Buy new:
-34% $16.39$16.39
Delivery Wednesday, November 13
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
Save with Used - Acceptable
$9.99$9.99
Delivery Wednesday, November 13
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The Starr Report: The Findings of Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr on President Clinton and the Lewinsky Affair Paperback – October 6, 1998
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length480 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateOctober 6, 1998
- Dimensions5 x 1.09 x 8 inches
- ISBN-10189162024X
- ISBN-13978-1891620249
Customers who bought this item also bought
Monica's StoryHardcover$10.13 shippingGet it as soon as Friday, Nov 22Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United StatesNational Commission on Terrorist AttacksPaperback$10.21 shippingGet it as soon as Tuesday, Nov 12Only 1 left in stock - order soon.
Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com Review
Whether or not it's the government's job to produce hackneyed narratives about young women who find themselves falling in love with powerful men is for voters to decide, but this story would be rejected outright by readers of Harold Robbins or Jackie Susann were it not for the newsworthy elements. Of course, there's also the second half of the report, in which Starr explains how Clinton's attempts to prevent his relationship with Lewinsky from becoming public knowledge constitute grounds for his impeachment. That's the part of the document that matters most from a political perspective ... but it's doubtful that it'll be the part that lingers in historical memory. (Note: You can also read the Starr report in electronic form for free at a number of locations on the Web, including the Library of Congress site and the commercial sites AOL.com, Netscape Netcenter, and Yahoo!)
From The New Yorker
Product details
- Publisher : PublicAffairs; First Edition (October 6, 1998)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 480 pages
- ISBN-10 : 189162024X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1891620249
- Item Weight : 1.1 pounds
- Dimensions : 5 x 1.09 x 8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,332,869 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #303 in Political Reference
- #1,804 in United States National Government
- #106,508 in Business & Money (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Related products with free delivery on eligible orders
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It is apparent that the report was written by more than one investigator due to some inconsistent organization, but that is offset by the careful collection of supportive facts where relevant. It is also helpful that there is first a narrative to build the framework before the specific charges are outlined. This causes some repetiveness, but necessary for both overall understanding and the legal presentation, as the report has two audiences, Congress and the public.
One reviewer who, like many, disliked the Starr Report, drew a comparison using the 9/11 Report as the model of a good report. Many reviewers of the Starr Report refer to it as sleazy, pornographic, etc. Obviously, those reviewers have no idea what an investigative report is supposed to be. An investigative report provides the information an attorney or prosecutor is going to use to prepare his case. It must report the findings; fully, accurately, and precisely. Imagine an investigator who writes a report on a brutal rape case. For the sake of prudence he chooses not to mention certain female body parts as well as acts that are either titillating or repulsive. That report would be a waste of time and effort.
Ken Starr's job was to investigate and report; fully, accurately, and precisely. The notion that he did not have to include some of the more lurid details is ridiculous. The investigator is not supposed to delete things he doesn't like or add things that seem nice (as 9/11 Commission did in some cases). That would be up to the prosecutor, in this case the house judiciary committee.
The Starr Report is an example of an investigator doing his job correctly. The criticisms that were reported by compliant media were nothing but an attempt to further demonize the investigator for the purpose of evoking sympathy for President Clinton. In that sense, it worked.

