Intellectual Impostures: Alan Sokal: 9781861976314: Amazon.com: Books

Paperback
$44.08

Buy used: $44.08

$9.99 delivery May 3 - 21. Details

Deliver to Canada

Used: Like New | Details

Sold by papercavalier 💂

Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.

Added to

Unable to add item to List. Please try again.

Follow the author

Intellectual Impostures Paperback – January 1, 2003

by Alan Sokal (Author)

73

See all formats and editions

When Intellectual Impostures was published in France, it sent shock waves through the Left Bank establishment. When it was published in Britain, it provoked vicious debate. Sokal and Bricmont examine the canon of French postmodernists - Lacan, Kristeva, Baudrillard, Irigaray, Latour, Virilio, Deleuze and Guattari - and systematically expose their abuse of science.

Report an issue with this product or seller

Print length

304 pages
Language

English
Publisher

Profile Books
Publication date

January 1, 2003
Dimensions

5.08 x 0.79 x 7.76 inches
ISBN-10

1861976313
ISBN-13

978-1861976314
See all details

Alan Sokal
239
Paperback
$17.34
$8.65 shipping

Product details

Publisher ‏ : ‎ Profile Books (January 1, 2003)
Language ‏ : ‎ English
Paperback ‏ : ‎ 304 pages
ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 1861976313
ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-1861976314
Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 8.8 ounces
Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 5.08 x 0.79 x 7.76 inches

Best Sellers Rank: #4,420,832 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Customer Reviews:
73

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Alan D. Sokal

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4.3 out of 5

73 global ratings

How customer reviews and ratings work

Sort reviews by

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Decoding the Mystery of Pseudo Science

Reviewed in the United States on June 15, 2010

Verified Purchase

The many hours I spent reading French philosophy in school while trying to glean something comprehensible were far too many. This book reinforced my earlier convictions that the writing was verbose and just plain terrible. I should add that it wasn't lost in translation. The fact that they still use French philosophy in Universities is unnerving to say the least. I recommend this book for anyone who wants to 'deprogram' the post-modern out of someone they know and love.

16 people found this helpful

The book was great. It was a little old and gave me ...

Reviewed in the United States on November 9, 2017

Verified Purchase

The book was great. It was a little old and gave me allergies although I attempted to air it out and put it in the microwave to try to kill some of the microorganisms. But I did purchase a used book so...

One person found this helpful

Pulverises intellectual and scientific nonsense with admirable panache

Reviewed in the United States on February 4, 2010

Verified Purchase

Anyone who has had the misfortune to purchase a book that is an offense to reason, or to have to listen to a talk full of pretense and pseudo-scientific subterfuge; anyone who is rightly scornful of woolly thinking, half-baked ideas and downright intellectual dishonesty backed up by specious reasoning, will delight in this expose by its two authors. They systematically take apart and pulverize the work of many perpetrators of the art of literary and pseudo-academic deception, exposing its dishonesty and impure motives. The authors do a great job as exposers of falsehood and upholders of objective truth.

This book is recommended reading for those whose grasp of objectivity is weak or faltering, or who wish to find champions of an approach to reality that is, to man's great peril, increasingly ignored today - an approach which relies on facts, not on fantasy; on painstaking research and meticulous reasoning, not on mere subjectivity and a plunge into an abyss of subjective fantasy and madness.

14 people found this helpful

Extremely relevant

Reviewed in the United States on July 20, 2012

Verified Purchase

I find the book extremely interesting and well written, and the subject is very relevant. It was surprising to learn how renowned philosophers wrote sentences completely meaningless. It is a depressing social phenomenon, but it also teaches us a lot about the role of prestige and authority in the judgement of some intellectual works.

8 people found this helpful

Reviewed in the United States on July 28, 2016

Verified Purchase

Thank you!

One person found this helpful

Raises some interesting questions about academic honesty

Reviewed in the United States on December 4, 2004

Have you ever been tempted to write pure nonsense? Maybe on some rainy first day of April? I once felt like writing:

"I sure made a mistake when I told the Goddess Minerva that She couldn't square the circle. In response, She drew a circle next to me, a truly beautiful and perfect circle. And right in front of my panicky brown eyes, She turned pi into four! Not just the circumference divided by the diameter, but the series expansion as an inverse tangent as well. What would She do next, make me unwell by dropping the first letter from my first name? i tried to apologize, but it was too late."

I was not the only one to dream of mangling pi. In "Contact: A Novel," Carl Sagan went me one better when he had aliens send messages to each other at infinite speed by hiding them in a numerical representation of pi and then, you guessed it, changing pi everywhere!

