This book could not arrive at a better time in our history. Clearly, politics is completely out-of-control and invading every single aspect of daily life, from what you hear on the news, what you see in the movies, to what your children are taught in school, with destructive and corrosive results. Chas Holloway's "The End: The Fall Of The Political Class" is a brilliant, cutting edge, brutally honest assessment of politics and, more importantly, how to replace politics with a stable, science based, non-coercive system that will eliminate the need for politics by replacing it with a much better cooperation-based system...one that will ultimately produce Freedom for the first time in history. Please do NOT take my word for it...judge for yourself. In conclusion, this is not a good book...this is a great book with a beautiful, revolutionary vision of mankind's true destiny...a free society that will someday roam the stars.
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
The End: The Fall of the Political Class: Open Source Government Book One Paperback – March 1, 2018
by
Chas Holloway
(Author)
This book – about a subject called “Open Source Government” – criticizes today’s political systems. Hard. It rattles establishment cages. But this needs to be done. Mathematician Alfred North Whitehead once said, “It is the business of the future to be dangerous … the major advances in civilization are processes that all but wreck the societies in which they occur.” Open Source Government began with two simple facts: first, science and technology is the only way humans have ever made progress. Forty thousand years ago, humans advanced because of toolmaking. Not mythology, not religion, not war, not lunar celebrations – toolmaking. Kings and wars, Presidents and Senate Sub-Committees, have never improved anything, fundamentally. But math and logic and industrialization and the advent of electricity and flight and computers have. Science and technology is the only thing that causes important historical advancement. Period. Second, politics contains no real science. The existence of “social science,” is a myth. Therefore, politics is incapable of advancing human civilization in a fundamental way. Politicians, who are supposed to be the experts, can’t even tell you what the fundamental terms of society mean – terms like “freedom” or “justice” or “security” – and without the ability to even understand what these things are, they simply can’t create technologies to get us there. When Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniac famously built the first small computers in their garage during the 1970s, they changed the world. Meanwhile, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, and hordes of senators and congressmen and governors who claimed they were making “social progress,” didn’t. During the Age of Steam Power, the Age of Electricity, the Age of Flight, the Age of Television, did Senators and Presidents and Secretaries of State create any significant social progress? No. It was James Clerk Maxwell, Sadi Carnot, Nikola Tesla and the Wright Brothers who advanced human civilization. The scientific and technological thinkers changed everything. The politicians did nothing of any lasting value. The message of this book is that the only way civilization was ever going to progress, is by understanding social phenomena scientifically. Then, and only then, can people build technologies that reliably and predictably improve society. Thus, although this book criticizes politics, it book is not about politics. Open Source Government is not a political philosophy. OSG is not right wing, or left wing, or democrat, or republican. Furthermore, OSG is not religion, not new age, not scientology, not philosophy, not a form of self-help psychology. Open Source Government is about understanding society through science and technology. Finally, this book began as a series of live lectures. That’s why these pages, now transcribed, have an informal, spoken word quality which I’ve tried to preserve. I think it makes the explanation of hard science data less daunting and scary. I should also point out I live in California and that’s why this book is USA-centric. I don’t have a deep understanding of European or Russian or Chinese or Islamic cultures, and so on, because I grew up here, in “Surf City.” Thus, I tend to illustrate concepts with American viewpoints. The principles in this book, however, are universal. This is a science book, and science identifies natural phenomena that are independent of arbitrary points of view. I mention this because a few months ago I posted an early version of this book as a white paper and it was downloaded, read and commented on by thousands of people all over the world. So if you live outside the U.S. please remember, even though I’m writing from an American viewpoint the underlying science is universal.
