Shop top categories that ship internationally
Buy used:
$14.96
Delivery Monday, January 20. Order within 8 hrs 1 min
Or fastest delivery Wednesday, January 8
Used: Good | Details
Sold by CCH2O
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: Item is USED, with normal wear and tear.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee's Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory Paperback – January 1, 2010

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 59 ratings

Former Chicago and Harvard law professor Cass Sunstein, who in 2009 was appointed by President Barack Obama to direct an important executive branch office, had in 2008 co-authored an article containing a plan for the government to prevent the spread of anti-government "conspiracy theories," in which he advocated the use of anonymous government agents to engage in "cognitive infiltration" of these groups in order to break them up. In his new book, Griffin focuses on the fact that Sunstein's primary target is the conspiracy theory advocated by the 9/11 Truth Movement. Examining Sunstein's charge that this theory is both "harmful" and "demonstrably false," Griffin uses both satire and overwhelming evidence to show that this twofold charge applies instead to what Sunstein calls "the true conspiracy theory" about 9/11ùnamely, the "theory that al-Qaeda was responsible for 9/11."
The%20Amazon%20Book%20Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Editorial Reviews

Review

"In the United States today, the phrase `conspiracy theory' functions as a sort of giant cudgel, used to scare us out of talking openly about a broad (and ever-growing) range of scandals that the powerful cannot afford to let the people comprehend. In this new book, David Ray Griffin takes devastating aim at that repressive tactic, exposing it for what it really is. All those who cherish democracy, and intellectual freedom, owe it to themselves to read this brave analysis---and owe its author their sincerest thanks." --- Mark Crispin Miller, Professor of Culture and Communication, New York University

About the Author

David Ray Griffin is professor of philosophy of religion and theology, emeritus, at Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University in California. He is the author of over 30 books.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Olive Branch Pr (January 1, 2010)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 202 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1566568218
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1566568210
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 12 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6 x 0.75 x 9 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 59 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
David Ray Griffin
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
59 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book well-researched and informative. They describe it as brilliant, fascinating, and a must-read for Americans. Readers appreciate the author's logic and intellectual bravery. The plausible story makes them believe it's true.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

9 customers mention "Intelligence"9 positive0 negative

Customers appreciate the author's intelligence and inquiring mind. They find the book informative and well-researched. Readers describe Griffin as a brilliant intellectual and one of the leading experts on the subject.

"...in a tight stack of DRG's other books as a heroic, scholarly, well-researched, superbly-argued body of work and a wake-up call for the world's people..." Read more

"...nature of the 9/11 Truth Movement, along with the extent and quality of its evidence," as the literary leader of the 9/11 Truth Movement..." Read more

"...Griffin's COGNITIVE INFILTRATION is a lucid and compelling exposure of the contempt held by the official defenders of the 9/11 myth for..." Read more

"...He certainly is one of the outstanding experts on that event...." Read more

8 customers mention "Readability"8 positive0 negative

Customers find the book easy to read. They describe it as a fascinating and artful explanation of Constitutional law. Readers consider it a must-read for Americans.

"...Brilliant and funny, this artful explication of Constitutional law scholar Cass Sunstein's essay, "Conspiracy Theories," conveys important legal..." Read more

"...to the effort by writing an essay that "has provided such an excellent foil for [Griffin's] laying out of the current nature of the 9/11 Truth..." Read more

"...not a forensic scientist himself, assembles and both ingeniously and impeccably (from a logical viewpoint) analyzes all of the knowable evidence..." Read more

"...two level analysis of Sunstein's proposal, makes for a fascinating reading of this book...." Read more

3 customers mention "Credibility"3 positive0 negative

Customers find the book credible. They find the material presented legitimate and the story plausible, though it lacks compelling discussion.

"...The plausibility of his story is ever so convincing to even make me believe it to be true...." Read more

"In spite of the legitimacy of the material presented, the book lacked a compelling discussion of its material...." Read more

"Heroic work!..." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on July 24, 2011
    I had great fun reading David Ray Griffin's Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee's Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory. Brilliant and funny, this artful explication of Constitutional law scholar Cass Sunstein's essay, "Conspiracy Theories," conveys important legal points while treating readers to enjoyable satire. As several talented reviewers have noted, many public figures, including Associate Justice Elena Kagan and President Barack Obama, consider Cass Sunstein, the current Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, to be the preeminent, most widely cited Constitutional law scholar in the country. Consequently, we who feel concern for civil rights naturally feel perplexed that the nation's leading expert on the Constitution would propose such profoundly unconstitutional policy. That Sunstein appears intent on resurrecting COINTELPRO--the FBI's counterintelligence program of the 60s and 70s that targeted citizens and activist groups--should concern everyone regardless of political ideology.

