Your Garage Editors' Picks Amazon Fashion Learn more Discover it $5 Albums Fire TV Stick Happy Belly Coffee Totes Amazon Cash Back Offer PilotWave7B PilotWave7B PilotWave7B  Amazon Echo  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Echo Dot  Amazon Tap  Amazon Echo Starting at $49.99 All-New Kindle Oasis DollyParton Shop Now STEM
Customer Discussions > Health forum

yes-you can cure yourself of cancer

This discussion has reached the maximum length permitted, and cannot accept new replies. Start a new discussion


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 101-125 of 1000 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 9:02:52 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 28, 2011 9:07:04 AM PDT
If you live 5 years past a treatment, why would you keep going? How long do you go before you call yourself cured? If all you had to do was say that you had patients that "lived 20 years" I am sure oncologists have a few of those anecdotal patients as well.

You would lose that bet.

I research them all the time. The only problem is that I hold them to the same standard as I do science and conventional medicine...peer review, clinical trials et al.

Posted on Oct 28, 2011 9:17:28 AM PDT
J. Mullally says:
Many people have also had great success with Rife generators (also called TENS units) and various frequencies to help treat various diseases, ranging from all forms of cancer, to AIDS/HIV and Hepatitis C.

But again, the proviso is that everyone is different. It is important to work with your medical team to treat your illness; who you have on your team is up to you. It can be a nutritionist, oncologist, acupuncturist and so on. The main thing is to learn as much as you can about your disorder.

Above all, share experiences in forums like this and other places, because the information can often help people who don't really know about their condition or what to do next or what alternatives there are.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 9:23:48 AM PDT
thaugen says:
"If you live 5 years past a treatment, why would you keep going? How long do you go before you call yourself cured?"
1. We are talking SURVIVAL. If a person dies 5.1 years after treatment, and due to the original cancer (or the cut/burn/poison treatments), conventional medicine claims success. Most of us hope to live way longer than five more years.
2. Cured? No one who understands cancer uses the word "cured." Cancer cells form in every healthy human every day and normally the immune system keeps them under control.

Peer review, clinical trials? Not at the Mexican clinics. But have you looked at such from Japan? From Germany? From the U.S. when the trials weren't sabotaged by sending terminally ill patients into the trial? Look it up.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 9:40:45 AM PDT
People who should not use TENS:

Persons using a CARDIAC PACEMAKER
Pregnancy unless under doctors reccomendations
Has any form of malignancy,
Various conditions where circulation is impaired.
Persons with a heart condition.
By someone with epilepsy
Around the head
With the electrodes placed on the neck near carotid

This is from the TENS website. The unit should NOT be used for treatment of cancer!! It is irresponsible to recommend this.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 9:45:55 AM PDT
And alternativer medicine does these long term survival studies? If so, where are they?

Cured? No one that understand molecular biology thinks of cancer that way. Yes, every time a cell undergoes mitosis there is a chance of errors in replication. But DNA polymerases (not the "immune system") repair most of the mistakes. If we are going to claim that a person has cancer because one of our cells *might* become cancerous then we all 'have cancer'

Friom Germany? Didn't do Farrah Fawcett much good. I guess they have failures everywhere, huh?

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 9:48:27 AM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on Nov 1, 2011 7:57:09 AM PDT]

Posted on Oct 28, 2011 9:53:11 AM PDT
Orion Keyser says:
Actually, I found some interesting news articles on a drug called DCA. It was discovered to have massive potential to cure cancer in mice, but it can't get the funding to do human testing, because the drug doesn't have a patent. Apparently it's a very old drug that's been used in the past to cure a variety of illnesses. So, basically, since no one would make any money off of it, pharmaceutical companies just aren't interested in a potential cure.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 10:08:19 AM PDT
[Deleted by Amazon on Nov 1, 2011 7:58:24 AM PDT]

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 10:23:03 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 29, 2011 1:42:19 AM PDT
Scarlett says:
Elizabeth Cardon says: Both my husband and sister did so after using surgery, chemo, and radiation unsuccessfully. They used a stress management technique that one of my cousins had used for infertility.

