Other Sellers on Amazon
+ $3.99 shipping
97% positive over last 12 months
100% positive over last 12 months
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle Cloud Reader.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
What the Koran Really Says: Language, Text, and Commentary Hardcover – October 1, 2002
| Ibn Warraq (Editor) Find all the books, read about the author, and more. See search results for this author |
| Price | New from | Used from |
Enhance your purchase
- Print length782 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPrometheus
- Publication dateOctober 1, 2002
- Dimensions6.36 x 1.84 x 9.31 inches
- ISBN-10157392945X
- ISBN-13978-1573929455
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

- +
- +
Products related to this item
Editorial Reviews
Review
-Times Literary Supplement
"Like Ibn Warraq's earlier (and extraordinary) Why I Am Not a Muslim, this book offers a perspective on Islam and the Koran which demands a wider reading and a wider debate , and not just in the Christian and secular West.... [An] excellent book on a sensitive and under-explored subject."
-Fortean Times
From the Inside Flap
Though some scholars of note have raised crucial questions about the authenticity and reliability of the Koran and Muslim tradition, Koranic studies by and large have failed to take advantage of critical skeptical methodologies. Today the majority of interpreters of Islam's sacred text appear content to lie in the Procrustean bed prepared by Muslim tradition more than a thousand years ago.
To correct this neglect of objective historical scholarship, Ibn Warraq has assembled this excellent collection of critical commentaries on the Koran published by noted scholars from the beginning of the twentieth century to recent times. These important studies, as well as his own lengthy introduction, show that little about the text of the Koran can be taken at face value. Among the fascinating topics discussed is evidence that early Muslims did not understand Muhammad's original revelation, that the ninth-century explosion of literary activity was designed to organize and make sense of an often incoherent text, and that many of the traditions surrounding Muhammad's life were fabricated long after his death in an attempt to give meaning to the Koran. Also of interest are suggestions that Coptic and other Christian sources heavily influenced much of the text and that some passages even reflect an Essenian background reaching back to the community of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Complete with a glossary of Arabic terms and appendices on Semitic languages and scripts, this outstanding volume is a welcome resource for interested lay readers and scholars alike.
About the Author
Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.
Product details
- Publisher : Prometheus; First Edition (October 1, 2002)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 782 pages
- ISBN-10 : 157392945X
- ISBN-13 : 978-1573929455
- Item Weight : 8.1 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.36 x 1.84 x 9.31 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,828,377 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #634 in Islamic Rituals & Practice (Books)
- #1,023 in Quran
- #1,121 in History of Islam
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Products related to this item
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The book was announced in 2002 and reviewed around the `web but I only caught a copy in January of 2003. It starts with two introductions. The first introduction, Ibn Warraq's own, is a sprawling overview of Arabic philology and Qur'anic scholarship. The second introduction is Toby Lester's Atlantic Monthly article... which you can get for free online.
So already we can see the problems with the book, and with its editor and publisher. It is published a year after the publisher promised it, and it is too long, and it contains material that can be found elsewhere, and it contains speculations that are extremely debatable within the field. A decade later, this author will put out "Which Koran?" which, as I've reviewed elsewhere, incorporates all these problems to an unforgiveable extent.
However, and this is what distinguishes this book from "Which Koran?": it also contains articles that cannot be found elsewhere (easily) and cannot be done without.
Part 2 concerns the archaeology of Islamic sloganeering - and it has just the one article, Yehuda Nevo's "Toward a Prehistory of Islam". This starts this book off with a nuclear bang. This article in 1991 forced scholarship to take a second look into the development of *popular* "Islam". Later in 2003, Prometheus put out Nevo's "Crossroads To Islam", which supercedes this article, but this article forms an effective "trailer" for the best part of that book.
Part 3 handles the language of the Qur'an - and is really multiple sub-parts. Here, too, there is external material you will need to make sense of the articles. The sub-text of the first sub-part is Arthur Jeffery's "Foreign Vocabulary". To that Mingana's article leads up, and then Margoliouth's article amends it. The sub-text of the next sub-part is the claim of Vollers that the Qur'an was not written in "irab" (noun-declensions). Kahle attempts to rescue Vollers and then Rabin disputes Kahle-Vollers (one problem here, though, is that this whole argument is likely moot as of now). Then come some speculative essays that add little to my understanding.
Part 4 started with some nice stuff about possible sources for the Qur'anic haggada: Essenic (Bishop, Philonenko) and Coptic (Bishai). Part 4 closed with a mini-part featuring Koebert's work on sura 22 and the "talbiya" pilgrimage-prayer. There we are, again, missing some context: in this case "Eine von 1 Kor. 15.27f beeinflusste talbia" in Biblica 35 (1954). Here, additionally, are some translation-decisions and outright typoes which drove me to my wit's end. Once I figured out what was going on, which literally took me years, I ended up agreeing with his reading of sura 22; but I remained unconvinced that 1 Cor. 15.27 can be located in Arabic ritual outside the tafsir / hadith tradition of the late Umayyad era (Qatada etc). For this: Manfred Kropp, "Tripartite formulas in the Qur'anic corpus" (2011), 259.
