Buy new:
$15.23$15.23
Delivery Tuesday, April 16
Or fastest delivery Thursday, April 11
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: MTEAE
Buy used: $6.99
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $12.81 shipping
75% positive over last 12 months
+ $8.65 shipping
96% positive over lifetime
+ $8.65 shipping
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It Hardcover – September 16, 2006
Purchase options and add-ons
"Mark Steyn is the funniest writer now living. But don't be distracted by the brilliance of his jokes. They are the neon lights advertising a profound and sad insight: America is almost alone in resisting both the suicide of the West and the suicide bombing of radical Islamism." - JOHN O'SULLIVAN, editor at large, National Review
IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT.....
Someday soon, you might wake up to the call to prayer from a muezzin. Europeans already are. And liberals will still tell you that "diversity is our strength"--while Talibanic enforcers cruise Greenwich Village burning books and barber shops, the Supreme Court decides sharia law doesn't violate the "separation of church and state," and the Hollywood Left decides to give up on gay rights in favor of the much safer charms of polygamy.
If you think this can't happen, you haven't been paying attention, as the hilarious, provocative, and brilliant Mark Steyn--the most popular conservative columnist in the English-speaking world--shows to devastating effect. The future, as Steyn shows, belongs to the fecund and the confident. And the Islamists are both, while the West is looking ever more like the ruins of a civilization.
But America can survive, prosper, and defend its freedom only if it continues to believe in itself, in the sturdier virtues of self-reliance (not government), in the centrality of family, and in the conviction that our country really is the world's last best hope. Mark Steyn's America Alone is laugh-out-loud funny--but it will also change the way you look at the world.
- Print length214 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherRegnery Publishing
- Publication dateSeptember 16, 2006
- Dimensions6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
- ISBN-100895260786
- ISBN-13978-0895260789
Frequently bought together

What do customers buy after viewing this item?
- Lowest Pricein this set of products
The Undocumented Mark SteynHardcover$8.91 shippingGet it as soon as Friday, Apr 5Only 1 left in stock - order soon. - Most purchasedin this set of products
"A Disgrace to the Profession"Mark Steyn (editor)Paperback$8.55 shippingGet it as soon as Wednesday, Apr 17Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
From the Inside Flap
Someday soon, you might wake up to the call to prayer from a muezzin. Europeans already are.
And liberals will still tell you that "diversity is our strength" while Talibanic enforcers cruise Greenwich Village burning books and barber shops, the Supreme Court decides sharia law doesn t violate the "separation of church and state," and the Hollywood Left decides to give up on gay rights in favor of the much safer charms of polygamy.
If you think this can t happen, you haven t been paying attention, as the hilarious, provocative, and brilliant Mark Steyn the most popular conservative columnist in the English-speaking world shows to devastating effect in this, his first and eagerly awaited new book on American and global politics.
The future, as Steyn shows, belongs to the fecund and the confident. And the Islamists are both, while the West wedded to a multiculturalism that undercuts its own confidence, a welfare state that nudges it toward sloth and self-indulgence, and a childlessness that consigns it to oblivion is looking ever more like the ruins of a civilization.
Europe, laments Steyn, is almost certainly a goner. The future, if the West has one, belongs to America alone with maybe its cousins in brave Australia. But America can survive, prosper, and defend its freedom only if it continues to believe in itself, in the sturdier virtues of self-reliance (not government), in the centrality of family, and in the conviction that our country really is the world s last best hope.
Steyn argues that, contra the liberal cultural relativists, America should proclaim the obvious: we do have a better government, religion, and culture than our enemies, and we should spread America s influence around the world for our own sake as well as theirs.
Mark Steyn s America Alone is laugh-out-loud funny but it will also change the way you look at the world. It is sure to be the most talked-about book of the year.
About the Author
In Canada, he is senior columnist for the country’s newest political magazine, the Western Standard, and literary correspondent for the country’s biggest-selling general interest magazine, Maclean’s. In addition, he appears in many other publications, from the Jerusalem Post to Hawke’s Bay Today in New Zealand. Born in Toronto, he lives in New Hampshire.
Product details
- Publisher : Regnery Publishing; First Edition (September 16, 2006)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 214 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0895260786
- ISBN-13 : 978-0895260789
- Item Weight : 15.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.9 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #419,127 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #85 in Political Leadership
- #560 in European Politics Books
- #1,001 in Political Conservatism & Liberalism
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Introducing him at the United States Senate in 2015, Ted Cruz called Mark Steyn "an international bestselling author, a Top Five jazz recording artist, and a leading Canadian human rights activist".
All of which happens to be true.
Mark Steyn is the author of After America, which was a Top Five bestseller in the United States and a Number One bestseller in Canada; America Alone: The End Of The World As We Know It, a New York Times bestseller in the United States and a Number One bestseller in Canada; and his most recent bestseller, The [Un]documented Mark Steyn. His new book, The Prisoner of Windsor, is set to release in April 2023.
