The author, Douglas Meed, did a great job of summarizing the Mexican War. This book is well written, logically organized, and easy to read. Although it lacks detail, it does provide a high level overview of the conflict. This book also contains historical information on world events of that period. Although this information is interesting, it is also irrelevant. Thus, it is wasted space.
The book contains several battle maps, which clearly show the movements of the various forces. The maps are in color, easy to understand, and uncluttered with extraneous detail. The author also included numerous color and black & white illustrations. These illustrations are detailed and make a worthwhile contribution to the book. There are also photos and drawings of several politicians and military officers.
The book has a logical flow and each campaign is described in chronological order. In addition, the author spends time describing organizations such as the Texas Rangers and the San Patricios. The San Patricios were a group of Irish immigrants who defected to the Mexican side. Finally, the author included information on several Civil War officers, such as Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant.
The main shortcoming of this book is that its battle coverage is weak. The storming of Chapultepec Castle by the U.S. Marines should have received significant coverage. Instead, the entire battle of Mexico City, which included Chapultepec Castle, is covered in only the briefest of detail. This vague coverage was unnecessary given that the author wasted space on irrelevant topics. The chapter on "Portrait of a Civilian" covers a woman who really had nothing to do with the war. When describing the world during this period, the author talks about the industrial revolution, Charles Darwin, and Karl Marx. This space would have been better spent on some of the major battles.
Bottom line: this is an easy to read summary of the Mexican War. The maps are clear and the illustrations add to the book. Although the book lacks meaningful detail on the battles, it does contain interesting historical information of the time. If nothing else, this book will certainly provide the reader with a basic understanding of the war.
Add to book club
Loading your book clubs
There was a problem loading your book clubs. Please try again.
Not in a club?
Learn more
Join or create book clubs
Choose books together
Track your books
Bring your club to Amazon Book Clubs, start a new book club and invite your friends to join, or find a club that’s right for you for free.
Flip to back
Flip to front
Follow the Author
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.
OK
The Mexican War 1846-1848 Paperback – July 25, 2002
by
Douglas V Meed
(Author)
|
Douglas V Meed
(Author)
Find all the books, read about the author, and more.
See search results for this author
|
-
Print length96 pages
-
LanguageEnglish
-
PublisherOsprey Publishing
-
Publication dateJuly 25, 2002
-
Dimensions6.66 x 0.24 x 9.89 inches
-
ISBN-101841764728
-
ISBN-13978-1841764726
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
-
Apple
-
Android
-
Windows Phone
-
Android
|
Download to your computer
|
Kindle Cloud Reader
|
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
The Mexican-American War, 1846-1848 (Men-At-Arms Series, 56)Paperback$19.00$19.00+ $35.48 shippingOnly 11 left in stock - order soon.
The Mexican War, 1846-1848Paperback$21.44$21.44+ $35.48 shippingOnly 11 left in stock (more on the way).
Terrible Swift Sword: The Legacy of John BrownPeggy A. RussoPaperback$29.95$29.95+ $15.48 shippingTemporarily out of stock.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1
Disunion!: The Coming of the American Civil War, 1789-1859 (Littlefield History of the Civil War Era)Paperback$24.82$24.82+ $35.48 shippingOnly 19 left in stock (more on the way).
Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil WarPaperback$18.32$18.32+ $35.48 shippingIn Stock.
The Mexican-American War, 1846-1848 (Men-At-Arms Series, 56)Paperback$19.00$19.00+ $35.48 shippingOnly 11 left in stock - order soon.
The Wars of Spanish American Independence 1809–29 (Essential Histories)John FletcherPaperback$20.95$20.95FREE Shipping by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Aug 23Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
The American Revolution 1774-1783Paperback$25.00$25.00FREE Shipping by AmazonGet it as soon as Monday, Aug 23Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Review
"I am most favorably impressed by the Essential Histories series on the American Civil War. Written by four of the best historians of the military course of the war, these volumes provide a lucid and concise narrative of the campaigns in both the Eastern and Western theaters as well as penetrating analyses of strategies and leadership. Ideal for classroom use or fireside reading."
From the Publisher
This unique series studies every major war in history looking at all the aspects of war, from how it felt to be a soldier to the lasting impact of the conflict on the world around it.