- Print length252 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- Publication dateMarch 1, 2018
- Dimensions6 x 0.57 x 9 inches
- ISBN-101986137570
- ISBN-13978-1986137577
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Products related to this item
Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1
Product details
- Publisher : CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 1st edition (March 1, 2018)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 252 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1986137570
- ISBN-13 : 978-1986137577
- Item Weight : 15.7 ounces
- Dimensions : 6 x 0.57 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,897,403 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #182,121 in Science & Math (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Products related to this item
Page 1 of 1Start overPage 1 of 1
Customer reviews
4.6 out of 5 stars
4.6 out of 5
7 global ratings
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star87%0%0%13%0%87%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star87%0%0%13%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star87%0%0%13%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star87%0%0%13%0%13%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star87%0%0%13%0%0%
How customer reviews and ratings work
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 3, 2018
- Reviewed in the United States on September 4, 2021strong, logical, coherent... a better way will require better people. lays the foundational concepts for book 2: implementation
- Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2018Finally, the system everyone can understand, make sense of and and work towards that allows freedom for everyone. Its base is in the Scientific Method, provable and repeatable. Can't wait for the 2nd book. Thank you Charles!!!!!!
- Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2022Though generally interesting and covering an extremely important subject, The End: The Fall of the Political Class by Chas Holloway suffers from some serious issues pertaining to the source and organization of its content.
At least half the contents of this book seem to be either directly taken or at least paraphrased from the original content of the V-50 Lectures (published in the book Sic Itur Ad Astra), created by Andrew J. Galambos and popularized by one of his lecturers, Jay Snelson. Both Galambos and Snelson are mentioned in the book's acknowledgements, but it's extremely worrying that the author did not (at point in the book that I saw) reveal that the ideas and theory he espouses in this book are not his own and that he is essentially just reframing someone else's work. Sometimes, the definitions, examples, and explanations given are exactly the same as published and lectured by Galambos. This could very well constitute plagiarism. This is even stranger considering how many decades have passed since Galambos came up with his original content. One would expect an original update to these ideas, perhaps more contemporary examples or presentation, instead of just rehashing the same thing practically by rote. This is actually quite ironic considering that Galambos himself placed such huge importance on respecting the intellectual property of others and not using or taking credit for or using their work without their permission. I have no doubt he would object highly to the publication of his ideas in this book. Bizarrely, Galambos is directly quoted and attributed briefly in the section on postulates and fundamental constants. Why bother quoting him in such an insignificant way here when the bulk of the book is directly taken from him?
The epilogue has Holloway explicitly claiming that "No one before me has been able to define the term property (and non-coercion) in a non-ambiguous and non-circular way. I'm the first to do it." This is an outright lie. He is using Galambos' definitions and reasoning throughout the book. He even provides many of the exact same historical scientific anecdotes to support his claims, practically taken verbatim from how Galambos presented them in his lectures. This is akin to if I started showing Star Wars off to all my friends from a country where it never became popular and telling all of them that I made it, merely because I liked it so much and identified so strongly with it. I don't understand how someone can be a student and admirer of Galambos and disrespect him so much by trying to take credit for his work to a public that largely doesn't know any better.
He then goes on to ask that anyone who uses his (i.e., Galambos') ideas as presented in this book to compensate him for doing so. The irony is massive enough to form a black hole.
The other issues are about the organization of the content, including the stuff that I cannot identify as directly coming from Galambos. There are a lot of good, interesting, and important ideas and historical anecdotes included here, but the order in which they are presented makes little sense. Basic philosophical and epistemological concepts are presented well after conclusions arrived at by them. The author presents big, all-encompassing conclusions that the reader is excepted to accept at face value from the beginning of what he calls "free world theory." Though much support is eventually presented for these conclusions and the author explains the structure of how he arrives at those conclusions, the way in which presented asks the reader to take too much on faith and just abandon up front whatever else they might already believe.
This is a book written for people who already agree with the author. As I happen to be one of those people (and happen to be familiar with the superior work of Galambos), I still found value in the ideas presented here. However, I cannot strongly recommend it to others. As well, the author should be held critically and economically liable for taking credit for another thinker's original work.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2018Holloway builds the need for a framework for a new way of thinking about governance in the digital area. I especially liked that he integrated a great deal of history and was very careful with definitions as to avoid contradictions. 5-stars. I will be reading his next books.
