing about the province.
I tried out my school Vietnamese on the girls who tended bar. It was interesting to watch their surprised reaction when an American spoke their language. Their initial response was always the same; they asked a series of questions that to an American seemed nosey:
How old are you, captain?
Do you have a wife, captain?
How many children do you have, captain?
How much do you weigh, captain?
Where are you going, captain?
And when I answered “Hau Nghia” to this last question, the response was ominous. “Oh God, Dai Uy!
Hau Nghia! Beaucoup VC, Dai Uy!”
I spent that last night in the transient billets, watching the occasional flares and the streams of tracers that erupted on the horizon around the perimeter of the base. I could hear the “thud” of outgoing artillery, and found myself wondering if the perimeter were under attack. Later I learned that the artillerymen were firing routine “H and I” (harassment and interdiction) missions at suspected enemy locations. The flares and tracers I had seen were also routine—the troops periodically opened fire to test their weapons and to let the enemy know that they were awake. Unfortunately, no one told me all of this in Bien Hoa, so I slept with my M-16 rifle uncomfortably draped over one arm.
I flew to Hau Nghia in a Swiss-built Porter aircraft that was known for its short takeoff and landing capabilities. During the short flight, I had the first of many looks at Vietnam from the air. I can still recall my pure astonishment at the lush beauty of the countryside. Conditioned as I was by the images of Vietnam drawn by others for the American people, I was unprepared for the tropical beauty that was spread out below. What about the infamous defoliation operations? Where were the wasted “free-fire zones” that I had read about? Hadn’t our artillery laid waste to vast stretches of the rural countryside? Finally, around a triangular mud fort somewhere west of Bien Hoa, I spotted a sea of craters. Still, what I saw (and what I didn’t see) during that flight activated a tiny caution lamp in my head, and I warned myself to be careful of preconceived notions and generalizations.
My thoughts on the rural beauty of Vietnam came to an abrupt halt as the pilot demonstrated his aircraft’s tricks. From five thousand feet directly above the Hau Nghia airstrip, he corkscrewed his way down and landed in a stomach-turner that made a believer out of me. The aircraft halted almost instantly. The pilot yelled at me to get out, and the enlisted mail clerk threw the cargo out on the runway. The entire operation took less than a minute. Just when I thought I was going to be left alone on the tiny airstrip, a jeep charged around the tail of the aircraft, and within seconds I was on my way to the headquarters of Advisory Team 43. The silver aircraft was airborne within thirty seconds. First Sergeant Willie Tate, the jeep driver, introduced himself and made an unflattering reference to skittish civilian pilots.
The province capital of Bao Trai consisted of a single asphalt main street which was crowded with peasants on their way to and from the bustling central market. Both sides of the street were lined with small shops, and the town’s citizens walked in the middle of the street, oblivious to the intrusions of the motorbikes and three-wheeled Lambrettas that plied their way back and forth. Chickens, ducks, dogs, and even pigs roamed the streets freely, and Tate maneuvered around the plodding ox carts of the farmers. The sergeant pushed the jeep through the chaos, blowing his horn impatiently. Bao Trai was dirty, crowded, and small. If this was the province capital, what would a district town look like?
The ride through Bao Trai took only a couple of minutes with Tate driving. It would have taken me three times as long. We pulled into the walled compound that housed the advisory team, and the sergeant informed me that I would stay there for one or two nights before going one step farther—to one of Hau Nghia province’s four districts.
At the team’s orderly room, I learned the worst. There had been a memorial service that morning for two men who had been killed in an ambush earlier in the week. The unfortunate men had been stationed in Cu Chi, one of the four districts. When a government outpost in their district came under a Vietcong attack, the two advisors jumped in their jeep and followed their Vietnamese counterparts to the scene of the action. They never made it. The Vietcong ambushed their hastily formed (and poorly thought-out) reaction force, and both were killed when an antitank rocket hit their jeep.
Later in the day, I met Maj. Dick Culp, the intelligence officer who ran the American side of the Hau Nghia Phoenix effort. The major explained the peculiarities of the program in Hau Nghia. The mission, he explained, was quite easy to define—kill or capture Vietcong agents—but it was seemingly impossible to get the Vietnamese to accomplish it. Our job as Phoenix advisors was to assist the Vietnamese intelligence services (our counterparts) in identifying the members of the “Vietcong infrastructure” (VCI) and in planning the operations to “neutralize” them. Neutralize was a euphemism that actually meant kill, capture, or convince to surrender.
Culp was obviously a frustrated man, discouraged because he believed in the rationale of the Phoenix concept, but had been unable to get the Vietnamese to cooperate in its execution. I sensed from his remarks that Colonel Weissinger was a problem, though he discreetly avoided discussing the details of his relationship with the colonel. Other members of the team cautioned me that being a Phoenix advisor on Team 43 was risky business and that the risks had more to do with Colonel Weissinger than they did with the Vietcong.
