Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Archeofuturism: European Visions of the Post-Catastrophic Age Paperback – August 26, 2010
| Guillaume Faye (Author) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
|
Audible Audiobook, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
$0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
- Kindle
$0.00 Read with Kindle Unlimited to also enjoy access to over 3 million more titles $6.99 to buy -
Audiobook
$0.00 Free with your Audible trial - Hardcover
$50.415 Used from $45.02 3 New from $50.40 - Paperback
$19.956 Used from $17.96 9 New from $19.95
Enhance your purchase
- Print length252 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateAugust 26, 2010
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.63 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-101907166092
- ISBN-13978-1907166099
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Manifesto for a European RenaissanceAlain de BenoistPaperback$4.50 shippingGet it Feb 3 - 27Usually ships within 9 to 10 days.
Editorial Reviews
Review
Product details
- Publisher : Arktos Media Ltd. (August 26, 2010)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 252 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1907166092
- ISBN-13 : 978-1907166099
- Item Weight : 11.5 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.63 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #251,978 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #131 in Nationalism (Books)
- #1,138 in History & Theory of Politics
- #9,942 in Social Sciences (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Guillaume Faye was born in 1949 and received a Ph.D. in Political Science from the Institut d'etudes politiques de Paris. He was one of the principal organisers of the French New Right organisation GRECE (Groupement de recherche et d'etudes pour la civilisation europeenne) during the 1970s and '80s, and at the same time cultivated his career as a journalist, particularly in the news magazines Figaro and Paris-Match.
In 1986 he left GRECE after he came to disagree with the direction of the group, which he felt was becoming overly academic and less engaged with the actual problems confronting Europe. For more than a decade, he worked as a broadcaster for the French radio station Skyrock, and on the program Telematin which aired on France 2 TV. He returned to the field of political philosophy in 1998 when a number of his new essays were collected and published in the volume Archeofuturism, which has also been published in English by Arktos. Since then he has produced a series of books which have challenged and reinvigorated readers throughout Europe and North America. His books have become must-reads for European Rightists and identitarians, regardless of whether they agree or disagree with his ideas. Over the last decade, Faye has been no stranger to controversy, having published books on immigration, the 'clash of civilisations', and the question of the Right's relationship to Islam and Zionism. He also published a monthly journal, J'ai Tout Compris (I Understand Everything!). He is very influential upon the identitarian movement, and rejects the communitarian and pro-Third World ideology propagated by hos former GRECE colleagues. He is also a frequent contributor to the Terre et Peuple (Land and People) group, and still lectures and writes frequently.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
I hesitate to describe Faye as a political philosopher because political philosophy is more concerned with theories of justice rather than soothsaying about the dynamics of the 21st Century. ArcheoFuturism isn't animated by concerns with distributive justice but rather with a prediction about the future. Equity, it is said, depends upon ample natural resources. Once physical resources are depleted, equity becomes an absurdity. The future, Faye argues, demands a reasoned method for an un-equal distribution of the world's resources so that a breakaway subset of Man can proceed forward both spiritually and technologically while the masses are consigned to live cyclically in a repetition of traditions that lock them in a contented, innocuous whirlpool that drives in the opposite direction; that is, backwards, into the past, then finally into an oblivion with more simian than human qualities.
Justice, as it is normally conceived of, plays no part in the new ArcheoFuturistic distributive model because the dynamic force is simply the Will to Power. The mandate to proceed forward to the highest destiny of Man justifies a partition of resources that is unequal. And as this dynamic plays out in the 21st Century, Faye envisions institutional collapse and widespread ethnic warfare, with a Balkanization of the planet based on race. Europe expands to Euro-Siberia. China in cooperation with Japan controls California. Africa, I believe, is partitioned between Asians and Europeans. Similarly, the resources of the balance of the solar system, particularly Mars, fall to a negotiated split between Asians and Europeans.
I suppose that in the ArcheoFuture Europeans and the quasi-Europeans of America will no longer watch television, in as much as it is well known that only the Japanese and Koreans are able to manufacture televisions worth watching at all. So, in the future, Europeans will have to watch other white goods, such as the Electrolux washing machine or, perhaps, their Phillips vacuum cleaners. Similarly, Asian women will have to carry their secret caches of cosmetics and other necessities in pockets or in their bare fingers, in as much as they will no longer have access to the Ferragamo and Chanel handbags of Italy and France.
The ArcheoFuture is a catastrophe. Faye describes a dystopia. There is nothing that is normatively desirable in his universe. It is likely that models of distributive justice will have to be devised for a future that will be frustrated with increased resource constraints. And the Will to Power will continue to operate as it always has to order the distribution of resources among individuals within the box we call civilization. However, to PROPOSE that we abandon justice is different from recognizing that justice will become more difficult in the 21st Century. In fact, it should be conceded that we do not today live in a system in which serious effort is made towards distributive equity. We live in a world of slogans and dreams. Faye suggests that we should WANT to abandon those dreams.
