Tory Burch on Shopbop
$16.99 with 39 percent savings
List Price: $28.00
Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
$$16.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$16.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
tttkelly1
tttkelly1
Ships from
tttkelly1
Returns
30-day refund/replacement
30-day refund/replacement
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt. You may receive a partial or no refund on used, damaged or materially different returns.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates Hardcover – August 24, 2012

3.8 3.8 out of 5 stars 181 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$16.99","priceAmount":16.99,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"16","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"99","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"yehts7TeYErI%2B5RTq9%2BBTyCPTTXmDhO3x2TxFzYgi7l%2B7Zabe%2BWkWX4cRVTKMts11s2sKLA0w5qYpN5Sec55U2SGf6FuhdIdPo%2B%2BZg3mj3dHinpn0NK2n1cRxtBdzXNYsKX4ww5IuUZTU%2Fj4HcqPaH9i%2ByZRnfPsX%2F2UfxfXWACli7DUurskJcWm7GapQzCC","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

God’s war crimes, Aristotle’s sneaky tricks, Einstein’s pajamas, information theory’s blind spot, Stephen Wolfram’s new kind of science, and six monkeys at six typewriters getting it wrong. What do these have to do with the birth of a universe and with your need for meaning? Everything, as you’re about to see.

How does the cosmos do something it has long been thought only gods could achieve? How does an inanimate universe generate stunning new forms and unbelievable new powers without a creator? How does the cosmos create?

That’s the central question of this book, which finds clues in strange places. Why A does not equal A. Why one plus one does not equal two. How the Greeks used kickballs to reinvent the universe. And the reason that Polish-born Benoît Mandelbrot—the father of fractal geometry—rebelled against his uncle.

You’ll take a scientific expedition into the secret heart of a cosmos you’ve never seen. Not just any cosmos. An electrifyingly inventive cosmos. An obsessive-compulsive cosmos. A driven, ambitious cosmos. A cosmos of colossal shocks. A cosmos of screaming, stunning surprise. A cosmos that breaks five of science’s most sacred laws. Yes, five. And you’ll be rewarded with author Howard Bloom’s provocative new theory of the beginning, middle, and end of the universe—the Bloom toroidal model, also known as the big bagel theory—which explains two of the biggest mysteries in physics: dark energy and why, if antimatter and matter are created in equal amounts, there is so little antimatter in this universe.

Called "truly awesome" by Nobel Prize–winner Dudley Herschbach,
The God Problem will pull you in with the irresistible attraction of a black hole and spit you out again enlightened with the force of a big bang. Be prepared to have your mind blown.
The%20Amazon%20Book%20Review
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.

Customer reviews

3.8 out of 5 stars
181 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book easy to read and enjoyable. They describe it as engaging, motivating, and soothing. However, some readers find the writing style poor, verbose, and difficult to understand. Opinions differ on the thought-provoking nature of the ideas, with some finding them fascinating while others feel the author lacks understanding of science. There are also mixed views on the length, with some finding it large and deep, while others consider it too long or short.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

32 customers mention "Readability"23 positive9 negative

Customers find the book engaging and a good read for scientists and philosophers. They describe it as an excellent compilation of knowledge and interpretation of the Universe.

"...I love it. It is Bloom's best book. Bloom has always written courageous books, deep books, original books, erudite books and fun books...." Read more

"...First off, you should know that this IS NOT a book for casual recreational reading...." Read more

"...Another masterpiece ... this time ... a minor masterpiece. We actually think you ... can do better. Please keep at it...." Read more

"...It's easily the most annoying book I've read in many years, and I'm only finishing it up because I want to find out if Bloom actually provides an..." Read more

15 customers mention "Pacing"15 positive0 negative

Customers find the book well-written and easy to read. They appreciate the conversational tone and intelligent writing style. The book contains thought-provoking ideas in an understandable format.

"...I recommend English Composition 101 for anyone who thinks this is good writing...." Read more

"...Some of the fantastic thought-provoking things written in this book includes “Brace yourself: The five heresies, a brief history of the god problem,..." Read more

"...In that instance, Mr. Bloom made his point. The book is highly readable and communicates extremely well despite the fact that if you are sensitive..." Read more

"...I give it two stars because the excessive prose, even if it rarely says anything, is soothing to read. Think of this as a book of free-form poetry." Read more

9 customers mention "Enjoyment"9 positive0 negative

Customers find the book engaging and refreshing. They describe it as motivating, courageous, poignant, and humanizing God.

