"Provocative."
(Jeffrey Rosen
New Republic 2004-11-08)
"A welcome and extremely timely book. . . . Because Professor Keck writes from a political science perspective, his book provides a broader dimension than others which have analyzed the Rehnquist Court in largely legalistic terms. Thus, he shows us how decisions of the Supreme Court are not easily separated from the broader trends of political and social change. . . . If one is looking to understand the relationship between constitutional decision-making and the political and social forces which may influence that process, especially in the immediate aftermath of the 2004 presidential election and with the looming prospect of vacancies on the Court, Professor Keck's book more than amply fills the bill."
(William E. Hellerstein
New York Law Journal 2004-12-07)
"[Keck] places the decisions of the Supreme Court in broad historical perspective and shows how the recent conservative activism of the Rehnquist Court fits within an unbroken activist tradition. . . . If you read just one book on the history of the modern Supreme Court, this should probably be the one."
(
Choice)
Choice Outstanding Academic Title, 2006
(
Choice 2006-01-01)
"Keck makes a compelling case for the Rehnquist's Court's very high level of judicial activism. I agree that for too long judicial activism has been equated with liberal judicial decisions. His book makes a clear statement that the same Court may issue both liberal activist decisions and conservative activist decisions. . . . I would recommend [the book] for general courses on the Supreme Court, the judicial system, or American politics."
(Craig Emmert
Law and Politics)
"Keck devastates claims that contemporary conservatives on the federal bench have no judicial agenda other than to return control over basic polity questions to elected officials."
(Mark A. Graber
AR Reivews in Advance)
“<I>The Most Activist Supreme Court in History<I> is far more detailed and theoretically rich than existing commentary. Keck has written what I believe will be recognized as the best place to begin a realistic debate on the merits of Rehnquist Court jurisprudence.”<\#209>Mark Graber, author of <I>Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism
(Mark Graber, author of
Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civi)
“Superb. A thoughtful, comprehensive, and balanced account of the rise of modern conservative activism in the United States Supreme Court. Keck’s <I>The Most Activist Supreme Court in History<I> is both an indispensable history of post–New Deal constitutional theory and an impressive ‘new institutionalist’ analysis of recent constitutional change. It should be essential reading for anyone interested in American constitutionalism or Supreme Court politics.”<\#209>Howard Gillman, author of <I>The Votes That Counted
![]({"https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51ao6wq568L._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg":[333,499],"https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51ao6wq568L._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg":[231,346]})
