Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
We The Media First Edition
"We the Media" is essential reading for all participants in the news cycle:
Consumers learn how they can become producers of the news. Gillmor lays out the tools of the grassroots journalist's trade, including personal Web journals (called weblogs or blogs), Internet chat groups, email, and cell phones. He also illustrates how, in this age of media consolidation and diminished reporting, to roll your own news, drawing from the array of sources available online and even over the phone.
Newsmakers politicians, business executives, celebrities get a wake-up call. The control that newsmakers enjoyed in the top-down world of Big Media is seriously undermined in the Internet Age. Gillmor shows newsmakers how to successfully play by the new rules and shift from control to engagement.
Journalists discover that the new grassroots journalism presents opportunity as well as challenge to their profession. One of the first mainstream journalists to have a blog, Gillmor says, "My readers know more than I do, and that's a good thing." In "We the Media," he makes thecase to his colleagues that, in the face of a plethora of Internet-fueled news vehicles, they must change or become irrelevant.
At its core, "We the Media" is a book about people. People like Glenn Reynolds, a law professor whose blog postings on the intersection of technology and liberty garnered him enough readers and influence that he became a source for professional journalists. Or Ben Chandler, whose upset Congressional victory was fueled by contributions that came in response to ads on a handful of political blogs. Or Iraqi blogger Zayed, whose Healing Irag blog (healingiraq.blogspot.com) scooped Big Media. Or acridrabbit, who inspired an online community to become investigative reporters and discover that the dying Kaycee Nichols sad tale was a hoax. Give the people tools to make the news, "We the Media" asserts, and they will.
Journalism in the 21st century will be fundamentally different from the Big Media that prevails today. We the Media casts light on the future of journalism, and invites us all to be part of it.
- ISBN-100596007337
- ISBN-13978-0596007331
- EditionFirst Edition
- PublisherO'Reilly & Associates, Inc.: Sebastopol, California
- Publication dateAugust 31, 2004
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.5 x 1.25 x 8.75 inches
- Print length299 pages
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on June 21, 2006Many people blame the Internet for accelerating the long-term decline of newspaper circulation, and think that the Internet is crippling the future of American journalism.
Don Gillmor believes that the Internet has the potential to dramatically improve American journalism and widen its appeal.
Gillmor is no naive innocent. He demonstrates that he has an extraordinarily detailed command of the interrelationships and applications of the many internet and software technologies and journalism. I met Gillmor in April, 2004, at the BloggerconII conference organized by Dave Winer and held at Harvard Law School. He held the attention of his audience of bloggers through his mixture of detailed knowledge and passionate advocacy for the worth of blogging and the value of it becoming an income-generating activity.
No journalist should fail to read this book. Nor should any citizen consumer of journalism who participates online. Only a small part manifesto, this book is a detailed roadmap of the future of journalism for those informed enough and bold enough to take it. Those in business and government who are the subjects of journalism would also do well to read it.
The future of journalism, Gillmor says, will be much more participatory in the future than it has been in the past. The many to many communications style of the Internet will become the style of successful journalism. Journalism will less about lecturing and more about leading a discussion. The "eat your spinach" school of civic advocacy will be replaced by a greater connection between readers and journalists in which readers will influence both the definition of news and the content of individual news stories.
The proliferation of tens of millions of blogs means that the separation of news producers and news consumers is far less than it used to be. Everyone can produce news in the blogosphere. One duty of journalists is to sift the through the blogosphere and find out what is relevant. Another duty of journalists is to actively engage the public in the news gathering process. The definition of what professionalism in journalism is will be rapidly changing.
What is now at the edges, Gillmour says, will and should be moved to the center. Public concerns that once were marginal now will become mainstream.
As a Pennsylvania state legislator, I believe that this will have significant public policy effects--especially the areas of taxation and public welfare expenditures. For the first time, those with average and below average incomes are able to communicate their concerns to a mass audience. The more the digital divide in Internet access erodes, as the divide in telephone and television access has eroded, the greater the erosion will be of the upper middle class dominance of the political process. The stakes for putting the brakes on the trends Gillmor describes will get increasingly large in the years ahead.