"...I should add that I find Howard Bloom both personable and engaging...." Read more

"...As a fan of Bloom's previous writings, I found his new book to be entertaining, thought provoking and educational...." Read more

"...within this incredible 708-page book is in actual fact teeming with joyous wonder, infinitely expanding creative urges---explained within a..." Read more

"...because the excessive prose, even if it rarely says anything, is soothing to read. Think of this as a book of free-form poetry." Read more

46 customers mention "Thought provoking"32 positive14 negative

Customers have different views on the book. Some find it thought-provoking and full of new ideas to digest, finding it educational. Others feel the author lacks understanding of science and fails to convince with his explanations and lack of careful argumentation.

"...Now it has one. The universe is naturally creative and it transcends you and me in a very natural and comprehensible way...." Read more

"...Let's clasp on Howard. Howard is that synoptic and transcendent, shaking out ideas like shining from shook foil and oozing to a greatness like a..." Read more

"This book is a wonderfully audacious attempt to discover the axioms of creation itself & then extract the implications...." Read more

"...If this is good science, then I have to wonder how intelligent our scientists are...." Read more

6 customers mention "Length"3 positive3 negative

Customers have different views on the book's length. Some find it interesting and provocative, while others feel it's too long and inconclusive. The 714 pages are considered short when compared to the intended scope.

"...It is Bloom's best book. Bloom has always written courageous books, deep books, original books, erudite books and fun books...." Read more

"...Therefore the 714 pages of this book is short when you consider Howard is trying to wrap his mind as wide as the cosmos while going as deep quarks..." Read more

"...This is a large book that you never want to put down...." Read more

"...Its only virtue is that it provides the reader with a good, if overlong, history of western philosophical thought." Read more

14 customers mention "Writing style"3 positive11 negative

Customers find the writing style disjointed, verbose, and difficult to read. They mention it's replete with philosophical implicitness and fuzzy explanations. The writing is also described as offensively cute, slangy, and egocentric. Readers also mention that the book reads like a text book and lacks research.

"...The author seems to have acquired a bunch of facts, but writes at a low level and fails to get his message across...." Read more

"...His non-stop use of sentence fragments makes for very difficult reading for anyone with high-school English competency...." Read more

"It's a very verbose difficult read. I'm a huge Bloom fan, but this one reads like a text book, not like his others that are more laymen friendly." Read more

"...creative and it transcends you and me in a very natural and comprehensible way...." Read more

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on August 28, 2012
    Boy, what a book ! I hadn't gotten this much pleasure from science since James Gleick's book on Chaos in 1988. Bloom's God Problem is today's ultimate thinking thrill. This is the first time I've understood the meaning of transcendance in a concrete, almost physical manner. I used to hear the word but it had no perceptual background. Now it has one. The universe is naturally creative and it transcends you and me in a very natural and comprehensible way. Bloom's tale is that of the ongoing movement of one trying to become many and many trying to become one. I love it. It is Bloom's best book. Bloom has always written courageous books, deep books, original books, erudite books and fun books. But The God Problem surpasses all the others (I've read all four) in all five categories !

    Bloom's writing transcends the modern divorce between knowledge (based on proof and theories) and gnosis (based on insight and experience).

    I love the idea of self creation at every level in the universe, from the quark level to the inter-civilisational level, and including the basic interpersonal level. Bloom writes:

    Remember, there are millions of ideas floated by the sea of human beings. Trillions. And only a few stick. To get ideas to last, you have to build a termite column, a ziggurat, a monument that will have attentional magnetism. One way to do it? The name game.

    This paragraph alone justifies reading the whole book. Because it is extremely dense and powerful, and because it connects instantly to many other brilliant parts of the book. At last, memes are viewed as attractors and not invaders. As recruitment patterns and not as viruses.

    Euclid used Aristotle's new ideas to build a template and a temptation. He used Aristotle's ideas to build a lure that would seduce, kidnap, and recruit the minds of greats far, far beyond his time. Seduction, kidnap, and recruitment are the claws of recruitment strategies. And seduction, kidnap, and recruitment are at the heart of cosmic creativity.

    This is huuuuge ! I love it ! Template and temptation: attraction and transmission. This is memetics all the way!

    My only question is: Minds of greats ? What is greatness ? I long (all throughout the book) for an explanation of how great becomes great... or is made so by history. For example, why does Bloom dignify Shannon, name Von Neumann only in passing, and discard Turing in the creation of the computing machine. Aren't they all equally great seen from here? The God Problem said earlier 'from the pettiness of egos massive leaps are sometimes made'. This is an important point that would, if discussed, reduce the disturbing feeling that Bloom's vision of society is reduced to superstars and supercrowds, with no ordinary social in-between. Of course I exaggerate because the socially 'average' people are present for instance with the Babylon grain cultivator and the scribe.
    Clearly to me a great man is just another social 'termite dung ziggurat'.