Indeed, it is my experience that we have abandoned justice already in too many sectors and for too many varieties of people. Visit any jail in America or attempt to walk through a poorer neighborhood in Southeast Asia. The dreams of distributive justice that have been knocked about and discoursed upon in classrooms in the major capitals of the planet have failed to achieve practical effect in reality. How is it that we can be exhorted to abandon what we have barely even begun?
Nonetheless, this is an important book, not because of its prescriptions, but because it may, in a positivistic way, amount to an accurate description of the developing mindset of many Americans, Europeans and even East Asians. The 21st Century, I believe, will begin to advance towards the resource choke points that were imagined in "Soylent Green" and similar works. Inequality will once again attempt to achieve conventional legitimacy. However, even in the midsts of catastrophe, one would hope that some communities would persist that continue to believe in the possibility of utopias.
Guillaume Faye postulates that the current iteration of civilization will fail within our lifetimes. He describes a "jump" phenomenology consistent with chaos theory: once acceleration and velocity reach zero, order degenerates into chaos. The parabola of the rise and fall of society isn't symmetrical. After the sluggish rise from the left to the very pinnacle, the plunge to the right is more or less vertical, from the grand dream of an equitable civilization to the reality of the rocks in just a few cycles of hyperventilation. Mad Max is waiting for us, and no one in our vicinity looks much like Charlize Theron.
We've all heard the peak oil theory; and after a few runs through it, we've dismissed it. But now, I've begun to reconsider the validity of the peak oil hypothesis. USD as the reserve currency is simply a restatement of oil. Once oil as a control mechanism begins to fail in a sort of Green Crisis, Guillaume Faye's ArcheoFuture may begin its march towards a horrific realization.
This situation exists because, since 1945, conservatism has been in disarray. Its fundamental idea is to learn from the past and what works (e.g. ends before means) instead of what is morally or politically correct, which is the foundation of liberalism.
As a result, conservatism endorses some things that are not very polite. It endorses nationalism, or delineation of nations by self-ruling ethnic groups; it supports a caste or class hierarchy; it endorses social Darwinism, or giving more wealth to those who are more competent; finally, it denies social equality, that "freedom" is a definable goal, or that we can all get along.
To a modern person, conservatism is apostasy and a denial of all the television, rock stars and Hollywood stars, writers, friends and gurus tell us is true.
While we might see modern television conservatives as essentially liberals with the methods of the right, the New Right is an attempt to make conservatives with the values of the right and the methods of the liberals. However, it has taken many years to flower and even be defined; Guillaume Faye's "Archeofuturism" is an attempt not only to define it, but to give it a creative ideal toward which to reach.
The book starts by re-capping the history you will not find in textbooks, namely that liberalism started in 1789, causes two centuries of wars trying to establish the nation state and now, thanks to atomizing individualism, has created societies where no one has anything in common and so chaos is the norm and heavy Nanny State enforcement is necessary.
Faye posits that as ongoing time proves that liberalism has not delivered on its promise of a world of peace and equality, and this causes further inner instability, we will face a "convergence of catastrophes" in which the ill-guided policies of liberalism show their consequences. For example, overpopulation, pollution, climate change, racial strife and proliferation of nuclear weapons will, in Faye's view, come due at about the same time.
Against this Faye posits "archaeofuturism," or a belief system that applies the values of the past to a forward and creative goal. This in itself is a big step for conservatism, which has essentially been a rearguard action since 1789 when politics fragmented with the French Revolution.
This book is an engaging read and, while it will offend most modern readers, is hard to deny as far as a realistic look at politics on the one thousand year scale, instead of the four-year election cycle. It is engagingly written, thoughtful and witty, as well as being informative to those of us who grew up on the filtered pro-liberal media.
Whether you're left or right, this is a "different" view of history that does not have the failings of the official-and/or-popular view. It may even portray a world we'd rather live in.
Faye tells us we should dream of the future and plan for the future, but temper this futurism with archaism, which he defines not as backward-looking nostalgia, but an understanding of and respect for the “founding impulses” of human social organization.
Using what is known about evolutionary psychology and tried forms of human social organization to inform humanity’s march into the future corrects the built-in mistake of modern life — which is truly driven by greedy commercialism and merely rationalized and pseudo-sacralized by “progressive” neophilia. In what passes for “social science” today, there is a tendency to throw out any traditional idea about human nature which cannot immediately be explained by scientific inquiry — some quick “study,” or the current perception of the barely understood brain — in favor of some theoretical form of social organization completely untried and unknown to our species.