Product details
- Publisher : Presidio Press; Reprint edition (November 23, 2004)
- Language : English
- Mass Market Paperback : 304 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0345472519
- ISBN-13 : 978-0345472519
- Item Weight : 5.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 4.19 x 0.79 x 6.75 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,026,936 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #672 in Vietnam War Biographies (Books)
- #819 in Southeast Asia History
- #1,916 in Vietnam War History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book provides insightful information about the Vietnam War. They appreciate the scholarly content and concise writing style that makes it easy to read. The book provides an excellent account of the operation, with knowledgeable and sympathetic advisors.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book scholarly and informative. It provides insights into how the war was lost and the frustrations of those involved. The advisors are described as knowledgeable and sympathetic. Readers appreciate the factual account of how things were done. However, some readers found the anecdotal content fascinating, though not always successful.
"...It made so much sense. It wasn't just the sanctuaries given to the enemy, it wasn't just our politicians...." Read more
"...This book delivers the message that knowledgeable and sympathetic advisors were aware that the will to fight would determine the outcome...." Read more
"...It's an advisor's story of an officer's one-year tour. Informative, and pretty well written...." Read more
"This is an educational account of what it was like to be an intelligence advisor during the late stages of the war...." Read more
Customers find the writing style informative and well-written. They appreciate the concise and well-thought-out description of events. The story is also praised.
"...the end of the book of why we lost the war in Vietnam was the most concise and well thought out I have ever read. It made so much sense...." Read more
"...Informative, and pretty well written. Not the Five o'clock follies, but not much ' stalking" either." Read more
"...THE AUTHOR DID NOT GLORIFY HIS SERVICE, HE EXPLAINED IT IN VERY CLEAR LANGUAGE. HE SHOWS THE REAL WAR ALSO IN THE HAMLETS AND VILLAGES...." Read more
"Loved the story. Stuart really showed his new culture. I can see how he fell in love with the country. Enough to marry a Vietnamese :)" Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 6, 2015This was a great book. The summary towards the end of the book of why we lost the war in Vietnam was the most concise and well thought out I have ever read. It made so much sense. It wasn't just the sanctuaries given to the enemy, it wasn't just our politicians. Excellent points about the Vietnamese culture and the people themselves. Highly recommend.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2010I've read a lot of Vietnam books, and this one is good. I didn't rate it a five because I like to leave that for really great books. This is the story of the Phoenix program, from one of the local adviser points of view. Stuart Herrington was an intelligence officer in Europe in the late 1960's before leaving the Army for 7 months. Herrington was then sent to Nam to become an adviser to the Vietnamese local militias. What is very interesting about this book is that America won the Vietnam War in 1971 or so, the North Vietnamese negotiated a peace, the Americans left, the North Vietnamese rested up, and then took all of Vietnam.
One lesson I learned from this book is that EVERYTHING is personal, Sonny Corleone is wrong, it's not business, EVERYTHING in the world is personal. When the local politicians steal your money because the one guy is corrupt, you personally dislike the government. The NVA took great advantage of this. The American advisers were able to gain the South Vietnamese trust, but then when they left after a year, the next advisor had to start over. We should have over-lapped a lot more. We also should have left the army over there until we won.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2015The VIetnam war is arguably more relevant to Americans than the fiascos in Afghanistan and Iraq because the agenda was clearer. This book delivers the message that knowledgeable and sympathetic advisors were aware that the will to fight would determine the outcome. Herrington captures this in the latter part of the book. Much of the book is anecdotal with many fascinating episodes that didn't always end well. I believe that sophisticated readers will draw more from this book than those simply seeking war stories. The revelations were perhaps more relevant to me than others, because I was the district senior advisor in the province next door at the same time. But were were both moved to greater regret in 1975 as the North Vietnamese Army swept over the area where we served with counterparts we admired and respected for their acuity and determination to keep South Vietnam out of the communist sphere. It seems obvious that we failed to understand the complexity of the Mideast, seeing the issues in the most simplistic manner as a mirror of how we see ourselves. I know no word in the English language to describe this stupidity adequately, and we too will fall unless we find a way to adjust our view of the world.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2007I have read a lot of books on Vietnam. If you want to know the combination of reasons why the North Vietnamese succeeeded, read this book ! Like someone else has said, what a shame the author was shipped back in '72, although one already knows ( from reading this book), what happened over the next 2-3 years. One cannot also help but feel that had America not tired of the war ( and the loss of American lives - for which the recruitment and personnel policies of the Army are greatly to blame !),the outcome may have been different. So bad was the sentiment against returning vets that some of them said they were coming back from Germany or Korea ( out of embarassment and the want to avoid being mistreated by their own countrymen !). I have to say,that as an Australian ( we also sent our men to Vietnam), I cannot get over the treatment meted out to vets upon their return.It disgusts me. The soldiers were not to blame !!Blame the McNamara's !!!