The whole of Part 5 is a waste of time. Mainly it demonstrates the lack of Orientalist agreement over The Verse of Jizya and the meaning of Furqan, alongside additional flights of scholarly fancy.
In part 6, J Barth explains the hiccups in the Qur'an, albeit in the order of revelation and not the canonical order. He is sometimes, I think, wrong but is awesome for sura 25. In part 8, Geyer lays out the strophic structure - the innate poetry - of suras 26, 51 among others (once more, it follows up someone else's work not reproduced here - this time it's DH Mueller's "Propheten", 1896, which handles 11, 44, 69 &c). In part 8 is also a Wellhausen miscellany, "Zum Koran", among which is a translation of a para-Qur'anic qasida by one "Samuel" and the start of a commentary. The rest of parts 6 and 8 is speculative - again. Well, there's part 7, which just rips off Bell's (discredited) commentaries; and there's an introduction by Ibn Rawandi to the work of Lueling (and Luxenburg), but I consider Lueling and Luxenburg to be fringe.
Finally, part 9 has the paleography of physical Qur'anic books. Grohmann lays out that they exist; Gerd-R Puin explains some of the controversy. I liked Gerd-R Puin's essay; I just wish he'd had more time with the manuscripts.
To sum up, a hefty portion of this thick book is redundant for honest researches into the Book of Allah. The redundant essays tend toward showing how little we know of the Qur'an - they are just illustrations of ignorance. Given that Ibn Warraq's argument at the outset was that these pericopae were unintelligible even when the Qur'an was compiled, and given that Ibn Warraq started out even before this book as an anti-Islamic essayist: I can't help but feel that the editor put in this backfill not for the reader's benefit, but for the activists'.
I don't know about you, but this annoys me, it makes me feel sucker-punched. I wanted a book about Islamic scholarship. In many places, this *is* a scholarly book. But that's not good enough for the activists; the activists want me to oppose Islam. I can do that, or not, just fine without the dubious help of dubious articles. There are enough GOOD articles out there for that purpose.
So I'm subtracting a star for the bloat and above all for the tendentiousness of that bloat. But I still have to give this book a four. It is a necessary work; and even more necessary if read alongside the other work of Arthur Jeffery and Yehuda Nevo.
There are political and cultural reasons that the Koran has not been as thoroughly analyzed as the Bible, but one of the main reasons has to be the simple fact that the history and language of the Koran is far more opaque that the Bible's. The text of the Koran is often very hard to understand, even by native speakers of Arabic and the way the texts jumps from subject to subject within every sura and even within paragraphs suggests a haphazard and complicated history of composition and editing.
The Greek New Testament was written in the context of a highly literate culture with a historical and cultural background fairly well known to the historian. We know more about the events of the first century AD than about almost any other period in the ancient world. The Hebrew Old Testament is older and the circumstances of its composition are somewhat more obscure, but Palestine or Israel is on the cross road between Asia and Africa and we can gain a fairly accurate idea of the history of the region from the records left by the Egyptians and the various Mesopotamian states, not to mention from the Israelites themselves.
The Koran, on the other hand, was created by a semi-literate people who lived on the fringes of the major civilizations of the time. We have few records of the Arabian Peninsula during the time of Mohammed and for the first century of the Islamic era, beyond traditional Muslim accounts that are difficult to verify. It is possible that almost everything that is said about the composition of the Koran, including the time and place it was revealed, is untrue and in fact, we cannot be certain that Mohammed actually existed or if he did the deeds attributed to him. The language of the Koran is Arabic, but again, many words in the text seem to have been derived from other Semitic languages, and it is not always whether the dialect is that of the Bedouins of central Arabia, as tradition states, or perhaps the language is closer to that of Northern Arabia, where the speakers might be more influenced by Syriac or Aramaic.
The articles presented in What the Koran Really Says deal with these questions and more. They are all very well done and thorough, however they are also intended for an audience of scholars and, as a layman, I sometimes had trouble following them. I think someone more knowledgeable of Arabic grammar and the text of the Koran would get more out of this book than I would. As it is, my attention wandered while reading about the fine points of grammatical constructions or the precise meaning of a sentence. The best and most interesting portions of this book were the introductions written by Ibn Warraq himself and I think he would have done a better service to his readers by writing a book which summarized and explained the arguments found in the various articles.
Still, I cannot complain if the book is not for me. I am certain that any scholar who wishes to study the origins and development of the Koran will find What the Koran Really Says to be a valuable resource.
Top reviews from other countries
Dass hier nicht der allerletzte Forschungsstand geliefert wird, mag für den Experten ärgerlich sein. Der Laie hingegen freut sich über dieses Buch, denn es bringt wissenschaftliche Ruhe in viele Debatten. Die Textsammlung muss als Anfang verstanden werden. Ihr müssen viele über den Tellerrand der Fachwissenschaft hinausgehende Beiträge zur wissenschaftliche Analyse des Koran folgen!


