Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the authors
OK
The Gulf War Did Not Take Place Paperback – October 22, 1995
In a provocative analysis written during the unfolding drama of 1992, Baudrillard draws on his concepts of simulation and the hyperreal to argue that the Gulf War did not take place but was a carefully scripted media event―a "virtual" war.
Patton’s introduction argues that Baudrillard, more than any other critic of the Gulf War, correctly identified the stakes involved in the gestation of the New World Order.
From the Back Cover
About the Author
JEAN BAUDRILLARD is the author of many books, including The Transparency of Evil, America, Evil Demon of Images, and For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign.
- Print length96 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherIndiana University Press
- Publication dateOctober 22, 1995
- Dimensions5.5 x 0.28 x 8.5 inches
- ISBN-100253210038
- ISBN-13978-0253210036
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : Indiana University Press; 1st edition (October 22, 1995)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 96 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0253210038
- ISBN-13 : 978-0253210036
- Item Weight : 4.8 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 0.28 x 8.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,181,970 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #7,832 in Popular Culture in Social Sciences
- #29,335 in Sociology (Books)
- #59,221 in Philosophy (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
Important information
To report an issue with this product or seller, click here.
About the authors

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Jean Baudrillard (/ˌboʊdriːˈɑːr/; French: [ʒɑ̃ bodʁijaʁ]; 27 July 1929 – 6 March 2007) was a French sociologist, philosopher, cultural theorist, political commentator, and photographer. His work is frequently associated with postmodernism and specifically post-structuralism.
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Photo by en:User:Europeangraduateschool [CC BY-SA 2.5 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5)], via Wikimedia Commons.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The Gulf War Did Not Take Place is a slim volume of three essays that were published over a three month period as separate pieces for a French newspaper Libération and a British newspaper The Guardian. The original title of each is telling. The first was "The Gulf War Will not Take Place." The second: "The Gulf War is not Really Taking Place." The third: "The Gulf War did not Take Place." All three collectively insist that this war was a phony war, but not to be confused with the German Sitzkrieg in France in 1940. In that war real soldiers simply sat around for months waiting for orders to shoot. In this war, there was real shooting all right. Real people were killed and many buildings were blown up. So how dare Baudrillard defame and dishonor the dead on both sides by calling the "war" no more than a Playstation computer run? His response: there was a "real" war but real in a new sense. From start to finish, from the first shot to the last, the Gulf War was pre-planned right down to a paper clip. Things ran so smoothly that even the Joint Chiefs were amazed. War rarely co-operates by being predictable. But in this case it was. The images of the fighting were sent in real time to America's television sets by CNN. The reality of the fighting precisely coalesced into what Baudrillard termed the simulacra of war. It looked much more savage than it was. From this delving into a war once removed from reality, Baudrillard called it a non-event. Many critics objected, thinking that by "non-event" he meant a hoax. But Baudrillard had a motivation that transcended semantic distinctions. For him, he wished to publicize the Dawn of a New Day, one that had long been in existence but only now paradoxically were the images of a false reality emerging from the shadows of an all too real entrenched apathy. In his earlier books, Baudrillard had described how signs had slowly begun disconnecting from their moorings. The image of a thing now was thought to exist in its own right. The "copy" was now indistinguishable from the "original." The next step would have to be hyper-reality, a mad universe where the inhabitants do not question their existence or their surroundings, nor should they since they are pursuing their lives just as if the hyper-real were truly real. It is this fear that humanity has already come perilously close to this insane world that motivated Baudrillard to write The Gulf War Did Not Take Place.
Insightful as always, cutting, pulling no punches as he presents the interface for what it is.
Some of the poetry is lost going from French to English, but in the absense of the one pick up the other.
Yes, the war happened, as in bombs were dropped, people died, buildings were destroyed, many suffered, etc. But it differed markedly from previous wars in that it was mainly an event to be manipulated by different sides in the media. Therefore, it did not take place the way previous wars had, in that the suffering and even a uniform understanding did not penetrate the population at home who watched the events on CNN.
Unfortunately, all of this business about the 'realness' of the war, and the simulacra, and the hyper-reality we're now mired in, is written in a frustrating and unnecessarily bloated style that makes even this slim work a slight chore at times. Can certainly be expressed in a simpler way, therefore appearing less profound, but then it wouldn't be the work of French postmodern philosopher. Interesting 'take' on a modern war, with points that would only resonate more in the years since, it's hit-or-miss for most readers of current events (more for the philosophy crowd).
If there are any parts that are worth further examination it is the tirades, some of which have sly humor and provoke some thought, but for a book about the First Gulf War to almost wholly ignore the Casus Bellum of the conflict--- the inexcusable invasion of Kuwait--- suggests a dark cynicism that more than overshadows any ‘point’ Baudrillard is trying to make.