About the Author
Douglas V Meed is a former US infantryman and cryptanalyst with the Army Security Agency in Europe. Following degrees in Journalism and history he worked as reporter and editor with the Houston Chronicle and San Antonio Light newspapers, before being selected as Foreign Services Officer with the United States Information Agency in Europe and Asia. He has written a number of books, including 'The Fighting Texas Navy 1832-1843' (Republic of Texas Press, 2001) and 'Texas Wanderlust' (Texas A&M University Press, 1997). He has also written numerous articles for history magazines and academic journals.
Product details
- Publisher : Osprey Publishing (July 25, 2002)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 96 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1841764728
- ISBN-13 : 978-1841764726
- Item Weight : 12.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.66 x 0.24 x 9.89 inches
-
Best Sellers Rank:
#1,853,484 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,945 in Mexico History
- #14,672 in Great Britain History (Books)
- #56,601 in Military History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Customer reviews
4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5
13 global ratings
How are ratings calculated?
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2009
Verified Purchase
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on August 4, 2015
Verified Purchase
Detailed account for a general read.
Reviewed in the United States on September 6, 2002
The new Osprey Essential Histories series on the Mexican War starts out fairly well, but falters mid-way through its narrative of the conflict and never regains its footing. Although the author's writing style and background are journalistic, he does succeed in delivering the essential elements that brought the conflict about, but his touch is less sure in dealing with the war itself. If one desires a "cliff notes" volume on the Mexican War, this is it. However, for a series that purports to engender a "deeper understanding of war," this volume fails to deliver.
The Mexican War begins with an 11-page section that lays out the background of the war. The author does make a good point in citing Mexican intransigence and American land-greed as the proximate causes of the war; he notes, "they [the Mexicans] allowed their pride to cloud their judgment of potential American military strength. The Mexican government therefore refused to negotiate..." Nature abhors a vacuum, as is said, and the vast open, sparsely populated Mexican northern territories were a great temptation to an expanding American republic. The section on opposing sides is woefully inadequate, with the equivalent of only three pages on the subject. While the author depicts the essential conditions of each country's military forces in cultural terms, he fails to provide much in the way of specifics. An order of battle for at least the two main campaigns would have been nice, but the omission of military details quickly reveals this as a watered-down account. The next section covers the actual outbreak of war on the Rio Grande and is fairly accurate. The bulk of the military campaigns are covered in the 30-page middle section. Aside from the lack of any order of battle type information or even specifics about how much cavalry or artillery each side had in various battles, the reader should note how few maps are used to support the text. The critical battles around Mexico City are particularly poorly supported by the few generalized maps. A 3-page section, entitled "portrait of a soldier," is interesting in its discussion of the wartime career of one Lieutenant Sam Grant (later U S Grant).
Unfortunately, the Mexican War makes a sharp turn off into irrelevance in a long-winded section entitled, "the world around the war," which was intended to demonstrate the progress being made elsewhere in the world in comparison to the stagnation in Mexico. This section covers an incredible array of non-issues for the Mexican War: the trapped Donner Party, the Mormons, the Revolution of 1848 in Europe, Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto, Charles Darwin, etc. The author compounds this shot-gun approach to history with a follow-up section intended to give a portrait of a civilian (who had no direct involvement in the war), spending time detailing the birth of each of her children. I thought this book was supposed to be about the Mexican War? The author finally gets back to the climax of the war and the resulting peace treaty. The incredible amount of space devoted to items totally unrelated to the conflict - fully 15% of the book - is inexcusable. In Osprey volumes there is no doubt that size constraints limit the amount of detail that could be included, but when space is flagrantly wasted the format should not be used as an excuse. This author should have included more detail on the war, on military leaders, on casualties rather than discussing nonsense like French ballet. History requires focus to be intelligible.
One major point that the author neglects in favor of above-mentioned nonsense is the uniqueness of Scott's Mexico City expedition. This expedition was one of the best armies that the United States ever fielded: primarily regular in composition, with both troops and officers having recent combat experience. Also, Scott's march on Mexico City required him to virtually sever his line of communication to the sea, which has only happened twice in US military history that a commander has voluntarily severed his supply lines (the other occasion was Sherman's March to the Sea). Scott was one of the best American battlefield generals ever - the author should have made some mention of his exceptional victories in 1814 rather than just focusing on side issues like Scott's political problems. Readers desiring a short history of the Mexican War will get that in these pages, but only that.