Still, Alan Sokal went beyond even this, getting the following published in the journal "Social Text:"

"In this way the infinite-dimensional invariance group erodes the distinction between the observer and the observed; the pi of Euclid and the G of Newton, formerly thought to be constant and universal, are now perceived in their ineluctable historicity; and the putative observer becomes fatally decentered, disconnected from any epistemic link to a spacetime point that can no longer be defined by geometry alone."

Sokal put this and many more whoppers into his hoax, which defended an equally absurd thesis: that "physical 'reality,' no less than social 'reality,' is at bottom a social and linguistic construct."

While this joke may not prove much, it does raise the issue of whether a few people in academia are misusing the vocabulary of science to create absurd statements in defense of an antirationalist point of view. This book shows that they are.

The authors show that Jacques Lacan makes completely arbitrary analogies between topology and psychoanalysis. We then see some of the same irrelevance and superficial use of topology in the early works of Julia Kristeva. After an interlude in which Sokal and Bricmont seriously discuss the philosophy of science, there are more examples of academic nonsense. The next victim is Luce Irigaray, who in what I agree is about as ridiculously antifeminist a statement as one could make says:

"Science always displays certain choices, certain exclusions, and these are particularly determined by the sex of the scholars involved."

That's rich: objective truth is different depending on whether one is a Woman or a man! I must admit that I half expected Irigaray to say that pi was different for Men and women.

After that, we see Bruno Latour's idea that Einstein's Theory of Relativity has implications for sociology. The authors point out that this is manifest nonsense. Were we to discover tomorrow that the ratio of the mass of a particle to its energy were slightly different from what relativity predicted, there would be a revolution in physics, but no need to alter theories of human behavior.

Later, we see Jean Baudrillard say, "It is a sign that the space of the event has become a hyperspace with multiple refractivity, and that the space of war has become definitively non-Euclidean." And there are more, um, words, from Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari, and Paul Virilio.

Sokal and Bricmont conclude that all this inanity is a threat. That either it will lead to even more irrationalism in academia or to an academic abandonment of social critique. And I think it's worth warning us to avoid such a future. But I also think we simply need social journals to get scientists to review (and reject) papers that use big scientific words instead of making coherent statements.

46 people found this helpful

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English

Sarthak Tomar

Highly recommitted for anyone even slightly interested in sciences.

Reviewed in India on July 30, 2015

Verified Purchase

This is one of the best book that I came across this year. The one by one study of some of the "postmordern" thinkers works is extremely precise and very "scientific". But what I found more interesting were the two extra chapters, one of epistemology of sciences and other, the Epilogue, on the social and political impact it has. Highly recommitted for anyone even slightly interested in sciences (natural and social, both.)

One person found this helpful

W. R. Stewart

How did this all happen?

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 15, 2014

Verified Purchase

The authors are even handed but there is no conclusion other than that post modernism is full of impostures, created we therefore infer by impostors. How much time has been wasted and confusion has been sown by the likes of Lacan and Kristeva? Surely this is phenomenon that will merit analysis in the future, cf. the witch craze in early modern Europe. Innocent concepts are taken out and burnt on a pyre of ego. I watch and I feel disgusted. In the future we should give mathematics the respect it deserves.

2 people found this helpful

Mikkenzi

Ha!

Reviewed in France on July 27, 2011

Verified Purchase

Drôle, intello, bien argumenté et très, très, très utile :) A mettre entre les mains de tout étudiant en sciences humaines, sociales et littéraires! Le grand +? Les citations en anglais sont souvent accompagnés par leur équivalents en français. Comporte deux préfaces et le fameux article de Sokal en annexe. Parfois je me dis qu'ils ont pu aller encore plus loin dans leurs analyses. Mais c'est déjà un très bon début!

3 people found this helpful

Translate review to English

Thomas Roth

Schwere Kost

Reviewed in Germany on May 7, 2021

Verified Purchase

Inhalt sehr interessant, liest sich aber nicht leicht.

Translate review to English

adison debbarma

Recommended along with 'Fashionable Nonsense'

Reviewed in India on August 15, 2018

Verified Purchase

Exposing the Post-modernist, culture-cannibalistic sham as they attempt to gain credibility by exploiting Scientific points.

See more reviews

Get to Know Us

Make Money with Us

Amazon Payment Products

Let Us Help You

English $USD - U.S. Dollar United States

© 1996-2024, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates