Buy new:
-12% $16.72$16.72
Delivery Monday, January 27
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Arizy
Save with Used - Very Good
$7.99$7.99
Delivery Monday, January 27
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: LuxuryMerchandise (Veteran Owned)
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
-
-
VIDEO -
Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies Paperback – April 1, 1999
Purchase options and add-ons
"Fascinating.... Lays a foundation for understanding human history."―Bill Gates
In this "artful, informative, and delightful" (William H. McNeill, New York Review of Books) book, Jared Diamond convincingly argues that geographical and environmental factors shaped the modern world. Societies that had had a head start in food production advanced beyond the hunter-gatherer stage, and then developed religion --as well as nasty germs and potent weapons of war --and adventured on sea and land to conquer and decimate preliterate cultures. A major advance in our understanding of human societies, Guns, Germs, and Steel chronicles the way that the modern world came to be and stunningly dismantles racially based theories of human history. Winner of the Pulitzer Prize, the Phi Beta Kappa Award in Science, the Rhone-Poulenc Prize, and the Commonwealth club of California's Gold Medal.- Print length480 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
- Publication dateApril 1, 1999
- Dimensions6.1 x 1.5 x 9.3 inches
- ISBN-100393317552
- ISBN-13978-0393317558
- Lexile measure1440L
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Explore your book, then jump right back to where you left off with Page Flip.
View high quality images that let you zoom in to take a closer look.
Enjoy features only possible in digital – start reading right away, carry your library with you, adjust the font, create shareable notes and highlights, and more.
Discover additional details about the events, people, and places in your book, with Wikipedia integration.
Frequently bought together

Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
Guns, Germs & Steel ((REV)05) by [Hardcover (2005)]N/AHardcover$6.99 shippingOnly 17 left in stock - order soon.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book engaging and compelling. They appreciate the well-researched and convincing arguments. The book explores the domestication of plants and animals, pointing out agricultural advantages in Eurasia. Readers find the ideas interesting and brilliant. Overall, they describe the book as an eye-opener and an entertaining read. However, some feel the writing is repetitive at times.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book engaging and well-written. They appreciate the author's effective literary technique and clear explanations. The writing is lucid and understandable, making it an excellent product with interesting and useful insights.
"...At that point China was the leading power in the world. It had a great navy, the largest country, gunpowder, advanced technology and far more people..." Read more
"What an incredible journey this book takes you on—truly fascinating!..." Read more
"...While many of the author's arguments are subject to debate, the writing is lucid; it's easy to see why the Pulitzer committee gave Diamon the..." Read more
"...This is an excellent book that ties together findings in history, archaeology, paleontology, epidemiology, and linguistics in an extremely readable..." Read more
Customers find the book well-researched and informative. They say it's a convincing academic discourse on human history, with detailed examples. Readers recommend it as a must-read for anyone interested in human history.
"...This book is a testament to following one’s interests and using one’s intellect. I highly recommend it to all readers...." Read more
"...It’s a monumental question, and this book tackles it brilliantly, covering not just the essentials but so much more...." Read more
"[Strong 3.5 stars for its scope and development of the central thesis, but loses points for trying too hard to explain away non-European cultural..." Read more
"_Guns, Germs, and Steel_ by Jared Diamond is one of the most informative, epic, well-written, and fascinating "macrohistory" books I have ever read...." Read more
Customers find the book informative about the domestication of plants and animals in Eurasia. They appreciate the abundance of suitable plants and animals for domestication, as well as the agricultural advantages like arable lands and mammalian advantages that allowed the Eurasians to domesticate a wide range of animals. The book explores the transition from hunter-gatherers to farming, sharing knowledge, and the spread of agricultural systems. The main takeaway is that the environment is everything to the success of a culture.
"...fertile soil amidst a variety of wild life that were easily domesticated for animal herding and valuable crops that facilitated the development of..." Read more
"...He notes that it was the fertile crescent that harbored the most suitable grains, legumes (or pulses), and domesticable animals...." Read more
"...This allowed the Eurasians to domesticate a wide range of animals. The Americas were left with one, the llama. Australia, none...." Read more
"...The sections I found most compelling dealt with agriculture and animal husbandry--two topics that would have probably induced sleep if covered by..." Read more
Customers find the book's ideas interesting and brilliant. They describe it as an insightful source for new ideas, with a well-crafted synthesis on what causes some societies to dominate others. The book is described as ambitious and exceeds expectations.
"...Thank you. 15. Ambitious book that exceeded my expectations. 16...." Read more
"...the surface and allows us all to start thinking about some amazing stuff. Good job Jared. Keep up the good work." Read more
"...Ultimately, this book is a long and ingenius answer to a single question: "Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brougt it to..." Read more
"I really like the ideas behind this book...." Read more
Customers find the book engaging and thought-provoking. They appreciate the author's style of writing, which is authoritative yet accessible to non-experts. The book has humor that lightens the subject matter and relieves the reader's burden.
"...These ideas, while clichéd, are still enthralling and Diamond presents them in a very clear and well-written way...." Read more
"...from a scientific approach but also in an interesting and entertaining style. John McBrearty (closet historian) LOL" Read more
"...a broad perspective, this book would seem technical and even boring at some points...." Read more
"...Jared Diamond turns boring subjects into gold. It's easily understood and difficult to put down. Like no other history book I have ever read...." Read more
Customers have different views on the book's bias. Some find it an antidote to racism and hubris, avoiding religious or political bias. They say it draws the big picture without cultural cliches, norms, or prejudices, and looks at the motivating factor of religion behind organized military colonisation. Others feel the book has a cultural bias against the observable, with outlandish conclusions and self-opinionated data in its statistics that skew the findings.
"...I also thought the author strove, quite frequently, a bit too hard for political correctness in for example, sounding a bit patronizing to the..." Read more
"...in complicated and trivial factors; on the contrary, he dismantles racially-based theory through analyzing environmental factors in the human history..." Read more
"...as the case with revisionist history, it has its share of one sided and extreme arguments. It is a good book but not great...." Read more
"...Seems narrow-minded in many ways. I was hoping for something much better." Read more
Customers find the book's style repetitive and plodding. They mention that the message becomes repetitive at times, with repetition in descriptions of development in different geographies. The flow of logic is described as jumping around between ideas and topics. Some feel the book goes into too much detail for their taste, reading as a series of lectures.
"...The author tends to repeat himself...." Read more
"...2. It can be repetitive at times but understandably so. 3. Some arguments are more speculative than others. 4...." Read more
"...and his text is extremely easy to follow even though he covers some highly complex concepts...." Read more
"...This section felt incomplete and sketchy...." Read more
Customers find the book too long and dense. They say some sentences are long and involved, and it should have been written half shorter.
"...An interesting read for sure. I thought that it was a bit lengthy and redundant, such that he could have made some of the content more concise...." Read more
"...My issues with Guns, Germs and Steel are two-fold: first, the book is huge...." Read more
"...This award winning book is 480 pages long and is composed of the following four major parts: 1. From Eden to Cajamarca, 2...." Read more
"...Book little to long and repetitive and conclusion predictable." Read more
Reviews with images
Great Book! Excited to read it again!
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on September 5, 2015Two decades ago when I served in the Missouri National Guard we had an extended drill weekend at Ft. Leonard Wood for a live fire artillery exercise. This was a three day drill and I remember it clearly because it was the same weekend as Princess Diana’s funeral on September 6, 1997. I had been at the local library the day before we rolled out and saw an interesting book that promised to explain why western civilization had been the one to colonize the New World and rise to ascendency over much of the world for a long period of time. That had always been an interesting question for me and one which many people do not know the answer to. I checked out the book and during some downtime I began to read. To say that the book grabbed my attention is an understatement. I started it on Friday and finished it on Saturday. My whole conception of how history had seen the rise of Western Civilization was fundamentally altered and would never be the same.
At the time I thought that using Guns, Germs, and Steel as an educational tool would be a great idea. My dream of teaching history had never been realized and in 1997 seemed like it would never happen. However, history is full of strange things and in 2009 I got the chance to return to college and pick up my degrees. I began teaching American History in 2013 and was then asked to teach World Regional Geography for the Spring 2014 semester. They handed me a textbook and said, “Good luck.” As I drove back home I considered how I would teach this course and my mind recalled Jared Diamond and his Pulitzer Prize winning book. To make the story short, I built a course that used the textbook, Diamond’s book, and the National Geographic series based on the book.
Obviously I take what Diamond said in Guns, Germs, and Steel seriously. I think Diamond did some outstanding work in doing three decades of research and then writing a book which to me is resonates with readers. For many years the idea that Western Civilization was superior to any other form has been the dominant world view. Diamond rejects that completely by saying Western Civilization had advantages that others did not have due to geography, or literally where it was. When you stop and think about it, why were the Europeans so superior to others for so long? Was it their race, their ideals, or what? Diamond said it was because of where they started that they developed into the world spanning civilization we know.
