Buy new:
-33% $10.69$10.69
Delivery Monday, November 11
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Good
$9.62$9.62
Delivery Wednesday, November 20
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Martistore
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Drug War Crimes: The Consequences of Prohibition 1/31/04 Edition
Purchase options and add-ons
- ISBN-100945999909
- ISBN-13978-0945999904
- Edition1/31/04
- PublisherIndependent Institute
- Publication dateMarch 1, 2004
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6 x 0.5 x 9 inches
- Print length130 pages
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more
Frequently bought together

Customers who bought this item also bought

A Knock at Midnight: A Story of Hope, Justice, and FreedomPaperback$9.87 shippingGet it as soon as Sunday, Nov 10Only 6 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Review
"Jeffrey Miron strengthens and enriches the case with his analyses of data from the prohibition era and from other countries" -- Steven B. Duke, professor of law, Yale University
"Legislators and other policy-makers would benefit from his non-politicized, non-moralistic approach; everyone can benefit from reading this important, insightful work." -- Margaret M. Russell, vice president, ACLU
"[T]he standard for judging all else in the field . . . has been needed for a very long time." -- John L. Kane, Jr., senior judge, U.S. District Court
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Independent Institute; 1/31/04 edition (March 1, 2004)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 130 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0945999909
- ISBN-13 : 978-0945999904
- Item Weight : 7.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.5 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,891,677 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,400 in Government Social Policy
- #6,613 in Criminology (Books)
- #6,747 in Popular Culture in Social Sciences
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
A good, in depth view of the current issues stemmed from the never ending war on drug. Because we live in Mexico, part of the year, a number of references to the drug cartels felt quite germane. The proposed solutions are debatable, But the statement of facts seems genuine.
The content is probably worth 4 to five stars. But it takes too much effort to go through it, thus the 2 star rating.
Miron certainly thinks so. Although the book is nominally objective, Miron's personal opinions on the issue are clear. This is not necessarily a criticism - to paraphrase Howard Zinn's argument in A People's History of the United States, the large body of evidence that has been built up in support of drug prohibition compels a one-sided account in order to balance the scales.
The argument goes like this: abridging the rights of citizens to use drugs is morally questionable in the first place; even if you decide that eliminating drug use is a noble aim of the government, the negative consequences of prohibition outweigh its positives; even if they didn't, outright prohibition is the worst way to go about achieving this goal. So why do we spend $33 billion a year on it?
Many negative effects of drug use are self-evident, such as increased corruption, the spread of infectious disease through the sharing of needles, and the transfer of wealth to criminals. Two questions, however, warrant extended analysis: To what extent does prohibition lower consumption? And what is the effect of prohibition on violence? Miron's analysis suggests that prohibition reduces consumption by only about 20%, while leading to dramatic increases in violence.
Some of these arguments are quite convincing, others aren't, while still others are neither, either due to moral subjectivity or to a lack of data. Nearly all of them, however, are thought provoking, and some are shocking. In an example rich with parallels to drug prohibition, Miron describes actions taken by the U.S. government during the 1920s. Knowing that individuals would attempt to use industrial alcohol to produce moonshine, congress ordered industries to change their method of alcohol production, making it unsuitable for ingestion. While their decision to poison their own citizens probably convinced some not to brew their own alcohol, thousands of others became ill or died.
As an example of the tenor of Drug War Crimes, consider the section exploring the idea of rational drug. The section argues that the negative effects of many drugs have been widely exaggerated. In support of this assertion, Miron cites a study of the consumers of certain products, including narcotics. The study finds that the percentage of consumers still using narcotics five years after the study began is similar to that of many legal products. Miron then concludes that heroin, say, is roughly as addictive as chocolate. Given the considerable legal, social, and health incentives to quit using drugs, this hardly seems a reasonable conclusion. But it's interesting, and it's an argument no one else is making.
A larger problem with the analysis is that the case against prohibition is, to some extent, academic. Every country on earth prohibits drugs; if any country were to change that policy, it would become a worldwide drug factory, not to mention violate international law and trade agreements.
Nevertheless, Miron didn't set out to write a book about politics - he wrote a policy analysis, and while his lack of neutrality will surely bother some readers, his overall conclusions are sound. He knows that in many of his arguments, there is no clear answer. The point is that "prohibition has enormous costs with, at best, modest and speculative benefits.... The goals of prohibition are questionable, the methods unsound, and the results are deadly." Given the available evidence, this appears undeniable. What to do instead is a tougher question.
The MERP Model for Re-Legalization will destroy the Mexican Drug Cartels and much, much more. Please visit and post the following link far and wide. This subweb is both for understanding MERP and implementing MERP. We need everyones help on this. Get on the mailing list now! Let's Re-Legalize Marijuana in 2009 World Wide.
MERP Headquarters
The Marijuana Re-Legalization Policy Project (MRPP)
[...]