Elizabeth, you don't bother to tell us if your husband and sister were told definitely that they were terminal after the surgery, chemo and radiation do you? Were they told they were going to die for sure and then decided to do stress management and they were miraculously cured? You still have your husband and sister and should thank their oncologists because the treatments they got is what saved them.

Someone newly diagnosed and reading this will think they can go to a yoga class and cure their cancer. I hope you people figure out the number of lives you will be putting at risk or the deaths you will cause with these types of irresponsible posts.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 10:50:25 AM PDT
19SUNSHINE78 says:
wow, that's an amazing successful testament. congratulations, i am going to share this info. w/my uncle.
thank you.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 10:53:42 AM PDT
How is this a dangerous position? CHEMO KILLS! End of story How many LONG TERM SUCCESS stories have you heard of?

Posted on Oct 28, 2011 11:10:51 AM PDT
It's all a crapshoot. Some survive with a diagnosis of cancer, some don't regardless of the treatment.Some forms of cancer however have been very successfully treated with thanks to traditional medicine ie Hodgkins Lymphoma.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 11:24:13 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 28, 2011 11:31:07 AM PDT
Ah, yes...Rife generators!

A unproven device based on psuedoscience and propagated by a person that claimed cancer was caused by bacteria.

He is a great example of nonsense that was discredited 60 years ago that, thanks to the infomercfial and internet, are ripping peple off again.

Of course.... his device "really worked" and he was discredited by "medical conspiricies". Strange how that happens to so many that have *really* cured cancer?

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 11:56:44 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 29, 2011 3:32:56 AM PDT
Scarlett says:
It's an irresponsible statement to say CHEMO KILLS! End of story.

I've heard plenty of long-term success stories. The cure rate for cancer is now over 65% in the United States. According to your theory, the cure rate would be 0%. Back up your outrageous claim with some facts. Post statistics here from a legitimate source that proves that every person who ever got chemo died from it (and good luck with that).

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 12:09:44 PM PDT
Amicus says:
Scarlett,

Unfortunately, as mentioned, cancer is the leading cause of death for Americans under age 65.

See this chart,
http://webappa.cdc.gov/cgi-bin/broker.exe

On the left of the chart is "RANK". As you look at the first row, you see the #1 cause of death for each age group.

As you can see, "Malignant Neoplasms" (Cancer) killed 103,171 people in the 55-64 age bracket and 50,167 people in the 45-54 age bracket, making it the leading cause of death for all people under age 65.

For seniors, cancer is the second-leading cause of death.

And this, in spite of chemo, radiation, and surgery.

Posted on Oct 28, 2011 1:01:20 PM PDT
Michele says:
scarlett----

Congratulations on your recovery, you are very blessed. I too just finished chemo and surgery as of last week and my pathology reports show remission.

Keep on keeping on...it's all we can do.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 1:51:57 PM PDT
[Deleted by the author on Oct 28, 2011 1:57:16 PM PDT]

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 1:55:11 PM PDT
Scarlett says:
Michele- Congratuations to you as well! I'm very happy for you and wish you positive reports for many years to come,
Scarlett

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 2:09:20 PM PDT
Bricktop says:
I didn't see any cartoons, Nazi or otherwise, in Knockout: Interviews with Doctors Who Are Curing Cancer--And How to Prevent Getting It in the First Place and I only paid $5 for it.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 2:11:56 PM PDT
Bricktop says:
"You still have your husband and sister and should thank their oncologists because the treatments they got is what saved them."
"It's an irresponsible statement to say CHEMO KILLS! End of story."

Wow, massive hypocrisy going on here within these two statements.