His most recent CD is his cat album, dedicated to his own beloved cat Marvin: Feline Groovy: Songs for Swingin' Cats was a Number One jazz bestseller, a Top Twenty album on the Billboard chart, and a Top Thirty album on Amazon's pop chart. "A Marshmallow World", his Christmas single with Jessica Martin, reached Number Seven on Amazon's easy listening bestsellers, and Number 41 on their main pop chart. Their subsequent full-length Christmas album, Making Spirits Bright, reached Number Four on the jazz chart. "Nine Lives", the song he co-wrote with Kevin Amos, was a Top Thirty smash on the Moldovan Hit Parade.
Steyn's human rights campaign to restore free speech to Canada led to the repeal by Parliament of the notorious "Section 13" hate-speech law, a battle he recounts in his book Lights Out: Islam, Free Speech And The Twilight Of The West.
Steyn hosts The Mark Steyn Show, which airs every evening Monday to Thursday. He also presents Steyn's Song of the Week every Sunday afternoon on Serenade Radio. In New York he can be heard with his longtime EIB comrade, Bo Snerdley, every Tuesday on 77 WABC.
For a decade and a half until Rush's death, Mark Steyn was a hugely popular guest-host of America's Number One radio show The Rush Limbaugh Program (EIB). He was also a favorite guest-host of America's Number One cable show Tucker Carlson Tonight, and hosted its lead-in-show Fox News Primetime. He regularly drew some of the highest ratings in all US television as a host for Tucker and other top shows.
With fans around the world, Steyn has appeared on stages across the planet from Toronto's Roy Thomson Hall to the Sydney Conservatorium of Music. His 2016 nationwide tour of Australia was sold out coast to coast. He has spoken in the Canadian Parliament, the Ontario Parliament, the Danish Parliament, and the Australian Parliament, where he was introduced by the then Foreign Minister, Julie Bishop.
Over the years, Mark Steyn's writing on politics, arts and culture has been published in almost every major newspaper around the English-speaking world, including Britain's Daily Telegraph, Canada's National Post, The Australian, The Irish Times, The Jerusalem Post, The Wall Street Journal, and many more.
Steyn's other books include A Song For The Season, Mark Steyn's Passing Parade, Mark Steyn From Head To Toe and The Face Of The Tiger. His personal view of musical theatre, Broadway Babies Say Goodnight, is an acknowledged classic published to critical acclaim in London, and to somewhat sniffier notices in New York.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonReviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
by David L. Bahnsen
Based on the variety of habits I have either taken on or rid myself of over the years, I am convinced that my most enjoyed vice remaining in my arsenal is reading books, or at least buying lots of them. My collection includes many books that I feel sentimentally connected to, and it includes many pieces I have plead with people to read over the years. Some of my most treasured pieces represent the largest influence I have had in my life ideologically, outside of the actual relationships I have enjoyed with key mentors. But, it is very rare, even in my library, that a book exist which I actually wish could be turned into a tract, and distributed to the masses. Hazlitt's "Economics in One Lesson" is such a book, and certainly there are dozens that I at least think a large body of people ought to read. However, Mark Steyn's latest work, "America Alone", not only deserves the rave review I am about to give it, but I truly wish that it could be re-embodied as a miniature treatise, and force fed to every single person floating around in the United States of America during this current age.
For those unfamiliar with Mark Steyn, he is the Canadian-born, New Hampshire-residing columnist who is likely the most popular editorial writer of any newspaper that syndicates him, yet the most ignored mainstream writer in today's press. As the MSM (mainstream media) attempted to do for years before the sheer extremeness of the numbers rendered it impossible with the radio popularity of Rush Limbaugh, Mark Steyn is a hit (deservedly so) in any paper that publishes him, yet he is mysteriously absent from the CNN panels and Tim Russert forums that such irrelevant personas as Maureen Dowd and E.J. Dionne Jr. often fill (as an aside, the God-send, Larry Kudlow, frequently features Mark on his afternoon show on CNBC). Mark's popularity is understandable for two main reasons: (a) As opposed to Maureen Dowd, he is an extremely gifted writer, and (b) As opposed to E.J. Dionne Jr., he is a very intelligent person. Indeed, as far as polemical skills go, Mark is unmatched even by other brilliant writers in the conservative movement. He lacks the flowery elegance of a George Will, falls short of the intellectual prowess of a Thomas Sowell (who doesn't), and yet surpasses even them in his ability to captivate readers, and render absurd the error du jour of the far left (particularly as it pertains to the topic this book was about). Beyond the fervent praise for the book I am about to review, I would strongly recommend you begin reading Mark's columns online[...]), or subscribe to a newspaper that wisely syndicates him. It will enhance the quality of your life.
