
Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
Buy new:
$29.95$29.95
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Acceptable
$23.95$23.95
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: LAAB Group
0.27 mi | MANASSAS 20110
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Someone Would Have Talked Paperback – Illustrated, November 1, 2010
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length506 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherJFK Lancer Production
- Publication dateNovember 1, 2010
- Dimensions6 x 1.13 x 9 inches
- ISBN-10097746573X
- ISBN-13978-0977465736
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book provides a wealth of information and photographic material. They appreciate the well-documented and fresh details it provides. The writing style is described as concise and to the point. Overall, customers consider the book an excellent resource for readers and researchers interested in information.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers appreciate the book's research quality. They find it well-documented, providing a wealth of information and photographic material they have never seen before. The book helps readers understand the big picture of what was going on in the Cuban Exile. Readers also mention that the basic premise is fascinating and the writer is an interesting writer who summarizes each section.
"...Mr. Hancock's relentless research and attention to detail has resulted in a virtual masterpiece...." Read more
"...The basic premise of the book is facinating. One frequently heard objection to the concept of a 'conspiracy' is that 'someone would have talked.'..." Read more
"...The book represents a tremendous amount of research and is likely to provide even a reader who has read a couple books on the Kennedy assassination..." Read more
"One of the best accounts on the history of the assassination of JFK...." Read more
Customers find the book well-written, concise, and to the point. They describe it as a valuable resource that brings together various sources for the first time. The case presented is compelling, and the writing style is engaging.
"...relentless research and attention to detail has resulted in a virtual masterpiece...." Read more
"...But Hancock's book is precious in putting together for the first time all the information pertaining to this aspect of the case, and sheding new..." Read more
"...Although IMO a well-written book, I got plenty tired of reading about disgruntled Cubans & the lives & crimes of the CIA...." Read more
"...and need it even after this much time,Larry Hancock is an interesting writer who summerizes each and every chapter which makes for quick reviews,..." Read more
Reviews with images
The Plot to Assassinate the President and the Conspiracy to Mislead History
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 5, 2012Enough time had elapsed since I read the earlier edition of this book and "November Patriots" to make Larry Hancock's revised work a must read. Mr. Hancock's relentless research and attention to detail has resulted in a virtual masterpiece. Just when you think there is little left that can shed more light on this frustrating and tantalizing puzzle, Hancock re-introduces you into the seamy world of fanatical intelligence agents inciting Anti-Castro Cubans, training for unapproved missions in the face of rapprochement between JFK emissary William Attwood and Castro's Carlos Lechuga. The deliberate disclosure of this poorly kept secret to violent warriors learning all about assassination and creating patsies was incendiary. There are always gaps that need to be filled but many of the key players are separated from mere suspects and startling revelations are discussed. While virtually everyone believes Ruby was involved, few viewed him as Hancock does, as an additional patsy.
One area that I was hoping for more involves LBJ's possible role. LBJ's most probable known intersection with the conspiracy occurs during his conversation with Hoover the next morning. Once Hoover informs LBJ of the "blame Castro" impersonation of Oswald in Mexico, and LBJ's post assassination cover-up response, it makes no sense for the new president to shut down a true investigation of conspiracy unless LBJ was involved. Why use the nonsensical threat of nuclear war with prospective Warren Commissioners to stop investigating conspiracy when you already know that someone went to great lengths to try to make people believe it was Castro? The "blame Castro" impersonation itself cries out "anti-Castro" and "domestic".
That said, Larry Hancock sets forth what is credible to draw your own conclusion and in doing so, has created an important source that advances us closer to the truth.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 26, 2007Seems like all the pieces are now starting to fall into place, forty years after the fact (maybe this should be "facts", as the recently documented presence of David Morales and 2 other CIA officials at the Ambassador Hotel when RFK was assassinated indicates...)
Larry Hancock shows that, at this point in the ongoing, unofficial investigation, there is much to gain in simply reassessing the wealth of data ammassed thru the years, if you do so with a good angle and a sound mind.
Hancock 's research is based on the statements of a number of people who professed knowledge (before and after the fact)of the assassination.
Most of these statements are officially documented, some are put forward by very credible and reliable witnesses and some are harder to substantiate.
Hancock pertinent analysis shows clearly that those statements in fact can all be traced back to a group of specific individuals, all formal or informal members of the "Secret War Against Castro".If you want names, you'll find them in the book...
Hancock also shows,interestingly,that the same goup of people is also very active in the "Oswald-as-a-Communist-Assassin" disinformation campaign that took off almost immediatly.