    The God Problem says some things about teaching and it could probably say a bit more: for teaching is how old schemes meet new settings and new media. Teaching is social. It is based on repetition in new media. Teaching is an arch-situation where lots of solutions gather. You will find numbers, grades, comparison, competiton, reward, attention, fuel for brain power and repetition.

    The idea that massive repetition produces massive innovation : man, that is something radical.

    And so is everything The God Problem explains about translation (peano, etc.)
    I think my favorite phrase in the book is : iteration is translation.

    Art as muscular metaphor! Huuuge again, one of my favorite parts.

    There is more than one book in The God Problem. Of course there is the inquiry about the 'Problem', all leading to simple rules and axioms and unpacking corollaries and 'time the translator' (I love it).

    But there is also some kind of 'Requiem for math'. The subtitle could be 'the rise and fall of (western) mathematics'.
    It begins with the babylonian grain counting math and ends with Wolfram's declaration that math as we know it is no longer needed.
    How long do you think it will take `til computer science, modelling and programming replace traditional math at school ?

    And beyond that, The God Problem could also be a complete history of what Clare W. Graves called the 'Rationalist level of existence'. Some collective world view (or V-meme) that started very, very discretely 2,300 years ago with extraordinary people - while the dominant system was about multiple gods and mighty warriors, and later a single god and solid institutions - a system that became the leading edge of rebellious intellect, industry and military might, gave the world speed and comfort, knew an apex of victory and horror at Hiroshima and then progressively lost its grip on the real world, while emotions, networks and communities prevailed.

    Man, I enjoyed all the chapters on emergence so much !

    The cosmos is doing its thing and it is doing it with us. Through us. Using our bodies, our brain cells, our imaginations, our muscles. How could you not believe in something like "a god" when you are the instrument of creation of something so huge it encompasses all and uses you and all living things simply because it is one big (and only) living thing itself ?

    I owe one big light to Howard Bloom.
    9 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on November 10, 2012
    The Bloom Problem

    "Is the second law of thermodynamics [the physical entropy law] true? Are form and structure steadily stumbling down the stairway of form into the chaos of a wispy gas?"

    In this scintillating new tome, The God Problem, Howard Bloom poses this question from a unique vantage point at a convenient seat at a table in a café in Brooklyn at the beginning of the Universe, where he can ogle the efflorescence of the Big Bang.

    To most of the world, without the vantage point of Bloom's table and brain, the answer is easy. Of course, the second law is true.

    Yet this lordly second law of thermodynamics is not only vain and demoralizing; it is also diametrically wrong.

    So audaciously argues Bloom, prolific author (The Genius of the Beast, The Lucifer Principle), inveterate atheist, lifelong Einstein scholar, amazing polymath, capitalist carouser, and grand master of mathematical logic and physical learning.

    "In fact," declares Bloom, dismantling the entropy law in The God Problem, "the very opposite is true. The universe is steadily climbing up. It is steadily becoming more form filled and more structure rich."

    From his imaginative slouch at the well situated café table, Bloom confesses, "When protons and neutrons became the new holy trinities of the material world--elementary particles [hydrogen, helium, and lithium]--I, the down-to-earth grump, was stunned. ...When you've got a mess of particles slamming, banging, and bouncing, you are going to run into the second law...You are going to end up with a random soup...All things tend toward entropy. All things tend to disorder...all things fall apart.

    "What's more, science has proved this in over a hundred years of research. Right? ....

    "Yes, the brand-new cosmos looks like randomness and entropy...At first, all I see is a mixed up random flurry of protons and neutrons jittering maniacally in the scalding soup of a plasma...But...squint and take a look at the big picture...and you'll see something that makes randomness and disorder look ridiculous...you'll see order on a level that defies belief...

    "These gazillions of crashing particles are cooperating in the formation of waves and troughs...that ripple from one end of the cosmos to the other...They are rippling as coherently as ropes of clay, ropes that stretch across the cosmos for hundreds of light-years, waves that roll protons and neutrons in tight synchrony, waves that retain their identity until they reach distant corners of the cosmos hundreds of thousands of light-years from the point where they began...And they are so regularly and harmoniously--yes, harmoniously--spaced that cosmologists call them musical....astrophysicists say this early cosmos and its plasma rang like a massive gong..." As the canonical journal Science put it, "The big bang had set the entire cosmos ringing like a bell..."