    COINTELPRO mainly attempted to discredit antipoverty resistance movements such as the Black Panthers and the Nation of Islam along with Vietnam War resistors and activists. Agents would routinely go undercover as "agents provocateurs" who would infiltrate groups, incite trouble, and then blame the groups. Naturally they got lots of help from the ever eager-to-please McMedia. COINTELPRO was an illegitimate method of discrediting legitimate political and social activities. Activists who were harassed, surveilled, or killed because of FBI COINTELPRO activities include antiwar activist Father Phillip Berrigan, John Lennon, Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X, Black Panthers Fred Hampton and Mark Clark (shot and killed about 4:40 AM in the presence of their lawyer, Charles Garry), and others we will never hear about.

    Griffin cites former ABC correspondent, John Stossel, who brilliantly criticized Sunstein's plan in a FOX business blog entitled, "Stealth Propaganda." Stossel commented, "This reads like an Onion article: Powerful government official proposes to combat paranoid conspiracy groups that believe the government is out to get them...by proving that they really are out to get them." Yet this is what Sunstein wants to reestablish in America. "Conspiracy Theories," which appeared on January 15, 2008 (Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday), makes it clear that he specifically intends to discredit the "9/11 Truth Movement," which appears to be quickly growing in popularity as did COINTELPRO `s original targets.

    Sunstein proposes several ideas for dealing with such organizations although he never really explains why these people are so threatening. The idea that "Truthers" as a group will become violent is a figment of creative imaginations. He's evidently given this issue a lot of thought, yet he seems to resist facts that threaten the inflexible paradigm he's chosen to adopt. Sunstein operates from the notion that nearly everyone suffers from a "crippled epistemology," which apparently means that anyone who suggests there are problems with the official government version of 9/11 events simply lacks good information, while the Sunsteins and similar elitists possess it. If that's true, they should disclose it. The 9/11 Commission thought so too. Commission vice-chair Lee Hamilton and senior counsel John Farmer both admitted the Bush Administration had delayed, stymied, and underfunded their investigation. Apparently, many of the government officials with the epistemologically superior knowledge weren't all that willing to share it.

    Griffin's refined humor had me for a few brief moments hoping that Sunstein really is a clever ally of civil rights and the truth. Using political philosopher Leo Strauss as his model, Griffin proposes that Sunstein's writing, like that of Strauss, can be interpreted on two levels--a more obvious exoteric level meant for a broad general audience and an esoteric one meant only for those few sufficiently astute or connected to accurately interpret the clues. As Griffin presents Sunstein's esoteric message, it sounds a lot like the claims of the 9/11 Truth Movement. He portrays the Bush Administration's version of 9/11 events as too ridiculous to be true and suggests, comically, that Sunstein is only pretending to agree with the official conspiracy theory involving 19 Arabs, a few of whom turned up alive. As Griffin demonstrates, the accusations Sunstein levels at the Truth Movement more easily and convincingly apply to the official conspiracy theory, which is largely nonsense. Sunstein's esoteric message then, Griffin tells us, confirms that the Truth Movement is right.

    In order to better understand Strauss and the idea of an esoteric dimension in literary interpretation, I interviewed political philosopher, Dr. Robert Abele, whose book, The Anatomy of a Deception: A Reconstruction and Analysis of the Decision to Invade Iraq, addresses Strauss' role in neoconservative thought. Abele told me that Strauss never explicitly claimed to be writing anything at an esoteric level but rather maintained that the best philosophy is philosophy like Plato's: always concealing something `between the lines' to make readers carefully contemplate the meaning.

    "This emphasis Strauss placed on `true' philosophy has resulted in his being taken by many to be a writer who was attempting to emulate the best philosophy of esoterica. In short, where other interpreters of the great philosophers saw them contradicting themselves, Strauss saw them as saying something more profound, `beneath' the contradiction that mundane philosophers read," Abele explained. As an example he cited John Locke who, in his Two Treatises of Government, unequivocally asserts his Christianity and his concern that government take into account Christian virtues. "Because Locke is inconsistent in his argument concerning this use of religion in politics, Strauss takes him to be an atheist, concealing that atheism," Abele said, adding, "One thing is quite clear in Strauss--and this motivates the likes of the Bush gang: Strauss was no friend of liberalism."