- Reviewed in the United States on August 10, 2013Very misleading title. It's an advisor's story of an officer's one-year tour. Informative, and pretty well written. Not the Five o'clock follies, but not much ' stalking" either.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2017This is an educational account of what it was like to be an intelligence advisor during the late stages of the war. The author was an army captain who was not enthusiastic about American intervention in Southeast Asia. Mr. Herrington pontificates at length about the intricate dynamic of "winning the hearts and minds" of a people split between wanting freedom from oppression and wanting a better lot in life. Be careful of your bedfellows is the message. He offers stories about trying to convince captured Communist soldiers to work for the South Vietnamese government. Finally, he explains the frustration in the realization that many of the root causes for the success of the Communist agenda were the result of corruption inside the South Vietnamese government system. For other reading, check out "Duster Duty, 1967."
- Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2019This is an anecdotal first-hand account of the experiences of an intelligence advisor in country during the Vietnam War. It is adequate in presenting the facts and frustrations of the mission for those charged with destroying the Viet Cong (Operation Phoenix), but it is short on the larger perspective of the war or recommendations on improving effectiveness for future conflicts.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2023The eventual withdrawal from Vietnam in 1975 reunited Vietnam. This withdrawal was preceded by failed psyops where captured and surrendered Vietminh to Vietcong deceived their Amercan handlers. The cultural differences played a crucial role in the deception.
Top reviews from other countries
John I. PonnampalamReviewed in Singapore on February 17, 20245.0 out of 5 stars A decent account
If this book is to be believed which I do, Stuart Herrington must be amongst the members of the United States military who abstained from committing war crimes in accordance with international law. Having said that the American war should not have been fought in the first place as it was a struggle of the Vietnamese people against foreign occupation, so my sympathy lies with the Viet Cong
-
Cliente KindleReviewed in Italy on June 5, 20154.0 out of 5 stars Splendida letura
Le memorie di un consigliere americano nella penultima fase della guerra vietnamita.
Lettura scorrevole, bei personaggi che balzano fuori dalle pagine, tutto quello che pensate ci debba essere in una storia del genere: combattimenti, guerriglia, corruzione, "scrounging", figure controverse da una parte e dall'altra.. umanità, valore e romanticismo.
Certo, sembra evidente che gli episodi siano i più significativi, i più belli, di un "tour" di venti mesi, ignoprando le settimane di burocratica quotidianità (ma senza trascurare i riferimenti al lavoro tutto sommato d'ufficio di un ufficiale che fa intelligence), ma emerge la passione di uno straniero che, per la sua interazione, impara a conoscere una civiltà tanto diversa (ed apprezzarla, con tutti i limiti che può avere una società in guerra) e i suoi compagni d'armi, a rispettare il nemico e a farsi coinvolgere in una causa tanto lontana da casa quanto, poi, perduta.
redrx7Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 21, 20124.0 out of 5 stars Incisive but flawed.
Herrington has certainly produced one of the more knowledgeable and sympathetic American accounts of one part of the US war against Vietnam. Having said that one of the flaws with any US account from a pro-interventionist perspective is that it inevitably ignores the political dimension ,focusing instead on the effectiveness or not of tactics,strategies and programmes,which equally inevitably leads to a measure of success based on numbers of Vietnamese killed or "neutralised".
The underlying logic of Herrington's position is in essence therefore no different from lunatic revisionist ideologues such as Moylar et al,namely ,that with the "correct" methods the Vietnamese revolution could have been defeated and American will imposed on the Vietnamese under the guise of assisting them (or at least those deemed suitable for such selfless American goodwill)to create a viable State in the Southern part of their country which was supposed to have been re-united following elections in 1956.
The notion that the US prescence was an un-wanted and wholly destructive intervention against the tide of Vietnamese nationalism is, therefore,just as un-thinkable to Herrington as it is to the deluded ideologues who began the deceitfull and shamefull attack on the largely rural population of Vietnam first through the French and later with direct invasion and occupation with horrific consequences for the Vietnamese people.
Unfortunately,despite his thoroughness and insights Herrington can never understand that the struggle was fundamentally a political one and moreover one in which the US was never going to be able to compete with the forces of Vietnames nationalism .
Paul BrowneReviewed in the United Kingdom on February 10, 20224.0 out of 5 stars A book of it's time 1982. Interesting.
To be honest I have not started reading this book as the print is quite small and the pages are aged. I need a magnifying glass. However, what I have read is interesting, for Vietnam nerds. I am going to read it and it is worth the money but it is only for somebody who can persevere. Quality is about 40% but it is an old book. I'd buy it again.
MonsieurCanonReviewed in Canada on November 30, 20144.0 out of 5 stars A very interesting book; especially if you were there ...
A very interesting book; especially if you were there. This book is a reprint of his previous book "Silence was a Weapon".