This is not just a book for journalists and the subjects of journalism, or even just a book for currently active internet participants. The detailed accounts of the consumer applications of various technologies of what he calls the "the read-write web" or "technology that makes we the media possible" are alone worth the effort to get through this book.
Others may understand individual technologies better than Gillmor, but it is unlikely that anyone has a better understanding of how they all--HTML,mail lists and forums,weblogs, wikis, SMS, mobile connected cameras, internet "broadcasting," peer to peer, RSS,Technorati, API, and many others--come to together to create a radically different architecture of information, news, personal reach, and circle of potential friends and allies for many millions of Americans.
This is not a book to be read and put aside. Gillmor clearly struggled to get his text into 241 pages, plus 36 pages of acknowledgements, websites, and detailed notes. While there is occasional redundancy, on the whole a longer book would have been clearer in some respects.
This is a book to be carefully studied and used as a springboard to continued learning about new applications, new technologies, and new interrelationships as they emerge.
The idea of the public as part of the media is not totally new.
Going back at least to the 1940's, public opinion research focused on the stages of influence: the mass media first influenced the opinion leaders in a community, who then influenced others by word of mouth.
What is new is the dramatically improved publishing capacity for the individual citizen, regardless of whether he or she had the community stature and web of influence to have been a community leader--formal or informal--in the past.
The media had been steadily eroding the influence of opinion leaders, by influencing more and more people directly, but now the opinion leaders are back in record-high numbers and with greatly expanded spheres of influence.
"I hope I've helped you understand how this media shift--this explosion of conversations--is taking place and where it is headed," Gllmour says on the last page of his book. "Most of all, I hope I've persuaded you to take up the challenge yourself.
"Your voice matters. Now, if you have something to say, you can be heard.
"You can make your own news. We all can.
"Let's get started."
- Reviewed in the United States on December 12, 2013I relied pretty heavily on this book to write my senior thesis. It's a very interesting dissection of today's news industry.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 30, 2004I am going to have to confess to something here. Before I started reading "We The Media:Grassroots Journalism By The People, For The People",(299 pages , O'Reilly Media, 2002, ISBN 0-596-00733-7) written by Dan Gillmor, I had my mind all set up that it would be some more rubbish spit out by a hack journalist. This was easy for me to do because I never considered myself to be a journalist and I knew virtually nothing about Dan Gillmor. The latter is because I have probably had my head buried too deep into purely technical books more than I should. I also have been undecided on the role of "new media" in society as a whole because of my disdain for the latest and greatest toys pushed out by manufacturers. Then I sat down and read this book. I was instantly drawn in, not only because I had started my own blog in July, but because the book challenged me to think about the role of bloggers in society. I do not agree with everything Mr. Gillmor has written, but like movies like "The Passion of the Christ", a truly good book is one that challenges your notions, makes you think about them, and offers you the chance to enter into conversation about them.
If you choose to read this book, don't expect a how to guide on how to build and publicize a blog. Expect to gain an understanding how, in Mr. Gillmor's view, the blog boom is a natural extension of how journalism has changed over the years. I disagree with him that we as bloggers are journalists because I define it differently. In fact, I believe that between the lines of this book, a reader will see that they are not truly journalists in the strictest sense, BUT, because blogs are essentially journals that we write and publish, what we write can take on a life of its own. Even though we do not have copy editors reviewing our work, blog postings can and do take on a life of their own, sometimes with damaging results. For me, this is key in Mr. Gillmor's presentation.
Mr. Gillmor discusses the evolution of Mickey Mouse (tm) impact of copyright law in the United States. If you can read this section of the book and not come away with even a smidgen of disgust for the tactics and hypocrisy of the corporate world in preventing works from truly entering the public domain as originally envisioned, then you will need to go back and reread the book. Here is where I diverge from his point of view again. Mt. Gillmor talks extensively of his view of Free Speech as being an inherent right on the Internet in all forms, with courts and laws stifling free speech with every chance they get. This IS something I did expect from a book written by a journalist. For me, we have no right to impose our values on other sovereign nations and that in our own nation, irresponsible free speech on the Internet needs to be policed. Yes I know this is a slippery slope, but his book provides a catalyst for conversation.