    Abele's depiction of Strauss helped me to more fully appreciate Cognitive Infiltration since it explains the contradiction of a Constitutional scholar's willingness to subvert the Constitution. "Strauss emphasizes Plato's concept of the `noble lie' in The Republic, where the leader must do what is necessary for the proper functioning and the preservation of the state. The Bush neocon Straussians see themselves as the elite enlightened that they `read' in Strauss." Abele added that whether or not Strauss himself wrote in such a style is open to some debate, but that he recognized it in the great philosophers is beyond question. "It is perhaps this method of seeing the esoteric in the great thinkers that his followers, such as [Paul] Wolfowitz, see in Strauss the hidden message of neoconservative thought," Abele said.

    This explains a lot--about Sunstein particularly and the governing elite generally. Sunstein knows he's lying, but he's doing it for our own good.

    The neocons' greatest impediment is the Constitution; it keeps getting in their way. Who is better-suited than a Constitutional scholar to dance around it? Griffin notes, "The FBI's COINTELPRO was eventually declared illegal because it violated the rights of free speech and association. Given its strong similarities to that program, Sunstein's proposal would seem to be equally illegal." Griffin cites Glenn Greenwald who suggested that another reason for such a program's illegality is "that it appears to violate `long-standing statutes prohibiting government propaganda' within the U.S. aimed at American citizens."

    Media Studies professor Mark Crispin Miller has argued, Griffin tells us, that if Sunstein and his allies cared about the truth, "they'd try to test those dreaded `theories' in the most effective way--not by setting up a covert force of cyber-moles, but by joining all the rest of us in calling for a new commission to look into 9/11, airing all of the evidence that's been so long ignored and/or suppressed, and entertaining all those questions that the first commission either answered laughably or just shrugged off. That would be the democratic way to deal with it," Miller said.

    Griffin points out that if Sunstein's goal is to arrest the spread of the 9/11 Truth Movement's pernicious theory, and if that theory is "demonstrably false" as Sunstein claims, then why would he feel the need to silence 9/11 conspiracy theorists? "The government would only need to discredit their theory so publically and severely that it would win no more converts and would even lose many of its previous converts," Griffin declares, saying that the government should rely on the power of truth rather than COINTELPRO-like tactics. "An excellent way to do this would be through a new investigation, carried out by credible, independent people, and mandated to answer all the questions that have been raised by the 9/11 Truth Movement," Griffin says. "If Sunstein is right in saying that this movement's theories are `demonstrably false, then the questions raised by this movement will be easily answered, and the investigation will demonstrate to the American people, and also people around the world, the falsity of the claim that 9/11 was an inside job."

    It makes one wonder what they're so afraid of.

    Shawn Hamilton
    28 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on September 24, 2010
    I have finished reading the book purchased here and it belongs in a tight stack of DRG's other books as a heroic, scholarly, well-researched, superbly-argued body of work and a wake-up call for the world's people, media, and the American voter. Todd Fletcher discusses the book et al on KPFA's "Guns and Butter" here: [...] .

    Footnote #128, page 166, from "Cognitive Infiltration" by David Ray Griffin:

    "Beyond the problems in Sunstein's alternative account of a crippled epistemology discussed in the text, there is a deeper problem, which lies in the very concept of "crippled epistemologies". Being derived from episteme, which is the Greek word for knowledge, and the suffix "ology", which signifies "the study of" or "doctrine of", epistemology means the doctrine or study of knowledge. As such, it is a branch of philosophy. It is, in particular, one of the two major branches of metaphysics; the other is ontology, the study of being. To engage in epistemology is to ask about the nature of knowledge, the difference between knowledge and (mere) opinion, how knowledge is acquired, and so on. To "have am epistemology" is to have a doctrine or theory about such matters. If philosophers would ever say of someone that he or she had a "crippled epistemology", they would mean that this person, probably another philosopher, had a poor theory of knowledge. They would not, in other words, use this phrase to indicate that someone had inadequate knowledge about the world - that this person was, in short, ignorant.

    This, however, is how Sunstein uses the term, defining it as having "a sharply limited number of (relevant) informational sources" or "know[ing] very few things", most of which are wrong.