Speaking of "quality of life", the book I now review, "America Alone", is the best apologetic I have read for a vigilant war on terror and jihadism, and yet it really does not even purport to be so. The explicit intent of Steyn's work is to demonstrate the utter disaster our European friends have created for themselves, and to lay out the case that only America can save the planet from Global Islamic Fascism (a last hope that Steyn is only holding onto by a thin thread). In the course of persuasively proving said assertions (that Europe is doomed is nearly irrefutable, and that America is on her way to joining them short of some massive changes in thinking, is comparably demonstrable), Steyn drafts what I believe is as clear of a defense as one could write for a militarily aggressive response to the Islamic threat. But even more than the traditional neo-conservative rhetoric that is so confusingly controversial in this day and age, Steyn reinforces that what is even more urgently needed is an immediate and emphatic change of heart/mind, culturally, from the American people. Indeed, we have a military power unlike any that has ever existed; what we lack is a will and conviction to defeat those who would kill us.
Many writers, myself included, have repeated ad nauseum the case for a successful posture in the face of Islamic terrorists who long ago declared war on us. For a better understanding of the contemporary history of Jihadism, see Lawrence Wright's, "The Looming Tower", which also carries with it a shocking expose of the failures of the American espionage and military community to protect us from 9/11. It is a powerful book, and provides far more depth and history than Steyn is attempting to at understanding the nature of our Islamic enemy. But, what Steyn has done in "America Alone", is go far beyond the base reality that jihadists want to kill us, say they want to kill us, have killed us, and still work passionately to kill us each and every day. He actually dares to delve into the real cultural phenomena of what is happening globally, beginning with the unavoidable subject of demography.
Without blowing the entire thesis of the book, which you will remember I have actually posited that I want to turn into a tract, the numerical facts of the day and age we live in are these: Europe with its pathetic birth rate is a self-extincting waste in the generational battles we face ahead, while the Islamicists are procreating at rates that would make the Mormons jealous. The United States of America, to its credit, continues to experience net population increase year-over-year, even apart from immigration considerations, though it is teetering on breakeven numbers as of late (sans immigration). However, Spain, Italy, France, and many others, are simply put: goners. They have long ago traded a vibrant culture of family and community for an apathetic socialism that has poisoned it into a dependent state of nanny-welfarism. They have forfeited the will to survive, evidenced not just in their capitulation to terrorists, but in their inability to reproduce themselves. I not only was flabbergasted to read what trends and forecasts and reasonable expectations exist in this data, but frankly was speechless at the current numbers, as they stand right now, today. I doubt that 1% of the American people are aware that Mohammed is the 5th most popular name in the United Kingdom (now), and the single most popular name in Belgium (right now). That 40% of Rotterdam is currently Moslem, or that 30% of those in France under the age of 20 are, or that 45% of those in urban areas in France are, do not necessarily represent statistics that should scare us (though they do me), but they certainly ought to shock us. That a continent of near exclusive Anglo-Christian influences for centuries has been replaced by rank secularism, with the most ardent demographic influence and growth coming entirely from the Islamic religion, is a historical fact that has to be understood and lamented. Steyn's analysis of this is profound, and commanding material.
Beyond the demography that Westerners presently face (the Islamic community reproduces at a rate of 5-8 new births per household, vs. a 1-2 rate for Europeans, and a barely 2 rate for Americans), Steyn's work masterfully mocks the apathy and political correctness that is rampant in American pop culture (and across the pond as well, of course). I hesitate to steal his thunder in terms of the voluminous illustrations of this, but I dare say that after you stop laughing at the sharp humor Steyn uses to make his various points, you will likely find yourself with a peculiar sense of discomfort and disgust at the harsh realities he highlights. We have a dangerous enemy, and they are as determined to kill us as any global threat has ever been determined to kill anyone, and yet the universal response amongst the left has been capitulation, appeasement, and inexplicable failures to deal with our problem. Political correctness has not just run amok; it has defeated the purpose of the old rhetorical device of "reductio ad absurdum" (the reductios are realities, and no one is kidding).
This is a tough book to review without making the mistake of re-stating its entire set of conclusions. It is so chalk-full of empirical data, historical happenings, and leftist quotations, I can not properly summarize what Steyn has done in a brief internet review. In that sense, I really mean that this book is a must-read for any student of culture, politics, the sanctity of life, and religious affairs. No analysis of the present immigration controversy is coherent without an appreciation of the material in this book (a controversy, by the way, that highlights some absurd advocates on the right, and left). The very word, "multi-culturalism", will take on entirely new meaning for any reader of this book. Disdain for American exceptionalism will have to be re-interpreted by any real American next time they observe such from your typical Hollywood star (or Massachusetts senator, for that matter). I came away from reading this book with a renewed vigor for the things I care about most in my life (family, community, church, freedom, ambition, prosperity, and faith). However, I also came away with a renewed commitment that we fight the ideological (and military) enemy we face in Islamo-fascism, and that we do so as proud Americans, whose historical commitment to economic prosperity and ethical principles are the sole reasons we stand alone in the generations to come as we fight the jihadist efforts to capture the west. I am more proud to be an American now, than I was prior to reading the book, and yet simultaneously I am more concerned about the future of America than I was prior to reading it. I share Steyn's view of the diagnosis, and I share his views on the remedy, yet I can not bring myself to a place of optimism that such a remedy will take place. These are dangerous times we live in, and I believe our response to the danger has been anything but serious.