    "Is this harmony of pressure waves, this symphonic spacing of universe-spanning ripples, this mass choreography of elementary-particle pulses, entropy? Is it a tendency toward disorder? Is it what... [Occidental chemist] Frank L. Lambert calls mere `energy dispersal'? Is this entropy at work? No...it's so anti-entropic that those in the scientific world who are trying desperately to rescue entropy from the ubiquity of form and structure call it `negentropy.'"

    And then, as the eons pass in this daunting dance of the elements viewed from a café table in Brooklyn at the beginning of the universe, Bloom admits to boredom. He's been sitting there 379,000 years after all, and things are starting to slow down... "At roughly the 380,000 year mark after the big bang, the particles in the plasma [are] cooling." Everywhere across the cosmos the quarks that have punctiliously clicked into six protons for every neutron are now picking up relatively infinitesimal electrons for the formation of the elements needed for stars. "Their fit is more precise than anything that even the makers of the ultimate high-precision scientific device, CERN's Large Hadron Collider, have ever been able to achieve.

    "If this were a truly random universe this fit simply should not be...But our universe does not blat out more than a zillion to a zillionth power new forms of atoms, as the probabilistic equations of randomness would imply...It produces just three rigidly constrained species of atoms." Hydrogen, helium, and lithium all appear at the same time, "with astonishing supersynchrony...It doesn't follow the rules of randomness..."

    For their simplest examples, probability theorists tend to cite dice, which have 36 outcomes when tossed around in a cup. "How can a universe of nearly infinite dice and nearly infinite tosses," asks Bloom, "produce just three varieties of atoms? This is staggering conformity and self-control...not mere trial and error..."

    Then two billion years later, from seemingly unrelated supernovae in the explosive death of stars, emerged another gas, oxygen (Greek for acid-maker), together with all the carbon, nitrogen, and iron indispensable to life. That oxygen, when combined with hydrogen gas, produced not merely a further explosion and a further gaseous substance. It engendered the providential properties of water that make possible our planetary home and bountiful bodies, in an astronomical cornucopian cascade of singularities, from quarks to carbon to us.

    "So what is it?" To Bloom, "It's the paradox of the supersized surprise. It's the mind-snarler at the core of cosmic creativity. It is the question at the heart of the God Problem."

    This book just begins by refuting the Second Law. It continues with a new theophany that leaves plenty of room for almost anyone's God, except that flakey designer Guy-in-the-Sky he doesn't like with the beard and pajamas and the support for the Discovery Institute, who was chattering away on his cell phone and issuing new commandments at the cafe table at the beginning of the Universe.

    But Bloom may still be too bold, original and interesting for you. If your notion of a scientist is Brian Greene and his infinite multiple parallel universes, The God Problem is probably not your book. But it is my book, as a right wing laureate Male Chauvinist Pig Christian techno-utopian lover of women and capitalist inequality who thinks Israel is way too small for the greatness of its people, its God, and its defense against the utter depravity of its neo-nazi enemies. And get this! It's Barbara Ehrenreich's book, too, as a mad victim mongering Palestinian nazi-sympathizing sick Israel boycotter with Angela Davis and Bill Ayers.

    No offense Barbara. And hey, I didn't think we agreed on anything at all except perhaps the persecution of Larry Craig, who may have been in the men's room at the cafe at the beginning of the universe looking for love and finding some sleazy cop.

    Let's clasp on Howard. Howard is that synoptic and transcendent, shaking out ideas like shining from shook foil and oozing to a greatness like a beast of a genius.

    So everyone between Barbara and me should read this book and figure out which of us is wrong and which is right about Howard and the Second Law.

    I want to know.
    7 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2022
    This book is a wonderfully audacious attempt to discover the axioms of creation itself & then extract the implications. Therefore the 714 pages of this book is short when you consider Howard is trying to wrap his mind as wide as the cosmos while going as deep quarks and race all the up to quasars while accounting for brains as well as the big bang. I think Howard Bloom may be the person on my bucketlist with whom I would most like to have dinner.

Top reviews from other countries

  • jogalot72
    4.0 out of 5 stars Bloom's God problem is the entropy problem that the life sciences should take more seriously
    Reviewed in Australia on January 2, 2020
    I have been following Howard Bloom's works through the years, from The Lucifer Principle and Global Brain to The God Problem. Bloom is a terrific writer, and The God Problem follows in his descriptive, entertaining style. However, I have to confess that at times it was a difficult read, because he introduces sometimes difficult or abstract concepts that take the reader beyond their comfort zone. But he is on the right track, because he has taken himself beyond his own comfort zone, to try to imagine a new idea before any notion of that new idea even existed.