    The confusion inherent in Sunstein's concept of "crippled epistemologies" was taken over from Russell Hardin's essay, "The Crippled Epistemology of Extremism" (in Political Extremism and Rationality, ed. Albert Breton, Gianluigo Galeotti, Pierre Salmon, and Ronald Wintrobe [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002]. 3-22). While Hardin is an astute thinker in his field, which is political philosophy, he treats the issues involved in epistemology in a careless and confused manner. For one thing, he simply equates "knowledge" and "beliefs", even though beliefs cannot be counted as knowledge unless they are justified - meaning that the person has good reasons for holding them - and also true, meaning that they correspond to reality: Knowledge is justified true belief. Hardin knows that this is the standard view in philosophical epistemology, but he dismisses it, saying that what interests him as a social scientist is "the ways people come to hold their beliefs" (4-5). He is, in other words, not interested in epistemology, which is a normative discipline, dealing with knowledge, but in the sociology of belief formation. This is an important and fascinating subject, but it is not epistemology, so it is unfortunate that Hardin coined the term "crippled epistemology," because he thereby used a normative discipline's name for a sociological description.

    His blurring of the distinction is illustrated in a passage in which, after pointing out that philosophers might say that "those who assert the truth of some particular view have inadequate grounds for their assertions," Hardin dismisses this concern by saying: "But this is a claim from standard philosophical epistemology. In their own epistemology, [those people] may genuinely suppose that they do have grounds" (10). Of course they may suppose this, but this doesn't mean that they actually have good grounds for their beliefs, and it certainly does not mean that they "have an epistemology".

    To justify his ignoring of traditional epistemological distinctions and concerns, Hardin says: "Most of us do not have the time or incentive to be deeply committed philosophers or scientists and we need not even suspect that there is anything questionable about our beliefs" (10). That is true. But if one is not interested in epistemology, one should not use the word. If one is interested in the sociology of belief, there is a perfectly good term for this area of interest: "sociology of belief" (often misnamed "sociology of knowledge").

    In any case, Hardin's ignoring of necessary distinctions led him to speak of "crippled epistemology" when he was simply talking about a crippled (distorted) process of belief-formation, meaning one that is likely to result in ignorance and hence a false-belief system. It would have been better if Hardin and Sunstein, if they wanted to use the term "crippled," had simply spoken of a "crippled process of belief-formation." This would not have been so catchy, but it would have had the virtue of accuracy."