Steyn quotes Bennett in a concluding chapter of the book: "Democracy. Immigration. Multi-culturalism. Choose any two." It is the most profound and captivating thought in the book, and it incidentally knocks both the liberal leftist loonies and the cartoonish right-wing anti-immigrationists right on their backsides. For those who want to protect the ideals this country was based on, a serious understanding of these very nuanced subjects is in order. For those serious about protecting our democracy, reading "America Alone" is a mighty fine way to start.
**********************
Incidentally, one of the most powerful points of the book is actually that it really doesn't matter if you are one of those pro-America, neo-con, God, guns, and gold nutballs who is anti-Jihadist, pro-American, or not. Indeed, you can be as loathing of America as Jimmy Carter and Sean Penn are, or as nasty and inflammatory about military interventionism as Lew Rockwell or John Murtha, it will not matter.
You see, in this war, the enemy is truly non-partisan.
According to Steyn, this book is about "the larger forces at play in the developed world that have left Europe too enfeebled to resist its remorseless transformation into Eurabia and that call into question the future of much of the rest of the world, including the United States, Canada and beyond. The key factors are: Demographic decline; The unsustainability of the advanced Western social-democratic state; and Civilization exhaustion."
Steyn pokes fun at the leftist doomsayers' preoccupation with global warming and resource exhaustion, for which there is little or no hard evidence, in favor of the very real and unequivocably established collapse of Western fertility rates. As Steyn points out, "A people that won't multiply can't go forth or go anywhere. Those who do will shape the age we live in." And guess who those people are who ARE reproducing? Why the Muslims of course.
The Western world has become enervated and overcome by civilizational ennui which should come as no surprise since the "state has gradually annexed all the responsibilities of adulthood to the point where it's effectively severed its citizens from humanity's primal instincts, not least the survival instinct. In the American context, the federal deficit isn't the problem; it's the government programs that cause the deficit. These programs would be wrong even if Bill Gates wrote a check to cover them each month. They corrode the citizen's sense of self reliance to a potentially fatal degree. Big government is a national security threat: it increases your vulnerability to threats like Islamism, and makes it less likely you'll be able to summon the will to rebuff it."
Europe has all but succumbed to the dull opiate of multiculturalism. Caught between the rock of collapsing fertility rates and the hard place of their increasing dependence on a government which has annexed most of the core functions of adulthood, Europeans cannot muster either the will or the babies to resist the inexorable collapse of their civilization. Their plight is compounded by the fact that Islam is providing the babies and the will to fill that vacuum. Europe is for all practical purposes lost.
The central thesis of this book is that demography IS destiny. For without favorable demographics a civilization cannot long survive. And with favorable demographics, even the crude, brutish and largely unproductive can prevail. What single factor led to the civilizational dominance of England in the 1820s? A bursting population brought about by the conquest of infant mortality allowing England to send her sons and daughters to populate America, Australia, New Zealand and countless other outposts as well as civilize many many others. All of mankind owes a debt of gratitude to providence that so benign and beneficial a civilization as that of 19th century Britain first achieved demographic critical mass. Today we face a much more pernicious civilization wielding the demographic sword. That would be the sword of the prophet.
There are two points that Steyn makes in "America Alone" that I take issue with. He says we have one of three options in dealing with Isalm: Surrender; Reform Islam; or Destroy Islam. Steyn says that we must work to reform Islam since the other two options are unthinkable. I believe there is a fourth option: Defeat, contain and isolate Islam. Islam cannot be reformed as history has taught us. Islam is a vicious circle of violence, mayhem and destruction called jihad. Attempts to alter this vicious circle in any way is short circuited by the Koran which asserts that any deviation from the its teachings is punishable by death. This is not a religion in any legitimate sense, but rather a death cult combined with a political ideology. It can be thought of more appropriately as the perfection of the Nazi creed. Could we have reformed Nazism?
Steyn says that we Americans have failed to export our magnificent American political innovation of limited republican constitutional government which theoretically reins in the appetites of the mob. And while I generally agree with this sentiment I think it is important to point out that Americans themselves no longer share a common civilizational vision nor accept the founding tenets of our republic. Steyn believes that to consider an exit strategy in Iraq is tantamount to a shirking our civilizational responsibilities and he points to the British who managed to successfully export their form of government to the world to the benefit of mankind. But, we live in different times, and as I pointed out above, Islam cannot be reformed. Attempts to do so are a foolhardy waste of time.
So, we are left with isolation, containment and the defeat of Islam as a challenge to our way of life. This will require in itself considerable will. And while we do not currently have the will to defeat Islamic supremacism and their desire for worldwide hegemoney that will come. Hopefully sooner rather than later for the longer we wait the further the scales will be tipped in Islam's favor.
