Buy new:
$15.16$15.16
Delivery Tuesday, April 16. Order within 13 hrs 25 mins
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Buy used: $7.07
Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $8.50 shipping
98% positive over last 12 months
+ $8.50 shipping
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
What's Wrong with the World Paperback – March 18, 1994
Purchase options and add-ons
Chesterton possessed the genius to foresee the dangers if modernist proposals were implemented. He knew that lax moral standards would lead to the dehumanization of man, and in this book he staunchly defends the family, its constituent elements and character over against those ideas and institutions that would subvert it and thereby deliver man into the hands of the servile state. In addressing what is wrong, he also shows clearly what is right, sane and sensible and how to change things in that direction.
- Print length201 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherIgnatius Press
- Publication dateMarch 18, 1994
- Dimensions5.25 x 0.63 x 8 inches
- ISBN-100898704898
- ISBN-13978-0898704891
- Lexile measure1120L
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought

Tolkien and the Great WarPaperback$8.44 shippingGet it as soon as Monday, Apr 15Only 9 left in stock - order soon.
Your Death Would Be Mine: Paul and Marie Pireaud in the Great WarPaperback$8.61 shippingGet it as soon as Thursday, Apr 25Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
G. K. Chesterton was one of the most beloved and prolific authors of the twentieth century. He wrote dozens of popular books on a variety of topics and thousands of essays. His works include Orthodoxy, The Everlasting Man, The Man Who Was Thursday, and the Father Brown mystery stories.
Product details
- Publisher : Ignatius Press; Reprint edition (March 18, 1994)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 201 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0898704898
- ISBN-13 : 978-0898704891
- Lexile measure : 1120L
- Item Weight : 9.5 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.25 x 0.63 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,615,099 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,802 in Christian Apologetics (Books)
- #5,057 in Christian Social Issues (Books)
- #6,633 in History & Theory of Politics
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

G. K. Chesterton (1874-1936) was a prolific English journalist and author best known for his mystery series featuring the priest-detective Father Brown and for the metaphysical thriller The Man Who Was Thursday. Baptized into the Church of England, Chesterton underwent a crisis of faith as a young man and became fascinated with the occult. He eventually converted to Roman Catholicism and published some of Christianity's most influential apologetics, including Heretics and Orthodoxy.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The organization of this book is straightforward, but certainly intriguing. The first, and longest, part, deals with the homelessness of man, that is, the lack of property possessed by poor people in England. If this was true in the early 1900’s, it is certainly just as true now. The second part is a short discussion of the error of imperialism, namely that Britain’s taste for gaining land through colonial adventures and romanticizing its colonies suggested a form of weakness as much as a form of strength. The third part, a critique on feminism, shows a fine appreciation for what we would consider the multi-tasking abilities of women as opposed to the more focused attention of men. Before this became a topic of brain studies, Chesterton viewed it as the difference between specialist man and generalist woman, and did so soundly. The fourth and final part, on the education of children, has an especially touching ode to the importance of the beauty of poor girls, which the author then takes around to demonstrate what would be required to preserve that beauty, namely parents who are not overworked and harried, and who possessed at least some modest property and a decent standard of living.
This book criticizes socialism for not being revolutionary enough, for being too much like the grim sort of big box businesses that were even in the early 1900’s showing themselves in the United Kingdom. Nevertheless, this book is no mere partisan attack, for it is critical of the lack of ideals and imagination and biblical focus of the Tories as well. It is immensely critical of the ruling aristocratic class, in part for its lack of interest in history, many of them being parvenus who merely went to good schools and had class inculcated into them. The book is especially scathing at the active suppression of honesty and moral courage among upper class “public” schools. It is the book’s combination of harsh criticism of moral failing and its charitable attitude towards people in general, and its grudging approval of others where credit is given that accounts for the humanity of the author, and for the worthiness of this book. More surprising than just about anything else that could be imagined is that a book originally written by an eccentric man about current events should still be au currant more than a century later, just as painfully relevant, and with lessons just as frequently unheeded. As is true of so much else in this book, this saying still holds: Christianity has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found difficult and left untried.
I found the content to be very thought provoking, especially his generalization of the differences between men and women from a political standpoint. Very fascinating.
Chesterton is absolutely a refreshing and original thinker. He can take a popular idea and turn it on it's ear with the greatest humor and abashment. He is not politically correct. If one with an agenda were to read his words without context, he could presumably come across as sexist, but surely not misogynistic. As a woman, I did find many things he said to be a bit sexist, but in the strangest, flattering way. He seemed to put women so far on a pedestal that it came across at times naive, but I think it came from a place of genuine chivalry.
This book is certainly more political than religious. Religion really has little place in the book at all. Chesterton is a self-described Distributionalist. He is anti-Socialist and had some great insight on Socialist dogma. "What's Wrong With the World" should really be- what's wrong with early 20th Century England. The book was written in 1910 and centers on political movements at that time.
Though some of the political issues may seem far removed; the underlying ideology is surprisingly relevant for today. It is uncanny how much modern American politics reflects previous English politics. Chesterton loathes the two party system and even accuses them of partnership. Many Americans could find good company with him on that belief. I think he gets it best in the final chapter "The Home of Man" when he describes his characters; Hudge (Socialist) and Gudge (Tory). It is his suspicion "that Hudge and Gudge are secretly in partnership." Their quarrels are public and a "put-up job" ending with one always playing "coincidentally" into the other's hands. Gudge, the plutocrat, wants anarchic industrialism, cheap women workers, obedient workmen, a tame populous without arms to rise up, and a family broken by overwork. Hudge, the Socialist, gives Gudge in return praises of Anarchy, work for women that are "free to live her own life", teetotalism for the worker, a populous that takes arms against no one for no reason, and tells the populous that the family is something that will soon be outgrown. If that doesn't smack of modern day Republican (Gudge) and Democrat (Hudge); I don't know what does. Hegelian dialectic at work again. Chesterton, though you might find much to disagree with, will definitely make you question your own beliefs.