What advantages did the Europeans have over others? They arrived with technology superior to all others, were better organized, and had the lethal gift of germs which in the Americas killed over half the population and was the biggest reason as to why the Europeans took those lands over. When Diamond explored the germ theory he realized that these germs came from contact with domesticated mammals such as horses, cows, pigs, chickens, sheep, and goats. These same mammals were what enabled Europeans to transport materials as well as have a convenient food supply and a power source such as horses pulling plows.
This idea works when you look at the Americas and Australia, but not when you look at Africa and Asia. The lethality of germs did not affect the people in those regions like it did the Americas. In fact, some of the diseases in Africa killed the Europeans and prevented them for exploiting Sub-Saharan Africa for centuries. Some of these germs are now known to have come from Asia as well along with domestic animals that came from there. Many of the larger mammals Europe had were also found in Asia. In fact, some of the technology such as gunpowder came from Asia as well. Diamond acknowledged this in his book and sought to explain why Europe was able to expand while Asia did not.
This is something I really stress in my class and it is something which the book and National Geographic series does not explore as deeply as it should. Diamond saw a decision made in the 15th century by a Chinese emperor as being the decisive event that altered human history. At that point China was the leading power in the world. It had a great navy, the largest country, gunpowder, advanced technology and far more people thanks to its agricultural practices than any other nation at that time. The decision by emperors in China’s Ming dynasty led to China losing its technological advantage over Europe although no one had any idea that this was happening. These decisions or orders are called Haijin.
Diamond did not explore this in any depth other than to point to it and say that China’s inward looking policies which had existed for centuries were the result of its location, its geography. Its singular form of government used Haijin to build up its power at the expense of expanding China’s culture and boundaries. There is a lot here to work with, but Diamond seems to casually bring it up in the book’s epilogue. Instead he focuses heavily on the Americas where his theory of environmental determinism is the strongest. I think he gets the theory right, but in the case of Asia he needed to go deeper.
Since Diamond is an ornithologist by education, and his world journey’s focused on New Guinea, I think his point of view was heavily influenced through his contact with hunter-gatherers. His theory is at its weakest in Asia and specifically China. That again reflects his preference for focusing on one type of people versus another. This does not mean his theory is wrong. It just needs expansion and I do not think Diamond will be doing that any time soon. His recent works have dealt with different ideas.
Even with this glaring problem, I think this book is outstanding. It does answer the question of why Western Civilization dominated the world for the most part. For my geography class it is a wonderful tool. I focus heavily on how man domesticated two grains from the Middle East, wheat and barley, and built Western Civilization upon them. Coupled with the domestication of large mammals, the forerunners of Western Civilization spread through Europe. Geography played a huge role in why it went west and why there are so many differences between East and West on a cultural level. It also explains why there are such huge differences between North Africa and the lands to the south of the Sahara.
The role of geography in shaping mankind is without a doubt the single underlying reason as to why history occurred like it did. This is really hard for students to understand because they seem to have been taught a much different concept prior to taking a geography course. Only by explaining the human-environment interaction do students begin to realize that geography caused man to make decisions which would reverberate for millennia. The people of the Middle East followed the Tigris and Euphrates rivers northwest into Anatolia and out of the desert. Man’s movement west, north, and south with the crops and animals of the Middle East were shaped by geographical barriers.
Diamond points out how man overcame these barriers over time. The civilization that was able to do so developed greater technologies than others. He points to both European and Chinese naval developments in this regard. China’s need to continue to build its naval forces was negligible due to a lack of naval enemies while in Europe those enemies were often themselves as nations competed for resources and trade. Since China controlled all of its trade which was mostly internal or land based, its need for a navy was reduced. Europe surged ahead while China languished.
In my classes I point to the barriers as we explore the world’s regions. I show how these barriers played such big roles. We play a board game by Avalon Hill that helps to illustrate this as well. Diamond’s book plays a big role in my class and so do his theories. I find it really helps students take the principles and ideas from the first part of the class and begin to apply them to the world regions we study. They are able to make the mental leap to the realization that the people of the world are different for many reasons, the foremost being the place in which they live more than anything else. It helps them to break down and discard the erroneous belief which many of them have regarding their place in the world. Using Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel I am able to use Transformative Learning Theory to overcome the disorientating dilemma they find themselves in at the beginning of class.