This is an exceptional and important book that should be read by anyone interested in the impending civilizational collapse and what, if anything, that can be done to reverse the trend. It is already too late for Western Europe. Hopefully America, civilization's last great hope, can stave off the rot of leftism and multiculturalism.
Top reviews from other countries
Mark Steyn reminds us of when citizens began to voice their concerns about immigrants taking their cities over (p. xvii.) I remember some of those conversations back in the ‘70’s. Now, in Britain, such takeovers are a present day reality. In some towns, Muslims maintain their dominance by intimidation, and, if necessary, even by assault and street violence. Tony Blair calls the changing demographic a ‘subterranean conversation’ (p. xviii.) Even a well known ‘multiculturalist ideologue,’ then, admits that a takeover is underway. Before this book was updated in 2008, Oxford was already being asked to welcome Islam’s call to prayer over loudspeakers from the domes (p. xv.) Maybe that is happening by now. I am afraid to check. The Muslim push has been on for a long time, and is getting more brazen. On 9/11, many years ago now, Muslim youth rampaged through northern England in celebration of the terror strikes (p. 46.) Because Islam is a religion, not an ethnic group, it is a global network (p. 62.) Its ideology is bankrolled by Saudi oil (p. 69) and its people are not open to ‘pluralism.’ The rule in Islam is ‘subjugation.’ Even the ‘moderates’ admit that (p. 78.) Islamic law has been on the ascent for decades in many nations (p. 202.) It is being taught in some American high schools. The material includes ‘the superiority of jihad’ and a ‘Judgment Day’ during which the Muslims will slay the Jews (p. 72.) That does not seem like ‘moderate’ teaching. When you map out the various peoples that the Muslims are terrorizing, you will get the impression that Islam has set itself against the rest of the world (p. xxxiii.) Since this book was written, even China has had to deal with its rebellions and massacres. Who’s next? North Korea? When that happens, nobody dare say that this fight with Islam is not a world war.
We are dealing with a religion whose adherents welcome death with a readiness that should make us fret (p. xxxviii.) It is an incoming culture that is populated mostly by youth (p. xxxii), that steers clear of books and learning (p. 16), that, religiously, is into ‘political motivation’ more than ‘spiritual contemplation’ (p. 100), and that does not share with us a philosophy of common humanity. For example, it is inconceivable that Muslims would suspend fighting at Christmastime, as German and British soldiers did in 1914 during trench warfare (p. 143.) We have seen the proof of this as recently as 2014 when Palestinians broke cease-fire after cease-fire against the Israelis. We are dealing with a primitive, inhumane mindset. In some ways, today’s Muslims are even more inhumane than they were in the days of Muhammad. ‘The ‘jilbab’ (head to toe covering for women) might not predate the disco era (p. 74.) If sixty percent of Muslim Brits want sharia to be imposed in Britain (p. 76), it is not wrong to not qualify the word ‘Muslim’ in all that has been said in this paragraph. A man owning and operating a cell phone can believe that shaking the hand of an infidel will cause his penis to disappear (p. 140.) This anecdote (the substantiation of which I have from ultra Muslim-accepting CBC Radio hosts) encapsulates what we are dealing with: the scary combination of crude beliefs and modern adaptability. Understandably, CBC left out of that conversation the fact that those who believed in the urban legend were Muslim.
Britain’s influence over the world has a lot to do with having been the first nation to ‘conquer infant mortality’ rates (p. 6.) While Western peoples have nearly quit reproducing, Muslims are repopulating themselves wherever they live or go (pp. 2, 10, 40, 53.) Rising generations in the West are, or will be, largely Muslim, and Muslims are at odds with the ways and freedoms of traditional Westerners (p. xlii.) It is the tradition among Muslims to extract tax money from their infidel neighbors whenever they can (pp. 83, 164, 165.) Until they can do it by an imposed jizya, they will do it by populating the welfare ranks. Is it reasonable to count on Muslim immigrants, then, to pay for all of those welfare programs that Western offspring will be too few in number to subsidize by themselves? (pp. 43, 114, 115, 189.) Large numbers of immigrants end up being beneficiaries of welfare, not contributors (p. 190)—this, in addition to all the ‘junkies’ on ‘state narcotics’ that we already support (p. 47.) There seems to be coming a perfect storm: Western welfare systems collapsing in the midst of a rising immigrant population that is balky, if not downright militant.
