Buy new:
$14.87$14.87
Arrives:
Saturday, Feb 17
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: NewOrigins
Buy used: $6.58
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $9.54 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution 12th Printing Edition
There is a newer edition of this item:
$13.85
(858)
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-100684834936
- ISBN-13978-0684834931
- Edition12th Printing
- PublisherFree Press
- Publication dateMarch 20, 1998
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions5.58 x 0.79 x 8.42 inches
- Print length307 pages
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Michael Behe is Associate Professor of Biochemistry at Lehigh University.
Product details
- Publisher : Free Press; 12th Printing edition (March 20, 1998)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 307 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0684834936
- ISBN-13 : 978-0684834931
- Item Weight : 10.3 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.58 x 0.79 x 8.42 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,176,069 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,448 in Evolution (Books)
- #4,985 in Biology (Books)
- #7,424 in Science & Mathematics
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the author

I am Professor of Biological Sciences at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania. I received my Ph.D. in Biochemistry from the University of Pennsylvania in 1978. My current research involves delineation of design and natural selection in protein structures. In addition to teaching and research I work as a senior fellow with the Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture.
In addition to publishing over 35 articles in refereed biochemical journals, I have also written editorial features in Boston Review, American Spectator, and The New York Times. My book, Darwin's Black Box, discusses the implications for neo-Darwinism of what I call "irreducibly complex" biochemical systems and has sold over 250,000 copies. The book was internationally reviewed in over one hundred publications and recently named by National Review and World magazine as one of the 100 most important books of the 20th century.
I have presented and debated my work at major universities throughout North America and England.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I am not a biochemist, nor is my training in the hard sciences. My background is in history and political science, so I am inept at commenting on the science and the data Dr. Behe musters. I can just review the book as a layman for laymen. C. S. Lewis said, "It often happens that two schoolboys can solve difficulties in their work for one another better than their master can. When you took the problem to a master, as we all remember, he was very likely what you understood already, to add a great deal of information which you didn't want and say nothing at all about the thing that was puzzling you." (Reflections on the Psalms, ch. 1) Moreover, Thomas Jefferson said, "State a moral case to a ploughman and a professor. The former will decide it as well, and often better than the latter, because he has not been led astray by artificial rules." (Thomas Jefferson to Peter Carr, 1787) Dr. Behe is re-examining those "artificial rules" of science.
This book comes in three parts. The first two chapters contain a concise overview of what he is talking about. I found that the first chapters are a book in their own right and provides a perfect overview. He introduces the idea of "irreducible complexity," and his now-famous mousetrap analogy.
The second section deals with the data. Dr. Behe warns "So, as a writer who wants people to read my work, I face a dilemma: people hate to read details, yet the story of the impact of biochemistry on evolutionary theory rests solely on the details." (p. xii) He therefore sets apart the technical text with a small box. He suggests that we skim the section just to get a feel of the ultra-complexities involved in the biochemical processes.
He takes five case studies: cellular cilia and flagella; the blood clotting process; protein production; the immune system; and AMP production. I confess that these sections lost me, even with the semi-familiar diagrams. Basically, the cell isn't homogeneous blob of protoplasm, but is more along the lines of a complex machine along the lines of the space shuttle or an aircraft carrier. However, unlike the carrier, which can operate without paint, all of the screws or elevators, inside the cell each piece of sub-cellular machinery is necessary for the cell to function.
The problem then is for the two theories of evolution, either gradualism or punctuated equilibrium, to account for how this machine got together in the first place. No one has been able to do this.
In the third part of the book, Dr. Behe takes a step back, and does a more philosophical analysis of the implications of the data. He begins with a study of the literature, specifically the "Journal of Molecular Evolution," and "Proceedings of the National Academy of Science," several books, and two college textbooks, and points out that evolution is presented but never explained.
He asserts that "No one at Harvard University, no one at the National Institutes of Health, no member of the National Academy of Science, no Nobel prize winner-no one at all can give a detailed account of how the cilium, or vision, or blood-clotting, or any complex biochemical process might have developed in a Darwinian fashion. But here we are. Plants and animals are here. The complex systems are here. All things are here somehow: if not in a Darwinian fashion, then how?" (p. 187)
Behe says that the evidence points to intelligent design for the cell. He asserts, "The conclusion of intelligent design flows naturally from the data itself-not from sacred books or sectarian belief." (193) To his credit, this is where he stops. I believe that you cannot go from the order in the cell to the Russian Orthodox practice of triple baptism. In some ways, this section is a bit disappointing since if you grant that there is an intelligent designer, the then who or what is he/she/it? For what purpose were cells, and therefore `we" were created? We cannot solve these problems from the data, but this is the Pandora's box that he has opened when he broke the seal on Darwin's black box.
