Beauty Best Books of the Month STEM nav_sap_plcc_ascpsc Starting at $39.99 Wickedly Prime Handmade Wedding Rustic Decor Book House Cleaning gotpremiere gotpremiere gotpremiere  Echo $129.99 All-New Fire HD 8, starting at $79.99 Kindle Oasis B06ZY5XM7W Water Sports STEMClubToys17_gno
Customer Discussions > Evolution forum

Kidneys - obvious examples of intelligent design.


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 76-80 of 80 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on Jun 3, 2012, 4:12:24 PM PDT
Abigail O says:
BlockHead says, "Evolutionists actually deny the fact that kidneys are intelligently designed."

Fact? I didn't see a fact that the kidneys are intelligently designed. You did a good job copying and pasting someone's intelligent description of a functioning kidney, but that was the extent of intelligent action in that post. The fact is that the kidney is a very delicate organ. Its structure is maintained by hydrostatic pressure from the normotensive state. Any hypotensive state happens through hypovolemia, for instance, and the kidney is the first major organ to shut down. You'd think that any intelligent designer worth his weight in spam would know this and make the kidney a bit more robust. But noooo....

BlockHead proclaims, "They agree, however, that a pencil is intelligently designed. "

That's right.. Being human, we know what human technology produces. But we can't infer what some unknown supergenius supernatural superintelligent designer's technology would produce. Sorry, but that's just your personal incredulity talking.

Posted on Sep 3, 2012, 5:35:17 AM PDT
havm says:
"Darwin's theory is based on assumptions....all things progressively evolved into something else."

That's not the assumption. That's the actual theory.

But todays' Theory of Evolution is not Darwin's anyway.

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 3, 2012, 9:39:54 AM PDT
A. Caplan says:
Christine M. Janis says: that's why Piltdown Man is proof that there is no evidence for human evolution, right?
>In reference to Piltdown Man there is a question that IDers and creationists seem to avoid: How many IDers and/or creationists did it take to prove that Piltdown Man was a fake? Answer: none. It was falsified by scientists.

Posted on Sep 3, 2012, 2:16:13 PM PDT
Brian Curtis says:
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. To creationists, the solution is obvious: no knowledge whatsoever!

In reply to an earlier post on Sep 20, 2012, 5:37:32 PM PDT
Doctor says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]
‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the Evolution forum (700 discussions)

  Discussion Replies Latest Post
Evolution info II 1241 17 hours ago
Evolution info ll 1738 22 hours ago
Signature in the cell 8352 1 day ago
The evolutionary idea is so clear 63 10 days ago
Intelligent Design isn't Science 2571 24 days ago
Forum's Not Dead Yet 57 May 30, 2017
BIble shows vegetation made first, sea animals made before land animals and man last in creation. Bible shows Earth round and hanging on nothing in space! All largely agreeing with science! 329 May 8, 2017
Nye lost the evolution debate....to Ken Ham ....evolution debunked 194 Apr 27, 2017
Once again, evolution is false. 51 Apr 27, 2017
Discover Magazine Article shows that some of the Earth's water is older than the Sun (like the first Chapter of Genesis in the Bible) 170 Apr 9, 2017
evolutionism is a god that is worshiped 93 Apr 6, 2017
Best Christian Movies Ever Made 57 Apr 4, 2017
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Evolution forum
Participants:  12
Total posts:  80
Initial post:  May 18, 2012
Latest post:  Sep 20, 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 3 customers