What happens in Europe is something to watch and learn from. Troubles over there eventually find their way over here. Brussels, the EU capital, has a caucus that is mostly Muslim (p. xii.) The Archbishop of Canterbury is open to accepting sharia in the United Kingdom as an alternative law (p. xiv.) Headscarves or even ‘full abaya’ uniforms (again, the head to toe coverings for women) are common sights now in some of the most liberal cities in the world: Amsterdam, Marseilles, Vienna, and Stockholm (p. 21.) In Paris a gay mayor was nearly stabbed to death by an anti-gay Muslim (p. 179.) In Spain, shortly following the infamous train bombings, no less, the traumatized Spaniards voted in a party committed to appease, rather than oppose, the terrorists responsible for the carnage (pp. 36.) That was nothing less than jihad toppling a European government (p. 37.) Can an apologetic attitude toward terrorists be the right approach? The will for war is diminishing all over the West. The so-called ‘exit strategy’ that politicians debate is a good definition of this weak will (p. 169.) Though the USA has more resolve against Muslim fanaticism than democracies abroad, its resolve is on the decline too. The foolish accommodations that are made to whining Muslims are revealing of this weakness. In California, the Crusaders agreed to rename their football club. But Muslim teams called the Intifada and Sword of Allah did not have to return courtesy (p. 158.) Muslims are being appeased practically every time I turn on the news or crack open a pundit’s book. Each example underlines our unwillingness to stare down oppression. Each instance of oppression by the moderates is a sign of solidarity with the fanatics. We cave in to the demands of moderates. We issue subpoenas instead of death warrants to jihadists (p. 161.) Appeasement of Muslims is just part of the Western spirit of accommodation that has grown out of our politically correct culture. The derangement is unbelievably strange: emasculating a lion on a coat of arms to satisfy female soldiers in Sweden (p. xxiii); replacing the traditional designations ‘father’ and ‘mother’ on birth certificates in Spain (p. 10); selling toilets with alarms that go off when their seats are raised in order to feminize men in Germany (p. 180.) Sensitivity indoctrination is geared mostly in favor of Muslims, though: getting rid of ice cream cones in Burger Kings across Britain because the swirls on the lids look like the word ‘Allah’ in Arabic (p. xlvi); removing Jews and Hindus from a Muslim’s jury trial in London (p. 38); making students in California practice the Muslim faith to promote awareness (p. 66); granting a Muslim inmate special meats for his feast-days in Boston (p. 82); advising police officers in Brussels to hide their coffees during Ramadan (p. 123); suspending the flying of England’s flag in prisons because the crusading emblem on it might offend Muslim jailbirds (p. 197.) The reason for Muslim favoritism is the fear of, not respect for, the Muslim faith. It is a disturbing, dangerous trend to give in to ‘resurgent Islam.’ The trend is more worthy of worry than global warming (p. xxvi.) “That’s how great nations die—not by war or conquest, but bit by bit, until one day you wake up and you don’t need to sign a formal instrument of surrender because you did it piecemeal for the last ten years” (p. 197.)
Accommodation, political correctness, appeasement—these are nearly synonymous terms; their practice issues from the multicultural ethic. America Alone, if it is anything—and it is many things—is a primer on multicultural madness. When a nation waters down its national identity in order to be inoffensive and polite to immigrants, the immigrants will retain their ‘cultural loyalty’ and undervalue their new ‘nominal citizenship’ (p. xvi, xxxv.) Or (which outcome could be worse), “multiculturalism makes a nation no more than a holding pen” (p. 202.) There you are in your new holding pen where no values and identity are held up for you to cling to and be dignified by. You get to squawk about whatever you do not like and the state will be sensitive to your every complaint. A society that is ‘sensitive to the insensitive’ and ‘tolerant of the intolerant’ will be taken advantage of (p. 158.) Agreeing to wear gloves before you hand the Muslim detainee his Koran is to agree that you are the unclean infidel that he claims you are and it ‘validates his bigotry’ (p. xliv.) A host country should not assimilate with the immigrant, but vice versa (p. 74.) Multicultural sensitivity toward the Muslim is the way to sharia (xlvi.) In a multicultural society, ‘laws and customs’ bow ‘before the gods of boundless multicultural tolerance’ (p. 134.) In short, multiculturalism acts like so: “Decapitate us, and our politicians rush to the nearest mosque to declare that ‘Islam is a religion of peace’” (p. 200.) The last chapter is the part of the book that covers the multicultural topic most densely. I doubt that this subject is covered with more acumen by another author.
It is hard enough to fathom that a person, even one raised in ignorance and indoctrinated to love death, would want to remain a Muslim. It is harder by far to understand why someone would want to become one. Many persons are converting to Islam and even to the most savage of its cabals. Much needed information on why is supplied here by Steyn. The worldview that promotes the fallacy that all cultures are equally acceptable has no identity to offer (xxi, 90.) If the choice comes down to being a confident Muslim or a cringing European, the former option will have a wide appeal (p. 90.) Some ‘Western females’ convert because they find feminism, the popular status quo for women, ‘degrading and unworthy’ of womanhood (p. 94.) As for converts who go all the way into Islamism, or bloody persecution, they join because their new identity comes with a license to ‘lie, cheat, steal, rape, kill’ and because to them, that is all cool and hip (pp. 67, 120, 203.) A sense of purpose and belonging, together with an invitation to swagger among thugs—that, for a certain kind of lad, is better and more glamorous than being a nobody who believes in nothing for certain.