He handles several objections to the idea of intelligent design, that we should not attach any specific theological dogma to the idea. He also refutes several questions, such as the panda's thumb and the blind spot on the retina, plus the issue of vestigial organs. He pitches softball answers to these questions, primarily since they are gross anatomy questions and not biochemical questions.
He brings up, but does not elaborate on the historical aspect of Evolution, which is up my academic alley. Historical data differs from scientific data. For example, I cannot scientifically prove that the Continental Congress ever happened, since it was a singular historic event. We infer from the diaries, journals, letters, newspapers, and documents such as the Declaration of Independence to prove it. But I cannot reconstruct the event here and now. Evolution is also an historical event, so we have to follow historical methods to discover what exactly happened. Paleontology is not a science, but is a branch of history. It fits somewhere between archeology and cosmology.
The last chapter discusses the philosophy of science and the a priori assumption that excludes supernatural explanations for the phenomenon. The problem is that they are trying to avoid a "God of the gaps," which is to say that anything that cannot be explained will always be explained by God's handiwork. The problem is that a "science of the spaces" ensues. It is the same problem but uses different mortar to fill the spaces in the bricks of data. The question is no longer science, but one of philosophy.
Behe has quite a quill. No mumbo jumbo. Easy read!
Let's say that at the beginning of a criminal investigation (a murder perhaps)that I believe an albino Samoan male adult is the culprit, despite the fact that I have no leads that cause me to believe this. Furthermore, I focus on a particular Samoan male adult who was in prison a thousand miles away at the time of the offense. As the search for clues continues, I suggest possible ways this man could have committed this crime. All of the ways I suggest are farfetched and groundless, but I doggedly continue in this line of thinking. The investigation stalls. I could excuse my lack of progress by saying that we just haven't found the evidence yet which will link this person to the crime. Or I could start from scratch by reconsidering the original hypothesis: that an albino Samoan male in prison was the suspect. If there was no support for this, a logical course of action would be to consider that it might have been someone else, perhaps someone of another sex, culture or nationality. Perhaps someone who wasn't in prison at the time. Once I do that, the investigation takes off and is quickly solved. This story reminds me of the investigative course that so many scientists have taken in starting with the assumption that belief in a supreme creator is unscientific, therefore, complex life forms must have evolved by random uncontrolled occurences.
When I was 12 years old, my sister-in-law gave the book: 'human beginnings'. After reading the book, I came to the conclusion that the whole idea of life evolving in this way was pure garbage. I knew how to use my God-given ability of reasoning without being taught such at the University. I didn't need a science degree then and I don't need one now to make an intelligent decision. I see nothing wrong with Behe's reasoning throughout the book -- the evidence of irreducible complexity and minimal function is one for which the darwinists have no plausible answer (and 'exaptation' is as laughable as anything else they have come up with).
"The supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience." -- Albert Einstein (1933)
Top reviews from other countries
Darwin was not wrong, he just didnt have all the facts and access to what we have today. His conclusions appeared reasonable and fair for their time and some aspects of what he wrote still holds true, but as Behe reveals, today we have opened the black box of Molecular biology to reveal the immense complexity of life, and I think we can forgive Behe's 'reigiouos' conclusions given what has been revealed.
Darwins theory for origins just doesnt hold water anymore, and yet it is the 'religious Dogma' of our day. The REAL reason people criticise Behe is not because he is a liar or biased, but because he dares to challenge their religious beliefs and that is always bound to stir emotions. But better we face the facts and truth, than a continue in a lie. As research increases, the bad news for Neo-darwinists will only mount, until they will be like the sad flat-earthers.
So what if the facts prove design? So what if there is a designer somewhere? If it is true, bring it/him/her on - we should not cover up facts out of fear of truth we dont like. Great Book - loved the option to skip heavy techy stuff if wanted, loved the analogies, and humour - and honesty. A Classic