This analysis, of course is not new in itself: I believe that most serious researchers of the case have come, separately, to the same conclusions, just like I did.
The fact, crucial in order to make sense of the ballistic and medical "evidence" (most of it self-contradictory) in the record, is also to understand that those who planned and executed the shooting did have different motives and agenda than those who initated the cover up.
Though Hancock does broach the subject,I think it can be developped further, most notably the hypothesis of a manipulation of the Exiles themselves, while they were busy manipulating Oswald to their own ends.
That will be my only, albeit very slight, critic of the book....
But Hancock's book is precious in putting together for the first time all the information pertaining to this aspect of the case, and sheding new light on some minute, but crucial, details.
It is also well written, and hard to put down, even if you are a seasoned afficionado of the case, whom I happen to be
In the end, the case he makes is compelling.
And that's an understatement....
I very highly recommand as a companion book "JFK: The Cuba Files" by fabian Escalante.
Escalante was head of Cuban security in charge of penetrating the Exiles groups, to prevent sabotage and assassinations attempts.
The very efficient Cuban services were in fact infiltrating and spying on the same group of people that we find, coincidentally, in Hancock's research.It is a vital reference index for names and activities of Exiles in the war against Castro
I don't think it a coincidence that the Cuban security were able to collect information (including a statement by a self-admitted participant)
indicating those same people were involved in the killing of JFK...
- Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2023And his name was John Martino. Loosely affilated with "exiled" Cubans who were planning to assassinate Castro, he was on the very edge of hearing the plans against JFK. (What is it about dictators? They seem to be "teflon," that is, untouchable. There were numerous attempts against both Castro & Hitler, none of which succeeded!) Although IMO a well-written book, I got plenty tired of reading about disgruntled Cubans & the lives & crimes of the CIA. But I disagree that the failed Bay of Pigs was the real reason JFK was killed - Cuba is NOT part of the USA, please tell me WHY we would owe them anything? (My same opinion of the conflict in Vietnam.) Fight your own dirty wars, leave us out of it! I believe the real reason was the bloodthirsty hawks in the Pentagon along with the Joint Chiefs, who wanted us to escalate the so-called "war" in Vietnam, plus bomb Russia & Cuba. They would've been out of a job had Kennedy lived to succeed in his plan for peace. It would've been a wonderful world indeed!
Top reviews from other countries
Lawrence CurtisReviewed in the United Kingdom on October 9, 20225.0 out of 5 stars Historically important.
Excellent journalism. The reader is presented with all relevant facts to judge for themselves.
Recommended.
GAZGPLReviewed in the United Kingdom on February 17, 20195.0 out of 5 stars People did talk.
An outstanding piece of research into the first Kennedy assassination.
Amazon CustomerReviewed in the United Kingdom on October 3, 20165.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
Good
Patrick CollinsReviewed in the United Kingdom on December 3, 20073.0 out of 5 stars Pure conjecture
This book is a reasonable contribution to the ongoing and probably never ending debate. I say reasonable in that it is at least well written and organized - unlike so many on the subject. But does it make sense - no, not in a million years. So three stars for effort rather than content !
The degree of knowledge shared within the "JFK assassination community" is extremely high and is evident on Amazon and other web based forums. However it never ceases to amaze me how often books like this receive such good reviews by people who clearly have such a high degree of knowledge on the subject. How on earth can you believe Larry Hancock's conclusions is a mystery to me. Surely you cannot.
Why ? Because most of the authors presentation of "what actually happened" is pure conjecture and as such this book joins that long list of pro conspiracy none sense that I am afraid, has deluded the majority of the American public for nigh on 45 years. Forget the grassy knoll and the man with the seizure and all those other HUGE red herrings. All the shots were fired from above and behind and yet - and yet - this author like so many just ignores that and the overwhelming evidence against Oswald. Take for example the quantum leap of a theory that the gun barrel that was seen pointing out of the TSBD sixth floor window was merely a device for framing Oswald and that other shooters were positioned around Dealey Plaza. Says who ? Where is the evidence ? Who says it was a ploy ? Larry Hancock ! Based on what ? Why oh why would you shoot from the front and have your patsy to the rear. And why did Oswald shoot Tippet if he were not at all involved ? The list of questions goes on and on. The books conclusions are utter nonsense and I suspect the author knows it deep down. Otherwise he is deluding himself.
Vincent Bugliosi has written a far more believable book. Buy both and make up your own mind.