“It’s at the intersection of these statistics—religious, demographic, terrorist—that a dark future awaits” (p. 65.) In other words, what can be done with Islam? What can be done with the ideology itself? The reformation of Islam is the only resolution, says Mark Steyn, which is only for Muslims to do (p. 205.) We may facilitate reform by not funding mosques anymore (p. 206) and by supporting the subjects of potential dissent within Islam: Islam’s unhappy, persecuted female population (p. 205.) But Steyn, at this late point, is no longer cognizant of what he wondered about way back on page 82. What if jihadism is the reform? And what about his opinion on page 86 that Muslims who are deemed ‘moderate’ are probably just ‘quiescent,’ which polls and observations indicate is true? Moderates are dormant members of Islamic orthodoxy; as such, they favor a return to the rough and rude religion of old more than they let on. There may be some moderate Muslims or some Muslims who want to be moderate, but there is ‘no moderate Islam’ (p. 88.) To reform Islam from what it fundamentally is, every mosque would have to be overthrown and every Koran would have to be altered. Well, nearly every church has been overthrown by higher criticism and nearly every King James Bible has been replaced by a weaker version; so this kind of reform may be possible, after all. It might take more than a century to achieve this, however; jihad is coming on too thick and fast for that.
It is secularism that has left a gaping hole in the soul that Islamism is on the spot to fill (p. 101.) It is this spiritual death that preceded the demographic decline (p. 111.) Muslims are here to offset our low birth rate. Islam is here to fill the spiritual vacuum. Churches, by and large, will not criticize Islam, much less preach, even when Muslims terrorize (p. 96.) Churches that get noticed for no other reason than their take on homosexuality have become irrelevant impotent (pp. 98, 99.) “Pre-modern Islam beats post-modern Christianity” (p. 100.) That is an accurate evaluation. Churches and Christians do not stand for anything anymore. There is much for a Muslim or a seeker to hate about America and the West, especially the lewd lifestyles that are proudly practiced and put on display (p. xxxix) and which the pastors of churches, incidentally, no longer censure. Our takeaway from all of this is that the visible Church and the Western world have become repulsive enough that even Islam, with its cruelty of Sharia Law and its many persecuting arms, is a religion that Muslims are willing to keep and that lost people will seriously consider when it comes time for them to belong. A reformation of the evangelical Church would occasion revival and sweep followers of Allah into the arms of Christ. This is what we need for the present evil tide to shift. There are no signs of Church reform on the horizon, though. Until there are, this reformation called ‘jihadism’ will have to be fought with natural resources, to a great extent. Converts to Christianity are few these days. The stories of multitudes of Muslims ‘coming to faith’ always come from distant places, and these ‘revivals’ never check out as genuine when one researches them. We can continue to believe that Muslim terrorists kill because of the plight of the poor among their ranks and tribes and that we must help to get the message out that they need more social services (p. 210.) But that is not their message, even if they say that it is. Their message is the next head they sever (p. 151.)
This book, or another like it, is a necessary one to read. Good radio programs transmit what we need to know about our changing moral and political landscape. But sometimes we should go through a detailed survey that explains these things in a systematic way. America Alone is not flawless. The name of God is carelessly thrown around a couple of times (pp. 154, 184.) There is one incomprehensible sentence (p. 134.) Despising is said to be worse than hating, which makes little sense (p. 197.) Steyn says that Muslim fertility rates will be in decline by 2050 (p. 19) and that “much of the planet will be uninhabited long before it’s uninhabitable” (p. 7.) How can he know such things? There are two instances of insensitivity too. It is insensitive to speak of a woman as one who ‘croaked’ (p. 113) and of 9/11 as the “unfortunate business with the planes and buildings and so forth” (p. 4.) Pundits, to be sassy, often end up trivializing tragedy. This is one reason I do not read their books much. Here is another. Pundits, even the social conservative ones like Steyn, slip into the use of unclean connotations and vocabulary (pp. 35, 142, 168.) America Alone, though, is too important, too insightful, still too relevant eight years after its publication to not highly recommend. Much of what is written in it is coming true. Many more informed guesses will shortly come to pass. Because of our weak will and denial of reality, Islamism will ‘destroy one day…on an epic scale’ (p. 152.) The chance we have of stopping that from happening depends on whether we believe it or not.
Entre parenthèse, à lecture simpliste, thèse simplifiée.
Et l'argumentaire est plutôt éloigné de ceux faits envers les juifs car eux ne s'appuient pas sur une religion politique promouvant un projet sociétal clair.
Les facteurs sont: la démographie (et plus particulièrement les taux de progression des populations musulmanes, en Occident comme au Moyen-Orient, plus forts que les autres), les programmes sociaux (sécurité sociale, retraites, chômage...), l'absence de volonté civilisationnelle et l'idéologie du multiculturalisme.