    Bloom is definitely spot on with his review of entropy within the context of Claude Shannon's information theory. I wholly agree with him about the need for an axiomatic framework, and the need to incorporate semiotic theory within it. While his writing style is descriptive and entertaining, this important message has not been delivered in a clear, succinct form.

    My own take, with my engineering background and interest in semiotic theory and systemic agency (systems theory, autopoiesis), is that this is a book about entropy, and how entropy is not taken seriously enough in the dominant, Neo-Darwinian paradigm. This is the thrust of what The God Problem is about. On the implications of entropy, Bloom concludes that if entropy were taken seriously and properly factored into the dominant narrative, we should not exist:

    "On the other hand, says entropy and its math, there are quintillions upon quintillions of paths that could lead to an utter chaos [...] If you carry this [entropic] reasoning to its extreme you come to an interesting logical conclusion. A conclusion that’s rock solid and irrefutable. You and I do not exist."

    Bloom’s solution to the entropy problem is semiotic, and resonates with commonsense:

    "The very shape of the universe is semiotic and linguistic. Space tells matter how to move and matter tells space how to bend. Note the word ‘tells.’ If no one opens the fortune cookie, you are not able to ‘tell’ a single thing. In ‘telling,’ meaning means everything. And meaning amounts to one simple thing: response. If one quark responds to another, it has opened the fortune cookie. It has read what Claude Shannon’s co-writer, Warren Weaver, call that quark’s meaning."

    There were a couple of things that I, with my interest in semiotic theory, had issues with. Despite his appreciation of the importance of agency and semiotics, Bloom had not referenced any of the well-established works in semiotic and biosemiotic theory... for example, Charles Sanders Peirce, or Jakob von Uexküll. Had he done so, this would have compelled more astute readers to flesh out the axiomatic framework that is the book's agenda. Furthermore, Bloom introduced his unfalsifiable conjecture about the bagel universe, which, with my skepticism about multiverse theory, dark matter, and all the other unfalsifiable conjectures that abound in cosmology, I thought was out of place.

    But ultimately I understand where Bloom is coming from. With his appreciation of the importance of meaning (semiosis), he is placing himself in the driver's seat, to imagine how new ideas come about before anything pointing to the new idea even existed. This meaning-making takes place at all levels throughout the universe, from quarks and leptons, to bacteria, cells, ant colonies, schools of fish and human cultures.

    Bloom’s point: The ancients were right to trust their gut instinct... there is something challenging and mysterious about all this complexity that persists across time. But we don’t need to revert to their ideologies, rituals and invented gods, to explain it. Agency and semiotic theory, as the science of meaning, provide the axiomatic foundations that address the entropy problem... nay, the God problem.

    The core message in The God Problem is perhaps the most important message among Bloom’s writings, because it relates back to his prior work emphasizing living systems and agency. Unfortunately this message was not delivered with the clarity that would have satisfied the average reader, but otherwise it is a fine work.
  • Bobleckridge
    5.0 out of 5 stars a science page turner
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 25, 2013
    Howard has such a distinctive style. It's so personal, so passionate, and so clear. In this book he takes us through the history of ideas, mathematical ideas, concepts, world views, in pursuit of the axioms at the heart of everything.
    He reveals the stepping stones of human intellectual development. He's looking for the Ur-patterns which underscore everything in the universe.
    I found it hard to stop reading this book. It reads like a great story which spins outwards like a fractal into multiple stories with the same underlying plot, the same kinds of heroes, all wrestling with the puzzle of how did everything come from nothing.
    I loved it.
  • Fedde
    5.0 out of 5 stars Out-of-the-box, all-in-one, modern philosophy
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 18, 2014
    Flabbergasting work. Tremendous. Page-turner. Read his other works as well. Start with 'The Lucifer Principle'. Howard Bloom gives you an intellectually and scientifically saturated spiritual philosophy. No hippie talk, but no dry left brain academia neither. From the workings of our biochemistry to the fabric of the universe. Read his books, they will change your views.
  • Angelo Barbato
    4.0 out of 5 stars Four Stars
    Reviewed in Australia on November 3, 2014
    A very good book. Highly recommend.
  • Llewellyn
    5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on September 18, 2015
    Good all round