The Mexican War begins with an 11-page section that lays out the background of the war. The author does make a good point in citing Mexican intransigence and American land-greed as the proximate causes of the war; he notes, "they [the Mexicans] allowed their pride to cloud their judgment of potential American military strength. The Mexican government therefore refused to negotiate..." Nature abhors a vacuum, as is said, and the vast open, sparsely populated Mexican northern territories were a great temptation to an expanding American republic. The section on opposing sides is woefully inadequate, with the equivalent of only three pages on the subject. While the author depicts the essential conditions of each country's military forces in cultural terms, he fails to provide much in the way of specifics. An order of battle for at least the two main campaigns would have been nice, but the omission of military details quickly reveals this as a watered-down account. The next section covers the actual outbreak of war on the Rio Grande and is fairly accurate. The bulk of the military campaigns are covered in the 30-page middle section. Aside from the lack of any order of battle type information or even specifics about how much cavalry or artillery each side had in various battles, the reader should note how few maps are used to support the text. The critical battles around Mexico City are particularly poorly supported by the few generalized maps. A 3-page section, entitled "portrait of a soldier," is interesting in its discussion of the wartime career of one Lieutenant Sam Grant (later U S Grant).
Unfortunately, the Mexican War makes a sharp turn off into irrelevance in a long-winded section entitled, "the world around the war," which was intended to demonstrate the progress being made elsewhere in the world in comparison to the stagnation in Mexico. This section covers an incredible array of non-issues for the Mexican War: the trapped Donner Party, the Mormons, the Revolution of 1848 in Europe, Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto, Charles Darwin, etc. The author compounds this shot-gun approach to history with a follow-up section intended to give a portrait of a civilian (who had no direct involvement in the war), spending time detailing the birth of each of her children. I thought this book was supposed to be about the Mexican War? The author finally gets back to the climax of the war and the resulting peace treaty. The incredible amount of space devoted to items totally unrelated to the conflict - fully 15% of the book - is inexcusable. In Osprey volumes there is no doubt that size constraints limit the amount of detail that could be included, but when space is flagrantly wasted the format should not be used as an excuse. This author should have included more detail on the war, on military leaders, on casualties rather than discussing nonsense like French ballet. History requires focus to be intelligible.
One major point that the author neglects in favor of above-mentioned nonsense is the uniqueness of Scott's Mexico City expedition. This expedition was one of the best armies that the United States ever fielded: primarily regular in composition, with both troops and officers having recent combat experience. Also, Scott's march on Mexico City required him to virtually sever his line of communication to the sea, which has only happened twice in US military history that a commander has voluntarily severed his supply lines (the other occasion was Sherman's March to the Sea). Scott was one of the best American battlefield generals ever - the author should have made some mention of his exceptional victories in 1814 rather than just focusing on side issues like Scott's political problems. Readers desiring a short history of the Mexican War will get that in these pages, but only that.
38 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2014
It is hard for me to think of a American War that truly could be justified as rightly starting the conflict in defense of the US. The most notorious example is the 1846-1848 Mexican-American War, the conflict which resulted in Mexico losing millions of acres of land in Texas, Utah, Colorado, California, Arizona, and New Mexico to the United States. This is one of Osprey's only books on the war which every school should teach and it is a good narrative.
Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2007
For someone living in Europe, the American-Mexican war is only important for it's consiquences, which can be summarized in one passage. So I ordered this small book to get the general idea of the conflict.
Overall I must say that it is fun and lively little book to read. The author gives enough details to generally understand the situation, and he does this quite well. The book treats both sides equally, without any "democracy has prevailed!" rhetoric, which is unwillingly expected after some exposure to the American mass media.
The cons of the book have already been covered in the previous review, although, I must add, it's not such a great deal,except for the "civilian" part, although the author covered the general condition of the civillian population in other sections.
If this book is the first (and, probalby last) thing you are going to read about this conflict, it would surely be helpful. Overall a very pleasant reading.
Overall I must say that it is fun and lively little book to read. The author gives enough details to generally understand the situation, and he does this quite well. The book treats both sides equally, without any "democracy has prevailed!" rhetoric, which is unwillingly expected after some exposure to the American mass media.
The cons of the book have already been covered in the previous review, although, I must add, it's not such a great deal,except for the "civilian" part, although the author covered the general condition of the civillian population in other sections.
If this book is the first (and, probalby last) thing you are going to read about this conflict, it would surely be helpful. Overall a very pleasant reading.
Reviewed in the United States on August 23, 2005
I bought this book for my husband who is a real history buff and he loved it! He collects Osprey Press books because they are so well done and informative.
2 people found this helpful
Report abuse
Top reviews from other countries
david
5.0 out of 5 stars
Informative.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on March 29, 2019Verified Purchase
Wargaming.
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Page 1 of 1 Start overPage 1 of 1