I could build a new class out of Diamond’s book that encompasses geography, history, and sociology if my school would let me. In fact, I could build two classes out of it. One would focus on why Western Civilization developed like it did and expanded to the Americas while the second one would focus on the development of Eastern Civilization and its failure to expand beyond Asia itself. While courses exist that dive into those ideas, they are built around history more than anything else. Few instructors use environmental determinism in explaining how early mankind developed in the places it did. The ultimate objectives of these courses would be why they developed like they did, not just their history.
Diamond has written several other books such as Collapse, The Third Chimpanzee, and The World Until Yesterday. He is Professor of Geography at the University of California, Los Angeles. He has been awarded all kinds of prizes and awards for his research and work in multiple fields. I find it interesting that he began to study environmental history in his fifties which led to this book and many others. This to me is proof that you are not bound by formal rules regarding your education, but rather by using your interests coupled with the research capabilities your education has provided you new careers beckon. This book is a testament to following one’s interests and using one’s intellect. I highly recommend it to all readers. It is one of my favorite books and I have read through it multiple times.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2025What an incredible journey this book takes you on—truly fascinating!
For as long as I can remember, I’ve pondered the question: why did the Old World conquer the New World? In essence, I’ve been seeking to understand why world history unfolded as it did.
It’s a monumental question, and this book tackles it brilliantly, covering not just the essentials but so much more. I thoroughly enjoyed every moment of it.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 31, 2003[Strong 3.5 stars for its scope and development of the central thesis, but loses points for trying too hard to explain away non-European cultural failures.]
The first line of Jared Diamond's Pulitzer Prize-winning opus is: "This book attempts to provide a short history of everybody for the last 13,000 years." His central thesis is that luck of genetic distribution of domesticable plants and animals, particularly cereals and large mammals, gave a tremendous leg up to western Eurasia in the development of civilization. In other words, it wasn't poor choices or innate inferiority that caused most of the world to be dominated by European culture -- just luck.
In a book with greatly wider scope than most nonfiction Pulitzer winners, Diamond pulls together long-term threads of farming, herding, languages, disease, technology, government, and religion. He attempts to explain how trends in all these disparate areas rather inexorably led to the cultural and economic state of the world today. While many of the author's arguments are subject to debate, the writing is lucid; it's easy to see why the Pulitzer committee gave Diamon the prize.
To take to task all the debatable points in "Guns, Germs, and Steel" would be a huge undertaking. I'll try to highlight a few.
Diamond argues that the temperate Mediterranean climate (featuring wet winters and dry summers) of southwest Asia aided greatly in early development, then has to explain why similar climates in California, Chile, and southwest Australia didn't spur development in those places. Human actions (particularly deforestation and overgrazing) have turned what used to be called the "Fertile Crescent" into a wasteland, whereas this didn't happen in the similar southern European area. Thus southwestern Asia possessed the seeds of human development, but the locals squandered their head start. At that point Europe and eastern Asia had an equal chance of pulling ahead, and Diamond proposes that the geographical fragmentation of Europe gave it a competitive advantage over China's cohesiveness. But because he earlier claims that easy movement (for the spread of domesticable species) gave Europe a competitive advantage over America and Africa, this argument is not compelling.
Diamond thinks that the different parts of the world were on a developmental par about 13,000 years ago. At that time there were many more potentially domesticable large mammals in the Americas than there are now. The evidence as to what the human presence at that time is mixed, but Diamond pushes hard to dispute evidence of any prior human occupation. He favors the "Clovis first" theory, which has humans first entering from Siberia across the ice age Bering land bridge not more than 13,000 years ago, carrying stone "Clovis point" weapons. Clovis points have been found in large numbers in mammoth carcasses in North America, and Diamond thinks they were developed in Asia and transported across Beringia. Mammoths are one of the many now-extinct large mammals. From the mammoth kill evidence, Diamond assumes hunting by immigrants from Siberia caused the extinction of not just mammoths but horses, elephants, lions, and all the other megafauna. But there are several problems with this argument. Firstly, there are more recent findings than those Diamond disputes to back up the earlier human occupation theory. Secondly, there are no Clovis points north of British Columbia, which would mean these genocidal immigrants fasted all through Alaska. And thirdly, while there are thousands of Clovis points in mammoth skeletons, to date we've found just ONE clovis point in an American horse carcass, and NONE in elephants, lions, or giraffes -- all at one time widely found in North America.