Si Steyn ne s'en tenait qu'au premier facteur pour orienter son discours, on pourrait à juste titre trouver ses propos racistes (en passant, l'Islam est une religion et non une race donc il serait plus juste de parler de propos islamophobes).
Or son discours est de montrer que les politiciens d'Europe, face à la situation démographique de leurs pays, se retrouvent confrontés à une difficulté de taille: les programmes sociaux sont bien trop forts pour être maintenus au vu des taux de natalité de leur pays. La réponse fut l'immigration au lieu d'alléger les programmes sociaux. Et pourquoi? Car les populations européennes ne lâcheraient jamais un centimètre de terrain dessus.
Mais l'immigration apporte un défi de taille compte tenu de deux autres facteurs liés: "l'ennui civilisationnel" et le multiculturalisme. Steyn se réfère à l'état actuel de l'Occident où le relativisme culturel, prétendant que toutes les cultures se valent, se traduit dans les faits par une auto-dérision voire un dédain des cultures nationales, d'une préférence évidente à l'égard des autres cultures et d'un anti-américanisme marqué.
Dans les faits, le multiculturalisme est une simple juxtaposition des cultures et les discours politiques européens versent de plus en plus dans l'absurde et la faiblesse face à l'Islam. De fait, toute référence aux cultures nationales, forcément ancrées puisque présentes avant les autres, est alors taxée de rétrograde et soupçonnée de verser dans le racisme ou l'islamophobie.
L'auteur ne mâche d'ailleurs pas ses mots envers les différentes mouvements européens de gauche qui n'ont pas leur pareil pour jeter l'anathème, stopper les débats et noyer le poisson avec une novlangue toute orwélienne, dans le but avoué de ménager les "sensibilités". Le fondement de cette approche qui est désormais plus clair que jamais en France et en Europe est la conviction à gauche d'être dans une position morale supérieure et surtout fonctionnelle.
Malheureusement les idéaux de gauche aveuglent leurs partisans qui ont toutes les peines du monde à concevoir que cette attitude est perçue comme une faiblesse. Leur déni crée un cercle vicieux de nouvelles offenses et de nouveaux "accommodements". Pour Steyn, la soumission se fait progressivement.
Le livre présente beaucoup de choses de façon claire, cohérente et souvent drôle. Les citations et les faits présentés sont édifiants. Même si on peut parfois trouver Steyn trop direct et peut-être simpliste, force est de reconnaître qu'il met en valeur de dynamiques dignes d'intérêt.
Pour compléter la lecture de ce livre, je recommande Décomposition française de Malika Sorel-Sutter.
Europe has an elderly native population living under the influence of a more fecund, self contained and more youthful Islamic community. The Islamic community sees no advantage in honouring the social costs or pensions that the indigenous thought were theirs by right. They also continue the process of common interest with the greater Islamic community instead of the rational, secular and `westernised' world we are accustomed to seeing as the model of all future development.
At the same time, China has suffered a population collapse, Africa is increasingly unable to lift itself from the stranglehold of corruption, tribal conflict and Islamist incursion. Russia too is just a hollow shell due to high mortality, abortion and a very low birthrate. A hollow shell that is being filled by Islamic expansion from the south. With South America continuing as a collection of uncooperative states with no global influence or reach it leaves only North America alone. More specifically, with Canada heading down the European model of self-destruction, it leaves only the United States (and probably Australia) as the last fragile enclave of the liberal, rational and tolerant world built by Christianity and the Enlightenment. Needless to say, the USA is no longer a global super-power.
The most disturbing part of this book is that Steyn does not just paint a scenario from thin air. That could be dismissed as `gloom-mongering'. He describes how that scenario is being constructed right now before our eyes...brick by well-meaning brick. His scenario is not what could happen so much as what will happen if the enlightened world does not change its mental habits and develop confidence and a sense of self-preservation.
I hope that this book is an alarm bell instead of a prediction.
I read this book on a transatlantic flight from cover to cover. I did not sleep or watch any films and it was the quickest flight I have ever been on. Some parts of the book made me laugh but when I finally arrived back in England I just wanted to cry.
The toxic outcome has been immigrant populations self-segregating and thus reinforcing their own culture and turning around to attack their host. These cultures step into the vacuum created by multiculturalism and present a strong identity, a sense of belonging and for those lost souls drifting and searching for meaning, that's a powerful draw.
The West is slowly being destroyed, not by murder, but by suicide wrought with our own values of tolerance and democracy. We've become so open-minded our wits have fallen out of our skulls and dropped on the ground like a splattered egg. In many cases, we are too thoroughly cowed to protest lest we be accused of giving offense by the thought police. (In Canada, that our many Human Rights Commissions.) America Alone, Steyn postulates, is the last best hope to push back this cancer. For one the US is enlivening its nation with replacement birth rates. For another, there is a tradition of fighting for freedom although that too is on perilous ground with political correctness infecting America's leadership.