Top reviews from other countries
But the main content of Archeofuturism is Faye’s theory that the (liberal) West is facing a convergence of catastrophes which will befall it during the first half of the 21st century, a theory that he would expand on in a later work of that name. Bearing in mind that Archeofuturism was written at the end of the 20th century, Faye warned of an impending global economic crisis worse than that of the 1930s Depression, the rise of (often violent) Islamic fundamentalism, global tensions resulting from attempts by non-nuclear powers to obtain such weapons (Iran & North Korea?) and by the subsequent proliferation of nuclear arms, a planet which continues to warm up, and a demographic crisis caused by falling indigenous European birth rates in an era of mass immigration.
That Europe and the West are currently facing many of these issues is undeniable. Indeed, Faye’s comments now seem prescient. When the centre left Prime Minister of the UK, Gordon Brown, tried to absolve himself from any responsibility for Britain’s lack of preparedness for the 2008 crash by saying ‘who could have foreseen it?’, it’s a shame he hadn’t read Faye a decade previously!
But Faye isn’t finished yet. In Spenglerian fashion, he predicts that current liberal democratic society has run its course and will be swept away by this perfect storm. Writing in 1998, he anticipated this happening in the early decades of the new century. But is he being overly optimistic? Clearly, Western liberalism is undergoing a series of shocks with economic stagnation, Islamic terrorism, Trump, Brexit et al. All this would have been unthinkable in 1998, when an American commentator could arrogantly proclaim that the victory of liberal democracy over its ‘last’ enemy, Soviet Communism, had ended history. But Western liberal democracy is proving to be remarkably resilient thus far.
The last segment of the book sees Faye outline some broad principles for the new Europe that must emerge following the storm. Central to this is his concept of archeofuturism, in which the world of tomorrow is a delicate symbiosis of traditional (ie. pre-Modern) practices and cutting edge, futuristic science. For this to happen, the nineteenth & twentieth century follies of egalitarianism & progressivism must be rejected. In practice, this will mean a federal Europe of largely autonomous regions (the ‘Europe of a Hundred Flags’ concept) which Faye argues should be Eurosiberian to include Russia. And it will also involve a two-tier world economy, with the existing developed world turning to greener ways of producing energy, while the developing world will be encouraged to return to an agrarian way of life. Faye helpfully finishes his work with a short story, set in this new post catastrophic age, to illustrate what all this might look like in practice.
So, what to make of Archeofuturism? Anything by Faye is worth reading but Archeofuturism especially so, as it addresses many of the issues we currently face, from Catalonian nationalism to North Korea. This translation by Arktos is of the highest quality, while Editor John B Morgan’s footnotes are invaluable.
According to Faye's book, modern progressive liberalism has stagnated. People no longer believe in the liberal fantasy that tomorrow will be better than today. Technology, science, globalism, capitalist greed, and empty political ideas - are all making our lives worse, not better. Progressive Western societies are no longer creating genuine freedoms - they are simply retreating into a charade: endlessly generating pointless lists of 'values' and abstract rights whilst ignoring modern society's chronic, deep-rooted problems.
In Faye's view, Europe's soft humanism, its superficial tolerance and it stupefying mass media spectacle, all demonstrate that progressivism is a dying idea. Liberal Western societies can no longer disguise the rot: social violence, the collapse of genuine public liberties, crime, insecurity and brazen economic exploitation. In addition, there is the human cost of mass immigration, widespread environmental damage, waste and pollution and brazen government monitoring of its own population. Progressivism and liberalism - no longer able to address people's genuine concerns - are turning on their own populations.
Faye believes modern European societies - hampered by their progressive mindset and unable to lead - will soon face a "convergence of catastrophies" which will tear them apart. But what will come next? Faye is right that many traditionalists, filled with an unrealistic sense of nostalgia, will simply long to return to the past. Faye rejects this. His solution is a radical synthesis of the past and the future which, he argues, will breathe new life into both. The future should be an uncompromising European federation of regions where the traditional and the futuristic sit side by side. Faye's treatise is an organic collection covering a broad range of topic areas and styles. Yet, although it was written in 1997, it reads as if it had been written yesterday.
Archeofuturism is not a dogmatic, fixed view of Europe's future; it is an invitation to think about traditionalism in a radically different way. For its audacity and thought-provoking ideas alone - five stars.
Yet certainly on the right Guillaume Faye is rather something of a neo-futurist, who takes no prisoners in this should-be, must-be, will-be classic of modern cultural and political thinking. (The book was published in french, in 1998, but is in many ways so prophetic it will blow your mind)
In some places surely Faye throws common sense out the window, but the main part of this work is a sound and much needed defense of the West and a fresh look on what can be done to free it from its destructive multicultural decline.
First and foremost a freethinkers book!
Anyone interested in politics and culture ought to read this prophetic book very closely. It's by no means what you might expect, whether you are left or right. Faye's fears of environmental fears, for example, are a case in point.
An insightful and all too accurate vision of the future from the not so distant past.