For business large and small, this book needs to be read to understand that a blog is not a toy of the fringe. It is a tool that is increasingly used to keep journalists and corporations/companies in line and the bull meter low (...). This same audience needs to read this book to understand how not using this medium themselves is a mistake, giving examples of how companies use and regulate it. There are business control and corporate governance issues that need to be addressed with this new medium. Without a fundamental understanding of the medium, the risks associated with it cannot begin to be assessed.
For students of journalism and new media, this book should be required reading. Mr. Gillmor points out that the field of journalism is often slow to react to change. They no longer can be and this understanding needs to start in the journalism schools and new media institutes (I will make sure that Dr. Scott Shamp at the University of Georgia's New Media Institute (...).
For bloggers of all kinds, whether they consider themselves to be journalists or not, need to read this book. They need to read and understand its context. They need to understand what their impact is. I also feel that they need to recognize their societal obligations in their writings (...), which I do wish Mr. Gillmor had addressed more in the book.
Over 20 years ago, I sat in a senior Political Science seminar at Niagara University (...) called "Women and Politics" taught by Dr. Nancy McGlen (...). In her book, "Women's rights: The struggle for equality in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries", she wrote about the presence of a critical mobilizing event being required for a social movement to truly take hold. Mr. Gillmor begins his book about the new media with virtually the same thesis. Whether the event he cites is the event is correct or not, its fits her model, I feel this book is the medium for serious discussions of the role of new media in society and in itself should be considered a critical mobilizing event.
I am not writing this to sell you a book. You see, Mr. Gillmor totally won me over when I got to the punchline of the book: It would be nice if you bought it, but you do not have to. It is available free for download from the "We The Media" blog (...) and under Creative Commons licensing, you are allowed to make derivative works. And true to his beliefs, Mr. Gillmor and the publisher have agreed that the copyright on the book, in the spirit of the original copyright laws, will expire after 14 years.
I have already finished 95% of a derivative work: a searchable Lotus Notes database version of the book that I plan to give to a colleague at the Atlanta Journal Constitution and any other Lotus Notes users that want to read it in this format. I think that after reading the electronic versions, you WILL want a hard copy for your library.
The Business Control Caddy Scorecard: Double-Eagle on a Par 5.
Christopher Byrne, IBM CAAD/CASA
The Business Controls Caddy (tm)
(...)
- Reviewed in the United States on August 10, 2004This is the first book I've seen on the incursion of citizen's media on the corporate news organizations, and has a fair amount of information on the history, and the technologies involved.
Dan repeats himself a number of times; for example, SMS gets defined multiple times throughout the book. A good developmental editor would have caught these problems, but this isn't difficult to overlook while reading.
The big blemish is that his left-leaning political views appear too often and too obviously. Early on, he even makes the claim that Big Media is politically conservative, something only he and Eric Alterman still seem to believe. His lefty, er, progressive readers might not notice, but because a number of the more popular blogs are antidotes to the liberal media slant, those of us who visit those blogs are likely to wince at some of his comments.
All that being said, overall, it's worth the read, until a better work on the subject comes out.
Top reviews from other countries
-
BambiReviewed in Germany on September 17, 20133.0 out of 5 stars Etwas unuebersichtlich, aber trotzdem informativ
Als dieses Buch ankam, erschrak ich etwas. Um die von mir gesuchten Informationen zu finden, brauchte es einige Zeit, da das Buch relativ unuebersichtlich ist. Es ist nicht besonders gut geliedert. Vom Inhalt jedoch informativ und spannend.
chuckpoleReviewed in the United Kingdom on July 12, 20154.0 out of 5 stars Four Stars
Great book. Prompt delivery.