Posted on Oct 28, 2011 2:16:20 PM PDT
Scarlett says:
Amius,

Age brackets have nothing to do with anything. The number one killer in the U.S. according to the CDC is consistently heart disease. These diseases are found in all age groups. Children die of both heart diseases and cancer as do adults so what's the point in narrowing it down to people under or over 65. It makes no sense, but you haven't written much that does. Yes, people die even with chemo and radiation but people also die with heart surgeries and medications.

Heart disease: 616,067
Cancer: 562,875
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 135,952
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 127,924
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 123,706
Alzheimer's disease: 74,632
Diabetes: 71,382

Posted on Oct 28, 2011 2:16:53 PM PDT
Bricktop says:
Scarlett the CDC seem to have missed the #1 cause in that post you deleted, medical error.

The most comprehensive report on the state of U.S. healthcare ever conducted shows that medical errors killed 7,841,360 Americans from 1993 through 2003. "Our estimated 10-year total of 7.8 million iatrogenic [doctor-induced] deaths is more than all the casualties from all the wars fought by the U.S. throughout its entire history," commented the Nutrition Institute of America (NIA), in its report, "Death By Medicine" (Oct., 2003).

The concept of the report was prompted by the fact that, while conventional medicine kills hundreds of thousands of Americans each year, government regulators attempt to ban and restrict the use of vitamins and herbs that kill no one.

Incidentally, the report, which resulted from the compilation and analysis of 94 U.S. hospitals and hundreds of medical journal articles, determined that medical error causes an astounding 783,936 deaths per year (and growing). "It is evident that the American medical system is itself the leading cause of death and injury in the U.S.," the authors observed.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 2:24:00 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Oct 29, 2011 1:46:06 AM PDT
Scarlett says:
Stephen, as soon as she tells us what specific cancers her husband and sister had, what stage they were diagnosed at, what the final prognosis was for each of them (how much time they were each told they had left to live by their oncologists) and then provides proof that something meant to help "infertility" saved them and not the oncologists, I'll retract my statement.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 2:25:40 PM PDT
Thus let's throw out the whole system??? There are problems with the system, and most originate with the fact that it is profit based.

In reply to an earlier post on Oct 28, 2011 2:26:12 PM PDT
thaugen says:
Anyone reading this thread should be careful to check the "facts" being represented here.

Michael Wasson wrote:

"Friom Germany? Didn't do Farrah Fawcett much good. I guess they have failures everywhere, huh?"

I guess you forgot that Fawcett first underwent surgery and chemotherapy in the U.S. and after that didn't work she went to Germany, so who gets the blame for that failure? I would guess that her immune system was so damaged by American conventional medicine that the German treatments couldn't work.

Scarlett wrote: The cure rate for cancer is now over 65% in the United States.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Cancer Institute, 66.4 percent of adults whose cancer is diagnosed today can expect to be alive in five years.

Not cured, but merely alive in five years. Some of those people were not even treated, but just doing "watchful waiting." For those who underwent treatment there was no distinction in that statistic as to the type of treatment they took, conventional, alternative, or a mix of both.

Scarlett wrote: "Most of the other things you claim happened to you are cut and pasted almost word for word from other wackos. Nonsense like "cancer cells feed off sugar". If that was true every diabetic ever born would die of cancer as their bodies are swimming in sugar."

Actually, here's a cut and paste for you since you think sugar (glucose) isn't involved:

Dr. Spitz and Dr. Lee with other cancer researchers published studies showing that when cancer cells are deprived of glucose, their energy supply is cut off which causes these cancer cells to commit suicide.

On a different note, anyone who complains about gouging by alternative practitioners should first learn about oncologists who administer chemotherapy: they are among the most highly paid specialists in the nation. They purchase their drugs directly from the pharmaceutical companies, often at deep discounts and make huge profits on the sale to patients. Search on "Excessive chemotherapy and uninformed patients" to get the full story.
Discussion locked

Recent discussions in the Health forum

 

This discussion

Discussion in:  Health forum
Participants:  594
Total posts:  10000
Initial post:  Aug 13, 2010
Latest post:  Dec 2, 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 69 customers

Search Customer Discussions