    Aside from mastering the logical, ethical, evidence-based, propagandist and other aspects of the events and their cover-up(s), Dr. Griffin ought to be respected for his warmth, wit and humanity. He has done the nation a great service. Buy not only this book but all his books on 9/11 and you will have the knowledge to understand the nation's most pressing political and foreign affairs issue of this quarter-century.
    24 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • sparX
    5.0 out of 5 stars Great condition
    Reviewed in Canada on February 24, 2022
    Great book in great condition with appropriate packaging .
  • Rafael Morís Pablos
    5.0 out of 5 stars Irrebatible desenmascaramiento del ataque de falsa bandera del 11-S
    Reviewed in Spain on November 22, 2013
    Sobre las técnicas directas e indirectas del sistema político-económico-militar para manejar a su antojo la información a través de los medios de comunicación, tanto oficiales como privados.
  • Markus Weber
    5.0 out of 5 stars Pflichtlektüre für Demokratieverfechter
    Reviewed in Germany on February 21, 2011
    Vielleicht ist dieses Buch unter rein schriftstellerischen Gesichtspunkten kein Glanzstück. Dies zu beurteilen, reichen meine Englischkenntnisse nicht aus. Seine Lektüre verlangt einem bisweilen Geduld und Verständnis für scheinbare Längen ab, die man erst dann als notwendige Formulierungen versteht, wenn man sich bewusst macht, dass der Autor ein Geisteswissenschaftler, mithin ein Wissenschaftstheoretiker und ein Logiker ist. Und was bekommt man heraus für die Mühen? Einen Weckruf zurück in die Demokratie, in der jeder frei seine Meinung äussern kann, in der es keine Oberaufsicht im "Ministerium für Wahrheit" über die Denkrichtungen gibt, denen man anhängt. Während aus der islamischen Welt tatsächlich kulturelle Bedrohungen auf "den Westen" zukommen könnten, droht sich zwischen den USA und Europa ein Graben aufzutun, so dass man sich in Europa einen "bedingungslosen" Schulterschluss gut überlegen sollte. In den USA ist die Regierung bereits soweit, dass sie sich allen Ernstes dazu raten lässt, diejenigen Kreise, die Zweifel an den offiziellen Erklärungen zu den Ereignissen des 11. September 2001 hegen, "kognitiv" zu "infiltrieren". Eine Bankrotterklärung der Debattenkultur und gleichzeitig ein Menetekel für das, was da noch kommen könnte, wenn die selbsternannte Führungskaste des Westens weiter durch Enthüllungen in die Enge einer gewissen ethischen Erklärungsnot getrieben wird. Angesichts der vielen bürgerlichen Freiheiten, die in den USA im Zeichen von 9/11 bereits kassiert wurden, ist das Mitziehen mit all den Bushs und Obamas, die den Bürgern Wahrung ihrer Sicherheit versprechen, ein Spiel mit dem Feuer und eigentlich das, wovor uns aus offiziellen Kreisen immer wieder Angst gemacht wird: Eben jene Verliererstrasse, auf der wir nach und nach exakt die Werte aufgeben, von denen wir behaupten, sie hätten uns so gross und erfolgreich gemacht und sie könnten uns nun durch Übelgesinnte streitig gemacht werden. Ein dreifaches Bravo dem Autor für seine analytische Schärfe und seine kerzengerade Haltung! Und seine intellektuelle Tiefgründigkeit, aus deren Fundus er eine Betrachtungsweise generiert, mit dem der "Hassprediger" Cass Sunstein geradezu vorgeführt wird und die dadurch fast kabarettistische Züge trägt, ist sozusagen das Sahnehäubchen obendrauf und belebt die Lektüre auf ihre ganz eigene Art. Lustig wäre das allerdings nur zu nennen, wenn die vielen Toten, die der 11. September gefordert hat, nicht eine so verdammt ernste Angelegenheit wären.
  • SeaGoat under Sirius
    5.0 out of 5 stars Exposes the rapid erosion of civil liberties and worse to come!
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 17, 2010
    Obama's 'Information Czar' appointee, a Harvard law professor and a personal friend, Cass Sunstein, is administrator of the White House Office of Information. In 2009 Sunstein published "Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures," in which he suggested propaganda against the people and, eventually, elimination! The article led to an outcry by civil libertarians of all political stripes, who especially singled out for protest Sunstein's call to make talking about conspiracy theories illegal; for covert "cognitive infiltration" by government agents; and even taxing or fining publishers for writing or printing material deemed to be conspiracy theory material! Sunstein says that "9/11 conspiracy theories" are his main focus. Sunstein has called for what is a "Counter Intelligence Program" directed specifically against the 9/11 truth movement! In this excellent book "COGNITIVE INFILTRATION", David Ray Griffin penetrates the obfuscation and phony scholarship employed by Sunstein to create the illusion of a rational critique of the 9/11 truth movement's alternative account of the events of September 11, 2001. Griffin demonstrates that Sunstein is completely unable to refute the major positions of the 9/11 truth movement, and doesn't actually even try to do so. Instead, Sunstein has produced a fake "analysis" as a basis for a call for the government to infiltrate and neutralize the movement through activities which create "cognitive diversity," clearly not the least bit different from the FBI's Cointelpro operations of the 1950's and 1960's. But in so doing Sunstein has provided Griffin the means to demonstrate yet again that defenders of the official account of 9/11 are forced to resort to disinformation, suppression of evidence, lies, illogic, threats and intimidation, always with the same result: failure. The more people study the events of 9/11 the more certain they become that the government and its media outlets are lying. Griffin's COGNITIVE INFILTRATION is a lucid and compelling exposure of the contempt held by the official defenders of the 9/11 myth for dissenters who have seen through their Big Lie. These officials expect that no one will be able to penetrate the murk of Sunstein's latest defense of the pretext for the US wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq, now covertly expanding into many other countries. But with David Ray Griffin's book, everyone who is concerned with bringing their carnage and criminality to a stop, as well as to reverse the rapid erosion of civil liberties in this country, will have no difficulty remaining clear-headed in the face of the "cognitive infiltration" carried out by the holders of high office and their agents. Tod Fletcher is thanked for his help on this matter. David Ray Griffin's works will illuminate things that won't sit well with some people.
  • A. Woods
    5.0 out of 5 stars Running Scared
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 4, 2011
    Another great book by DavidRay Griffin regarding the 911 inside job and the threat posed by the truth movement. The government are so concerned with this movement exposing them that they must find a way to bring it down.