All of this debate for later occupation of the Americas appears designed to buttress a secondary argument that American development got started too late to catch up with the Eurasians. But ironically, the Pleistocene overkill hypothesis, linked to a single overwhelming swarm of human invaders, argues against Jared Diamond's central thesis. If he's right, it WAS the Native Americans' own fault that they were later overrun by Europeans on horses, becaused they killed and ate all the existing horses on arrival.
Diamond also has to resort to some hand-waving to explain why independent Mesoamerican invention of writing and wheels (used only in toys, rather than tools like wheelbarrows) never went anywhere. Similar weak arguments are used to explain why China went into cultural stagnation centuries ago. Ultimately, the author tries too hard to make all of history fit his model.
In trying to explain why superior technology isn't necessarily accepted, Diamond trots out the old myth about the Dvorak keyboard being superior to the standard QWERTY layout, yet never finding much demand. However, Diamond's book came out in 1997, and the Dvorak myth had been debunked 7 years previously (Journal of Law & Economics vol. XXXIII (April 1990)). Diamond is left with no argument other than cultural superiority to explain why societies that adopt better technology succeed, and he rejects that position a priori.
In his professional career the author has spent much time working in New Guinea. He thinks constant local warfare has made the average surviving New Guinea tribesman superior to the average descendant of European culture, and wants to explain why the people of New Guinea have so little "cargo" (wealth). But Diamond's focus on New Guinea as a model for global development is more elucidating to the author than to his readers.
There are some problems with the book layout itself, including a surprisingly poor index. For instance, trying to look up horse extinctions in the Americas, I found references to horses under "Americas, animal extinctions in" that didn't appear under "horses, in Americas". Also, there are a variety of different maps with different levels of detail to show the migrations of peoples, languages, and domestic species. It's necessary to flip back and forth between the maps to follow the narrative thread.
This is a good book to read, but a skeptical perspective is necessary while doing so.
Top reviews from other countries
-
Karol MezzomoReviewed in Brazil on January 5, 20255.0 out of 5 stars Entrega rápida
A entrega foi super rápida e o livro venho impecável
BentonReviewed in Canada on November 22, 20245.0 out of 5 stars Awesome book
Fantastic and engaging read. Really distills a lot of research down to digestible language.
-
Rafael AguilarReviewed in Mexico on March 19, 20245.0 out of 5 stars Excelente libro y excelente calidad.
Compré la edición pasta dura, y la calidad de los materiales es muy buena, recomiendo ampliamente.
JonathanReviewed in Germany on October 2, 20245.0 out of 5 stars Great book, in perfect condition
Arrived in perfect condition and in good time.
Regarding the work itself, I can't recommend it highly enough. If you're curious about the human condition, and how the accidents of history and geography had a major impact upon contemporary differences between nations and ethnic groups, this is the book for you. If you read stuff along these lines (history books, etc) you will be impressed at the global perspective Diamond is able to take. (Most such books focus on European/Western history, at least in my experience). I learned so much about Polynesia, pre-colonial north and south American societies, etc. If anything, the one major criticism of the work which I have is that he should ideally do more to explain modern European social/political developments, which he doesn't devote much space to.
It's a well-worked, thought-provoking series of arguments, building off of the author's knowledge of geography and biology. You can find lots of discussion and criticism of his work on the internet and in academia (which just goes to show what an important and powerful book it is), so I'll leave you to make up your mind about his arguments. Personally, I think he argues his case very convincingly, and most of the criticisms that I've read (including in academic sources - I'm a geography undergrad) don't seem to hold water, except on matters of minor detail.
I will say one thing, though: ignore people complaining about "geographic determinism". As Diamond himself points out, when biographers or historians write about the impact of major individual leaders upon human history (e.g., Hitler's personality and its role in starting World War 2), nobody accuses these writers of 'individual determinism' or 'psychological determinism' or whatever. Diamond is not denying that individual human beings or cultures have a role in shaping human history. Rather, his point is that, at the largest and most 'macro' scales (and to an extent even at more moderate scales), geographical differences are the ultimate causes of inequalities between groups of people. This includes unequal access to resources, technological innovations, etc. His epilogue in particular argues the case brilliantly, by showing how even present-day inequalities are largely explained by geographical factors which, one would think, are less relevant in the age of globalisation and high-tech societies. But I won't give the details of the argument - judge for yourself once you read it.
BobbieReviewed in the United Kingdom on September 26, 20245.0 out of 5 stars fascinating, well-researched
Why did history unfold so differently on different continents?
A fascinating, well-researched account of human history before writing began writing history down. Geography, not race, is the answer..







